Moray Man jailed for trying to murder woman and children in car
Phillipson was found guilty by a jury at an earlier trial.Appearing on Wednesday at the High Court in Inverness, he was given an extended sentence of nine years and one month, of which he will spend seven years and one month in jail. The remainder of the sentence will be under supervised release.
Phillipson had denied a series of charges.During his evidence at the High Court in Edinburgh, he said: "I never pulled the handbrake."He claimed it would have been the female driver who did it.But a witness at the crash scene said Phillipson appeared unsteady on his feet and heard the driver shout that he had pulled the handbrake and steering wheel.The court was told that he had "gambled with the lives" of the occupants.Advocate depute Martin Crawford, prosecuting for the Crown, told the jury that he was inviting them to find that the accused was trying to cause the crash and that it posed "obvious danger".
'Wicked recklessness'
He said a picture had emerged in evidence of Phillipson being intoxicated, irrational and violent, and said that he was acting with "wicked recklessness" as to the fate of those in the car.Phillipson was found guilty of assaulting and attempting to murder the woman and the children aged under 10 by grabbing and pulling the steering wheel and applying the handbrake, causing the vehicle to veer off the road and roll over, to their injury and to the danger of their lives on 11 June 2023.He was also convicted of attacking the woman at a flat in Rothes, Moray, on the same date, when he punched her and stamped on her wrist, and assaulting a child who was pushed.Judge Pasportnikov said he could have killed everyone involved, including himself, and the impact of what he had done must have been significant on those involved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dentist charged with poisoning wife went through 'drastic' life change months before murder, trial hears
The Colorado dentist accused of fatally poisoning his wife was told he'd need to take a 'drastic' pay cut in the months before her murder, jurors heard on Friday. Dr Ryan Redfearn, a dental school friend of defendant James Craig, told the court how in 2022 he'd invited the father of six to join Fit to Smile, the umbrella dental services group Redfearn runs with his brother. Craig would have the opportunity to become a partner while the operation 'would provide management services to run his practice,' Redfearn testified at Arapahoe County District Court. After making the invitation, Redfearn testified that he learned Craig had in recent years declared bankruptcy, blaming it on coronavirus troubles. The arrangement with Fit to Smile meant the operation would pay $18,000 a month to service Craig's debts, Redfearn told the court. By January 2023, however, Redfearn testified that the partnership was 'not going well.' After a Monday night meeting with other partners, Redfearn drove to Craig's house, told him he'd need to cancel upcoming trips, work more days and reduce his salary from a 35 per cent to 28 per cent cut. During the conversation, in admissions that 'came out of nowhere,' Redfearn said Craig broke down and told him 'that his marriage was in a bad place. 'He didn't elaborate, and I didn't feel the need to ask; it was more of just, things weren't good between him and Angie,' Redfearn testified. 'He cried.' Redfearn added that Craig's practice had numerous problems, including 'excessive spending.' Craig took the pay cut portion of the conversation better than he expected, Redfearn testified. Two months later, however, Angela fell ill. Redfearn was pulling into the hospital complex on March 15, the day she was declared brain dead, when he was told by employees that Craig had received a delivery of potassium cyanide to the office earlier that week. Testifying that he was 'shocked,' Redfearn told jurors he joined Craig in the ICU waiting room and looked up symptoms of potassium cyanide poisoning on his phone. He pulled aside a nurse at the hospital to share his concerns, Redfearn testified. 'I even think I said to him ... "I'm not accusing anyone of anything, I don't know what's going on here, but I just received some information that she might have been poisoned,"' Redfearn told the court. Craig was arrested the day after his wife's March 18, 2023 death. Family friend and business associate Dr Ryan Redfearn testified on Friday that Craig's practice had multiple problems, including 'excessive spending' - with the dentist told to cancel trips and work more days He said he didn't know at the time 'if there was any way to save her' or if a 'reversal agent' existed but he knew that 'time was of the essence, probably.' Redfearn was later brought to speak to a forensic nurse, he said, and after that left the hospital with his wife - but told Angela's brother and the family's bishop, who'd also been in the waiting room, about his concerns. He 'felt it was important to tell somebody, and we went to our car,' Redfearn testified. That's when Craig called. 'He said that he'd heard some disturbing news about me talking to somebody at the hospital, and I acknowledged that I had talked to a nurse,' Redfearn testified. Redfearn then confronted Craig about the package delivery, he said. 'I said, "Jim, what was in the package?" And he ... kind of blew it off, [like] it's not that big of a deal,' Redfearn testified. Upon further pressing, Redfearn told the court, Craig 'said it was a ring for Angie to surprise her. "And I said, "It wasn't a ring, Jim" - and he said, "Well, it wasn't opened." And I said, "It was." 'And I said, "Why do you need potassium cyanide?" 'His first response was: "Ryan, what have you done?" Redfearn said. 'He said that a couple of times, and I continued to ask him: "Why do you need potassium cyanide? That is not something that we need in dentistry or that we practice with."' Craig told him 'it was a game of chicken with Angie.' 'What do you mean by that?' Redfearn testified he asked Craig. 'And he said that she was suicidal and he bought it for her because she couldn't buy it herself, that you needed special credentials.' The following day, Redfearn testified, Craig sent a 'pretty lengthy text.' Redfearn told the court he 'basically didn't want me to talk to anybody about what we talked about' and requested that Redfearn ask other employees not to speak with investigators, either. Angela had been declared brain dead on March 15, the day Redfearn alerted nurses. She was taken off life support on March 18, and Craig was arrested the following day. The trial continues on Monday.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Bangladeshis linked to Hasina regime appear to have made UK property transactions in past year
By the time Bangladesh's student-led revolution finally toppled Sheikh Hasina, her security forces had already spilled the blood of hundreds of protesters. Now, almost a year after the country's autocratic leader fled the former British colony into exile, an interim government is struggling to navigate bitter factional politics and economic turmoil. Against that traumatic backdrop, a Knightsbridge townhouse in London, or a mansion on a private road in Surrey, seem worlds away. Yet luxury UK real estate is playing a central role in the drama. Investigators in Dhaka have been sifting through allegations that powerful and politically connected figures under the previous regime exploited senior positions to loot state contracts and the banking system, channelling millions into UK property. In May, the National Crime Agency (NCA) – sometimes called Britain's FBI – froze £90m of property belonging to members of the Rahman family, whose UK portfolio was revealed in a Guardian investigation last year. Three weeks later, the NCA froze more than £170m of assets belonging to Saifuzzaman Chowdhury, a former land minister in the Hasina government who amassed a vast fortune during her tenure that included more than 300 UK properties, ranging from apartments to lavish townhouses. Now, an investigation by the Guardian and the campaign group Transparency International has found that several Bangladeshis who are under scrutiny in Dhaka appear to have either sold, transferred or refinanced UK property since the revolution began. The transactions raise questions about the freedom with which those under suspicion have continued to conduct business in London, as well as the due diligence performed by UK law firms and consultants who helped facilitate the transactions. Leading figures in Bangladesh's interim government are now calling on Britain to err on the side of caution by freezing more UK property assets while the authorities in Dhaka complete their investigations. London property could now play a starring role in what has been billed by some as a long overdue anti-corruption purge – but by others as a politically motivated witch-hunt. The London five-star hotel the Dorchester, where rooms cost upwards of £800 a night, may not seem the most appropriate base from which to take aim at a decadent elite. Yet the Mayfair hotel's plush rooms served as the temporary home of a large Bangladeshi government delegation that visited in early June, led by the interim premier, Muhammad Yunus, on a mission to forge stronger ties with the UK. London is of particular importance to Bangladesh, due in part to the huge diaspora in the capital, but also to the UK's offer of support to track assets that investigators in Dhaka think may have been obtained using laundered money. Ahsan Mansur, the central bank governor who is leading his country's efforts to repatriate assets, wants more measures such as those issued against Chowdhury and the Rahmans. 'We are aware of efforts to liquidate assets and we would like the UK government to consider more freezing orders,' Mansur said. Measures to block transactions would, he said, 'give us hope of following due process to repatriate assets'. His call was echoed by the chair of Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). Last month, Mohammad Abdul Momen said he had asked the NCA to consider freezing the assets of several individuals, amid a flurry of post-revolutionary property market activity. Disclosures to the UK Land Registry show at least 20 'applications for dealing' have been submitted in the past year in relation to property owned by figures under scrutiny by Dhaka. Such documents typically indicate a sale, transfer or change to a mortgage. Three relate to £24.5m worth of property ultimately owned by members of the Sobhan family, the powerful dynasty behind the multibillion-pound Bashundhara business group, a conglomerate that spans cement to media. One, a four-storey townhouse in Knightsbridge, has been the subject of two recent transactions, the purpose of which are unclear. Until April last year, it was owned directly by Sayem Sobhan Anvir, Bashundhara's managing director, via a company based in the United Arab Emirates. Sobhan is among several family members under investigation by the ACC for allegations including money laundering, the Guardian understands. In April, the property was transferred – apparently free of charge – to a UK business called Brookview Heights Ltd. Brookview is owned by a director of Orbis London, a real estate advisory firm with offices in Liechtenstein and Singapore that has acted for the Sobhans on property transactions in the past. The London home appears to have subsequently been sold for £7.35m to a newly formed company, whose sole director is an accountant with no online profile. The accountant is registered as the owner and director of multiple other companies that appear to be special purpose vehicles for multimillion-pound London properties. Land Registry records show that UK law firms have made two more applications for dealing on properties owned by another member of the Sobhan family, Shafiat, including an £8m mansion in Virginia Water, Surrey. A family member did not return a request for comment but has previously said that the family deny 'all allegations of wrongdoing and will robustly defend ourselves against these allegations'. Members of the Sobhan family are among a clutch of UK property owners whose assets the ACC has asked the NCA to consider freezing. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Two more individuals have come under scrutiny from the ACC as part of investigations into Chowdhury. Both have engaged in multiple property deals over the past year. One is Chowdhury's brother, Anisuzzaman, while the other is a successful British-Bangladeshi property developer, whom the Guardian has chosen not to name. Land Registry data shows recent market activity on four properties owned by Anisuzzaman Chowdhury. They include the sale of a £10m Georgian townhouse on the fringes of Regent's Park, central London, completed last July. A further three applications, understood to relate to refinancing, have taken place since. Lawyers for Anisuzzaman Chowdhury said he did not believe that there was any legitimate reason for any of his assets to be frozen and that the sale of the Regent's Park property was agreed in 2023, before the revolution. According to reports in Bangladesh, the ACC has previously been asked by the chair of a large local bank, UCB, to investigate whether Chowdhury helped the London-based property developer obtain loans irregularly from the lender. This year, a Bangladeshi court imposed a travel ban on the developer, who denies any wrongdoing. A further three applications for dealing relate to properties owned by the son and the nephew of Salman F Rahman, who runs the Beximco business group, one of Bangladesh's largest conglomerates. Ahmed Shayan Rahman and Ahmed Shahryar Rahman are under investigation by the ACC. The properties, including a £35m apartment in Mayfair's Grosvenor Square, were frozen by the NCA last month. Lawyers for the Rahmans said they denied any wrongdoing. They said 'political upheaval' in Bangladesh had led to allegations being made against many people, adding that they would 'engage with any investigation which takes place in the UK'. Joe Powell MP, the chair of an all-party parliamentary group examining corruption and tax, wants any such investigations to move quickly. 'History tells us that assets can quickly evaporate unless swift steps are taken to freeze those assets while investigations are under way,' he said. Powell welcomed the action already taken by the NCA but urged it to 'expand the net as soon as possible'. The Labour MP leads a group of parliamentarians that is targeting London's reputation as a home for suspicious funds and those who enable the transfer of that wealth, particularly given the renewed focus on oligarchs that followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Transparency International is raising questions over the role played by multiple UK firms that have acted for individuals the NCA has already targeted, or who the ACC has named. The law firm Jaswal Johnston submitted applications on properties owned by the Rahmans. A spokesperson said the firm had not been involved in any sales and that it took its due diligence obligations 'extremely seriously'. Merali Beedle, a law firm that made applications for dealing on one £35m Rahman property and another £8m home owned by a member of the Sobhan family, declined to comment. A spokesperson for Transparency International said: 'Professional services firms should exercise extreme caution when conducting regulated activities for clients known to be under investigation. They should perform comprehensive source-of-wealth checks and immediately report suspicious activity to police. 'Without swift action, these funds risk vanishing into the international financial system, potentially placing them beyond recovery.' The ACC declined to comment on its investigations.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Border Force chief who ‘suggested game of Naked Attraction' with colleagues was able to leave civil service with unblemished record
A Home Office investigation has found one of its most senior officials harassed and behaved inappropriately towards a female colleague, before being able to leave the civil service with an unblemished record after a 'shambolic' disciplinary process. The case has caused such alarm in the department that the new permanent secretary, Antonia Romeo, has ordered an immediate review of complaints, conduct and disciplinary procedures to 'ensure confidence in the integrity of the system'. Steve Dann, the former chief operating officer (COO) of Border Force, was effectively banned from visiting the organisation's offices in Paris in 2023 after he suggested to female officers that regional directors could play a game of Naked Attraction, the Channel 4 dating show in which contestants stand in front of each other fully nude. He told investigators he did not recall the incident. Dann, who was in the £120,000-a-year post for four years, faced other allegations of misogynistic name-calling and making comments to women with sexual connotations, according to Home Office sources. He denied the allegations, suggesting comments had been taken out of context and that selective evidence had been used during the investigation by the Home Office's professional standards unit (PSU). He acknowledged during the process that some of his comments may have been careless, but said he had never intended to upset or offend. After a chaotic HR process, which one source said was littered with 'procedural errors and delays', the original grievance was eventually upheld on appeal. However, Dann was not informed about the process until the initial stage was completed. He was also subject to a parallel misconduct investigation into the claims which was not upheld. Dann decided to leave the Home Office in December last year, standing down as the COO of Border Force, a role that placed him at the centre of the organisation's key responsibilities, including securing the UK's borders by enforcing immigration regulations and patrolling coastlines during the small-boats crisis. He has since entered the private sector in the field of security and law enforcement operations, and public safety. The complainant first reported Dann in February 2024, after working with him for 18 months. An initial internal grievance inquiry was launched two months later, with the final PSU report quoting named Home Office officials who appeared to confirm a series of sexist and misogynistic comments, according to sources. While the complaint was not initially upheld, it was later upheld on appeal in October 2024. Dann was not involved in this process and was not given the opportunity to respond. At the same time a separate misconduct process was launched, also based on evidence in the PSU report. This was not upheld, no formal disciplinary sanction was imposed, and there was no record of it on Dann's file, although Home Office sources said he was asked to undergo training in response. The claims being investigated included the colleague being told in a voice note that she was 'very pretty', which the PSU report concluded was 'reasonable' for her to have interpreted as harassment. Other comments were described by the report as 'inappropriate and offensive' and 'unprofessional topics with a sexual connotation'. According to sources, the report said he messaged about one person who attended a meeting suggesting that she had a 'porn star name', which he told the inquiry was meant in a 'lighthearted' way. On a separate occasion, he was said to have misnamed a female colleague 'kinky', although he later admitted this had been a 'careless' thing to say. During a discussion on the diversity of his office, Dann allegedly said: 'Don't forget the sweaty woman in the corner', referring to a colleague going through menopause. In the report, he denied making this comment. In another meeting, in December 2022, he asked junior colleagues if they knew what a 'fluffer' was, and then explained it was 'someone whose job was to keep a porn star's penis erect', sources said. He denied to investigators that he had made the remarks. On the official visit to Border Force in Paris in April 2023, he brought up the Channel 4 naked dating show Naked Attraction to two female officers working in intelligence. In remarks corroborated by witnesses, he added: 'We were thinking it could be all the regional directors and, you know, people had to look at it and guess whose penis it was.' The officers were 'very shocked' by the conversation and felt 'incredibly uncomfortable', a senior official told investigators, but when they were asked if they wanted to make a complaint they said they would prefer that Dann not return to the Paris office. This was reported to Border Force chiefs. Dann told them he did not recall the incident. One senior official who witnessed the exchange said they were 'disappointed' by Dann's conduct, which they felt was 'inappropriate'. Several others said they considered that he was 'prone to oversharing' about his private life at work, sources with knowledge of the report said. The appeal, which was based on the same evidence in the PSU report, was finally concluded eight months after the initial complaint. It was after the Labour government entered office, and six weeks later Dann left his role, declaring that after nine years at the Home Office it was time to 'embrace new challenges'. In a letter to the complainant in October 2024, the Home Office upheld the grievance, acknowledging that Dann's conduct had fallen below the standards expected from a senior official and was in breach of the department's policies on appropriate behaviour, sources said. However, Dann – who was previously a 'people champion' and diversity lead in the civil service, roles that focused on improving the workplace environment, as well as representing the organisation in parliament and in the media – avoided any formal consequences because the separate earlier disciplinary process had already concluded and the rules meant it could not be reopened. According to sources, Dann told the initial investigation he had worked incredibly hard in a stressful frontline environment. Much of his time running Border Force operations was when the Tory government was struggling to get control of irregular migration, including small-boat crossings. Several of the witnesses said they had not been offended by his behaviour. However others, including senior civil servants and junior frontline operational staff, found his conduct inappropriate and unprofessional, according to sources who have seen the final PSU report and with knowledge of the final outcome. During the PSU investigation, Dann denied some of his conduct and said other incidents had been taken out of context, and that selected evidence had been used. But sources said he added that 'on reflection' there had been times when some of his comments had been 'careless', although they were not meant in a malicious way. When approached by the Guardian, he declined to comment. Yvette Cooper, who was home secretary throughout the latter part of the grievance process, has repeatedly and vocally called out workplace discrimination, misogyny and harassment. The case was flagged with her office although she is understood not to have been personally aware. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'While we do not comment on individual HR cases, where there are allegations of inappropriate behaviour or sexual harassment the Home Office will investigate and take appropriate action. 'The Home Office expects the highest standard from all members of staff and does not tolerate anyone displaying or taking part in unacceptable behaviour. 'The new permanent secretary has already commissioned a review of complaints, conduct and disciplinary procedures, to ensure absolute confidence in the integrity of the system.'
