
HHS ends mRNA projects, public health experts raise concerns about the impact
'This represents a significant setback for our preparedness efforts in responding to infectious-disease outbreaks,' said Dawn O'Connell, the former assistant secretary of preparedness and response at HHS during the Biden Administration. If viruses change, mRNA can be quickly rebooted and manufactured.
But HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy jnr has criticised mRNA vaccines, arguing that they are ineffective at fighting upper respiratory infections and keeping up with the mutations of a virus.
Kennedy has a history of disparaging the mRNA coronavirus vaccines, in 2021 falsely calling them the 'deadliest vaccine ever made'. He has also said there was a 'poison' in it – claims refuted by medical experts.
He has also been under pressure from anti-vaccine activists who say he has not done enough to remove mRNA vaccines from the market.
The full scope of mRNA projects terminated was not immediately clear. Multiple companies mentioned by HHS did not immediately respond to questions. A spokesman for Moderna, which previously lost funding to develop an mRNA bird flu vaccine, said the company was not aware of new contract cancellations.
The AstraZeneca programme that HHS is restructuring is an RNA-based pandemic influenza vaccine that is in early stages of development. The company is exploring options for next steps, a spokeswoman said.
An inhaled mRNA treatment for flu and Covid being developed at Emory University was terminated. Some late-stage projects are proceeding, such as early human testing of an mRNA-based H5N1 candidate being developed by Arcturus Therapeutics 'to preserve prior taxpayer investment', according to HHS.
Gritstone Bio, which HHS said had a project proposal rejected, already ceased operating earlier this year after declaring bankruptcy.
A terminated contract to Tiba Biotech was for a H1N1 flu treatment that was not based on mRNA, but a different RNA technology. The company received a stop work order yesterday.
'This comes as a surprise given the Department's stated goal of winding down mRNA vaccine development,' Jasdave Chahal, Tiba's chief scientific officer, said in an email.
'Our project does not involve the development of an mRNA product and is a therapeutic rather than a vaccine.'
'It's going to deter innovations,' said Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California College of the Law at San Francisco, whose research focuses on vaccine law and policy.
'Why invest in new technologies if the government can not only refuse to fund them, but if it's going to cancel already promised contracts?'
HHS said in its statement that 'other uses of mRNA technology', such as cancer treatments, are not affected by the announcement.
But researchers are worried that the Trump Administration's criticism of the mRNA technology would have a chilling effect on one of the most promising fields in medicine.
In 2023, Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman shared the Nobel Prize in medicine for fundamental work on mRNA that enabled the development of coronavirus vaccines.
'It's absolutely perplexing why this is happening,' said Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University who has studied mRNA for more than three decades.
'You have to sort of scratch your head to wonder why the secretary is directing these sort of actions against probably one of the most powerful platforms in medicine that has come along in the last 20 years.'
Misleading assessments
Six scientific and medical experts said Kennedy and HHS offered misleading assessments of mRNA technology as they announced the termination of research.
Here are the issues they flagged with some of the statements:
'The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like Covid and flu,' Kennedy said in a statement.
It's true that mRNA vaccines can be ineffective at preventing coronavirus infections, although data from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention shows they still offer some protection.
But several scientific experts noted the primary purpose of vaccination is to prevent hospitalisations and death, which the mRNA vaccines have effectively done, according to CDC data.
The FDA has not approved an mRNA flu vaccine, so experts said it was premature to make sweeping claims about its potential efficacy.
The decision affects US$500 million in projects, including Covid-19 and flu vaccines. Photo / Getty Images
'One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective,' Kennedy said in a video.
The coronavirus keeps evolving in a way that makes it easier to infect people who have some immunity from vaccination or prior infection. Medical experts said the mRNA vaccines have been resilient in maintaining protection against severe outcomes.
Manufacturers have also been able to update formulas annually to better target new variants.
'That is actually one of the most powerful aspects of mRNA vaccines: that you can, in real time, develop new mRNAs against the virus as the virus changes,' Coller said. 'I'm not sure why that would be considered a bad thing.'
'We've seen now these epidemics of myocarditis,' Kennedy said at a news conference.
Coronavirus vaccines designed using mRNA carry a very small risk of myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart, from the coronavirus vaccine, particularly in young men.
However, medical experts said the data shows there is not an 'epidemic' of the condition; in fact, the rates of myocarditis and other heart illness are much higher from the virus instead of the vaccine.
Jessica Malaty Rivera, an infectious-disease epidemiologist, said this rhetoric was part of the pandemic revisionist 'revenge tour'.
'Calling it an epidemic is absolutely misleading,' she said.
'Technologies that were funded during the emergency phase but failed to meet current scientific standards will be phased out in favour of evidence-based, ethically grounded solutions – like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms' - HHS statement
Scientific experts said a variety of vaccine types are often required to fight emerging infectious diseases. In some cases, whole-virus vaccines have been known to have serious side effects.
Peter Hotez, a physician and co-director of the Texas Children's Hospital Centre for Vaccine Development, said he was surprised to hear HHS tout whole-virus vaccines because China had used a whole-virus vaccine for coronavirus that was 'pretty mediocre', Hotez said.
Kennedy is 'pushing a technology that is actually probably the most problematic of all vaccines we could pick', Hotez said.
Rachel Roubein, Sabrina Malhi and Daniel Gilbert contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Auckland family struggles as both parents diagnosed with cancer
Their daughter, Victoria, told the Herald her parents are 'extremely scared' and overwhelmed by the uncertainty the future holds. 'He's worried about his family and what will happen, you know, how we're going to manage and stuff like that,' she said. 'Mum just wants to enjoy simple things with him, like going to the beach, without worrying. But he's very short of breath; he can't move far at all right now. 'It's horrible… we're just getting through day by day.' Kevin and Tracey are overwhelmed by the uncertainty the future holds as they both battle cancer. Photo / Givealittle 'He's a fighter': Lifetime of health battles Kevin is no stranger to dealing with health issues throughout his life, including multiple cancers and heart attacks. Victoria said Kevin, originally from New Zealand, was living in England but returned here with the family in search of more opportunities and a better lifestyle. Along with Victoria and her younger brother, they settled on the North Shore and hoped for a fresh start. Shortly after their arrival, Kevin's daughter from a previous marriage died from cancer at 13 years old. 'My dad has a genetic mutation linked to cancer, his mum had it, and our sister passed away from it too,' she said. 'It was very traumatic. 'Our sister had rhabdomyosarcoma, a type of cancer in the muscle behind the eye. Ten years later it returned as a brain tumour. She passed of cancerous meningitis at age 13.' Tracey (left) and her daughter Victoria, who says the family is trying to focus on the positives. Photo / Supplied Kevin suffered his first heart attack at 35 and was later diagnosed with prostate and bowel cancer, while Victoria was still in high school, she said. 'He was told he had a year to live when he was 50. But he's a fighter, he's always had this incredibly optimistic outlook, which I think has helped keep him going,' she said. Cancer fight and financial strain Six weeks ago, Kevin was hospitalised with Covid and pneumonia, but tests revealed he also had AML. 'It was touch and go, 50/50 whether he would survive that night,' Victoria said. Because of his weakened condition, his doctors advised that chemotherapy is not an option and the public health system can do no more for him, she said. 'The chemo would kill him. His body just wouldn't cope.' Victoria's older brother is visiting from Ireland for the first time in 10 years with his wife and three young children. The trip was made so they could spend time with Kevin while they still can. Kevin has been spending time with his grandchildren as Victoria's older brother is visiting from Ireland for the first time in 10 years with his wife and three young children. Photo / Supplied 'They just want some time with him. It's really hard knowing this might be the last chance they have together as a family,' Victoria said. With Kevin retired from his career as a draftsman, and Tracey forced to 'drastically reduce' her hours as a mental health nurse, the family is under financial pressure. 'Mum hasn't been able to work her normal shifts since her diagnosis. 'Mum did her first shift the other day but still worries about Dad the whole time,' Victoria said. Kevin was recently diagnosed with terminal acute myeloid leukemia after a history of cancer and illness throughout his life. Photo / Supplied The family set up a Givealittle page to help relieve the financial pressure they are facing. The money raised will go towards Kevin's special diet, supplements and alternative treatments, as well as everyday living costs. 'Those things are expensive, but they're giving him hope and maybe helping to extend his life, even if just a little,' she said. Victoria said: 'It's been really stressful because both of them have been unable to do stuff at times. So I've taken quite a bit of time off work. 'I'm not really sleeping… We are just trying to get through each day and focus on the positives.' The family is appreciative of the help it has received so far from the community. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
New mRNA vaccines saved millions — so why is the US pulling funding?
So-called mRNA vaccines saved millions of lives during the Covid-19 pandemic — and now scientists are using that Nobel Prize-winning technology to try to develop vaccines and treatments against a long list of diseases including cancer and cystic fibrosis. But this week, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine critic, cancelled US$500 million (NZ$842 million) in government-funded research projects to create new mRNA vaccines against respiratory illnesses that might trigger another health emergency. That dismays infectious disease experts who note that mRNA allows faster production of shots than older vaccine-production methods, buying precious time if another pandemic were to emerge. Using older technology to target a pandemic flu strain would take 18 months to 'make enough vaccine to vaccinate only about one-fourth of the world", said Michael Osterholm of the University of Minnesota, an expert on pandemic preparation. But using mRNA technology 'could change that dramatically, such that by the end of the first year, we could vaccinate the world'. How mRNA technology works ADVERTISEMENT Traditionally, making vaccines required growing viruses or pieces of viruses called proteins — often in giant vats of cells or, like most flu shots, in chicken eggs — and then purifying them. Injecting a small dose as a vaccine trains the body how to recognize when a real infection hits so it's ready to fight back. But that technology takes a long time. Using mRNA is a faster process. The 'm' stands for messenger, meaning mRNA carries instructions for our bodies to make proteins. Scientists figured out how to harness that natural process by making mRNA in a lab. They take a snippet of that genetic code that carries instructions for making the protein they want the vaccine to target. Injecting that snippet instructs the body to become its own mini-vaccine factory, making enough copies of the protein for the immune system to recognise and react. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including a cold weekend on the way, Israel reveals a new plan in Gaza, and what not do when driving over a rail crossing. (Source: 1News) The Covid-19 vaccines aren't perfect Years of research show protection from Covid-19 vaccines — both the types made with mRNA and a type made with traditional technology — does wane over time. The vaccinations provide the strongest protection against severe infection and death, even if people still become infected. ADVERTISEMENT But that's a common feature with both the coronavirus and flu because both viruses continually mutate. That's the reason we're told to get a flu vaccine every year — using vaccines made with traditional methods, not mRNA. Today's Covid-19 vaccines made with mRNA by Pfizer and Moderna can be updated more quickly each year than traditional types, an advantage that now has multiple companies developing other vaccines using the technology. Traditional vaccines aren't the only use for mRNA Osterholm counts about 15 infectious disease vaccines that could benefit from mRNA technology, but that's not the only potential. Many disease therapies take aim at proteins, making mRNA a potential technique for developing new treatments. Researchers already are testing an mRNA-based therapeutic vaccine for pancreatic cancer. Genetic diseases are another target, such as an experimental inhaled therapy for cystic fibrosis.


Scoop
21 hours ago
- Scoop
Defunding Of mRNA Vaccine Research In The US
This week, the US Health Department announced the cancellation of several mRNA vaccine development contracts. The cuts and restructuring of collaborations affect 22 projects worth about half a billion US dollars, and no new mRNA projects will be funded. The US Secretary of Health, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., claimed mRNA vaccines don't provide effective protection against upper respiratory tract infections and said that funding would be shifted towards 'safer, broader vaccine platforms'. The SMC asked experts to comment on how this affects NZ and local mRNA vaccine research. Professor Kjesten Wiig, Co-director of the RNA Development Platform and Director of the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, comments: 'The recent decisions out of the US to cut funding for mRNA vaccine development represent a new low for the American medical and scientific community, one that risks undermining decades of progress in public health and infectious disease preparedness. 'At the Malaghan Institute, our research is not directly affected by US funding cuts. Likewise, the national RNA Development Platform continues to receive sustained support from the New Zealand Government. This backing allows us to focus on developing safe and effective RNA vaccines and therapeutics not just for human medicine but also for treatments that will benefit our primary industries, and for New Zealand specific problems. 'RNA is a proven, safe and transformative technology. Its potential extends well beyond the pandemic. In the absence of US leadership, there is an unprecedented opportunity for countries like New Zealand to step up to ensure this breakthrough science continues to benefit people globally.' No conflicts of interest. Our colleagues at the UK SMC have also gathered comments. A small selection follows—see their website for the full expert reaction. Prof Christopher Chiu, Professor of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, said: 'Hundreds millions of people received mRNA vaccines during the pandemic with no major ill effects, dramatically reducing the risk of severe COVID-19, hospitalisation and death. In this way, they played a critically important part in allowing society to return to normal. Overall, the mRNA vaccines have been shown to be very safe, although like all treatments they can cause side effects, mostly mild but including some rare severe reactions. It is misleading to single out mRNA vaccines for promoting mutations and failing to protect against common cold-like symptoms; this is true for all respiratory virus vaccines that are given by injection and can stimulate a protective immune response. Better protection is needed but until we have next-generation alternatives that can completely block infection in the nose and lung, mRNA vaccines will continue to be important and valuable.' No conflicts of interest. Dr David Elliman, Honorary Associate Professor, UCL, said: 'This is a very worrying development. mRNA vaccines were an extremely important tool in saving the lives of people from COVID. There is no reliable published evidence that supports RFK Jr's assertion that the vaccines encourage new mutations and, in so doing, may prolong pandemics. The evidence to support this should be made public, so that it can be examined, by experts in the field who have not been picked because of their anti-vaccine views. 'While this development is not only a retrograde step for the development of mRNA vaccines, of greater concern, perhaps, is that it reinforces the impression that, in spite of his protestations, RFK Jr is antivaccine. This has implications, not only for vaccination programmes in USA, but around the world. At a time when vaccination rates are falling globally, we need to follow the evidence, not ideologically led beliefs. Such misguided beliefs are likely to cause unnecessary suffering and death, particularly in children.' No conflicts of interest. Prof Robin Shattock, Professor of Mucosal Infection and Immunity, Imperial College London, said: What do we know about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines? 'Following their use in millions of individuals during the pandemic and using current technology, we have an extraordinary level of detail on the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines. In the context of COVID-19, these vaccines prevented millions of deaths and hospitalisations. As for mRNA vaccines against other infectious these would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Do mRNA vaccines increase the mutation rate of viruses? 'No, there is no scientific evidence that this is the case. Different viruses mutate at different rates, for example influenza virus changes on a seasonal basis, SARS-CoV2 continues to vary irrespective of whether individuals have received mRNA vaccines. What are the impacts of this funding cut on public health and health research in the US and globally? 'This will impoverish American resilience to future pandemics. But more importantly, it will be used by some to legitimise unfounded claims that mRNA vaccines and vaccines in general are unsafe. This is directly opposite to the scientific evidence-based approach to science. This technology offers real benefits not only against infectious diseases, but also in our fight against cancer, autoimmunity, and hereditary diseases. If known, what data might he [R.F. Kennedy Jr] be referring to and how does it compare with other existing evidence? 'It is unclear as to what evidence he is referring to, given that these vaccines have been highly scrutinised by regulatory bodies on an ongoing basis (FDA, EMEA, MHRA). He has provided no evidence to show that alternative vaccines are any different to mRNA vaccines concerning claims of safety and the unfounded claim that mRNA vaccines drive the mutation rate of viruses. Any other considerations you have about the claims being made? 'This is another blow against vaccine uptake in general, where for example, we are seeing the return of Measles outbreaks in the US and unnecessary deaths.' Conflict of interest statement: 'I work on RNA vaccines in an academic setting, but have no associations with any of the work that is being axed by RFK or the companies involved.'