
Is it reasonable to pay a Kos villa owner in cash?
Ian Robins
A Both your destination and your timing are excellent; the Greek islands are at their best in September. However, first you will need to pay for the stay. I recommend that you take the euros you need to pay for the villa, and then a bundle more for your holiday spending. Yes, there is some attendant risk, but I believe it is tolerable (last year I had to take $10,000 in cash to Nepal to pay for a group trekking trip, and that worked). Crime levels in Crete are low; take extra care going through transport locations in the UK and on arrival.
There are several reasons against relying on ATMs. The first: in my experience, electronic banking is not to be relied upon in the Greek islands, whether you are seeking to pay for a restaurant meal or hotel bill, or withdraw money from a cash machine. Next, all the ATMs I have checked out recently in Greece have applied substantial charges – upwards of €5 – for withdrawals. This reflects the costs of providing and maintaining the machines, and appears to be spreading across Europe.
Most significantly, though, my bank limits daily withdrawals to £500 or the equivalent (in this case, about €575). Even if there are two of you, each able to withdraw this sum, I imagine it would take a couple of days to generate sufficient cash – awkward for you and the property owner.
If you are persuaded to take euros with you, the next question is: how to procure them in the UK at the most advantageous rate? Ordering in advance at a decent rate and picking them up at your departure airport may be easiest. High street providers may be competitive, if you are buying a large quantity. Or, if you plan to be in London between now and September, try a bureau de change such as Currency Online Group or Thomas Exchange Group – the companies I tend to use because of their reliably keen rates.
Q Like many thousands of people, I received the news that ELO had cancelled their Sunday gig in Hyde Park just 24 hours before the concert was due to take place. We had already travelled to London and had booked a hotel for two nights, plus car parking, plus putting our dog into the kennel for two nights. The only recompense we will receive is our ticket money. Our travel insurance does not cover this either, as it is not cut short by one of our party being ill. Had we been informed earlier, we would have been able to cancel our hotel and the kennel. Is it worth taking this further with the organisers?
D South
A The pop legends ELO have been on a final tour, branded Over and Out. The last performance of Jeff Lynne 's ensemble was due to end the BST season at Hyde Park in London. Ticket holders were told about 24 hours ahead: 'Jeff Lynne is heartbroken to report that he will not be able to perform at tomorrow's BST Hyde Park show.'
The organisers said he had been 'battling a systemic infection' and that doctors had told him neither performing nor rescheduling was possible. We all wish Jeff Lynne a swift and complete recovery. Nine pretty solid support acts were ready to perform, including fellow 1970s sensations the Doobie Brothers and Steve Winwood.
Yet the whole sold-out event was called off. I think this decision will be much-discussed over the coming weeks, as disappointed fans get their tickets refunded. From a travel perspective, though, I am afraid that the tightly written terms of the promoter, AEG, make it clear that a claim will not be entertained: 'To the fullest extent permitted by law, neither we nor any other party shall have any liability to you beyond the face value of the ticket.'
Even if a legal claim were mounted, I believe a defence that you enjoyed the benefit of a short break in London might be accepted. Could you insure for future gigs? Insurance for cancelled events is aimed at organisers, not ticket holders. I know of no policies that cover the costs of travel and hotels when the gig is called off.
Q My two boys (aged 10 and six) and I are heading from Dover to see friends in Cornwall. We all have bikes and would like to build in a couple of days of cycling along with doing most of the travelling by rail. Can you suggest a stretch that would be safe, fun and not too demanding?
Stephanie S
A National Cycle Network route 1 starts beside the ferry port at Dover and runs all the way to John O'Groats in northern Scotland. The first stretch, from Dover around the coast to Sandwich and then inland to Canterbury, could be just what you need – a little hilly, but fun, and 12 miles/20km for each portion. Two relaxing days or one really challenging one.
If hills are not what you need, then allow me to direct you to the Kennet and Avon Canal Cycle Route. This connects Reading with Bath – a distance of 82 miles/133km, but it can be sliced and diced. However, rail access is patchy. Devizes would be the ideal place to start, except that the station closed in 1966.
So instead I recommend Trowbridge. An advantage of this Wiltshire town is that you can access it by rail without the need to navigate London with youngsters and bikes in tow. Take a train from Dover to Waterloo East in the capital, walk across the link bridge to the main Waterloo station and board the fast(-ish) train to Salisbury. Change again, and you can be in Trowbridge about five hours after leaving Dover.
You will need to cycle a mile or so north to the canal, but from then on it should be an easy 13-mile/21km ride through beautiful Bradford on Avon to Bath. You could overnight in the spa city and then tackle the quite different – but safe and rewarding – Bristol and Bath railway path. This is another largely flat and traffic-free route that includes an exciting stretch in a tunnel.
You will be taken close to Bristol Temple Meads station, from which there are plenty of trains in the direction of Cornwall – though you may need to change at Plymouth.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TTG
28 minutes ago
- TTG
Premier Travel to take on three former Baldwins Travel branches
The high street sites in Maidstone, Uckfield and Tonbridge are likely to open with Premier's branding at the end of this month or in early September. It also revealed each shop is currently being rebranded, with new signage, systems, and in-branch materials being introduced over the coming weeks. The agency claims the additional shops enhance its existing footprint in the South East, joining franchise offices in Seaford, Bexhill, and Reigate, along with the managed service branch Hallmark Travel in East Grinstead. Managing director Paul Waters said: 'I've personally had the pleasure of speaking with the teams in recent months, and it's clear they share our passion for delivering exceptional, personalised travel experiences. "We know they'll be a fantastic fit with our culture and values. This isn't just about growth for us — it's about protecting what matters in our industry: personal service, local knowledge, and long-term relationships." Waters added: 'We're passionate about investing in the high street and keeping travel expertise accessible to all. "With these new branches, we're not only creating stability, but also fresh opportunities for our staff, our customers, and our industry partners." Premier stressed its commitment to working "collaboratively with the trade to maximise these new locations through stronger marketing, local events, co-branded activity, and shared expertise". Waters explained how this expansion marked an "exciting time" in Premier Travel's story. 'We're proud to be investing in the high street, supporting local jobs as well as local communities and welcoming such talented teams into our growing network," he said. It comes just a few days after Surrey-based Ashdown Travel announced it had hired 10 former Baldwins staff – including marketing and commercial manager Tricia Lester – and would open three new shops including one former Baldwins premises in the coming weeks.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Tourists warned over increasingly common passport mistake
By For some tourists, getting their passport stamped at iconic or dreamy destinations is like a badge of honor. Many use them as a way of keeping track of all the different places they've visited across the globe, almost like a souvenir. However, travelers have been warned to avoid collecting 'novelty' stamps in their official passports. At some popular destinations such as Machu Picchu, in Peru, tourists may be offered unofficial stamps as a memento of their visit. Other places include Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch, in Wales and Checkpoint Charlie, Berlin . But what my appear to be a harmless addition to your passport could actually land you in trouble with border control, as some countries see these stamps as tampering or even a potential security concern. There have been instances where tourists have had to replace their passport because a foreign border official considers it damaged or altered. Jamie Fraser, an American summer camp director at Wildpacks, explained how the popular stamps have become problematic for some travelers. He said: 'Souvenir stamps have become a bit of a badge of honor for travelers — they look cool, they feel like part of the adventure. 'But the second you let someone stamp your passport who isn't a border official, you're not adding a memory — you're risking the whole document being declared invalid.' He added: 'If your passport includes anything not placed there by an official, you're at the mercy of each border's interpretation. For something that takes up just one square inch, it can cause a world of trouble.' The UK Government considers unofficial stamps, markings or writing as passport damage, according to Wildpacks. Torn or missing pages are also counted, as well as faded or unreadable information. Ink stains or water damage on passports is seen as damage, and loose or separated covers. It's recommended that travelers ask for the souvenir stamps on a piece of paper or postcard, instead of their passport. Tourists are also urged against marking passports themselves, as even small doodles or messages could case issues. A page-by-page check is also recommended before flying, to ensure everything is in order and there are no unfamiliar marks or stamps. Passengers have also been urged to replace their travel document early if concerned. It comes after we revealed there's a dreamy Caribbean island giving out passports if you buy a home there .


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Some travelers to the US will have to pay $15,000 bonds for visa - money they could lose if they overstay
The State Department announced Monday that some travelers to the U.S. will have to pay $15,000 bonds for a visa, money they could lose if they overstay their allotted time. The Trump administration claimed to be addressing what it referred to as 'a clear national security threat.' The State Department was planning on testing a similar program towards the end of the first Trump administration, but didn't act on it as foreign travel came to a stop amid the Covid-19 pandemic, The New York Times noted. Those coming from countries with high visa overstay rates looking to enter the U.S on a tourist or business visa would be expected to pay a bond of at least $5,000, the department added. Those who don't leave on time forfeit the funds, while those complying with their visas will get the money back. The public notice, which is set to go into effect on August 20, was issued by the State Department and didn't state which countries would be affected. It did say that it would be based on visa overstay data collected and shared by the Department of Homeland Security. 'The applicant on any canceled bond will be entitled to a full refund. There will be no accrued interest on visa bonds that are issued and canceled as part of this pilot program,' the notice said. This comes as the Trump administration continues its broad crackdown on illegal immigration after President Donald Trump promised mass deportations during the 2024 campaign. As the new rule was announced, a notice in the Federal Register said it was 'a key pillar of the Trump administration's foreign policy to protect the United States from the clear national security threat posed by visa overstays and deficient screening and vetting.' Pointing to data collected by DHS in 2023, the notice stated that more than half a million people coming into the U.S. via air and sea ports of entry most likely overstayed their visas. Visitors required to pay the bonds would have to arrive and depart from the U.S. via airports selected to be a part of the program. The State Department said it would make the revelation 15 days before the bonds were enacted. The notice also said that the year-long pilot program would also apply to foreigners from countries where 'screening and vetting information is deemed deficient.' It would also apply to those granted citizenship based on pledged investments or those without a residency requirement. The consular officers granting the visas will be able to decide the amount of the bond, the notice said. It added that the program is intended to test the State Department's previous belief that bond payments are 'too cumbersome to be practical.' While consular officers already have the power to put in place bond requirements on those applying for visas, the notice stated that the State Department's official Foreign Affairs Manual said that 'such bonds will rarely, if ever, be used.' It said that the practical considerations were 'untested.'