Wales have belief to cause upset against England, says Angharad James
Currently sitting bottom of Group D, Wales have yet to win a match at Euro 2025 having fallen to defeat against the Netherlands and France in their first major tournament.
But as the Dragons face a crunch clash with rivals England, James believes her side can get one over the Lionesses and knock them out of the competition.
'The pressure is all on England. They have to come out, they have to perform and they're expected to win this game,' she explained.
'Within our group, we believe that we can upset a very top team. We've prepared as normal and we're ready for the fight tomorrow.
'There's no hiding behind the history of Wales vs England. Whatever sport you're playing in, it's a rivalry match and it's one that everyone wants to play in.
'As a group, we've come on so much since the first game and the second game was such a big improvement from us. We're looking to step it up again in this game.'
Having lost 3-0 to the Netherlands in the opening match, Wales made history in the second game through 38-year-old Jess Fishlock.
The Dragons legend latched onto Ceri Holland's pass at the back post to turn home the first major international tournament goal in Wales' history.
It saw them equalise against France in the 13th minute but Les Bleues went on to win 4-1.
'Moments win or lose you games,' reflected James. 'We've been so close to those moments. Looking at the game it's 4-1 against France, but it wasn't a 4-1 game if you watch the game.
'Those small margins are what we need to work towards as a group and we're prepared to have those honest and hard conversations to make sure that we keep improving and keep moving in the right direction.'
The Wales squad have been turning to history in search of those small moments. In 2018, the national team held England to a 0-0 draw at St. Mary's Stadium in Southampton, leaving Jayne Ludlow to hail it the greatest performance in their history at the time.
Ten members of the current squad were involved in that performance and have been drawing inspiration from the embattled display in the hopes of pulling off a result of an even greater magnitude.
'You don't forget when you get a result against England, that's for sure,' said James.
'We've spoken about it and a lot of time has gone on since then and new players have come into the squad.
'We've got a nice mixture of younger players, more experienced players and there's a really nice blend within the group.'
Just as back then, midfielder James is expecting another physical contest against an England side who need a win to ensure their progression to the Euro 2025 quarter-finals.
'As soon as this group got announced, we knew they were going to be three tough games, three very competitive games and three games that, as a midfielder, you love to play in,' she said.
'This group has come very far the last few games and we're looking to step it up again against England.
'The rivalry, the history behind Wales-England, whether it's football, rugby, whatever, we're ready for the fight.
'We'll be preparing the best we can in the next 24 hours to bring all of that.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
23 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Noni Madueke eyes ‘great success' at Arsenal after £48m arrival from Chelsea
Arsenal's £48 million (€55 million) arrival Noni Madueke said his new club are capable of winning it all after leaving Chelsea to become Mikel Arteta's fourth signing of the summer. Madueke's controversial move across London, which provoked a backlash from some Arsenal supporters, takes the club's spending to beyond £120 million so far. Advertisement Madueke, who has signed a five-year contract, follows Spain midfielder Martin Zubimendi, goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga, who also joined from Chelsea, and Christian Norgaard in moving to the Emirates in the off-season, with Valencia defender Cristhian Mosquera's £13m deal also expected to be finalised shortly. Arsenal remain hopeful of signing striker Viktor Gyokeres from Sporting Lisbon, although it is not believed a deal, which could be worth as much as £65m, is imminent. Madueke, 23, will provide competition to Bukayo Saka and Gabriel Martinelli in Arsenal's wide areas and the club are confident his arrival will help fire them to a first Premier League title in two decades. But the transfer, which could exceed £52m with performance-related add-ons, has been met with severe criticism by Arsenal supporters on social media. A petition against the England international's move to the Emirates has attracted more than 5,000 signatures. Advertisement However, Madueke said: 'I'm somebody who goes with my gut feeling a lot of the time and I feel like it's steered me in the right direction so far. So I don't think it's going to be any different here. I think it's going to be a great success and I'm really happy to be here. 'I've just been relaxed, waiting for the green light and when I came in today, it all felt real. I'm really happy and really proud, so it's a great moment for me. Noni Madueke For a Young 23 year old English footballer to be vilified, bullied, embarrassed and totally strip down at a time when you're meant to be celebrating a transfer worth £55 million. Yes a young kid with a dream about to secure a £55 million dream move to a club of his… — Rio Ferdinand (@rioferdy5) July 12, 2025 'It's already a great team with a clear identity and I can't wait to bring my style to the team and try and help the boys as much as possible to take that next step. (I want) to win all the competitions we're in, I feel like we're definitely capable of doing that.' In a post on X, former England and Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand said Madueke had been 'vilified', 'bullied' and 'embarrassed' by the backlash. Advertisement He added: 'It's fine for fans to disagree with signings or decisions made at their football club but the way some fans have publicly voiced their opinions and those who have gone a step further in publicly joining a petition for this player not to be signed by their football club is beyond me. 'I have never seen anything like this before, and I hope I don't ever again. Like I said earlier just imagine this was your best friend, one of your family members, your brother, son, then tell me how would you feel if they were on the receiving end of this vulgar behaviour? Noni Madueke has left Chelsea to join Arsenal (Jane Barlow/PA) 'I just hope Noni Madueke rams all of this negativity back down the throats of these impostors.' Madueke left Chelsea's eventual Club World Cup-winning campaign in the United States last Friday to undergo his medical at Arsenal. Advertisement He scored 11 times for Chelsea across all competitions last season and was rewarded with his first senior international appearances under England interim manager Lee Carsley and his permanent successor Thomas Tuchel. Madueke will be absent from Arsenal's upcoming tour of Singapore and Hong Kong following Chelsea's post-season exploits at the Club World Cup.
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
England v India: second women's cricket ODI
Update: Date: 2025-07-19T09:00:19.000Z Title: Preamble Content: Charlotte Edwards is the best women's cricket coach in the world*. But even she can't build Rome in a day. The scale of Edwards' job has revealed itself in the last month, with her England side fighting tooth and nail just to stay in the India's slipstream. They were flattered by a 3-2 defeat in the T20 series and were beaten with deceptive comfort in Thursday's first ODI. If India win at Lord's today, England will have lost two white-ball series at home in the space of 11 days. Edwards will surely succeed in time, but there could be more short-term pain than we envisaged. The upcoming 50-over World Cup is in India and Sri Lanka; for a team who bat so awkwardly against spin, this is not entirely optimal. It's hard to see them beating the favourites at the World Cup, although New Zealand's glorious T20 triumph last year was a reminder that you can achieve anything with Maureen Mentum on your side. First England need to built that momentum, ideally by winning this ODI series. Or at least drawing it: it's bucketing down at Lord's, with a forecast for a whole lot more. Toss** 10.30am First ball** 11am * Probably. This is a live blog, not a judicial review. If you have a different opinion, that's fine. As Clint Eastwood said, opinions are like foibles; everyone's got dozens. ** Not happening
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
The mathematics of the perfect penalty shootout
Professional footballers sometimes use a mathematical strategy to help them score a penalty, or save one – and it all comes down to randomness. As we reach the latter stages of any major football tournament, penalty shootouts between evenly matched teams seem almost to be an inevitability. An absorbing spectacle for neutral watchers, agonising for the fans of the teams involved, and potentially career-defining for the players – the penalty shootout offers a form of sporting drama almost unrivalled in its acute tension. And so it transpired on Thursday night, when England and Sweden couldn't be separated over normal and then extra time in their Euro 2025 quarter final (read more analysis of the game on BBC Sport). Up stepped Allessia Russo for England to take the first kick putting it just beyond the reach of the diving Swedish keeper Jennifer Falk. But England would not score again for the next three kicks. Falk dived the right way and saved all three. When the camera cut to Falk before England's fifth penalty she could be seen consulting her water bottle on which the names of the England penalty takers and their preferred penalty direction were listed. Fortunately for England, Sweden were equally wayward with their penalties – goalkeeper Hannah Hampton saving two while two others missed the goal completely – leaving the sides tied on two scored and four missed after six penalties each. Up stepped stalwart defender Lucy Bronze to take what would transpire to be England's last penalty; blasting it right down the middle over the legs of a diving Falk. Teenager Smilla Holmberg then skied Sweden's final spot kick to spark scenes of jubilation amongst the England players. (Read more analysis on the shootout on BBC Sport.) In her interview after the game, Bronze (whose mum is a maths teacher, and who achieved a very apt bronze award in the UK Mathematics Trust challenge while at school) discussed why she chose to blast her penalty straight down the middle. "I watched the goalkeeper, and every single penalty she dived quite early. Statistically it's risky for the keeper to stand still… So yeah, I love maths." Bronze's comments raise an important question: can mathematics help players determine how they should take their penalties? What can they do to make it more likely that they hit the back of the net? Should they go high or low, left or right or perhaps down the middle? Should they put their boot through it as hard as they can or should they aim for placement above all else? Does it pay off to opt for a "Panenka" – a chipped penalty kick down the centre of the goal relying on the keeper diving one way or the other? Audaciously brilliant if it works, but embarrassing if the keeper doesn't buy the dummy and the ball floats gently into their open hands. When all the rivalries, the personalities and the occasion are stripped away, penalty taking is a very simple sort of game with just two players: the taker and the keeper. Fortunately there is a branch of mathematical sciences, known as Game Theory, dedicated to understanding and interrogating the dynamics of such simple competitions. To use the language of that subject, penalty taking is a zero-sum game: for the taker to score the keeper has to concede and for the keeper to triumph they must ether save the shot or rely on the taker missing. Either way, there is only one winner. As outlined above, the kicker has a variety of strategies from which to choose when taking the penalty and the keeper has a corresponding range of options when attempting to block the shot. For the sake of simplicity though, let's just think about three options for the placement of the penalty kick: to the left, to the right or down the middle – and the same three options that the keeper can use to attempt to save. Let's also imagine, as is usually the case, that both the taker and the keeper make up their minds about what their strategy will be in advance. As four of the seven English penalty takers in the quarter-final shoot out discovered, no single strategy like "always aim right" is going to be optimal, precisely because it makes you predictable and predictability can be exploited, as so expertly demonstrated by Sweden's goalkeeper Jennifer Falk. There is no single best place to put your penalties. In fact, the optimal strategy to use when taking penalties might just be what game theorists call a "mixed strategy". This is an approach in which a player deliberately introduces unpredictability into their decisions to prevent opponents from exploiting patterns. In the context of penalty taking, this would involve the taker aiming at a different, randomly chosen position each time. Not all players opt for this strategy, but even if they do, a perfectly random approach is difficult to achieve. Preferences for a particular placement can sometimes become apparent – hence Falk's notes on England's penalty takers' habits written on her water bottle. A 2002 study found that, rather than consistently favouring one side of the goal, penalty takers in two of Europe's top leagues chose randomly between kicking to the left, the right or down the middle. Remember, though, that this is not the same as simply alternating sides, which is an entirely non-random and easily predictable strategy. Football is by no means the only sport in which a mixed strategy might pay dividends. In tennis, the serve is one of the most potent weapons a player has in their arsenal. Pro players might expect to win about two-thirds of the points on their serve which translates to winning 86% of their service games. For the elite this percentage is even higher. In the recent men's Wimbledon final, defending champion Carlos Alcaraz won 73% (121 of 165) of his service points, whilst world number one and eventual winner Jannik Sinner won 76% (116 of 152) of his. Part of the advantage of the serve comes from its speed, leaving the receiving player relatively little time to react. Typically, there are two options for serves in elite level tennis, either "down the middle" or "out wide". Being able to predict which of these two strategies an opponent will use on their service games would give the returner an advantage, enabling them to anticipate, prepare and execute a return of serve. So again the optimal strategy for the server is to mix things up by randomly selecting between the two options to keep the receiver literally on their toes. Analysing almost half a million serves from over 3,000 matches, Romain Gauriot, an economics researcher at Deakin University in Melbourne, Australia, and his colleagues found that professional tennis players adopt a near-optimal strategy when it comes to switching between the different serve types. Interestingly they also found that junior level players diverge quite substantially from the optimal strategy – serving in a more predictable manner, suggesting that perfecting a mixed strategy is something that pro tennis players have either learned to do, or is a trait that has helped them reach the professional ranks. Beyond the world of sport, mixed strategies have been adopted in a variety of different arenas ranging from politics to business to hunting. It is believed that for hundreds of years, the Naskapi people of eastern Canada have been using a randomised strategy to help them hunt. Their direction-choosing ceremony involves burning the bones of previously caught caribou and using the random scorch marks which appear in order to determine the direction for the next hunt. It is suggested that divesting this decision to an essentially random process circumvents the inevitable repetitiveness of human-made decisions. Some academics have argued that this reduces both the likelihood of depleting the prey in a particular region of the forest and the probability of the hunted animals learning where humans like to hunt and deliberately avoiding those areas, although others have cast doubt on how effective this mixed strategy would be in practice. In recent experiments into the impacts of emotional unpredictability, management students were asked to negotiate a hypothetical venture with each other according to some pre-specified rules. In one scenario, negotiators were asked to be relentlessly negative and angry, while in another, they were asked to frequently change their emotional tone between positive and negative. The students whose counterparts displayed emotional unpredictability were made to feel as though they lacked control over the negotiations, leading them to make larger concessions and irresolute demands. More like this: Political leaders employing mixed strategies aim to appear erratic and volatile to manipulate adversaries. One particular mixed strategy, a form of brinkmanship known in political science as the Madman Theory, was the basis of much of Richard Nixon's foreign policy in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The aim, as the name would suggest, was to convince Nixon's communist opponents that he was more than a little unhinged. He reasoned that if his opponents judged him to be an irrational actor, they would not be able to predict his plays and would thus have to make more concessions to avoid the risk of accidentally triggering him into retaliation. More recently, observers have argued that President Donald Trump is also harnessing the power of unpredictability by resurrecting Nixon's Madman ideology in his trade negotiations as well as his dealings in the Middle East and Ukraine. (Read Allan Little's analysis of Trump's use of Madman Theory.) Whether we are on the football pitch, the tennis court or the boardroom, game theory teaches us that predictable decisions can give our opponents the upper hand. Mixed strategies remind us that raw talent isn't everything and that randomness in how our skills are deployed can have a big impact. Staying unpredictable might be our most predictable path to victory. -- For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
