
Trump Administration Halts NIH From Issuing Any New Research Grants
Things just got even tougher for science and scientists around the country and the countless patients and other people that their research could eventually benefit. For the past several months, many researchers in the U.S. have already had to deal with kind of a 'cancel culture' with their grants from the National Institutes of Health being abruptly held, cut or terminated if certain words, phrases or concepts appeared in them that didn't correspond with what the Trump Administration wanted. And now the Trump Administration is putting an immediate 'pause' on the NIH's ability to issue any new research grants, contracts or training awards to anyone outside the NIH.
The OMB Blocks The NIH From Providing New Funding
Yep, Angus Chen, Megan Molteni, and Anil Oza just reported for STAT how this directive came out of the White House Office of Management and Budget and was delivered as a four-sentence email to the directors of NIH institutes and centers on Tuesday afternoon. The email referred to a 'footnote' from the OMB regarding funding for the NIH and indicated that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 'has interpreted this footnote' to mean that new funding from the NIH would be prohibited for now but the NIH is 'working to make this limitation short-term and temporary.' That footnote could end up being quite a kick to the rears of grantees, awardees and contractors in universities, medical centers and other research organizations around the country.
It looks like any researcher expecting to receive funds from the NIH through either new awards or renewals of current awards may have to wait for it, wait for it, wait until who knows what needs to happen. Neither the OMB nor the NIH have clarified what will happen and what needs to happen to make funding available again. (I am reaching out to contacts at HHS and NIH for further comment.) This situation basically further handcuffs the NIH's ability to use money that Congress already allocated to the NIH to use this fiscal year. It's kind of like of your parents giving you an allowance and then someone else saying, 'Oh you can't use that.'
NIH Employees Prohibited From Spending Money On Purchases Or Travel
The OMB footnote will do some further kicking to those working within the NIH as well. That is those still working within the NIH. Since U.S. President Donald Trump took office, there have been multiple waves of different Rs at the NIH. And these Rs haven't exactly been rest and relaxation. They've been rounds of resignations, retirements and RIFs—meaning reductions in force. The remaining NIH employees will reportedly not be able to spend any more money on purchases or travel until the end of the current government fiscal year, which will be September 30.
Unspent NIH Funds Would Return To The U.S. Treasury After September 30
Speaking of the government fiscal year. Being only two months away from its end raises an even bigger concern. If this situation isn't 'short-term' and 'temporary' enough, it could soon become quite permanent. Once September 30 passes, money unspent by the NIH would automatically go back to the U.S. Treasury. So, in two months, researchers might have to sing 'bye-bye-bye' to the funding they thought they would receive. That certanly wouldn't be in sync with any of their staffing and scientific plans. This so-called 'temporary' situation could be a way of cutting NIH funding in a manner that bypasses Congress. This office of Senator Patty Murray (D-Washington) has estimated that the funds currently hanging in the balance may total around $15 billion.
NIH Funding Halt May Cause Even More Job Loss
I've written previously in Forbes about how the cutting and canceling of research grants will cause job loss. Unless we've entered some other world in the multi-verse, that still hold. Many scientists depend on NIH funding to pay their own salaries and fringe benefits as well those of their research staffs. When it's not clear when and if expected funding will arrive, there's only so long researchers can hold on, in the words of Wilson Phillips, before they have to lay off people or even lose their own positions.
And once a researcher or research staff member is lost, it can be tough to replace them. It's not as if you are simply looking for something to post something dumb on social media or be featured in the reality TV show 'Cheaters.' The U.S. doesn't have an unlimited supply of those with appropriate scientific talent, skills and drive. It can take a lot of time to find someone with the right stuff to fill a position. You can't simply tell the coaches or managers of the Los Angeles Dodgers, Philadelphia Eagles or Oklahoma City Thunder, 'Yeah, we know that you have been sort of successful. But we won't allow you to pay your players, so you are going to have to cut them. Oh, but don't worry, some day when you do have money, we aren't saying when and how, you can always find new players.'
NIH Funding Halt Will Have Widespread Ramifcations On Health And The Economy
If you don't do any scientific research and think this NIH funding halt won't affect you, think again. It's not as if the NIH funded researchers out there are spending their days posting random rants on social media. They are working hard, often day and night, on ways to prevent and treat different disease such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, cancer and a whole range of different infectious diseases, including those that may cause the 'p' word some day. Who knows how many lives will end being affected by these interruptions, disruptions and stoppages of such work? And no matter how healthy you think you are right now, no matter how much kombucha, eyes of newt or whatever you are consuming right now, you will run into health problems some day. You, your family members and your friends will.
Trying to keep as many Americans as healthy as possible shouldn't be a political thing. More Americans being healthy longer would mean more Americans to work and produce for society longer. That should be a win-win situation. Or a win-win-win situation. More legit biomedical and health research as opposed to more let's-just-say-it-happens-woo-woo should help the economy as well. More science-backed stuff would mean more stable and sustainable health products and interventions that can form the basis of more sustainable businesses.
Yet, this 'pause' in NIH funding is yet another blow to science, scientific research and all of the above. It should give everyone pause to think about what's really important for this country and whether things are headed in the right direction in U.S. After all, this latest 'temporary' situation with NIH may not end up being temporary at all.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines
I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. In a now-viral X video, RFK Jr. tried to explain the funding cuts saying, "HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." Twitter: @SecKennedy According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." Related: In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." Related: While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." Related: And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." Related: "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump plans to meet with Putin as soon as next week, New York Times reports
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump plans to meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as early as next week, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing two people familiar with the plan. Trump then plans to meet with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the newspaper reported, adding that the plans were disclosed in a call with European leaders on Wednesday. The White House did not immediately respond to the report but earlier on Wednesday Trump acknowledged that he spoke with European leaders after U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff's "highly productive" meeting with Putin in Russia. While noting that "great progress" was made during the meeting, Trump wrote on Truth Social: "Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come." Trump, who promised to end Russia's war in Ukraine on "day one" during his presidential campaign, has held several phone calls with Putin and has met with Zelenskiy since returning to the White House in January. However, in recent weeks, he has become increasingly frustrated with Moscow over a lack of progress towards ending the three-year conflict.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s shock decision to cancel nearly half a billion dollars' worth of research projects because they're based on mRNA technology horrified vaccine experts Tuesday, among them President Donald Trump's own former surgeon general. Jerome Adams, who served as the nation's 20th surgeon general during Trump's first term, warned on social media that the decision will have very real negative consequences. 'I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives,' he wrote. 'mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions.' Adams ended the missive with the 'head exploding' emoji. I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives. mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions. 🤯 — Jerome Adams (@JeromeAdamsMD) August 6, 2025 In another thread, Adams blamed politicized messaging around vaccination during the coronavirus pandemic for leading to a widespread public misunderstanding of what vaccines actually accomplish. People believed that 'if you get this vaccine you won't get COVID,' said Adams, when the real aim was to prevent severe cases of the disease. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, technology has potential far beyond COVID. At Emory University, for instance, researchers are looking into using mRNA technology to train the immune system to cure cancer and chronic infections, thanks to a $24.8 million federal grant. The three-year program was funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, or ARPA-H, which Kennedy merged with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, in March — only to announce Tuesday he'd be pulling the funding for BARDA's mRNA investments. The inaugural director of ARPA-H, Dr. Renee Wegrzyn, was fired by the Trump administration in February amid mass layoffs at the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tiba Biotech, another research company that saw its HHS contracts terminated Tuesday, is investigating using mRNA to combat tick-borne diseases. Thanks to climate change, more ticks are surviving through warmer winters, leading to a sharp increase in tick-borne illnesses. Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, told The Associated Press the decision on mRNA research is a historically bad one. 'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' he said. Related... RFK Jr. Cancels $500 Million In Funding For Vaccine Development 800,000 Vaccine Doses The U.S. Pledged To Send To Africa Are About To Expire Instead RFK Jr.'s Stunning Claim About Black People And Vaccines Sparks Concern From Medical Experts RFK Jr. Keeps Telling A Flat-Out Lie About Childhood Vaccines — And Doctors Are Sick Of It