
Why did a Chinese economist slam Ray Dalio's assessment of debt situations in US, China?
Xu Gao, chief economist at Bank of China International (China), said in a recent 9,000-word article that Dalio was mistaken in calling for China to deleverage, arguing that such a view 'misjudges' the country's debt dynamics.
'China's recent debt-rollover issues were not caused by excessive borrowing, but by overly harsh deleveraging policies that disrupted liquidity,' Xu wrote in the article titled 'Where Did Dalio Go Wrong on National Debt?'
'Rather than doubling down on deleveraging, we need to correct the mindset behind it, which has already weighed heavily on the macro economy,' Xu said.
His comments, posted to social media on Thursday, came as economists and policy circles have been discussing whether more stimulus is needed in the second half of the year to shore up China's economy amid external uncertainties, a prolonged property downturn, and persistent deflationary pressures. Attention is now turning to an upcoming Politburo meeting that is expected to
set the policy tone for the second half.
In the US, worries over the sustainability of US government debt have intensified following the passage of the
'Big Beautiful Bill' , which raised the debt ceiling by US$5 trillion and prompted warnings of a looming 'debt bomb' from figures such as Elon Musk and Dalio.
Dalio, the billionaire investor and founder of one of the world's largest hedge funds, has long advocated for a 'beautiful deleveraging' strategy in China to address its debt challenges.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTHK
6 hours ago
- RTHK
China says trade jumped in July, beating forecasts
China says trade jumped in July, beating forecasts China's exports beat forecasts in July, as manufacturers made the most of the tariff truce between Beijing and Washington. File photo: AFP Official data showed that China's exports expanded 7.2 percent year-on-year in July, as the world's second-largest economy navigates a shaky trade truce with the United States. The increase in China's overseas shipments last month outpaced a Bloomberg forecast of 5.6 percent and June's 5.8 percent growth. Imports jumped 4.1 percent year-on-year in July, compared with a Bloomberg forecast of a one percent fall. Imports had risen 1.1 percent in June. Data also showed that China's exports to the United States, its largest trading partner, continued to fall, sinking 6.1 percent from the previous month. Total imports and exports for the first seven months of the year climbed 3.5 percent to 25.7 trillion yuan. Beijing and Washington agreed in Sweden last month to hold further on extending their tariff truce. That deal has temporarily set fresh US duties on Chinese goods at 30 percent, while Beijing's levies on US goods stand at 10 percent. The accord -- initially agreed in Geneva in May -- brought down triple-digit tariffs each side had imposed on the other after US President Donald Trump launched his trade war on April 2. The 90-day truce is set to end on August 12, when the original duties could snap back. Thursday's data also comes after Trump unveiled new tariffs on dozens of trading partners -- including a blistering 35 percent on Canada -- as he seeks to reshape global trade to benefit the US economy. (AFP & agencies)


RTHK
7 hours ago
- RTHK
Apple to invest US$100b more locally to avoid tariffs
Apple to invest US$100b more locally to avoid tariffs Donald Trump shake hands with Tim Cook at the White House after announcing the additional US$100 billion investment undertaking by Apple. Photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump has announced that Apple will invest an additional US$100 billion in the United States, a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. The new pledge raises Apple's total domestic investment commitment to US$600 billion over the next four years. The company announced earlier this year it would invest US$500 billion and hire 20,000 workers across the country. The announcement centres on expanding Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing footprint in the US, but still falls short of Trump's demand that Apple begin making iPhones domestically. "Companies like Apple, they're coming home. They're all coming home," Trump said in the Oval Office, moments after Apple chief executive Tim Cook gave him a US-made souvenir with a 24-karat gold base. "This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in America also are made in America," Trump added. Asked if Apple could eventually build entire iPhones in the United States, Cook noted that many components such as semiconductors, glass and Face ID modules are already made domestically, but said that final assembly will remain overseas "for a while". While the investment pledge is significant, analysts say the numbers align with Apple's typical spending patterns and echo commitments made during both the Biden administration and Trump's previous term. In May, Trump had threatened Apple with a 25 percent tariff on products manufactured overseas, a sharp reversal from earlier policy when his administration had exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics from rounds of tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump's effort to reshape global trade through tariffs cost Apple US$800 million in the June quarter. "Today is a good step in the right direction for Apple, and it helps get on Trump's good side after what appears to be a tension-filled few months in the eyes of the Street between the White House and Apple," said Daniel Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities. Apple has a mixed track record when it comes to following through on investment promises. In 2019, for instance, Cook toured a Texas factory with Trump that was promoted as a new manufacturing site. But the facility had been producing Apple computers since 2013 and Apple has since moved that production to Thailand. Apple continues to manufacture most of its products, including iPhones and iPads, in Asia, primarily in China, although it has shifted some production to Vietnam, Thailand and India in recent years. (Reuters)


AllAfrica
8 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Trump-Putin face-to-face meeting could happen very soon
The big news is that US President Donald Trump has pronounced the Special Envoy Steven Witkoff's talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as very productive. He has further announced he will meet with Putin face-to-face as soon as next week. He spoke to Putin by telephone today (August 6). Trump also says that he intends to follow up on his meeting with Putin with a three-way meeting between himself, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. We have no official word from Russia, but the Trump announcement is in line with predictions coming from Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that there will be 'big surprises.' We have no readout from either side on the terms discussed between the parties, only that there were two subjects: Ukraine and US-Russia strategic cooperation. It may be that the Russians are uncertain about how much political or strategic support they can expect from China, suggesting maybe the Chinese leadership is in flux. Likewise, we also know, at least in part, that preliminary talks took place between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Lavrov and between Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu, acting as a mediator with Trump, and Putin. The Russians have promised a readout of the conversation, although I am not sure it will be enlightening. Certainly, this is a very big development, but it carries plenty of risk for all sides, especially for Trump. The US president will need to control Zelensky, a difficult task because Zelensky has nowhere to go, as he cannot easily make significant concessions. Washington allegedly wants to get rid of him because he is an obstacle to a deal, so we can't rule out a melodrama involving Zelensky's status. Meanwhile, Trump slapped India with a 50% tariff, in part because of its purchases of sanctioned Russian oil. This is a mistake because India will have to fight back and the US will find itself in a position of strengthening the military alignment between India and Russia. Ideologically, it is also counterproductive, as India is a strong democratic country and the US is treating it as a pariah. India will likely quickly make a deal to buy Russia's new Su-57 fighter jets instead of the F-35, something that has been trending anyway. There are other potential 'disrupters.' One potential is the UK. I doubt the UK and French, along with Estonia and some others (maybe not the Germans) will be enthusiastic in supporting a brokered deal on Ukraine. The Russians report the UK is planning a so-called shadow-fleet incident (probably in the Baltic or Sea of Finland) that will trigger a UK and potential NATO response, forcing the US to support a hard anti-Russian position. So some sort of provocation can't be ruled out, notwithstanding whether the Russians have real intelligence on UK planning, or if they are faking it. The 'shadow fleet' are ships carrying Russian oil that are not insured by the London exchange. However, other insurance instruments are available in the maritime trade, so the terminology is intended to characterize these ships in a pejorative manner and does not describe the status of these tankers. Meanwhile, the Estonians and Finns have attempted to thwart the transit of these tankers and have tried to pull them into port for 'inspections.' The Russian Navy is now escorting them, putting a stop to these provocations. More yet may happen. There are many other wild cards, including moves that Ukraine may make. The last time there was a ceasefire that stopped flights of aircraft and drones, the Ukrainians kept up attacks anyway on Russian territory. There are plenty of other possibilities. Even so, it looks like the diplomatic track may, at last, be leading to concrete results in ending the conflict in Ukraine. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared in his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.