Consultation for plans to change Isle of Wight fire services
A fire service has revealed plans to merge and close stations which "are not required or currently used".Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service has launched a public consultation on potential changes to services on the island.It comes after the announcement of a new fire station in East Cowes.The proposed changes are part of the service's safety plan for 2025-30, outlining its goals for the next five years.
The plan is created by looking at different risks in communities, their potential impact and how the service could adapt to address them. In a statement, the service says it has identified ways to "rationalise operational response on the Isle of Wight".It has unveiled plans to combine Yarmouth and Freshwater fire stations, which would mean two fire engines could operate in the west of the island.There are also proposals to stop operational responses from Bembridge fire station.
'We will continue to be there'
The statement explained: "There has been no response from Bembridge since 2020 due to lack of available on-call firefighters. "During this time, Ryde fire station received investment to increase staffing to a full-time crew."The public consultation on plans will run until 29 July and there will also be community events to discuss the proposals in Bembridge and Yarmouth.The changes come as the fire service is testing the removal of less frequently used fire engines in four on-call stations in Romsey, Waterlooville, Petersfield and Lymington.There are also plans to introduce a new vehicle which would mean a reduction in 20 firefighter posts across Redbridge and Cosham, but the service has explained this would not result in redundancies.Chief fire officer, Neil Odin, said: "We are looking to make changes because we need to ensure that we have a modern, fit for purpose and efficient fire service. "The changes are about having the right resources in the right place to meet the identified risks in our communities. Public safety will always be our priority and, if you need us, we will continue to be there quickly, with the right people, vehicles and equipment."
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Minding our language on the use of Americanisms
The continual expansion of the English language is inevitable and welcome. But while Elisabeth Ribbans is right that 'it would be a mistake to regard language as a fortress', it is not unreasonable to lament the effect of some invasive species whose proliferation is so rapid that native alternatives face possible extinction (How the use of a word in the Guardian has gotten some readers upset, 4 June). 'Gotten' may be an innocuous, if inelegant, English word making a return journey from the US, but some other US variants are more problematic. For example, the phrase 'Can I get …?' is suffocating more polite ways of making a request, such as 'May I/can I have …?' or simply 'I'd like …'. It is also annoyingly inaccurate, since in most cases the person asking has no intention of helping themselves and wouldn't be allowed to, even if they wanted to. But wholesale adoption not only leads to neglect of alternatives, it can also produce banality. So when both a sandwich and a sunset might today be described as 'awesome', it is reasonable to imagine that even as eclectic a wordsmith as Shakespeare might consider modern English borrowings as diminishing the language through having gotten McGilchristCromer, Norfolk Thank you, Elisabeth Ribbans, for your article on the cosmopolitan and evolving use of words in the English language. I am always stung by the snobbery I encounter among my British peers regarding American words or spellings. Criticism of American accents more so. My country of origin provokes pride and shame in increasingly equal measure, but to be cowed because of my voice, both written and spoken, leaves a foul taste. Once we've gotten past this distasteful persnicketiness, we can actually appreciate the meaning of the words being used, not just their Amy FultonOxton, Scottish Borders I grew up in the old West Riding, only a few miles from the county border with Lancashire. In the early 1950s, we regularly used the word 'gotten'. It was frowned on by teachers and others addicted to standard English. I believe the use of the word was common in other districts of Yorkshire. It is an English and not an American word, which has sadly passed out of use. Language evolves!Roderick WilsonAmpleforth, North Yorkshire When I worked at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, US, in the 1980s, my friendly editor had more appreciation of British irony than spelling. She once wrote on a draft paper: 'Richard. Please pick one spelling of 'practice' and stick to it.'Richard LammingShaldon, Devon Am I alone in finding 'shined' for 'shone' less than illuminating? Incidentally, like, who introduced 'like' like?Bill WintripDorchester, Dorset So not an ill-gotten 'gotten' then. Now where do we stand on 'snuck'?Tony RimmerLytham St Anne's, Lancashire Never mind 'faucet' and 'gotten' (Letters, 29 May), I've been racking my brain: in what play did Shakespeare use 'worser'? (Colon used free gratis.)Iain FentonLancaster Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
My algae-covered fence panels went from green to brown overnight with a £12 Wickes buy you just have to spray and leave
AN AFFORDABLE, easy-to-use product could help keep your garden in tip-top shape this summer. The fence cleaner will help ensure you can be garden proud as we approach the summer months. 3 What's more, the product is available for just £12 at Wickes. The KilrockPRO Wood, Deck & Fence Cleaner has been praised as a quick and easy solution to your fence-related problems. A product description on the Wickes website reads: "The KilrockPRO Wood, Deck & Fence Cleaner cleans, brightens and rejuvenates outdoor wooden surfaces." It can be used for a wide range of purposes, making the £12 price tag seem like even better value for money. The cleaner can be used to tackle dirt and stains caused by algae, mould and mildew on fences, wood, decking, sheds, cladding, shake shingles, and other wood surfaces. With 5 litres of concentrate, it can make up to 50 litres of usable product when diluted, ensuring you have enough to keep your fences spotless throughout the summer. Once diluted, the formula can be applied using a spray or a brush. For bigger areas of growth, a spray can help speed up the process, while a brush might help get those hard to reach spots in between fence panels. The solution can then be left to work its magic, making for a quick and easy application process. After waiting for a suitable length of time, according to the product's instruction manual, the product can then be washed off. My garden was looking so old and the patio was broken - now it's a lush oasis and people can't believe how little I spent Reviews for the product were generally positive, with one shopper writing: "After a day the green algae was fading and a couple of days after that it's no longer there. They added: "Moral of the story - use Kilrock fence cleaner first, on a dry day without any threat of rain for at least 6 hours and then leave it for 3 days or so to work it's magic. "It will save you days of time and effort!" Another customer said they use a dilution ratio of one to four, left it for 24 hours, before rewashing it which has meant their "decking has come up like new." One reviewer posted a photo of their fence, clearly showing the difference between the algae covered panels and the new and improved clean fencing. They wrote: "From what I can tell, people who have had trouble and left poor reviews are expecting instant results. It works overnight - spray and leave it alone!" Others were less positive, saying that the product had not worked as effectively they've hoped. A couple of lower rated comments suggested that soapy water and a stiff broom would have done just as good a job. The diluted formula is also safe on plants and grass, as it doesn't contain bleach or acid, meaning the rest of your garden won't be ruined in the process. Shoppers are advised to test the solution on a small "inconspicuous" area before applying to the rest of the fence. Once cleaned, the product description claims that it "provides long lasting surface protection that deters regrowth for months."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Humans need both housing and wild places
Your article highlighting that more than 5,000 English nature sites may be at risk from planning reforms brings into focus the ethical and emotional challenges involved in decisions about land use (Revealed: 5,000 English nature sites at risk under Labour's planning proposals, 3 June). Our new citizen science project, Last Haven, explores precisely these tensions. What happens when the last known habitat for an endangered species stands in the way of vital human development? We present participants with simplified, hypothetical scenarios, such as a hospital being dismantled to make space for a rare plant sanctuary, or an agricultural initiative threatening the last refuge of a wild species, to examine how people reason through competing priorities. Our work suggests the value of nature as an important factor in human flourishing and mental health. Yet access to housing and infrastructure is also vital for wellbeing and security. These thought-provoking cases help uncover the values and beliefs that guide people when faced with choices between ecological preservation and human needs. Our wider hypothesis is that human flourishing and the wellbeing of the non-human world are fundamentally connected. Understanding how people perceive this relationship can help inform more ethically grounded decisions. As the UK considers the future of its planning frameworks, we hope that those making these important decisions, and indeed all of us, will reflect on the values at Edmond AwadSenior lecturer, University of Exeter Your article makes chilling reading for the future of some of our most important wild places. Some years ago, while engaged in a successful fight to forestall planning consent for an intrusive power line overland from Ullapool to Beauly in the north-west Highlands, my group, Highlands Before Pylons, was accused of nimbyism – a term now widely used to imply a blinkered, backward-looking approach to necessary progress. I asked a scholarly friend if we should redefine the word nimby. She suggested a tweak in the acronym to nimbie: 'Not in my beautiful, irreplaceable environment.' Perhaps the Guardian and its readers could set a new HopkinsonBath I note that the five English landscape 'jewels' listed in the print edition, 10 in the online version of the article, are almost entirely in the south-east. As a native of the north-west, I don't know whether to be pleased or disappointed about this. Pleased because none of our northern jewels are under threat but disappointed because, as usual, all the investment is going to the LuptonPrestwich, Greater Manchester Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
