Frustrated gamers lead revolt of digital serfs against subscription-led model
It essentially damaged the feudal system beyond repair. That was an unexpected positive benefit. Under feudalism, ordinary people owned nothing; there was instead a chain of responsibility from monarch through nobles to lesser nobles and eventually to peasants or serfs.
Those higher up the chain benefited from those at the bottom engaging in the system, largely with no choice, and could pull the rug out from the serfs at any time without any notable right for peasants to challenge.
With fewer peasants or serfs available to work the land they didn't own after the Black Death, those left became empowered to make more demands.
READ MORE
The
European Commission
may soon be in position to end or reform
digital serfdom
due to a movement built around computer games.
Stop Killing Games is a movement that is using the commission's
European Citizens Initiative
to try to reform the nature of ownership of digital assets. Its core demand is that if a consumer has paid for a game, that consumer should be able to play it even after official support ends.
That goal goes beyond video games to a fight over what digital ownership actually means.
The European Citizens Initiative was introduced under the Lisbon treaty and is a direct democratic tool that requires action from the European Commission should certain thresholds be met. The key threshold is to get one million signatures from EU citizens, with signatories from at least seven member states.
Stop Killing Games began collecting signatures in June last year in response to a game called The Crew being delisted by Ubisoft, a gaming giant, earlier in 2024. Players who had invested time and, crucially, money into this game could no longer access it.
A game that most of the people reading this column haven't heard of has now fuelled an extraordinary movement. The Stop Killing Games European Citizens Initiative cleared the one-million-signature, seven-member-state requirement earlier this month. In fact, it has signatories from citizens in 22 EU member states.
The movement plans to collect another 400,000 signatures between now and December, at which point it plans to submit the European Citizens Initiative to the commission. That's the point at which matters get really interesting.
Once the signatures are verified, the commission must meet the campaigners in a public hearing and respond within six months, either outlining what legislation it will bring forward or explaining why it will not bring any.
Any outcome, even a negative one, has ramifications for the subscription-led digital economy we all live in today. It will be obliged to address the issue of digital serfdom.
In a manner akin to medieval peasants, consumers today have access but not control over many of the things they spend money on. The rights that consumers have are quite limited in terms of preservation. The games, books, films and music you listen to exist at the mercy of platforms and publishers.
It extends beyond our social lives. Subscription models permeate every aspect of the software we use in our working lives today. The end result is a built-in obsolescence not just of the good or service but of users' rights to them.
The gaming industry has largely opposed the Stop Killing Games movement. Sega,
Nintendo
,
Microsoft
, Square Enix, and
Epic
along with other large publishing houses have come out against the European Citizens Initiative. That is understandable, as any level of success will cost these publishers either money or power.
On the financial side, publishers would have to consider maintaining largely unprofitable platforms to provide access to games in perpetuity. If they opted against that, they would need to turn over control of these games to an entity that would, creating assorted headaches around intellectual property.
That is why a petition using the European Citizens Initiative is pivotal to the future of what we consider ownership and our consumer rights.
[
Microsoft making billions from alleged unlawful processing of data for advertising, lawsuit alleges
Opens in new window
]
To date, the European Citizens Initiative hasn't proven very effective a tool. Of the few that have gone forward, none have directly led to legislation. That said, the attention gained using the process has indirectly led to change. This includes the EU's current plans around limiting the caging of animals, with the bloc taking stronger stances on matters such as the right to water.
The commission's own rules and habits mean we won't have to wait all that long for answers on what comes next. If Stop Killing Games files as expected in December, the commission will indicate within less than a year what it will do and why.
Digital serfdom will move from a concept of philosophical debate to the legislative agenda. That in itself is a win.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
EU commissioner shocked Michael McGrath by dangers of some goods sold by Shein and Temu
EU justice Michael McGrath commissioner has expressed shock at the toxicity and dangers of some goods being sold by Shein and Temu, amid a crackdown on the popular Chinese retail platforms. With 12m low-value parcels each day coming into the EU from online retailers outside the bloc, Michael McGrath has vowed to crack down on the sale of goods that blatantly break the law. He is waiting for the imminent results of an EU-wide secret shopper operation to further test evidence already gathered that Chinese retailers are bypassing EU laws. Among the worst examples Mr McGrath came across were baby soothers with beads that fall off easily, which pose a choking hazard because they did not have the regulation size hole to enable a baby who did swallow one accidentally to continue to get air. Among other goods cited by MEPs in a report released this month include children's raincoats with toxic chemicals, sunglasses with no UV filter and kids shorts with draw strings longer than regulation length that cause a trip hazard. They also found cosmetics containing butylphenyl methylpropional, also known as Lillal, which is listed as a chemical of 'very high concern' by the EU and has been banned since 2022 over concerns that it affects fertility and fetal development. EU Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection, Michael McGrath. File Picture: Shane O'Neill 'I am shocked by it, and I think we have a duty to protect European consumers,' Mr McGrath said. National consumer protection authorities send out rapid alerts across the EU warning of unsafe non-food products as part of a service, Safety Gate, which is also open to consumer complaints. Last year, Safety Gate received a record high of 4,137 alerts with more than a third relating to cosmetics, ahead of toys, electrical appliances, auto and chemical products. While consumer groups are concerned about safety, Mr McGrath is also worried that the platforms which have exploded in popularity in the last two years are damaging local businesses through unfair competition. The growth is extraordinary, and it has placed enormous pressure on the systems at member state level. 'I am determined that we step up our enforcement of our product safety laws and our consumer protection rules," he said. "It's not only about protecting consumers, but there is a very serious level playing field issue here for European businesses, because they are expected to compete with sellers who are not complying with our rules." 'They are incurring significant costs in Europe to comply with our requirements, and they should not be expected to compete with those who are not doing the same.' EU figures show 12m low-value items coming into the bloc a day, amounting to 4.6bn consignments under €150 for 2024 – double that of 2023 and three times as many as 2022. Among the moves the EU is considering is an abolition of the €150 duty-free threshold and the introduction of a handling fee for each package which may deter low-value purchases and help pay the cost of extra customs investigations. The move would echo the situation in the US, where Donald Trump signed an executive order to end the $800 duty-free threshold in an assault on the Chinese sellers. American buyers have had to pay an additional 30% tax or a minimum of $50 an item after 1 June this year. Also possible is the creation of a EU-wide customs authority to cope with the systemic issues. Mr McGrath said it 'remains to be seen' if the subject will be raised at an EU-China summit in Beijing on 25 July but he plans to address it directly himself. 'It will certainly be engaging directly with Chinese authorities and we will visiting later on this year,' he said. Shein said it was investing $15m this year in compliance and safety initiatives including 2.5m product and safety quality tests and has partnerships with 15 testing centres. It said it had removed 500 vendors since the launch of its marketplace. A spokesperson said: 'Earning and maintaining the trust of our consumers is paramount, and we are fully committed to ensuring the products we offer are safe and compliant." 'All of our vendors are required to comply with Shein's code of conduct and stringent safety standards, and must also abide by the relevant laws and regulations of the markets where we operate.' Temu has been approached for comment. - The Guardian Read More
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Government scrambling to avoid recession as fund to help businesses hardest hit by US trade war established
Coalition scrambling to avoid recession as jobs and businesses in the firing line The Government is planning to do 'everything it possibly can' to avoid a recession, as the Sunday Independent can reveal details of a new fund for those Irish businesses worst affected by US tariffs. With US president Donald Trump pushing to impose a 15pc minimum tariff rate on all EU goods, the Government is now bracing for 'quite stark' impacts on the Irish economy — even if the new rate is lower than the 'devastating' 30pc tariffs Trump previously floated.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
CAP battle starts as EU plans to overhaul farmer payments
The European Commission this week outlined long-anticipated proposals to radically overhaul the system of financial supports for the agricultural sector across the European Union. The top-line changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) would see ringfenced funding for farming cut by more than a fifth, with supports for agriculture merged with those for rural areas into a single fund. In brass tax, this would mean a fall in guaranteed CAP funding from €387 billion down to €300 billion over the course of the EU budget cycle from 2028. Around 120,000 Irish farmers receive roughly €2bn annually in CAP payments, and much of this money essentially makes a huge cohort of Irish farms viable. Given this, it was no surprise to see farming organisations here quickly coming out of the blocks to condemn the proposals. The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) warned the move would put food security at risk, while the group representing dairy farmers, the ICMSA, said there would be immediate upward pressure on food prices. A number of Irish MEPs also came out against the plans, which the Commission argues would allow for "stronger synergies between policies", and create a more flexible, crisis-responsive budget. Now the horse-trading really gets going as member states, through the Council of Ministers, start the long process of agreeing on an approach to the proposals, before painstaking talks with the parliament in Brussels and the Commission begin. Ultimately, it could take over two years before any agreement is in place for the start of the next EU budgetary cycle in 2028. Ireland will likely play a key role in this process, as we will hold the rolling six-month EU presidency for the second half of next year. This means that what the EU Commission is proposing and what eventually ends up happening might well be very different. Based on what I've written so far, it might seem the changes suggested are largely negative, but are there any positives in there for farmers across the bloc? Well, from what the Commission has outlined, it wants to make a strong play to encourage more young farmers into the profession. And this is in response to one of the major issues threatening the future of family farms both here in Ireland and across the EU. The average age of a farmer in Ireland is pushing 60, and with high income volatility and increased regulation farming isn't seen as an attractive career path in the way it would have to previous generations. A recent Teagasc report showed farm incomes were up across the board last year, but it also highlighted severe differences in farmer earnings from one year to the next. Paired with that, the level of environmental regulations farmers have to adhere to, and biodiversity and other targets that need to be met is only rising. These are welcome moves to protect our environment but they come at a price, and add layers of complexity to the job. In an attempt to address the challenge of generational renewal, the Commission has recommended that CAP funding "should be focused on active farmers", meaning supports would be "targeted towards farmers who exercise agriculture as a principal activity". This would mean that farmers who are of pension age would no longer receive supports under CAP. In addition, the proposals would hugely increase supports for young farmers starting out, with funding for the costs of establishing a new farm potentially rising from €100,000 to €300,000. The changes would also give individual member states more autonomy when it comes to doling out funds to farmers and rural areas, and can steer money in one direction of the other based on what is deemed more necessary. This could bring a shift in the well-worn path of supports going directly to farmers in less-well-off regions, as opposed to the areas themselves getting the money. So farmers could still benefit from rural EU funding, just not directly. However, the Commission's proposals are just proposals at this stage and will need approval at various stages of the EU decision-making process if they are to become part of the EU budget. The Irish Government hasn't wasted any time in putting domestic structures in place to decide on the country's stance on all this. On Thursday, the day after the EU proposals, Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon held the first meeting of what he calls the "CAP Consultation Committee". He called the Commission's CAP recommendations a "starting point", adding "we have been through considerable reforms before and we've managed to negotiate through them in the past and we'll do the same again". The minister's positive take might given some of the stakeholders at that CAP committee some reassurance. Ireland's response to this will be pretty much an all-inclusive one. The stakeholders gathered together by the minister include five Government departments, a host of State agencies, farmer organisations, business groups, as well as academics. IFA President Francie Gorman was giving his reaction to the Commission's CAP proposals on Wednesday's RTÉ Six-One News, in which he summed up the complexities associated with finding the right funding model for farmers. He welcomed the EU's renewed focus on bringing along more young farmers but pointed out: "If you want the next generation of farmers coming home, along with all the measures that we bring in to support young farmers, we still have to have viable farms for them to come into." Essentially, however well-intentioned it is, the idea of giving newer farmers more financial support at the expense of older ones could prove to be a misguided one if it kills off the very farms its trying to protect. Like most budget-related considerations, it will come down to finding a balance. And with the next EU budget not kicking in until 2028, at least there is sufficient time to try and get this balance right. But there's no doubt that between now and 2028, many battles will be fought as competing interests vie for pieces of a potentially smaller pie of EU funding.
