logo
From the top down, Virginia's 2025 elections are packed with contenders

From the top down, Virginia's 2025 elections are packed with contenders

Yahoo08-04-2025
The Executive Mansion in Richmond. (Photo by Markus Schmidt/Virginia Mercury)
The 2025 election season in Virginia is officially underway — and the landscape is coming into sharp focus after last week's filing deadline for the June 17 primaries. With the top of the tickets now set and the full list of candidates for the House of Delegates finalized, both parties are preparing for what could be one of the most consequential election years in the commonwealth's recent history.
Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears became the Republican nominee for governor by default after former state Sen. Amanda Chase and former Del. Dave LaRock failed to submit enough valid signatures to qualify for the primary ballot.
The GOP now avoids a potentially divisive nomination fight and can direct all of its resources toward the general election, where Earle-Sears will face former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee who left Congress in 2024 to run for governor.
Spanberger enters the race with a clear financial advantage. Her campaign reported raising $9.6 million by the end of 2024, with $6.6 million in cash on hand. On Monday, her team announced an additional $6.7 million raised in the first quarter of 2025.
'Our campaign is tremendously grateful for this record-breaking show of support,' Campaign Manager Samson Signori said in an email. 'We are proud to run a grassroots campaign with the strong support of thousands of volunteers across every corner of our commonwealth.'
Earle-Sears ended 2024 with $2.6 million raised and $2.1 million in cash. Last week, her campaign announced a $3.1 million haul for the first quarter — a figure she achieved despite being unable to raise money for much of the reporting period. As a sitting member of the legislature, Earle-Sears is barred from fundraising during the General Assembly session.
'Our campaign is proudly fueled by hardworking Virginians who want a leader who will cut taxes, defend parental rights, and keep our communities safe,' Earle-Sears said in a statement. 'The threat of radical change that would turn our commonwealth in the wrong direction is real and demands we fight back directly and aggressively.'
Two independent candidates, Donna Charles and Andrew White, have also filed to run for governor. No campaign finance disclosures have been filed for either.
Stephen Farnsworth, a political science professor at the University of Mary Washington, said the absence of a gubernatorial primary gives both major candidates a strategic edge heading into November.
'This is the best case scenario for both of the candidates,' Farnsworth said. He noted that primaries often force contenders to cater to their party's ideological base — sometimes at the expense of their appeal in a general election.
'If you go through the primary process, you will have to say a number of things to win over the ideological extremists who vote in primaries, and the things that you say in the spring can come back to haunt you in November,' he explained. 'And now they don't have to deal with it.'
For Republicans especially, Farnsworth added, the early clarity in the race is a rare bright spot.
'With no primary, you can focus on the general election,' he said. 'It's a rare bit of good news for Republicans, who have a lot of headwinds coming out of Washington going into this election.'
The lieutenant governor's race has drawn large and diverse fields on both sides. Three Republicans are seeking the nomination: U.S. Navy veteran John Curran, Pat Herrity — the last remaining Republican on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors — and conservative radio host John Reid.
The Democratic field is even more crowded, with six candidates vying for the nomination: attorney Alex Bastani; state Sens. Ghazala Hashmi, D-Richmond, and Aaron Rouse, D-Virginia Beach; physician Babur Lateef; former U.S. Department of Justice counsel Victor Salgado; and former Richmond mayor Levar Stoney.
Marlow Jones, a member of the Petersburg City Council and a Republican, is also running for lieutenant governor — as an independent.
In the race for attorney general, Republican incumbent Jason Miyares is seeking a second term. Miyares, who made history in 2021 as the first Latino elected to statewide office in Virginia, is running unopposed in the GOP primary.
Two Democrats are competing for the nomination to challenge him in November. Former state Del. Jay Jones of Norfolk, who previously ran for attorney general in 2021 but lost the primary to then-incumbent Mark Herring, is back for another attempt. Henrico County Commonwealth's Attorney Shannon Taylor, a veteran local prosecutor, is also seeking the Democratic nod.
In the House of Delegates, all 100 seats are on the ballot this year. Democrats are fielding 114 candidates in 96 districts, while Republicans are running 76 candidates in 66 districts. Democrats have primaries in 14 districts, and Republicans have primary contests in 10.
The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC) on Monday announced a seven-figure investment in the campaigns of four incumbents in what they view as winnable districts — Dels. Josh Thomas, D-Prince William, Josh Cole, D-Fredericksburg, Nadarius Clark, D-Suffolk, and Michael Feggans, D-Virginia Beach. Each won their 2023 races by 3 to 6 percentage points.
DLCC pours money into Virginia races, citing 'All eyes on 2025'
'The DLCC's investment is a clear signal that the eyes of the nation are on Virginia — and for good reason,' said Amber Gantt, a spokeswoman for the Virginia House Democratic Caucus. 'Our frontline delegates flipped some of the toughest districts in the state, and they're already delivering real results for Virginians.'
The margin for control of the House couldn't have been tighter in 2023, when just 975 votes statewide ultimately determined which party held the majority. That razor-thin outcome is a vivid reminder of how every district, and every ballot cast, could prove decisive in 2025.
Farnsworth, the political scientist, said that this year's political landscape carries echoes of 2017, when Democratic enthusiasm surged in response to Donald Trump's first presidency — a dynamic that appears to be resurfacing after Trump's return to the White House.
'In a lot of ways this does look sort of like eight years ago, where you have a lot of motivated Democrats in part because of the energy within the party, but also because of the frustration with President Trump. Both of these dynamics seem to be present this year.'
Farnsworth cautioned that Republicans could face a turnout challenge if they fail to field candidates in enough down-ballot races — a challenge that hurt Democrats in the past.
'There is a potential problem, though, in a statewide election if you don't have Republican candidates in a larger number of districts, because you may not be encouraging a Republican turnout,' Farnsworth said.
'The more Republicans there are on the ballot in House of Delegates races, the more likely there'll be people voting Republican up and down the ballot. That was one of the problems that the Democrats had four years ago were districts that didn't have a Democratic name on the ballot, and that hurt (Democrat) Terry McAuliffe's campaign.'
Only one GOP incumbent — Del. Terry Austin, R-Botetourt — faces a primary challenge this year, from Austen Schwend.
On the Democratic side, several incumbents are being challenged from within their own party.
Del. Patrick Hope, D-Arlington, faces Sean Epstein and Arjoon Srikanth in District 1. In Richmond's District 81, Del. Delores McQuinn is up against Alicia Atkins, while in Virginia Beach, Del. Kelly Convirs-Fowler is being challenged by Brandon Hutchins in District 96.
Democrats are also making a concerted push into Republican-held territory, with candidates running in 43 GOP-leaning districts this year.
Republicans, by contrast, are challenging Democratic incumbents in only 15 districts. The disparity is part of a broader Democratic strategy aimed at driving turnout — especially in areas that could also benefit Spanberger's gubernatorial bid.
Sen. Lamont Bagby, D-Henrico, who chairs the Democratic Party of Virginia, said the stakes in this year's elections have galvanized Democratic voters — and now the focus is on sustaining that momentum through November by winning back the governor's mansion and increasing Democrats' narrow 51-49 majority in the House.
'There's no question that folks are energized headed into this election cycle, we just need to make sure to keep the energy up,' Bagby said.
Framing the governor's race as a pivotal moment for Virginia's future, Bagby described the contrast between the candidates as sharper than anything he's seen in recent memory.
'We've heard it time and time again, but in my lifetime I don't think there's ever been a clearer choice between the two candidates for governor,' he said.
With that clarity, he added, comes a responsibility to channel enthusiasm into organizing and outreach — while recognizing that serious challenges remain.
'We are working to make sure we are prepared to move that energy in the right direction,' Bagby said. 'At the same time, we understand that there is a lot of work ahead, and some folks are committed to turn back the progress that we made related to health care and protecting families, we'll just have to run through the tape.'
But Ken Nunnenkamp, executive director of the Republican Party of Virginia, downplayed the idea that more Democratic candidates equals more enthusiasm.
'I'm still not seeing an enthusiasm gap here. We've got a bunch of really good candidates,' Nunnenkamp said. 'And at the end of the day, just because three or four people have filed in a Democratic primary, that doesn't mean that there is any enthusiasm.'
Democrats seize on enthusiasm gap in 2025 Virginia House races
He also expressed skepticism that a broader Democratic field in rural districts would pay off for Spanberger in November.
'Four years ago, Terry McAuliffe went and worked his tail off trying to get votes in the rural districts, and he couldn't do it because the Democratic message doesn't resonate with a lot of people in those areas,' Nunnenkamp said.
'I think (Spanberger) is going to spend as much time and money trying to turn out Democrats in those five districts where no Democrats are running, and I have a feeling just like last year, the Democratic message at the House of Delegates level is the same as it is on the statewide level. I think they're going to have a horrible time.'
Still, Democrats are making history with their field. Of the 114 Democratic House candidates, 58 are women — including 27 incumbents — and at least seven are veterans. Eight veterans already serve in the chamber. By contrast, just five GOP incumbents are women, and a total of 17 Republican women are running for the House in 2025.
Independent candidates are rare this cycle, appearing in just four House districts. One of the most closely watched is District 50, where former Democrat Trudy Berry is now running as an independent after being denied ballot access last year due to an email error.
Berry is up against Republican Del. Tommy Wright of Lunenburg and Democrat Earnadette Powell Farrar in a three-way contest that includes parts of Mecklenburg, Charlotte, Lunenburg, Prince Edward, and Halifax counties.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than 700 National Guard troops from 3 GOP-led states will be deployed to DC to bolster Trump crackdown
More than 700 National Guard troops from 3 GOP-led states will be deployed to DC to bolster Trump crackdown

New York Post

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Post

More than 700 National Guard troops from 3 GOP-led states will be deployed to DC to bolster Trump crackdown

Three Republican-led states will be deploying hundreds of National Guard members to Washington, DC, to bolster President Trump's crackdown on crime and homelessness in the nation's capital. West Virginia will be sending up to 400 troops, South Carolina has pledged 200 and Ohio will dispatch 150 in the coming days, the three states announced on Saturday. 'We stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region and contribute to the collective effort of making our nation's capital a clean and safe environment,' Maj. Gen. Jim Seward of the West Virginia National Guard said. The Mountain State's governor, Patrick Morrisey, added: 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital,' adding that the mission 'reflects our shared commitment to a strong and secure America.' Three Republican-run states are sending an additional 750 National Guard personnel to Washington DC. AP South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster announced the deployment of 200 National Guard personnel from the Palmetto State to DC, but said the troops could be recalled in the event of a major national disaster such as a hurricane. He said the deployment was part of Trump's efforts to restore law and order in Washington, and in response to a request from the National Guard Bureau at the Pentagon. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, meanwhile, said he was sending 150 military police officers to support the DC National Guard. It follows protests in the capital on Saturday. Getty Images 'These Ohio National Guard members will carry out presence patrols and serve as added security,' he said in a statement. None of the members — who are expected to arrive in DC within the coming days — are currently serving as law enforcement officers within the Buckeye State, DeWine said. The deployments of 750 troops from the three states would bring the total number of National Guard personnel within the capital to over 1,450. So far, National Guard members have played a limited role in the federal intervention. Troops have been spotted patrolling landmarks such as the National Mall and Union Station, as well as assisting law enforcement with tasks such as crowd control. With Post wires

NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public
NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public

New York Post

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Post

NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public

Supporters claim a bill introduced by Democratic state lawmakers last month banning ICE agents and police from wearing masks during raids will ensure safety and prevent authoritarianism. One backer, Sen. Patricia Fahy, fumes that ICE is 'operating like masked militias' and 'paramilitary secret police' and so must be reined in. Nonsense: The awkwardly and misleadingly named Mandating End to Lawless Tactics Act is actually little more than an attempt to thwart immigration enforcement by making ICE agents fear for their personal safety. It joins similar efforts in other states and in Congress to 'unmask ICE.' In the words of GOP Sen. George Borrello, 'This bill is driven by ideology, not a genuine concern for public safety.' The Left's hypocrisy on this issue is staggering. Progressives — including many of the MELT Act's supporters in the Legislature — have opposed mask bans for criminal suspects and rioters, such as Nassau County's common-sense ban, which has exceptions for law enforcement. Yet for all their sympathy for those involved with the criminal-justice system, they have no qualms about painting cops as criminals and subjecting them to mask bans. If these lawmakers truly cared about public safety, they'd go after the rioters and real criminals who've routinely hidden their identities to evade accountability following the 2020 George Floyd unrest and Oct. 7 demonstrations. ICE and other law enforcement don't mask up because they have machinations of becoming a 'paramilitary secret police.' They do so to keep themselves and their families safe from multinational gangs such as Tren de Aragua. Facial-recognition technology, now rapidly improving due to AI, gives anyone — including nefarious actors like Antifa or cartel members — the ability to reverse image search the unmasked face of an ICE agent. They can then obtain and post their names, addresses and information about their relatives to social media. While the Justice Department can prosecute those responsible for such doxxing, it is nonetheless a frequent threat to agents and loved ones. Addresses of hotels where agents stay during operations are routinely spread on social media so that protesters can harass them. Agitators are so well-organized that an app was created to report and rush to ICE raid locations, as seen in Los Angeles riots this year. The Department of Homeland Security has reported an 830% increase in assaults on ICE personnel this year, attributed to an increase in doxxing and rhetoric against agents. Worse still, even if the MELT Act passes, its effects would be largely symbolic. Lawmakers like Fahy clearly don't understand federalism. Because the Constitution gives federal law precedence, any federal regulation would immediately supersede the MELT Act if passed, rendering it largely symbolic. Additionally, federal agents are immune from state criminal prosecution when acting within the scope of their authority. The MELT Act would also require that all law enforcement agents display their names or badge numbers on their uniforms, hamstringing the plainclothes units of local New York police departments, which now must only provide this information verbally. Some of the bill's supporters mention a more realistic point that masking without wearing identification might allow for easier impersonation of ICE officers. They might also argue that a lack of masking deters possible police misconduct, despite the widespread use of body cameras. Those are valid concerns. But there are ways to protect the public even with masked law enforcement. Public-education campaigns should remind residents that ICE agents and other law enforcement are legally required to identify themselves as police as soon as it is practicable and safe to do so. New Yorkers under arrest should keep in mind their constitutional protections, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. Masked or not, imposters can still pose as ICE or any other law-enforcement officers. Requiring names or badge numbers does nothing if there's no reliable way to immediately verify the person's legitimacy. The answer isn't a largely symbolic law to neuter real agents; it's to strengthen identification through local cooperation. The only way to fully reassure New Yorkers is cooperation between local police and ICE, whether via collaborative task forces, such as through the federal 287(g) program already adopted by several counties, or by having nearby officers accompany raids to keep public order, which would help quickly debunk any imposters. This type of public partnership would not be a political statement about immigration, rather a commonsense way to put the public at ease and ensure all involved in raids are safe. The MELT Act is symbolic theater that punishes law enforcement while doing nothing to realistically stop imposters. New Yorkers would be safer if lawmakers scrapped this bill and instead fostered real cooperation between local police and ICE to deter fraud and protect both the public and the agents doing dangerous work. Paul Dreyer is a cities policy analyst at the Manhattan Institute.

GOP States Send Hundreds of National Guard Troops to D.C.
GOP States Send Hundreds of National Guard Troops to D.C.

Time​ Magazine

time14 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

GOP States Send Hundreds of National Guard Troops to D.C.

Governors from three Republican states announced this weekend that they would send hundreds of National Guard troops to support President Donald Trump's already 800-strong deployment in Washington, D.C. Joining the D.C. Guard members deployed by Trump last week, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said the state would send 300 to 400 of its Guard troops, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster pledged 200 troops, and Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said 150 Guard members would arrive in the coming days. McMaster said he was sending troops 'to support President Trump in his mission to restore law and order to our nation's capital,' and that the Guard members would return home if an emergency affected South Carolina. Morrisey said that the troops are being sent 'at the request' of Trump and as a show of 'regional cooperation.' 'WVNG involvement will include providing mission-essential equipment, specialized training, and approximately 300-400 skilled personnel as directed,' Morissey's office added. The new contributions amount to a near-doubling of National Guard troops in D.C. and a significant escalation of Trump's takeover of policing in the city, which has already been marked by protests and criticism over his attempts to expand his executive power. Though the escalation has not been addressed specifically by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, she posted on X late Saturday: 'American soldiers and airmen policing American citizens on American soil is #UnAmerican.' Trump invoked emergency powers to take control of the D.C. police department and call in the National Guard last week, claiming the city had been overrun by "bloodshed, bedlam and squalor." That claim is disputed by experts. Trump also mentioned other major cities where he wants to put police under federal control, including New York City, Baltimore, and Oakland. 'They're so far gone," Trump said. 'This will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C." Bowser's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Chief Pamela Smith still technically has day-to-day command over MPD following a failed attempt by the Trump Administration to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as an "emergency police commissioner." But, Bowser and city leaders are still required to cooperate with Trump and his Executive Order declaring a state of emergency in the district. Bowser has been adamant that Trump's response to crime in D.C. has been overblown and unnecessary, as crime has decreased in the city in the last two years after a spike in 2023. In addition to National Guard troops, Trump also deployed federal officers from the U.S. Park Police, ICE, the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and the U.S. Marshals Service on night patrols in D.C. In the first week, federal officers have set up checkpoints around the city, and police have arrested almost 200 people, including 75 arrests by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE)—utilizing the city takeover to further Trump's aggressive immigration tactics since his return to office in January.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store