Parents entitled to pension after widow's remarriage: Himachal Pradesh High Court orders pension for 83-year-old BSF soldier's mother
The single-judge bench of Justice Sandeep Sharma directed the Union of India to grant family pension to petitioner Shankari Devi, who had been denied her rightful claim for decades. The court also quashed the rejection order issued by the Pay and Accounts Division of the BSF, which had earlier declared her ineligible.
Directing the Union Government to act in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, the court stated:
'The Union Government is directed to consider the prayer made by the petitioner for the grant of family pension, strictly in terms of Sub-clause 10 of Rule 50 of the Rules, which makes parents entitled to pension after the remarriage of the widow.'
The petitioner had informed the court that her son, Lekh Ram, had joined the BSF in 1979 and got married to one Suraksha in 1985. However, barely ten days after the marriage, Lekh Ram died under mysterious circumstances. His widow, Suraksha Devi, was initially sanctioned a family pension.
In December 1990, Suraksha Devi remarried, thereby becoming ineligible for the family pension. She voluntarily informed the department in writing that she was not drawing the family pension after her remarriage.
Following this, Shankari Devi and her husband, the late Sita Ram (who passed away during the pendency of the petition), applied for family pension. However, their request was denied by the authorities on the grounds that parents of a deceased government employee are not eligible for pension -- a claim that the court has now ruled as erroneous.
The High Court noted that the petitioner was wrongly denied family pension despite being entitled to it under the rules.
'Since petitioner has been fighting for her rightful claim for years together coupled with the fact that petitioner is 83 years old, this Court hopes and trusts that needful at the behest of the Union Government shall be done expeditiously, preferably, within six weeks, by affording due opportunity of hearing,' the court observed.
Further, the court added, 'In this case, Shankari Devi is found eligible for family pension; she shall be entitled to arrears for a period of three years prior to the filing of the petition.'
The Union Government has been directed to file a compliance report within three weeks after the expiry of the six-week period granted to complete the process. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
‘Big Blow': Trump Targets Russia Over Oil Exports To India, Says ‘Their Economy Not Doing Well'
Last Updated: Trump targeted Russia over its oil exports to India and said that Moscow's economy "is not doing well". His remarks came days after he dubbed Indian and Russian economies "dead". US President Donald Trump on Monday (local time) described his decision to slap 50% tariffs against India for buying Russian oil as a 'big blow" for Moscow, while taking a shot at Russia's economy again, days after dubbing it as 'dead". Trump said that he was 'all set to do things far bigger" than targeting Russian oil exports, and claimed that he 'got a call" about holding a meeting with President Vladimir Putin. His remarks came while speaking with the reporters about his plans to meet Putin on August 15 in Alaska. 'I'm going to meet him…Their (Russia's) economy is not doing well right now because it's been very well disturbed by this. It doesn't help when the President of the United States tells their largest or second-largest oil buyer that we are putting a 50 percent tariff on you if you buy oil from Russia. That was a big blow," he said. #WATCH | On meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump says, 'I'm going to meet him…Their (Russia) economy is not doing well right now because it's been very well disturbed by this. It doesn't help when the President of the United States tells… — ANI (@ANI) August 11, 2025 'I haven't stopped there. I mean, look, I was all set to do things far bigger than that. But I got a call that they'd like to meet and I'm going to see what they want to meet about," Trump added. His comments came as tensions with India have been on the rise since his announcement of 25% tariffs on India, and then the subsequent 25% additional duties on Indian exports to the US for New Delhi's decision to continue buying Russian oil, even though he did not impose any new tariffs on China — which is the largest buyer of oil from Moscow. More to follow… view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
37 minutes ago
- News18
Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit, says ex pentagon official
By Reena Bhardwaj Washington, DC [US], August 12 (ANI): A former Pentagon analyst, Michael Rubin, has delivered a scathing assessment of Pakistan's recent nuclear rhetoric, describing the country as behaving like 'a rogue state" following threatening comments made by its army chief on American controversy centres on remarks attributed to Pakistan's army chief General Asim Munir, who allegedly threatened that if Pakistan 'goes down, it would take half the world down" with it. The comments were reportedly made during a meeting in Tampa, Florida, with US military Rubin, a former Pentagon official and Middle East analyst, told ANI that Pakistan's behaviour was 'completely unacceptable" and compared the army chief's rhetoric to statements previously made by ISIS and Osama bin Laden.'Pakistan is raising questions in many people's minds about whether it can fulfil the responsibilities of being a state," Rubin said. 'The Field Marshal's rhetoric is reminiscent of what we've heard from the Islamic State."Rubin called for immediate diplomatic consequences, including stripping Pakistan of its status as a major non-NATO ally and potentially designating it as a state sponsor of terrorism. He also suggested that General Munir should be declared persona non grata and banned from receiving US analyst expressed particular concern about the lack of immediate response from US officials present during the alleged remarks. He argued that the Pakistani army chief should have been immediately escorted from the meeting and expelled from the country.'Within 30 minutes of when Asim Munir made those comments, he should have been ushered out, taken to Tampa International Airport, and flown out of the United States," Rubin former Pentagon official suggested that President Trump's continued engagement with Pakistan might be influenced by external noted that Trump's approach represents a departure from the traditionally strong bipartisan support for the US-India partnership that has developed since the George W. Bush painted a broader picture of regional instability, suggesting that Pakistan's nuclear threats could provide cover for terrorist elements to 'go rogue" with nuclear weapons. He argued that Pakistan represents a fundamentally different challenge from traditional diplomatic disputes.'Americans look at terrorism through the lens of grievance," he explained. 'They don't understand the ideological underpinnings of many terrorists. Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit."Perhaps most controversially, Rubin suggested that the international community should consider allowing Pakistan to undergo what he termed a 'managed decline," potentially including recognition of breakaway regions such as Balochistan. He even raised the possibility of future military intervention to secure Pakistan's nuclear arsenal.'It's coming near time when, in a future administration, other SEAL teams should enter Pakistan to secure its nuclear weapons because the alternative is simply too great to bear," he interview highlighted the complex web of relationships affecting US policy in South Asia. Rubin suggested that Trump's recent tensions with India over trade and sanctions related to Russian energy purchases were not counterproductive, noting that the US itself purchases strategic materials from predicted that US-India relations would likely improve once the current administration's approach changes, describing the current tensions as a 'stress test" that would ultimately strengthen the analyst's comments reflect growing concerns about Pakistan's stability and its nuclear capabilities. While his proposals for dealing with Pakistan appear to go well beyond current US policy, they highlight the challenges facing policymakers as they navigate relationships with nuclear-armed states in an increasingly volatile region. (ANI)
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India plans retaliatory measures against Pakistani diplomats following harassment in Islamabad
Synopsis India is planning retaliatory measures against Pakistani diplomats due to the hurdles faced by Indian diplomats in Islamabad, including gas and water supply disruptions and intensified surveillance. The MEA has also criticized Pakistan's army chief for his nuclear threats, calling it irresponsible and raising concerns about nuclear command and control, especially given Pakistan's ties to terrorist groups. ANI There has been an intensification of surveillance by Pakistani authorities against the Indian diplomats both at their residences and offices in Islamabad India is planning retaliatory measures against Pakistani diplomats following hurdles faced by the Indian diplomats in Islamabad over gas and water has been an intensification of surveillance by Pakistani authorities against the Indian diplomats both at their residences and offices in Islamabad. Reports have also surfaced that Indian diplomats are facing hurdles over gas and water supplies akin to measures imposed since the cross-border strikes in deliveries to the Indian High Commission and residences of Indian diplomats in Islamabad was stopped in June. Subsequently India stopped newspaper supplies to Pakistani diplomats here. Meanwhile the MEA on Monday slammed Pakistan's chief of army staff field marshal Asim Munir over his reported threat to use nuclear weapons in a future war between the two countries, calling it an example of 'nuclear sabre-rattling', while asserting that it will not give in to nuclear blackmail and will take all steps necessary to safeguard national security. The external affairs ministry said in a statement that such remarks reinforced doubts about the integrity of Pakistan's nuclear command and control, particularly in a country where the military is 'hand-in-glove with terrorist groups'. 'Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade,' the external affairs ministry said. 'The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks, which also reinforce the well-held doubts about the integrity of nuclear command and control in a state where the military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups.'The ministry also said, in a message to the US, that it was 'regrettable' that the remarks were made from the soil of a friendly third had reportedly said while addressing the Pakistani diaspora in Tampa, Florida, that Pakistan would use nuclear weapons if it faced an existential threat in a future war with India. 'We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us," he said, according to media reports.
