Air India finds ‘no issues' with fuel switches on other Boeings after crash
A preliminary report into the incident, released last week, found that the switches that controlled fuel going into the engines had been turned off 'one after another' just after the plane took off from Ahmedabad airport.
It meant the engines were starved of fuel, causing them to shut down. Moments afterwards, the London-bound plane lost altitude and crashed, killing 241 people on board and 19 people on the ground.
The preliminary report, by India's aviation authority, made no recommendations for action against Boeing, which manufactures the 787 Dreamliner. However, after the report's release, Air India ordered that the locking mechanisms of all fuel control switches – designed to prevent them from being accidentally turned off in-flight – on its Boeing planes be examined as a precautionary measure.
On Thursday, an official from Air India confirmed that 'inspections have been completed and no issues were found'.
According to a report by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), an early assessment made by US officials indicated that investigators were now focusing on the actions of the plane's captain, Sumeet Sabharwal, a veteran pilot who it said is believed to have been the one who moved the fuel switches to cut off.
The black-box recording is reported to indicate that it was the plane's first officer, Clive Kunder, who was flying the aircraft during take-off and had questioned why the pilot had moved the fuel switches to cut off. Sabharwal had replied that he had not.
The WSJ cited what it said were people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence uncovered in the crash investigation as saying that Kunder, the first officer, had panicked, while the captain had remained calm.
The sources cited by the WSJ did not state if the action was believed to be deliberate or accidental. It was reported that US officials believed criminal investigators should also be involved in looking into the incident.
The WSJ did not name the sources it interviewed and Indian authorities have not attributed any fault in their preliminary investigation.
India's preliminary report had summarised the exchange between the pilot and the first officer but had not attributed the quotes. A direct transcript of the recorded discussion has not yet been published by officials.
The fuel switches were moved back on seconds after, and one of the engines restarted, but it was not enough to reverse the plane's deceleration. A 'mayday, mayday, mayday' message was transmitted to air traffic control before the plane hit the ground, just 32 seconds after it had left the runway.
The Federation of Indian Pilots strongly criticised the WSJ report as 'baseless', accusing it of attempting to blame the pilot.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
After the release of the report last week, India's civil aviation minister, Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu, said people should not 'jump to conclusions', citing the welfare and wellbeing of India's pilots.
Two groups representing pilots condemned the suggestion that pilot error or action could be the cause of the crash as 'reckless and unfounded insinuation'.
A report in the Indian Express said investigators were examining previous technical glitches with the plane, to explore the possibility of an 'uncommanded transition' of the fuel control switches.
Relatives of the 241 passengers who died on board the Gatwick-bound flight have expressed frustration at the 'vague and inexact' preliminary report.
In an email to staff after the report, Air India's chief executive, Campbell Wilson, acknowledged the report had 'opened additional questions' but urged staff to 'avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Air India pilot's final words as he left home before plane crash
The captain of an Air India plane that crashed last month killing 260 people had promised he would return home hours before jetting off on the doomed flight. Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, was the senior pilot onboard the Boeing 787 Dreamliner that plummeted into a residential area in Ahmedabad on June 12, killing 241 people on board and 19 people on the ground. The veteran aviator, who had more than 8,200 hours in the cockpit, is being looked into by investigators over suggestions he turned off the plane's fuel switches, causing it to lose power. The plane had set off to London at 1:38pm and remained airborne for about 30 seconds before losing power and falling to the ground. Upon impact, it was engulfed by a huge fireball, claiming the lives of all but one person on board. A preliminary report into the tragedy revealed that before the crash, two fuel switches – which are used to start or shut down the engines and are typically left on during flight – were moved from 'Run' to 'Cutoff', depriving the engines of fuel. The report also revealed there had been confusion in the cabin when Sabharwal and his co-pilot Clive Kunder, 28, realised the fault, before desperate attempts were made to flick them back. Sources close to the investigation believe recordings of the conversation from the Boeing's black box support the view that the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines. But Sabharwal's final words to a security guard at his apartment complex, where his elderly father also lived, would suggest otherwise. 'Please, take care of papa. I will be back soon,' he reportedly said just hours before the crash. Friends and colleagues also reject the idea Sabharwal was responsible, claiming he was a 'gentle soul' and an 'ace pilot' who had never been involved in any major incident prior to the crash. Neil Pais, 61, a former colleague of Sabharwal, told The Telegraph he was 'one of the nicest people you could ever hope to fly with'. 'He had absolutely no airs about himself, so humble, so respectful. Always a smile when he spoke to you,' he added. 'I never once saw him raise his voice or lose his temper. And yet he never compromised on work or safety. If there was an issue, he'd point it out, but always in the nicest possible way.' Another colleague and close friend, Captain Kapil Kohal, said Sabharwal was a 'hero' with a 'gentle soul'. Despite his nickname of 'Sad Sack', given because of his 'melancholic eyes', Sabharwal was 'deeply charismatic and always ready to help,' he added. But the sadness noticed by his peers was resultant of a deeper tragedy. Sabharwal had struggled to come to terms with the death of his mother in 2022 and in the wake of her passing had separated from his wife and moved from Delhi to Mumbai, to be closer to his elderly father, Pushkaraj. Investigations into the tragic crash have reportedly begun to analyse Sabharwal's behaviour after 'several' Air India pilots allegedly confirmed he suffered from poor mental health. He is understood to have taken bereavement leave after his mother's death. Although it is believed that he had been 'medically cleared' by Air India prior to the fatal crash. Friends also revealed Sabharwal had considered retiring as a pilot to help care for his 90-year-old father full time. According to Sunil Lokhande, the security guard at his apartment complex in Mumbai, Sabharwal would often visit his father 'for two or three days' and take him for evening walks. The pilot would also buy vegetables and fruits, which he would share with Lokhande and would also give him money to buy meals. Such details bring further questions as to why the pilot might have decided to cut off the fuel switches only seconds after takeoff, a move described by aviation experts as 'absolutely bizarre'. While there was no cockpit video recording definitively showing which pilot flipped the switches, early assessments by U.S. officials claim the weight of evidence from the conversation points to the captain being responsible. Citing U.S. pilots familiar with the AAIB report, the Wall Street Journal reported this week that 'as the pilot actively flying, [First Officer] Kunder likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight'. On Sunday, a preliminary report released by the Indian authorities led to questions about why the pilot would have manually turned the switches off – and whether it was a deliberate act or a catastrophic mistake. The report said: 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other: why did he cut off? The other pilot responded that he did not do so.' Pilots will turn the fuel switches on and off at the correct times in every flight, but this time the fuel was cut off straight after takeoff and the landing gear was not raised. The co-pilot was flying the aircraft at the time of takeoff while the captain was monitoring. The report added that the switches were flipped back to 'Run' seconds afterwards, which started the process of relighting the engines. One of the engines had relit but had not gained power while the other was in the process of regaining power. At the crash site, both switches were found in the 'Run' position. Before the flight, both pilots had an adequate rest period and were found 'fit to operate' following a breath analyser test. There were no dangerous goods on the plane and the weight was 'within allowable limits'. Fuel samples taken from the tanks were tested and found to be 'satisfactory' and there was 'no significant bird activity' observed in and around the flight path of the aircraft. But Mr. Ranganathan previously suggested it may have been deliberate. Each lever has to be pulled upwards to be unlocked before it can be flipped and they also have further protective guard brackets to safeguard against any bumps and nudges. Explaining that he believed it 'had to be done manually', Mr. Ranganathan told NDTV of the fuel levers: 'The fuel selectors they aren't the sliding type they are always in a slot. They are to pull them out or move them up or down, so the question of them moving inadvertently out of off position doesn't happen. It's a case of deliberate manual selection.'
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Air India captain 'cut fuel to engines before crash'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video New information leaked from the Air India disaster investigation suggests the captain switched off the engine fuel flow. Officials have been probing the black boxes of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner recovered from the crash site in Ahmedabad. An early assessment by US officials suggested the June 12 crash, which killed 260 people, was not caused by any problems with the passenger jet. This raised suspicions that the plane's fuel flow was switched off. Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, was leading the flight destined to London Gatwick, with first officer Clive Kunder, 28, in control just before the smash, a source has said. It comes after the first initial report left out which pilot said what. The audio allegedly reveals how the first officer was controlling the plane when he asked captain Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches into a position that stops the fuel, a source told the Wall Street Journal on condition of anonymity. The preliminary report showed that the two crucial fuel switches were in 'cutoff' mode instead of 'run,' causing the plane to lose power before plunging onto a hostel housing doctors and medical students. The early report by India's Air Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) did not say whether the switch was accidental or deliberate. But a pilots' association accused the initial report of trying to blame the captain and the first pilot without definitive proof. The AAIB has since urged the public and the media to 'refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process,' adding that 'it is too early to reach any definite conclusions.' The pilots had only seconds to try to repair the fault and switch the fuel back on, but the plane began losing thrust at 650 feet and fell. Just hours before one of India's worst aviation disasters, the captain had reportedly told the security guard in his apartment complex to look after his elderly father who lived with him. The captain, who had over 15,600 hours of experience in the cockpit, said: 'Please, take care of papa. I will be back soon.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video His colleagues have rallied around him to pay tribute. Sabharwal was 'one of the nicest people you could ever hope to fly with,' former colleague Neil Pais told The Telegraph. Captain Kapil Kohal described him as a 'hero' and a 'gentle soul.' His nickname was 'Sad Sack' because of his melancholic eyes, and he was deeply charismatic and always happy to help,' captain Kohal added. The doomed plane was carrying 169 Indian nationals, 53 British, one Canadian and seven Portuguese people. One passenger on board, Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40 was the only survivor from the plane. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Air India crash investigators give update after recovering black box data
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
US transport body chief says Air India crash report suspecting pilot error ‘premature'
The head of the US National Transportation Safety Board cautioned that initial reports about last month's Air India crash were premature and speculative. A preliminary investigation released last week by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau found confusion in the cockpit shortly before the June 12 crash, raising questions about the position of the critical engine fuel cutoff switches. The crash in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad killed 260 people. 'Investigations of this magnitude take time," NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy said in a social media post on Friday. She called recent media reports on the crash 'premature and speculative', without providing any specifics about what exactly she was referring to. The investigation report revealed that the Boeing 787 Dreamliner's fuel switches were almost simultaneously flipped from 'run' position to 'cutoff' barely three seconds after takeoff. It said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he had cut off the fuel. "The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. At the crash site, however, both fuel switches were found in the 'run' position. The report noted there had been indications of the engines relighting before the low-altitude crash. The Wall Street Journal reported, citing unnamed sources, that an analysis of the investigation report showed first officer Clive Kunder had control of the Dreamliner for takeoff and at the time of the crash. It was Kunder who had asked captain Sumeet Sabharwal why he had flipped the switches, the paper added. All but one of the 242 people onboard Air India flight AI171 to London Gatwick were killed, including 53 British nationals. Nineteen people also died on the ground as the plane crashed into a medical college building. Pilots' associations and Air India chief executive Campbell Wilson have urged the public not to draw conclusions while the investigation was ongoing. The Airline Pilots' Association of India, representing the South Asian country's pilots at the International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations in Montreal, called for "fair, fact-based inquiry'. "The pilot's body must now be made part of the probe, at least as observers," the association's India president Sam Thomas said. After the preliminary report was released, India's civil aviation authority ordered inspections of fuel switches on all Boeing 737 and 787 aircraft operating in the country.
