logo
Government urged to introduce minimum price for alcohol

Government urged to introduce minimum price for alcohol

Leading alcohol health experts urged the UK Government to take steps to 'protect the public', including the introduction of minimum unit pricing (MUP) – a policy which sets the lowest price an alcoholic drink can be sold for.
MUPs have already been introduced in Scotland and Wales.
Minimum unit pricing for alcohol was associated with a 13% decrease in deaths from alcohol consumption in Scotland, according to a new study.
Read this and more in our latest issue: https://t.co/ydjx6DVTxa pic.twitter.com/6vQKZ6cxIs
— The Lancet (@TheLancet) April 21, 2023
A consultation was launched by Welsh officials on Wednesday to maintain MUP for alcohol in Wales beyond March 2026, and raising the unit price from 50p to 65p.
The Welsh Government said that the number of harmful drinkers could be reduced by nearly 5,000 people as a result of the plans.
It comes as officials in England have been urged to introduce a MUP after health experts warned that plans to tackle problem drinking 'are not sufficient to address the scale and complexity of harm'.
Academics, medics and charities from around the country have urged ministers to take 'ambitious' action to tackle the 'scale of the current crisis'.
The UK Government recently set out plans to improve the health of people in England over the next decade.
But in a letter to Health Secretary Wes Streeting, shared with the PA news agency, experts said that the public 'want and deserve' more action to tackle the harms.
The letter has been signed by 34 health leaders from leading health organisations including the Alcohol Health Alliance; the Royal College of Physicians; the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine.
Experts have called for a series of measures, including:
– A call for the introduction of MUP in England, as seen in Scotland and Wales.
– Giving local authorities the power to regulate hours of sale and online deliveries of alcohol.
– For advertising regulations for alcohol to be 'aligned' with those for foods high in fat, salt and sugar.
– A change to alcohol tax, linking duties to inflation and ending 'cider exceptionalism'.
– More funding and support for local alcohol care teams.
The authors conclude: 'The public want and deserve action, and we stand ready to work with Government to deliver real progress.
'By taking meaningful and co-ordinated action now, the burden of alcohol harm can fall significantly within the term of this Government, with visible results for families, the NHS, crime, and the economy.'
The Department of Health and Social Care said it will continue to consider the most effective interventions to reduce alcohol harms.
A spokesperson said: 'As we shift from sickness to prevention through our 10-Year Health Plan, we will make it mandatory for alcoholic drinks to display health warnings and nutritional information.
'To improve drug and alcohol treatment services and recovery support in England, the Government has also provided an additional £310 million in 2025/26, on top of the public health grant.'
A spokesperson for the Portman Group said: 'As the alcohol industry regulatory body for marketing, we welcome the chance to work constructively with the Government on the proposals within its 10 year plan to help more consumers make an informed choice and drink moderately.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jersey women forced to travel for abortion face no financial help unless it is 'medically necessary'
Jersey women forced to travel for abortion face no financial help unless it is 'medically necessary'

ITV News

time8 hours ago

  • ITV News

Jersey women forced to travel for abortion face no financial help unless it is 'medically necessary'

Campaigners have hit out at Jersey's government as it was revealed that while proposed changes to the island's abortion law will allow longer for terminations, women will have to travel off-island for treatment after 13 weeks and pay for it themselves unless it is deemed "medically necessary". Those seeking an abortion from 13 weeks to 21 weeks and six days, which is the suggested new limit for most terminations, would have to foot the bill for the procedure, as well as travel to the UK and accommodation. The draft law states this is because abortions can only be performed in Jersey before 13 weeks due to "workforce constraints and the need to provide safe services" - there is an exception for urgent medical situations. Rachael Clarke from the UK's leading abortion care charity, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, says Jersey lags behind other British Islands. She explains: "Unfortunately, Jersey seems to have made this decision that they don't want to help those women, even though their abortions would be legal if there were someone on island who could provide them. "That's an incredibly different position from what's in place in Guernsey and the Isle of Man, where if a woman needs an abortion that she can't access locally, she's funded to travel to England. "That's exactly what happens with all other forms of healthcare ... so the decision not to fund abortions seems to be specific and only because women's choices are being judged. "What we really need is government to step up and take responsibility." Ms Clarke says aspects of the proposed changes, such as legislating for women to access abortions later, are positive, but they only work if they can be put into practice. She adds: "In essence, it's completely pointless to change the law for women if you're not going to enable them to access the services that the law allows. "We're talking about such a small number but for those women, the impact on their lives of having to continue a pregnancy and raise a child that they really would have preferred not to is incredibly difficult." Ms Clarke says private abortions can cost up to £1,500 in the UK, without factoring in travel and accommodation, as the Government has confirmed that Jersey residents are not entitled to free NHS terminations. Abortions under 13 weeks can be carried out in Jersey and cost £185 for women who have lived in the island for at least six months. Some can also receive this on-island treatment for free, such as those on income support, aged under 18, in full-time education, or pregnant as a result of rape or incest. However, these groups are not covered after 13 weeks and would face the same travel and treatment fees, unless there is a medical exemption. In response to concerns over the draft law, Deputy Andy Howell, Jersey's Assistant Health Minister, says: "I'm really sorry but we just can't pay for everything, but we want people to know that if you go early then it's much less traumatic and we've got a really lovely councillor who can help you and is there at all times. "Try to go early, try to recognise that you might be pregnant early and then seek help." Deputy Howell adds: "I understand the concerns some islanders may have, however, very few Jersey residents have non-medically necessary terminations in the UK. "In 2022, the last available data, fewer than five Jersey residents had terminations in the UK, which includes women having medically necessary terminations. "Women are, instead, opting for earlier stage terminations in Jersey, which are lower risk than later-stage terminations, so our priority is to support access to those terminations." The proposition is expected to be brought to the States for debate by the end of the year.

NHS under fire for delaying a ban on trans-women using female-only wards, changing rooms and toilets until the autumn
NHS under fire for delaying a ban on trans-women using female-only wards, changing rooms and toilets until the autumn

Daily Mail​

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

NHS under fire for delaying a ban on trans-women using female-only wards, changing rooms and toilets until the autumn

The NHS has come under fire for delaying a ban on trans-women using female-only wards, changing rooms and toilets until the autumn. Health secretary Wes Streeting promised new guidance in April, after the Supreme Court ruled biological men should be barred from women's single-sex spaces. But NHS England has no plans to bring out the guidance until 'late summer or early autumn', meaning it may not be published until October or November. Women's rights charities said hospitals and GP surgeries are putting females in an 'undignified and humiliating' position by failing to comply with the law. The group Sex Matters told the Telegraph it has been contacted by staff at several English trusts who had raised objections to biological men in female facilities but were rebuffed. NHS England's delay comes even though a health trust in Scotland faces making a huge payout to a nurse who was forced to share a changing room with a trans doctor. Helen Joyce, the director of advocacy at Sex Matters, said: 'NHS England's failure to forbid unlawful policies permitting trans-identifying hospital staff to use changing rooms for the opposite sex is staggeringly complacent. 'Sex Matters has heard from staff in several English trusts who have objected to such self-ID policies without success. 'All around the country, it seems as if lazy, self-satisfied bureaucrats are leaving female staff to face undignified and humiliating conditions rather than admit that the 'inclusive' policies they put in place were always unlawful and harmful to women.' The Supreme Court ruled that a trans woman was not legally a woman because the word 'sex' in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, not self-identified gender. It means services segregated by sex, such as toilets and changing rooms, should be segregated by biological sex. Many public bodies have already started observing the rules. But NHS England has still not acted, despite prime minister Sir Keir Starmer telling organisations to comply with the law 'as soon as possible'. The national NHS guidance on same-sex accommodation, published in September 2019, says: 'Good practice requires that clinical responses be patient-centred, respectful and flexible towards all transgender people whether they live continuously or temporarily in a gender role that does not conform to their natal sex.' It adds: 'Trans people should be accommodated according to their presentation: the way they dress, and the name and pronouns they currently use. 'This may not always accord with the physical sex appearance of the chest or genitalia. 'It does not depend on their having a gender recognition certificate or legal name change.' The NHS Confederation, which represents trusts and other health organisations, withdrew its guidance two months ago. The original guidance said trans people should be allowed to use their chosen toilets and changing rooms. Ms Joyce said NHS trusts faced huge pay-outs if they did not update their guidance to comply with the law. In Fife, the NHS is defending itself in an employment tribunal against nurse Sandie Peggie, who was suspended after objecting to a trans woman in the changing room. Ms Joyce said: 'In Scotland, NHS Fife has already wasted hundreds of thousands of pounds defending an employment tribunal brought by nurse Sandie Peggie. 'The eventual cost, which will be borne by taxpayers, could approach £1m. 'How many more Sandie Peggies have to put their reputations and livelihoods on the line before this ends?' Baroness Falkner, chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said in April: 'We've been speaking to the health service for an inordinately long time - we will now be asking them when they will be updating their advice.' NHS England said: 'The NHS is working through the implications of the ruling, and we absolutely recognise the need for revised guidance. 'It's important for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to publish its statutory guidance before final decisions about future policy are taken. 'In the meantime, we are working closely with Government to ensure we can provide updated guidance as soon as possible.'

Scottish Labour take £200k in private healthcare-linked donations
Scottish Labour take £200k in private healthcare-linked donations

The National

time10 hours ago

  • The National

Scottish Labour take £200k in private healthcare-linked donations

Welcome to this week's Branch Office Updates! Subscribe for free using the linked banner above. SCOTTISH Labour have been panned over research which finds its MPs have received nearly £200,000 from donors linked to private healthcare. The SNP have said that leader Anas Sarwar must 'come clean'. Earlier this year, EveryDoctor revealed that MPs had bagged more than £2.7m in donations from people with links to the private healthcare sector. READ MORE: Australian influencers 'damage' historic Jacobite site, as investigation launches Among those receiving the most donations was Health Secretary Wes Streeting who has pocketed a whopping £224,575. The organisation's research, however, also found that half of all Scottish Labour MPs – including Scottish Secretary Ian Murray (below) and Minister Kirsty McNeill – have received donations from companies or individuals linked directly or indirectly with private healthcare, worth a total of £192,071. The largest donor to Scottish MPs is the Labour Together Ltd think tank. It is primarily funded by Martin Taylor, who founded the hedge fund Crake Asset Management, as well as Trevor Chinn, a senior adviser to the private equity firm CVC Capital Partners. CVC has investments in dozens of private healthcare companies in the UK, Europe and Asia, whilst Taylor's firm has held millions worth of shares in firms including United Health and Elevance Health. Several Scottish Labour MPs – Gregor Poynton, Melanie Ward, and Martin McCluskey – have also benefited from donations from Danny Luhde-Thompson, who is an advisor to investment firm Quadrature Capital, which has had extensive shareholding in private healthcare firms. READ MORE: Ian Blackford to give shock return in Kate Forbes seat 'careful consideration' The donations have been declared in the proper manner and there is no suggestion of wrongdoing. But SNP MSP Clare Haughey has told The National that these figures are 'alarming to everyone who is serious about protecting the NHS". 'The volume and amount of donations involved show just how much influence these shadowy think tanks and hedge funds have within the Labour Party,' she added. 'Even before coming to power, Labour's Health Secretary Wes Streeting said that he would 'hold the door wide open' to private investment in the NHS. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to see why when you discover who is bankrolling the Labour Party.' Haughey went on: 'Anas Sarwar previously tried to dismiss Labour Together Ltd as a group on the 'fringes' of the Labour Party. The fact that they have funded half of his MPs would suggest they are far from being on the fringes but are in fact at the very heart of Labour. 'Sarwar must come clean on Scottish Labour's position on private healthcare, and whether his prospective MSPs will be getting bankrolled by groups with links to private healthcare. 'Whilst Labour has many questions to answer, one thing is clear – only the SNP will protect the NHS and ensure that healthcare is provided based on medical need rather than the ability to pay." A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: "All donations are declared in line with Parliamentary and Ministerial rules. "While one in six Scots are abandoned by the SNP on NHS waiting lists, the Labour Party – who created the NHS – will always make sure it remains free at the point of need on our watch."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store