
PM: Tories have questions to answer over Afghan data breach and superinjunction
Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of a scheme set up after the breach which was kept secret as the result of a superinjunction imposed in 2023 which was only lifted on Tuesday.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir said: 'We warned in opposition about Conservative management of this policy and yesterday, the Defence Secretary set out the full extent of the failings that we inherited: a major data breach, a superinjunction, a secret route that has already cost hundreds of millions of pounds.
'Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen.'
He suggested the Conservatives should 'welcome' scrutiny from the Commons Defence Committee.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle said: 'This episode raises significant constitutional issues.'
Downing Street later declined to say what questions former ministers should face but said Sir Keir was 'angry' about the breach.
Sir Keir's press secretary said: 'The Prime Minister is angry at such a terrible breach that had such grave consequences being allowed to happen.
'Which is why it's clear that there are questions that need to be answered by Conservative ministers who, in their own words, have talked about the ineptitude of the Conservative government at the time.'
She also pointed to comments from former veterans minister Johnny Mercer, who described the handling of the breach as 'farcical' and 'the most hapless display of incompetence by successive ministers and officials that I saw in my time in government'.
Tory former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace said he makes 'no apology' for applying for the initial injunction and insisted it was 'not a cover-up' but was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk.
The key facts on the Afghan Resettlement data incident that took place in 2022, and the action we are taking to support those impacted.
Defence Minister @LukePollard explains 👇 pic.twitter.com/DY3SbBSmgp
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) July 16, 2025
A dataset of 18,714 who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released in February 2022 by a defence official who emailed a file outside authorised government systems.
The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the blunder when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak.
Then defence secretary Sir Ben said he had applied for a four-month standard injunction shortly before leaving office but on September 1 2023, when Grant Shapps took the role, the Government was given a superinjunction.
Sir Ben said he did now know why the superinjunction was granted 'but nevertheless, I think the point here is I took a decision that the most important priority was to protect those people who could have been or were exposed by this data leak in Afghanistan, living amongst the Taliban who had no regard for their safety, or indeed potentially could torture them or murder them', he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
He also defended his actions in an article in the Telegraph.
'I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time. It was not, as some are childishly trying to claim, a cover-up,' he said.
Former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace (Ben Birchall/PA)
The leak led to the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024.
The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million.
A total of around 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme.
The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked.
Defence Secretary John Healey said he was not going to 'lead a witch hunt after a defence official'.
'This is much bigger than the mistake of an individual,' he told the BBC.
The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments.
Kemi Badenoch has said sorry on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak.
'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that,' she told LBC.
Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024.
However, an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
This is how we reboot Britain's decimated economy
It was meant to be turning Britain into the fastest-growing economy in the G7. It was meant to be shaking up planning laws, picking the fast-growing new industries to prioritise for investment and unlocking a wave of inward investment by restoring 'stability' and 'grown-up' government. Labour made plenty of bold promises during the election campaign last year. And yet, as this week's shocking employment data made painfully clear, the British economy is stagnating. Even worse, gilt yields are far too high, with the markets increasingly deeming HM Government's to be a risky credit. The two main parties of the Right, the Conservatives and Reform, must urgently start devising a compelling free-market, pro-growth alternative, an adulterated version of the sorts of much-needed changes pushed through in Argentina by Javier Milei. Whatever its other faults, and there were plenty of them, over the past 20 years the British economy was at least very good at generating lots of jobs. They were not necessarily very skilled, or productive, but they were plentiful. This is not the case anymore. On Wednesday, the Office for National Statistics published the latest employment data. It made for depressing reading. Another 40,000 people dropped off the payrolls in June, the fourth month in a row that the number of employees has fallen. Over the past year, almost 200,000 net salaried roles have vanished, the most significant decline since the Covid pandemic. The vacancy data is even more worrying, with the number of openings falling for 36 consecutive months. The welfare rolls are the only metric that is booming. The public sector is still expanding as if money would keep flowing forever. But the private sector has stopped hiring. The reason is simple: GDP is barely going up, and yet the cost of employing workers is rising. The minimum wage has been pushed too high for many companies and the Chancellor made a catastrophic error of judgment when she increased employers' National Insurance contributions and lowered the threshold at which these have to be paid. NI is a tax on jobs; it is no great surprise that we now have fewer of them. It is only going to get worse over the next few months. It takes time for the companies to slim down their workforce, as most of them prefer 'natural wastage' to risking the hassle and expense of an employment tribunal by laying people off. As people leave they won't be replaced. And the Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner's draconian extension of employment rights will further undermine the economy. Why risk hiring someone if you can't get rid of them? Without new jobs, the economy can't grow; while it will be impossible to shift people off welfare benefits, the tax base will shrink; and the burden on the Treasury will grow ever larger. Britain will be tapped in a doom loop where taxes crush employment, leading to lower revenues, which in turn means taxes have to be pushed even higher, starting the whole dismal cycle all over again. There is only one way to fix the malaise. The Conservatives and Reform have to make the case for a free-market revolution. It is not exactly hard. The time has come to stop pushing up the 'living wage' by more than the rate of inflation every year. We need to deregulate the labour market, repealing Rayner's idiotic reforms and also blocking the madness of judges effectively setting wage rates by using equalities legislation. It is better to be hired and fired than to never be hired at all. We need to rein in the public sector to reduce the deficit and allow room for supply-side tax cuts. We need a radical programme of liberalisation to fire up the animal spirits of entrepreneurship once again. Net zero should be scrapped. The lower capital gains rate for entrepreneurs should be restored in full, and the lifetime limit put back to £10m. We need a better monetary policy that actually targets price stability. Planning laws should be genuinely liberalised so that firms can start building. Ridiculous laws left over from the European Union, such as the GDPR rules (perhaps the worst piece of internet legislation ever devised), should be repealed to allow start-ups to flourish. 'Opportunity Zones' based on the successful experiment from president Trump's first term should be launched, with lower taxes and lighter regulation, to reboot run-down urban areas. Each one of these policies would help fix some of the damage from Labour's disastrous first year. Taken together, they would get the economy moving again, laying the foundations for the long project of restoring the nation's prosperity. The campaign needs to start now. For too long, the British political establishment has complacently assumed the economy could withstand whatever taxes and regulations were thrown at it. We learnt this week that is no longer true. Like much of the rest of the country, it is now broken.


Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour council accused of downplaying small boats crisis
A Labour-led council has been accused of downplaying the small boat crisis after one of its lawyers referred to a motion describing 'record-breaking' arrivals as 'inflammatory'. The motion was submitted by opposition councillors on Swindon borough council who were objecting to lucrative tenancy deals being offered to private landlords to house asylum seekers. Under the Home Office scheme to house asylum seekers, landlords are guaranteed five years of rent payments, funded by taxpayers, to accommodate the growing number of new arrivals to the UK. Local Conservatives had sought to pass a motion that would require asylum seekers making use of the scheme to prove a local connection to the area. But in documents seen by The Telegraph, a claim referring to a 'record-breaking surge in small boat arrivals ' was described by the council's top legal officer as 'inflammatory'. It was requested that the wording of the motion be reviewed. It is understood that this was advice, and it was at the discretion of the Labour mayor of the borough as to whether or not the motion was allowed in its current state. Kevin Hollinrake MP, the shadow levelling up, housing and communities secretary, said: 'Saying there has been a record-breaking surge of small boats in the Channel is a factual statement. The last thing any responsible Labour council should be doing is downplaying this crisis or covering for Starmer's failures. 'This isn't just about politics – it's a serious national security issue that demands urgent action, not denial.' The council denied that the officer was calling the wording of the motion 'inflammatory' and instead said the advice had 'been misunderstood when it was relayed to councillors' as 'the intention was to ask that the sentence was fact-checked'. A spokesman added: 'This story does not represent the full picture. Our chief legal officer provides confidential advice to political assistants and councillors via our committee services team when they submit any motions to full council to ensure they are fair, accurate and based on fact. 'For the record, our chief legal officer does not consider the motion to be inflammatory in any way. This is why the wording relating to small boat crossings has been published as part of the agenda for next week's meeting.' Local Conservative sources confirmed that they intended to proceed with the motion in its current state ahead of next week's meeting. The Telegraph understands that the council's chief legal officer had advised the mayor of the borough to not allow the motion to be moved at the next meeting of the council, which Swindon Conservatives said was 'subverting the democratic process'. More than 22,500 migrants have reached the UK in small boats so far this year, up 50 per cent on the same period last year and the highest number in the first six months since the first dinghies arrived in 2018. Swindon declared itself a 'city of sanctuary' shortly after Labour took control of the council in 2023. At the time, it said the status meant it would 'talk with the community about the positive impact of migration' and 'advocate for why being a welcoming and inclusive town is beneficial to us all'. A Conservative source called the description of Swindon as a sanctuary city 'council-sponsored gaslighting'. Swindon has seen the largest rise in immigration in the West of England, up 30 per cent in the past 20 years. One in five of its residents were born outside the UK. The motion stated that Swindon housed 539 asylum seekers as of this June, compared to 376 residents in similar temporary accommodation.


The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
Ed Miliband's deputy sent secret WhatsApp messages to Labour rebels working to torpedo PM's welfare reforms
ED Miliband's protege sent secret WhatsApp messages to Labour rebels working to torpedo Keir Starmer's welfare reforms, The Sun on Sunday can reveal. Net Zero minister Miatta Fahnbulleh was active on key WhatsApp chats used to organise the revolt - posting several messages. She was even considering resigning to inflict maximum damage on the PM, senior Labour insiders believe. Ms Fahnbulleh is a former aide to Mr Miliband and he is believed to be working to help her to be party leader one day. After being elected MP last year, she was immediately handed a plum ministerial job in his energy department. The bombshell revelations will inevitably spark questions about Red Ed's loyalty to the PM. A Labour insider said: 'It's astonishing that after just a year, this minister is more interested in her own ambitions than delivering for the people who have elected her and the Labour government.' Sir Keir was forced to tear up his plan to trim £5 billion from Britain's bloated benefits bill after an astonishing Labour backbench rebellion late last month. Over 120 Labour MPs signed a rebel amendment scuppering the plan - forcing the PM into a humiliating U-turn. It was an extraordinary challenge to Sir Keir's leadership just a year after he swooped to power in a landslide victory. And now The Sun on Sunday can reveal that a Labour minister - Ms Fahnbulleh - was in the thick of the rebel plot. She was on two separate WhatsApp chats with other Labour MPs used to organise the revolt. Changes to UC & PIP payments in full as Labour reveals bruising welfare bill concessions in bid to quell rebellion One was called Sunday Lunch Organising and the other was called Buffet Organising - covert names which gave no indication of what was actually being discussed. The minister sent several texts on the groups, including one which described the government's welfare plan as a 'mess'. She also allegedly cast doubt over the explanation given by ministers regarding the reforms. Ms Fahnbulleh was also allegedly spotted having 'victory drinks' in Parliament's famous Terrace bar - overlooking the River Thames - with a gang of Labour welfare rebels on the day the PM was forced to U-turn. Last night, Ms Fahnbulleh's office said: 'What is implied here is simply untrue. Miatta publicly backed the government and voted for the Universal Credit Bill at every stage.' They declined to comment further on the Whatsapps. Ms Fahnbulleh was elected MP for Peckham, in south London - succeeding former Labour Party deputy Harriet Harman. A high flier, she has previously worked for Mr Miliband when he was Labour leader and ran the New Economics Foundation - a leftwing think-tank. Last year, Labour bible The New Statesman put her on their 'Left Power List' as one of the 50 most influential people in leftwing politics in Britain. A Labour insider said: 'She is close to Ed Miliband and it's a pretty open secret that she is his pick to be leader one day.' A spokesman for Mr Miliband said: 'These are spurious and nonsense allegations. Ed supported the welfare bill at all stages.' Who are Labour's 'five families' who could cause trouble for PM Sir Keir Starmer Labour's 'five families' of rival factions have the potential to cause trouble for Sir Keir Starmer. Here are the Mafia-style clans vying for power and influence in Britain's governing party. In a nod to The Godfather film, we have given each family a horses head rating to show how dangerous they are to the PM. THE HARD-LEFT: A hardcore of around 25 former die-hard Corbynistas who are in the Socialist Campaign group. They loathe the PM and want higher taxes and spending. Led by John McDonnell inside Labour. Includes Jeremy Corbyn's new party outside. They can inflict pain on No10, but are limited in number. Head rating: 2/5 THE SOFT LEFT: A large chunk of Labour MPs are in this faction, which led the welfare rebellion. Includes Ed Miliband, Louise Haigh and suspended welfare rebel Rachael Maskell. Group most likely to swing behind Angela Rayner for leader, has strong ties with trade unions and associated with 'King of the North' Andy Burnham. Horses head rating: 4/5 AMBITIOUS NEWBIES: Starmerites who swept to power in the 2024 landslide election and are being fasttracked to Cabinet. Include new Labour royalty Hamish Falconer and Georgia Gould. They are loyal - but ambitious. Horses head rating: 1/5 THE BLAIRITES: Devotees of Tony Blair and his brand of New Labour politics, they are pro business and back market reforms in the public sector. Includes Wes Streeting and Pat McFadden - both big players in Keir's government. Horses head rating: 1/5 REDWALLERS / BLUE LABOUR: Straight-talking faction representing Labour's old industrial heartlands of the North and Midlands. Want tougher immigration policies, a crime crackdown and investment in blue collar jobs. Include Jo White, Jonathan Hinder and Gareth Snell. Impatient for change and not afraid to rebel. Horses head rating: 3/5