Council Pushes Ahead With Changes Despite Government's ‘Plan-Stop' Policy
The district council's environment plan changes aim to ensure buildings or objects that could compromise aircraft safety could not be built close to Marlborough's three airports.
Resource Management Act (RMA) reform minister Chris Bishop announced on Wednesday the Government wants to stop councils from passing amendments to environment and land use plans.
Councils should not be wasting resources on making changes to plans under the RMA, ahead of major reforms expected in 2027, he said.
'Even though councils know the RMA's days are numbered, many are required to continue with time-consuming, expensive plan-making processes under the RMA,' Bishop said.
'The Government's intention is that stopping plan requirements for councils will enable them to focus on critical work to prepare to transition to the new system.'
Councils would be required to withdraw any planned changes that had not progressed to hearings within 90 days of the RMA Amendment Bill coming into effect in early August.
The Marlborough District Council environment and planning committee unanimously voted to prepare a change to their Proposed Marlborough Environment Plan on Thursday, 24 hours after Bishop's announcement.
Council strategic planner Clementine Rankin said the planned change would ensure buildings or objects that could compromise aircraft safety could not be built within the vicinity of Marlborough's three airports.
'For safety purposes, it's critical to provide protection for air corridors used in approaches to, and departures from, our airports,' Rankin said.
'It is a civil aviation safety issue when structures like buildings or frost fans penetrate into [air corridors].'
Visual and structural objects that penetrated into an airport's approach air space were already prohibited under Civil Aviation Authority rules.
But the council could not legally deny resource consents for people who wanted to build those objects without a change to the Proposed Marlborough Environment Plan.
Rankin said there were recently constructed frost fans that had become a safety risk.
'This issue has occurred due to the focus [in rural zoning] on noise only.
'The controlled activity rule does not include an airport protection standard.'
Rankin said that the council would move forward with the plan change, despite Bishop's announcement, and would ask the Environment Minister for an exemption if they had to.
Only private plan changes, natural hazard changes, and changes directed by the minister were automatically exempt.
All other exemptions had to be requested from the minister within three months of the policy becoming law.
Councillor David Croad greeted the announcement with a shake of his head, calling it 'disingenuous'.
'I don't often participate in politics, but yesterday's plan-stop thing, [saying] 'we're stopping that because we want to save ratepayers' money', it's a little bit disingenuous in my opinion,' Croad said.
'Ultimately it implies that the staff that we have in our planning departments are going to go home and go off payroll for a period of time.
'We have great people in this building and it takes a while to build good teams.
'We just don't get to turn these things on and off at will.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Editorial: It may be too late to save NCEA
It is now expected Education Minister Erica Stanford will announce substantial proposals for the future of NCEA. 'There really isn't an option to do nothing,' she said. 'I don't think that tinkering around the edges is going to be something that's going to get us where we need to be.' Part of the problem appears to be the flexibility we deliberately built into the system is now what is causing so much harm and inconsistency. Students quickly also found ways to game the system and avoid external examinations by collecting the required credits to achieve each level throughout the school year. Highlighting the widespread nature of this habit, last year there were more than 250,000 instances of students skipping exams because they felt they weren't necessary. Officials warned students being able to avoid exams 'can mean that critical learning in a subject may not occur'. When students can simply choose not to show up, the credibility of the qualification plummets. The Government also recently introduced some reforms. It had been, in part, triggered by employers complaining about the standard of students graduating with Level 1. Too often these kids couldn't read, write or do simple maths. Now students are required to pass online literacy and numeracy tests in order to gain their qualification. But it may be too late to save NCEA, which now seems so damaged it may be phased out entirely. A review by the Education Review Office (ERO) found that despite the recent overhaul, Level 1 was still 'difficult to understand' and not preparing students for future achievement. It said one option could be to 'drop it entirely'. Stanford told the Herald that New Zealand wanted to be 'world-leading' with its flexible qualification. But the world took a look and said, no thanks. Epsom Girls Grammar will start its Cambridge International pilot next year. It said it had been flooded with 'overwhelming community demand'. MAGS' principal Patrick Drumm also said his school is facing growing pressure to offer Cambridge exams. Parents, Drumm explained, are concerned NCEA lacked 'rigour'. But thousands of Kiwi kids are still doing NCEA. While the qualification may not look the same in the future, we owe it to those still studying hard every day to set them up for success. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
3 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Inflation is back and that's a problem for the Prime Minister
Rising prices for vegetables and fruit are adding to the pain we're already suffering for butter, cheese and beef prices. The Stats NZ release came with an avalanche of horrible numbers that confirmed what we're already feeling at the supermarket checkout. Milk prices were up 14.3% annually, butter up 46.5% over the same timeframe and cheese up 30%. Beef mince was up 21% and fruit and vegetables, which had been pretty good, rose 5% just in June. Obviously, there are seasonal factors, but that's a big spike and recent flooding in key growing regions means things will probably get worse before they get better. While overall inflation is considerably lower, grocery bills represent an outsize proportion of weekly spending for the poorest Kiwis. Food prices are also pushing up the overall inflation rate and forcing the Reserve Bank to slow the pace at which it cuts interest rates. That, in turn, slows the pace of economic recovery. Tomorrow we'll get the full inflation figures for the second quarter. Economists are picking annual inflation to land at 2.8% or 2.9% (up from 2.5%). From there, they expect it to keep rising to more than 3% in the third quarter, above the Reserve Bank's mandated target range. That all looks bad, but it isn't necessarily disastrous. Inflation should start falling again towards the end of the year, economists say. In the politically sedate world of economics, all the talk is about tradeable inflation – the price of volatile, internationally priced goods. Non-tradeable inflation, the stuff that is generated by wages and service costs in the core of the domestic economy, continues to fall. It's hardly an upside. Ongoing recessionary conditions are expected to ensure that non-tradeable inflation keeps falling. So there is a consensus among economists that the current inflationary conditions won't derail the economic recovery – they'll just delay it. Politically, it still hurts. Remember 'survive to 25″! We spent last year hanging on for the long-promised economic recovery. Now we've got economists forecasting things will come right in 2026. Looking at all the moving parts, I still remain optimistic that it will. An agricultural export boom and low interest rates must eventually generate some growth in the New Zealand economy – it's just not that complicated. But the waiting will be wearing thin for voters. Next year it's the election already, which is cutting things fine for a Government that has staked its reputation on being all about economic growth. As I said at the start, I don't think this is the Government's fault. But details like that don't matter much where the economy is concerned. Sometimes governments do cause or exacerbate inflation with overly stimulatory fiscal policy. That isn't the case this time. The Government can legitimately be attacked from the left for making the downturn worse by running a tight fiscal policy. The counter-argument (which lands well with a lot of Kiwis) is that Crown debt is out of control and retrenching was the right thing to do in the long run. Regardless of where you sit on that debate, it doesn't leave any reason to blame the Government for this latest inflationary spike. Still, the idea that governments are responsible for the cost of living is almost unshakeable in the minds of a large chunk of the voting public. The problem for Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis is exacerbated by the fact they publicly took credit for bringing inflation down. 'This Government has delivered on its promise to Kiwis – our careful and deliberate plan to get on top of inflation is working,' Willis said in an August 2024 press release celebrating the latest RBNZ rate cut. Also, the Nats weren't shy of heaping the blame on Labour when inflation soared in 2022, even though that was initially driven by international price spikes. Labour complained at the time but is now happy to run the same attacks. Labour leader Chris Hipkins continues to draw attention on social media to the price of butter, implying Government policy is to blame and ignoring the fact that dairy prices are currently the only thing saving the nation's economic bacon. Despite my best efforts to explain the ins and outs of global commodity pricing, my inbox confirms the public remains highly engaged about the price of butter. Did I say engaged? Sorry, I meant enraged. I still don't get the obsession with butter. How much of the stuff do you actually have to use... put some Country Soft on your toast, it's fine. But I don't want to downplay the real economic pain that high food prices cause. I've personally found the rise in cheese and beef prices worse. With two teenage boys to feed, we get through a lot of cheese and bulk our pasta sauces and nacho toppings with plenty of ground beef. The notion that burgers or spag-bol are no longer affordable for many Kiwis is worrying. The commodity cycle will turn. International dairy and beef prices will eventually fall. But that will mask the real problem. It's not that food prices are too high, it's that wages are too low. In the perfect world, prices for our export commodities would stay high, but New Zealand's domestic economy would be creating more well-paid jobs and generating higher wages. A quick check on supermarket websites in Australia or Britain reveals that groceries (once you do currency conversions) aren't actually much cheaper there. They just earn more than us. The Prime Minister understands this and I believe him when he says his real policy goal is to boost productivity and wages. But that's going to take time. Meanwhile, immediate conditions continue to pull the rug out from under him. In the next few months, he faces a tough sales job to convince the public that the economy remains on the right track. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
NZ Herald
3 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Rural economy is buoying Māori economy after Budget cuts to development funding
The first research, by Stats NZ, looked at 1450 Māori authorities and related businesses at the start of 2025. Like the rest of the economy, Māori businesses have suffered at the hands of this Government. The total number of filled jobs for Māori authorities was 11,870, down 170 jobs or 1.4% annually. The total value of earnings for Māori authority employees was $212 million, a decrease of $8.7m or 4%. This shows the reduction in hours occurring across the rest of the economy is also reaching Māori businesses. When examining the business sales data of Māori firms, the same problems observed across the wider economy are also present. Professional, scientific, technical, administrative and support services were down $18m or 13%. Meanwhile, primary industries were up $11m or 3% annually. The rural economy is supporting the Māori economy as much as primary industries' buoyancy is helping out anywhere else in Aotearoa. The second insight comes from ANZ's Te Tirohanga Whānui Report. That data confirms 2024 was a tough year for Māori businesses. However, it also confirms Māori businesses are 'performing better' than 'many of the country's largest listed companies'. Despite challenges, Māori businesses are performing better than many large companies, showing their resilience. Photo / Alan Gibson There is a resilience not seen in other parts of the economy. As ANZ notes, 'When the Māori economy grows, it strengthens the whole of the New Zealand economy.' Visit Whakatāne and see how Ngāti Awa has underwritten the local economy to the benefit of all. Given the increasing size of the Māori economy – its asset base having nearly doubled to $126 billion in 2023 – you'd think it would form a key part of the Government's economic agenda. But it's not mentioned once during the Minister of Finance's Budget speech. In the last Budget, $20m was cut from Māori economic development initiatives. The only new funding for the entirety of Vote Māori Development was $3m a year for Māori Wardens and the Māori Women's Welfare League. The Government's 'Going for Growth' economic development plan says the Māori economy is important – but that is it. There are no specific programmes to help it grow. There is nothing to help Māori businesses grow into new sectors or help capitalise on their intellectual property. In short, it is left alone. He Kai Kei Aku Ringa: the Māori-Crown Economic Growth Partnership – written initially in 2013 under National and revised in 2023 under Labour, was abandoned when the coalition took office. It looks increasingly likely that the economy is heading backwards again. The Reserve Bank is now forecasting that the economy declined 0.2% last quarter. You would think the Government would be pulling every lever to make sure there was new economic activity and new employment. But this is a Government that has a complete blind spot when it comes to anything Māori. Some $88m was cut in total from direct Māori funding at the last Budget, on top of $97m last year. There is an urgent need to change thinking. The Government is content with ever higher numbers of Māori being in prison, homeless or unemployed. That is not the 'growth, growth, growth' many were hoping for. It does nothing to support a unique and growing part of the New Zealand economy. Nothing to help enterprises and authorities that may be able to reach where other government actions have failed. It is time for a better plan – and one that recognises a remarkably simple fact. The scale of the opportunity in the Māori economy is not being grasped by the Government. We will have spent more on landlord tax relief over the next four years ($2.9b) than we have on the entirety of the Treaty settlement process to date ($2.8b). Budgets are about choices. Choices show values. The Government should value the Māori economy better. That way we all benefit.
