
Hate speech against religious minorities in India soared by 75% in 2024
The country recorded 1,165 hate speech events last year, a 74.4 per cent increase from 2023, the report by India Hate Lab said. As many as 98.5 per cent of these events targeted Muslims, either explicitly or in combination with Christians, while almost 10 per cent targeted Christians in some capacity.
The report by India Hate Lab, a project of the Washington, DC-based Center for the Study of Organized Hate, noted a 'deeply concerning trend of escalating hate speech' especially in states governed by Narendra Modi 's BJP party and its allies.
The United Nations defines hate speech as 'any kind of communication, in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or group on the basis of who they are, in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, colour, descent, gender or other identity factor'.
The report found that at least 931 of the recorded hate speech events, just under 80 per cent, occurred in states or federal territories governed by the BJP. This suggests 'a strong correlation between political control and the prevalence of hate speech', it said.
The Independent reached out to the BJP for comment, but had not received a response by the time of publication.
States ruled by opposition parties in contrast accounted for 234, or about 20 per cent, of the documented hate speech incidents.
The states of Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh led the nation in hate speech incidents, collectively contributing to nearly half of the total events.
The report noted that hate speech incidents spiked during last year's general elections, making up 32 per cent of the total events recorded in 2024.
'The persistence of hate speech targeting minorities – and its sharp escalation in the lead-up to the 2024 elections – suggests a deeply troubling trajectory,' the report stated. 'Hate speech is no longer just an instrument of communal polarisation but is becoming increasingly normalised as a standard feature of Indian political culture and electoral campaigns.'
As many as 259, or over 22 per cent, of the recorded events featured dangerous speech, including explicit calls for violence. No less than 224 of these events occurred in states governed by the BJP or its allies or in union territories under the jurisdiction of the BJP's central government, the report said. This is an 8.4 per cent increase in dangerous speech incidents compared to 2023.
According to the Dangerous Speech Project, a nonprofit research team, dangerous speech is defined as communication that 'can increase the risk that its audience will condone or participate in violence against members of another group'.
Social media platforms played a major role in amplifying hate speech, the report said, with 995 of the recorded events first shared or live-streamed on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and X.
The platforms did not remove such videos inciting violence even though they were in breach of their community standards, it said.
'Our report clearly demonstrates that anti-minority hate speech is not incidental but follows a deliberate pattern. It is no longer just an instrument of communal polarisation but, shockingly, a standard feature of Indian political culture and electoral campaigns, institutional structures, and social fabric,' Raqib Hameed Naik, executive director of the Center for the Study of Organized Hate, told The Independent.
'Modi government's politicisation of religious identity has reshaped public discourse on Muslim identity to such an extent that even leaders from opposition parties have largely refrained from categorically condemning hate speech against Muslims. The lack of public outrage over hate speech suggests the disturbing social acceptance and normalisation of the sentiments expressed in such rhetoric. The complicity of Big Tech in enabling hate speech is also very evident from its utter unwillingness to stop the weaponisation of its platforms.'
The Independent has contacted Meta, X, and Google (which owns YouTube) for comment.
The report further noted that while hate speech incidents nationwide rose by 74.4 per cent from 2023 to 2024, Karnataka saw a 20 per cent decline, with 32 events recorded in 2024 compared to 40 the previous year. Six of the incidents occurred during the 2024 election campaign.
The southern state was governed by the BJP until May 2023, when the Congress party took power. 'The new administration implemented measures that contributed to a decline in hate speech incidents,' the report said.
India has also witnessed a rise in hate speech targeting places of worship, the report said, with 274 incidents calling for the destruction of Muslim or Christian places of worship. Hate speech against vulnerable communities like the Rohingya and people of Bangladeshi origin has gone up as well.
The report argued that 'the degradation of political life through the mainstreaming of hate speech signals a new low in India's political culture, one with grave implications for the security, psychological wellbeing, and fundamental sense of belonging of religious minorities in the Indian republic'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Ice-cream toting guards escort JD Vance to UK's poshest farm shop
The man in the dark suit with an earpiece in the middle of a meadow was what gave it away. Quiet country lanes and rolling farmland are not the natural habitat of the Secret Service. So when they descended on Daylesford Organic, Britain's poshest farm shop, visitors suspected someone important might be about to make an appearance. JD Vance, the American vice-president, and his family were to visit for lunch as they continue their summer holiday in the Cotswolds. 'This morning there were two guys walking the perimeter of the meadow in a black suit and tie,' said one member of the gym that is attached to the farm shop, having spotted them out of the window during a fitness class. 'There are gardeners in the meadow sometimes but not a man in a suit and tie, I have never seen that before, so I knew it must be for the vice-president. It's not really very secret when they are dressed like that.'


Powys County Times
4 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Decision on collapsed river wall in Powys is coming this week
2 This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald. A DECISION on whether to replace or fix a riverside wall in Ystradgynlais that partially collapsed 18 months ago will be made by a senior Powys councillor later this week. On Friday, August 15, cabinet member for highways, transport and recycling, (HTR) Cllr Jackie Charlton (Liberal Democrat) will received four options and decide the 'most appropriate' way forward that 'best meets' Powys County Council's legal obligations in respect of the Llys Tawel triver wall in the town. The wall is located at the back of four homes at Llys Tawel on the west bank of the River Tawe as it flows through this part of the town. The report explains that the wall is 100 metres in length, but 30 metres of the structure collapsed on February 1, 2024. According to the report the remaining structure shows visible signs of 'scour' – this means that its foundations could be affected by soil erosion. There has been some legal wrangling over the ownership of the wall with Powys council eventually conceding that they own it. Options for repair are estimated to cost from £382,000 to £1 million. Option Four, which is also supported by residents, emerges as the best option in the report. This would be the direct replacement of the retaining wall, providing riverbank protection which would cost £1 million However, the recommended preferred option from council officers is Option Three. According to the report it would provide: ' blockstone at a lower level with an embankment above it. 'This is a tried and tested form of erosion control offering bank protection but would not be reinstated to the original wall level.' This would cost the council £850,000. Funding for the repairs would come from the HTR department's own capital budget. Local Powys councillor Susan McNicholas (Ynyscedwyn – Labour) said: 'I am very grateful to Powys council for their decision to rebuild the river wall at Llys Tawel. 'It has taken a long time to get to the stage we are now at. 'The residents will rest a lot more easily once the work has been completed.' Under the council's protocol the decision will come into force five full working days later -this is to allow for it to be called in by councillors for scrutiny should they wish to do so. The wall was built by Brecknockshire County Council in 1912 and the report states that there is no evidence that the structure's ownership has been passed on to another owner. Following the last local government reorganisation in Wales during 1995/1996 the ownership of the wall fell to Powys council as a successor local authority. But the council's Highways Service refused to take responsibility for the wall and believed that either National Resources Wales (NRW), as the lead authority for main rivers, or the riverbank landowner was responsible for it. After the wall partial collapse the residents of Llys Tawel engaged lawyers that argued the council as owner of the wall is responsible for it and have a duty of care to: 'take reasonable steps to prevent natural occurrences on its land from causing damage to neighbouring properties.' After taking their own legal advice, Powys council 'concluded' that it owns the wall.


Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
American Bar Association adopts resolution against Trump's law firm crackdown
Aug 11 (Reuters) - The American Bar Association's policymaking body on Monday adopted a resolution opposing government efforts to punish 'lawyers, law firms, or other organizations for representing or having represented any particular client or cause disfavored by the government.' The resolution, opens new tab is the latest in an escalating conflict between the Trump administration and the ABA, which is the nation's largest voluntary lawyer organization with about 170,000 dues-paying members. In recent months, the ABA has publicly clashed with the administration over officials' attacks on judges and law firms, while government officials have dismissed the ABA as a 'snooty' organization of 'leftist lawyers' and alleged that some of its diversity efforts are illegal. The U.S. Department of Justice has barred its attorneys from participating in ABA events and curtailed the organization's ability to vet new federal judicial nominations. Trump in April threatened to revoke the ABA's status as the federally recognized accreditor of law schools. The rule of law 'will not long survive if lawyers and law firms are threatened and punished for doing their jobs and if judges are threatened with punishment for doing their jobs,' the ABA's new resolution said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the resolution. The ABA has brought multiple lawsuits against the Trump administration, including a pending case filed in July that seeks an order barring the White House from pursuing what the ABA called a campaign of intimidation against major law firms. The ABA said Trump's actions, including executive orders targeting specific firms, have chilled the ability of some public-interest organizations to find lawyers for new matters. Reuters in a special report last month described how some firms were retreating from public interest legal work in the wake of Trump's pressure campaign. The Justice Department on Friday asked, opens new tab a federal judge in Washington D.C., to dismiss the ABA's case, arguing that there's no certainty that Trump will target the business operations of another firm, and that the claims could only be brought by individual plaintiffs, and not the "monolithic" ABA. The DOJ also said the ABA hadn't shown Trump's actions had dissuaded lawyers from taking certain cases. The ABA's House of Delegates is meeting Monday and Tuesday in Toronto to consider a slew of resolutions, many of which relate to the federal government and the rule of law. The resolution opposing attacks on lawyers and law firms also opposes threats to impeach judges 'based solely on disagreement with the merits of the rulings made by those judges.' Since returning to the White House, Trump has issued a series of executive orders targeting law firms over their past clients and lawyers they hired. Nine law firms have struck deals with the president, pledging nearly $1 billion in free legal services on mutually agreed legal issues with the White House in order to stave off similar executive orders. Four law firms successfully sued the administration to block the orders against them, which stripped their lawyers of security clearances and restricted their access to government officials and federal contracting work. Read more: How Trump's crackdown on law firms is undermining legal defenses for the vulnerable What Republican, Democratic judges said about Trump's law firm orders ABA ramps up defense of judges as White House dismisses 'snooty' lawyers American Bar Association sues to block Trump's attacks on law firms