Former county clerk in Murdaugh murder trial charged with obstruction of justice and misconduct
CrimeFacebookTweetLink
Follow
The former clerk of court who read the guilty verdicts against notorious convicted double murderer Alex Murdaugh is now facing multiple felony charges.
Rebecca 'Becky' Hill was arrested early Wednesday morning in Colleton County, South Carolina, and charged with obstructing justice and two counts of misconduct, according to court records. She was also charged with one count of perjury in Richland County, South Carolina. Two of the charges are related to Murdaugh's 2023 murder trial.
Hill was released on a personal recognizance bond, according to Colleton County jail records.
She is accused of making available photographs that were sealed evidence, 'which prevented, obstructed, impeded, hindered, or potentially impeded or hindered the administration of justice' during Murdaugh's trial for the murders of his wife and son, according to an arrest warrant for the obstruction of justice charge.
Hill is also accused of allegedly using her position as the clerk of court to promote her book, 'Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders,' resulting in one of the misconduct charges, according to the arrest warrant.
The second misconduct charge appears unrelated to the Murdaugh trial.
In Richland County, Hill is also facing a perjury charge for 'false, misleading, or incomplete' testimony she gave during an evidentiary hearing to establish if Murdaugh should get a new trial.
Hill allegedly lied under oath when during testimony she was asked, 'Did you allow anyone from the press to view the sealed exhibits' by former state Chief Justice Jean Toal. Hill responded 'No Ma'am.'
The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, which released the arrest warrants, has been investigating Hill since early 2024 over allegations of jury tampering in Murdaugh's murder trial and whether she used her elected position for personal gain.
Murdaugh's attorneys, Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, told CNN in a statement in a statement the charges were not surprising for them.
'We are aware of the charges filed against Becky Hill and while these developments are serious, they are not surprising. We have long raised our concerns about her conduct during and after the trial and this arrest further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the judicial process. Every defendant is entitled to a fair and impartial trial and we look forward to Alex Murdaugh finally getting that fair treatment,' the attorneys said.
In late 2023, Murdaugh's legal team requested a new trial based on allegations that Hill tampered with the jury by making comments implying Murdaugh's guilt to jurors.
Last year, Toal, a retired Supreme Court of South Carolina chief justice, said that Hill was 'attracted by the siren call of celebrity' and made improper comments to the jury, but ruled the comments did not influence the verdict it reached.
'I simply do not believe that the authority of our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial such as this on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-influenced clerk of courts,' Toal said.
Murdaugh's team has since appealed that ruling.
Hill has repeatedly denied the allegations against her but resigned her position as clerk of court in March 2024. She maintained her resignation was unrelated to the state investigations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chabria: Newsom's 'Democracy is under assault' speech could turn the tables on Trump
Frame it as a call to action or a presidential campaign announcement, Gov. Gavin Newsom's address to America on Tuesday has tapped into our zeitgeist (German words feel oddly appropriate at the moment) in a way few others have. 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes,' Newsom said during a live broadcast with a California flag and the U.S. flag in the background. 'The moment we've feared has arrived.' What moment exactly is he referring to? President Trump has put Marines and National Guardsmen on the streets of Los Angeles, and granted himself the power to put them anywhere. Wednesday, a top military leader said those forces could "detain" protesters, but not outright arrest them, though — despite what you see on right wing media — most protesters have been peaceful. But every would-be authoritarian ultimately faces a decisive moment, when the fear they have generated must be enforced with action to solidify power. The danger of that moment for the would-be king is that it is also the time when rebellion is most likely, and most likely to be effective. People wake up. In using force against his own citizens, the leader risks alienating supporters and activating resistance. Read more: Mayor Karen Bass decries continuing raids, wonders if L.A. is a 'national experiment' What happens next in Los Angeles between the military and protesters — which group is perceived as the aggressors — may likely determine what happens next in our democracy. If the military is the aggressor and protesters remain largely peaceful, Trump risks losing support. If the protesters are violent, public perception could further empower Trump. The president's immigration czar Tom Homan, said on CNN that what happens next, 'It all depends on the activities of these protesters — I mean, they make the decisions.' Welcome to that fraught moment, America. Who would have thought Newsom would lead on it so effectively? "Everybody who's not a Trumpist in this society has been taken by surprise, and is still groggy from the authoritarian offensive of the last five months," said Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at the embattled Harvard University, and author of "How Democracies Die." Levitsky told me that it helps shake off that shock to have national leaders, people who others can look to and rally behind. Especially as fear nudges some into silence. "You never know who that leader sometimes is going to be, and it may be Newsom," Levitsky said. "Maybe his political ambitions end up converging with the small d, democratic opposition." Maybe. Since his address, and a coinciding and A-game funny online offensive, Newsom's reach has skyrocketed. Millions of people watched his address, and hundreds of thousands have followed him on TikTok and other social media platforms. Searches about him on Google were up 9,700%, according to CNN. Love his message or find it laughable, it had reach — partly because it was unapologetically clear and also unexpected. "Trump and his loyalist thrive on division because it allow them to take more power and exert even more control," Newsom said. I was on the ground with the protesters this week, and I can say from firsthand experience that there are a small number of agitators and a large number of peaceful protesters. But Trump has done an excellent job of creating crisis and fear by portraying events as out of the control of local and state authorities, and therefore in need of his intervention. Republicans "need that violence to corroborate their talking points," Mia Bloom told me. She's an expert on extremism and a professor at Georgia State University. Violence "like in the aftermath of George Floyd, when there was the rioting, that actually was helpful for Republicans," she said. Read more: After images of unrest comes the political spin, distorting the reality on the ground in L.A. Levitsky said authoritarians look for crises. "You need an emergency, both rhetorically and legally, to engage in authoritarian behavior," he said. So Trump has laid a trap with his immigration sweeps in a city of immigrants to create opportunity, and Newsom has called it out. And it calling it out — pointing out the danger of protesters turning violent and yet still calling for peaceful protest — Newsom has put Trump in a precarious position that the president may not have been expecting. "Repressing protest is a very risky venture," said Levitsky. "It often, not always, but often, does trigger push back." Levitsky points out that already, there is some evidence that Trump may have overreached, and is losing support. A new poll by the Public Religion Research Institute found that 76% of Americans oppose the military birthday parade Trump plans on throwing for himself in Washington, D.C. this weekend. That includes disapproval from more than half of Trump supporters. A separate poll by Quinnipiac University found that 54% of those polled disapprove of how he's handling immigration issues, and 56% disapprove of his deportations. Bloom warns that there's a danger in raising too many alarms about authoritarianism right now, because we still have some functioning guardrails. She said that stoking too much fear could backfire, for Newsom and for democracy. "We're at a moment in which the country is very polarized and that these things are being told through two very different types of narratives, and the moment we give the other side, which was a very apocalyptic, nihilistic narrative, we give them fodder, we justify the worst policies" she said. She pointed to the Iranian Revolution of 1979, when some protesters placed flowers in the barrels of soldiers' guns, and act of peaceful protest she said changed public perception. That, she said, is what's needed now. Newsom was clear in his call for peaceful protest. But also clear that it was a call to action in a historic inflection point. We can't know in the moment who or what history will remember, said Levitsky. "It's really important that the most privileged among us stand up and fight," he said. "If they don't, citizens are going to look around and say, 'Well, why should I?" Having leaders willing to be the target, when so many feel the danger of speaking out, has value, he said. Because fear may spread like a virus, but courage is contagious, too. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sunday, June 8 Evening Cable News Ratings: L.A. Demonstrations Drive Cable Viewership
The cable news networks offered continuous coverage of the unrest unfolding in Los Angeles as a result of the ICE raids. CNN and MSNBC saw a rise in viewership in total viewers and the Adults 25-54 demo due to their live coverage, but still trailed Fox News, which remained the most-watched cable news network of the evening. CNN landed in second place in the demo during total day and primetime, but split the the No. 2 finish with MSNBC among total viewers; MSNBC claimed that spot in primetime, while CNN was second in total day. 25-54 Demographic (Live+SD x 1,000) Total Day: FNC: 170 | CNN: 75 | MSNBC: 44Prime: FNC: 184 | CNN: 111 | MSNBC: 57 FNC: CNN: MSNBC: 4PM Scott:221 CNN Newsroom:83 MSNBC Reports:32 5PM Breaking News/Levin*:211 CNN Newsroom/Dean:103 Sharpton:29 6PM Big Weekend Show:209 CNN Newsroom/Dean:120 Weekend:55 7PM Big Weekend Show:253 CNN Newsroom/Dean:123 Weekend:60 8PM Breaking News/Levin:159 CNN Newsroom/Dean:125 Weekend:44 9PM Breaking News/Gowdy:203 CNN Newsroom/Dean:123 MSNBC Reports:50 10PM Kilmeade:191 CNN Newsroom:86 MSNBC Reports:78 11PM Breaking News/Levin*:187 CNN Newsroom:80 MSNBC Reports:48 Total Viewers (Live+SD x 1,000) Total Day: FNC: 1.218 | CNN: 438 | MSNBC: 432Prime: FNC: 1.621 | CNN: 537 | MSNBC: 565 FNC: CNN: MSNBC: 4PM Scott:1.231 CNN Newsroom:494 MSNBC Reports:356 5PM Breaking News/Levin*:1.215 CNN Newsroom/Dean:694 Sharpton:445 6PM Big Weekend Show:1.475 CNN Newsroom/Dean:730 Weekend:539 7PM Big Weekend Show:1.888 CNN Newsroom/Dean:654 Weekend:561 8PM Breaking News/Levin:1.526 CNN Newsroom/Dean:647 Weekend:510 9PM Breaking News/Gowdy:1.715 CNN Newsroom/Dean:553 MSNBC Reports:550 10PM Kilmeade:1.623 CNN Newsroom:410 MSNBC Reports:635 11PM Breaking News/Levin*:1.081 CNN Newsroom:341 MSNBC Reports:459
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rand Paul attacks ‘immaturity' of White House after rescinded picnic invitation, says he's lost a ‘lot of respect' for Trump
GOP Sen. Rand Paul is accusing the White House of 'immaturity' and engaging in 'petty vindictiveness' after he and his family were disinvited from the annual White House picnic long held with members of both parties. Paul, a libertarian-minded deficit hawk who has been raising deep concerns over President Donald Trump's sweeping policy bill, said his family – including his nearly six-month-old grandson — had been planning on attending Thursday's bipartisan picnic on the White House lawn. But Paul said their invitation was abruptly rescinded with no real explanation, even as the move came after Trump and his aides have been bashing Paul over his position on the president's bill for days. 'The level of immaturity is beyond words,' Paul said of the White House, adding that he's lost 'a lot of respect' for Trump. 'It's just incredibly petty,' Paul told CNN outside the Capitol on Wednesday evening. 'I'm arguing from a true belief and worry that our country is mired in debt and getting worse. And they choose to react by uninviting my grandson to the picnic. I don't know. I just think it really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. The move could be a risk for Trump. To pass his agenda through the Senate, he can only afford to lose the support of three Republican senators. Paul has indicted he couldn't support the bill because it includes an increase of the national debt limit, but he's said he'd be open to considering it if GOP leaders removed that from the overall bill. The White House and top Republicans have rebuffed Paul's demand. 'It's just, I think, a really sad day that this is the level of warfare they've stooped to,' Paul said. 'But it's also not very effective. It probably has the opposite result.' Paul said it's unclear if the directive came directly from the president or 'petty staffers who have been running a sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' 'Who knows if it came from him,' Paul said of Trump. 'It could be from lower-level staff members, but these are people that shouldn't be working over there.' And then he took a shot at one of the most powerful aides in the White House, Stephen Miller. 'You have people that are basically going around casually talking about getting rid of habeas corpus,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells it they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' When asked if he was speaking about Miller, Paul nodded. When asked by CNN if he believes Miller should still be working at the White House, Paul would only say: 'I'm just going to leave it at that.' 'I like Donald Trump, but when they want to act this way, it's where they begin to lose a lot of America who just wonders, 'Why does everything have to descend to this level?'' Paul added. Paul said that his wife, Kelley, along with his son, daughter-in-law and infant grandson were all planning on attending Thursday's event — with some planning to fly in Thursday morning. 'President Obama didn't disinvite us …. Biden didn't disinvite us, and we always did this,' Paul said, noting he's been to 10 White House picnics. 'It's the Americans' White House. We all pay for it.'
