Thousands to rally in Bangladesh one year after Sheikh Hasina's fall
The events will culminate in a declaration touted as a roadmap for democratic reform in the political journey from an uprising sparked by economic woes and repression to rule by an interim government led by Nobel peace laureate Muhammad Yunus.
"Together, we will build a Bangladesh where tyranny will never rise again," Mr Yunus said in a message to the nation a year after protests forced Ms Hasina to flee to neighbouring India, as he paid tribute to those who sacrificed their lives.
A peaceful, fair, and transparent election could be held early next year, Mr Yunus said.
He pledged a return to full democratic rule at a time of mounting pressure for a swifter transition amid growing labour unrest.
"Fallen autocrats and their self-serving allies remain active," however, he added, urging unity to protect the gains of the uprising while his government holds reform talks with political parties and civil society.
His interim government had launched sweeping reforms, he added, while trials for those responsible for the "July killings" were progressing swiftly.
Police were on high alert throughout the capital, with armoured vehicles patrolling the streets to deter any attempt by Ms Hasina's banned Awami League to disrupt the day's events.
"Let this anniversary not be a day of retrospection, but a rallying cry for a brighter tomorrow," Ms Hasina said in an open letter to the people of Bangladesh, adding that she had never resigned from her duties as prime minister.
"Bangladesh has overcome adversity before, and we will rise again, stronger, more united, and more determined to build a democracy that truly serves its people."
The July Declaration, to be announced later in the day by Mr Yunus, will formally recognise the 2024 student-led uprising and the shift away from authoritarian rule to democratic renewal.
Despite some opposition, it is backed by major political groups, including the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by former premier Khaleda Zia.
Supporters see the charter as a foundation for institutional reform, but critics have warned that its impact could be largely symbolic in the absence of a legal framework or parliamentary consensus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
36 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Starmer defends Palestine recognition plan but hits out at Hamas
Sir Keir Starmer has said the UK will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to meet certain conditions, including addressing the humanitarian crisis, implementing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. But he insisted the move was not a propaganda boost to Hamas, saying the 'terrorist organisation' could play 'no part in any future government'. The Prime Minister's approach has been criticised by the Israeli government and a protest over his stance is due to take place in London at the weekend. Demonstrators, including some British family members of hostages still held by Hamas, will march on Downing Street calling for the release of the remaining hostages before any talk about the recognition of Palestine. Asked if he had given Hamas a public relations boost by talking about recognition, Sir Keir told Channel 5: 'They should release the hostages straight away and they should play absolutely no part in the governance of Palestine at any point.' He said the hostages taken during the October 7 2023 attacks had been held for a 'very, very long time in awful circumstances, unimaginable circumstances, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, and that's why I'm really clear about Hamas'. Sir Keir added: 'We do, alongside that, have to do all that we can to alleviate the awful situation on the ground in Gaza. We need aid in volume and at scale.' People have seen the 'images of starvation' in Gaza, he said, adding that 'the British public can see it and there's a sense of revulsion of what they're seeing'. The Government had to do 'everything we can' to get aid in, working with other countries 'and it's in that context that I set out our position on recognition'. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said on Tuesday that 'Keir Starmer has made a mistake' and 'what we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home'. Tzipi Hotovely, Israeli ambassador to the UK, said the actions of Hamas 'must never be rewarded'.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
ICE wants to target Gen Z in PR blitz including ads on YouTube, HBO and X to fill 14,000 roles
Donald Trump's administration is urgently trying to launch an ad campaign to help recruit more than 14,000 immigration officers who can rapidly remove people from the country, government documents say. Immigration and Customs Enforcement specifically wants to target 'Gen Z and early-career professionals,' as well as former law enforcement officers, military veterans and people from legal fields, according to the agency's request for information, the first step in a government procurement process to begin contracting with eligible firms. ICE wants to reach more than 42 million people in those 'target audience groups' across social media platforms as well as through ads on Hulu, HBO Max and Amazon Prime, among other networks, the pitch says. 'This is a critical priority,' the agency wrote on the government's procurement website. 'ICE has an immediate need to begin recruitment efforts and requires specialized commercial advertising experience, established infrastructure, and qualified personnel to activate without delay.' Marketing firms should be able to zero in on potential recruits through 'geofencing,' which delivers ads based on a viewer's location, as well as 'behavioral' practices, according to the documents, first reported by 404 Media. The effort ties together with the Trump administration's 'national launch and awareness saturation initiative aimed at dominating both digital and traditional media channels with urgent, compelling recruitment messages,' according to the pitch. The Independent has requested comment from ICE. Republicans in Congress earmarked $30 billion for the hiring spree, alongside $45 billion in new funding for ICE detention centers. Altogether, Trump's 'big, beautiful' domestic policy bill sets aside more than $170 billion for immigration enforcement over the next decade. That injection of taxpayer cash makes the law enforcement agency one of the most expensive police forces in the world, outpacing most foreign military budgets. Homeland Security is also advertising a 'maximum $50,000 signing bonus' and student loan forgiveness for new recruits. Secretary Kristi Noem announced Wednesday that she is dropping age limit requirements and allowing people older than 40 to apply, 'so even more patriots will qualify to join ICE in its mission to arrest murderers, pedophiles, gang members, rapists, and other criminal illegal aliens from America's streets,' according to DHS. And people as young as 18 years old can apply, Noem told Fox News Wednesday. ICE is looking to hire more removal officers, Homeland Security Investigations agents, attorneys and other personnel. The pace of daily immigration arrests fell by nearly 20 percent in July following a wave of court challenges, mass protests, and reports suggesting that morale within ICE ranks has been plummeting with officers spending more time 'arresting gardeners' than investigating major crimes. 'It's miserable,' one ICE official told The Atlantic last month. 'It became a contest of how many deportations could be reported to Stephen Miller by December,' added Adam Boyd, an attorney who resigned from the agency's legal department in June. In May, White House adviser Stephen Miller announced on Fox News that the administration had set a goal of arresting 3,000 people a day, and that Trump 'is going to keep pushing to get that number up higher each and every day.' But in court filings, government lawyers have denied any such arrest targets. ICE has not been directed to 'meet any numerical quota or target for arrests, detentions, removals, field encounters, or any other operational activities that ICE or its components undertake in the course of enforcing federal immigration law,' they wrote to a federal appeals court last week. Between July 1 and 27, ICE averaged 990 daily arrests, down from 1,224 the previous month, according to government data analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a nonpartisan research project at Syracuse University. ICE is likely to face significant roadblocks in reaching 14,000 new recruits, according to analysts and former law enforcement officials. Without effective guardrails to screen how those agents are hired and who exactly is filling those roles, the government may be setting itself up to repeat critical past mistakes the last time there was a surge in new recruits, experts said. But the agency is growing at such a rate that 'we're going to see an ICE that it is going to be hard for any future administration to shrink,' former acting ICE director Josh Sandweg said earlier this year. The agency's 'capacity to deport will certainly be at the highest level it's ever been in the history of the United States,' he added.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Should former party leaders keep their noses out of politics?
The political phenomenon of the 'back-seat driver' is hardly new, but it's a bit of a thing at the moment. Neil Kinnock, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, and Jeremy Corbyn have all been giving Keir Starmer private and public advice about taxation, welfare reform, the general conduct of government, and, in Corbyn's case, even about local authorities selling off allotments. It's meant to be helpful (maybe not in the case of Starmer's immediate predecessor), but it doesn't always work out that way... What's their problem? On the whole, and crudely speaking, they think that Starmer isn't really left-wing enough, which is ironic because they too (excepting Corbyn) were often criticised for just that in their own time. Most recently, Kinnock has backed a 'wealth tax' (never a prominent part of Labour policy during his own leadership), and wants to apply VAT to private healthcare charges (supposedly analogous to private school fees). Brown doesn't, but he does think child poverty is an under-regarded problem and that the winter fuel allowance, which he introduced, needs to be restored. Tony Blair has been pushing digital ID hard, just as he did when he was in No 10, when he never quite managed to make compulsory ID cards acceptable. More critically, Blair is supposed to have told Starmer that 'this isn't working' in a wider sense, and that net zero is 'doomed to fail' (a point he later rowed back on). Were he not already in Starmer's cabinet, Ed Miliband would also be outspoken about the downgrading of his Green New Deal. Are they right? Probably, but they do enjoy the luxury of observerdom, no longer living in fear of their own MPs, financial markets and, of course, Britain's devoutly cakeist electorate. They, and we, cannot assume they'd be doing a better job, notwithstanding their experience. Even so, if Starmer metaphorically says 'Well, you try it' – running the party, government, or both – they can reply, 'Well, we did, mate.' Why does this happen? They miss the attention? Former party leaders and prime ministers – deprived, usually forcibly, of their former power and status – are sometimes unable to resist the temptation to advise and warn their successors, not least when their own policies and record are under attack (whether real or imagined). Margaret Thatcher, conscious that such interventions can be unhelpful, actually promised after she left office in 1990 (and most unwillingly) to be a 'good back-seat driver'. John Major and, to a lesser degree, William Hague would beg to differ about what that meant. Thatcher more or less inflicted on them what Ted Heath, whom she ousted, visited on her during her premiership – constant barracking, grumbling and plotting. Harold Macmillan, who'd left No 10 even longer ago, also chose to criticise her harsh economic policies in the 1980s. Kinnock, in a backhanded way, said of Blair in 2007 that 'he's a bastard, but he's our bastard'. James Callaghan, who was in the merchant navy as a young man in the war, and was most restrained towards his heirs, said this of former leaders: 'Don't distract the man at the wheel, and don't spit on the deck.' Aside from one remark, and a subsequent indecorous row with John Prescott in the Commons tea room about nuclear disarmament, Callaghan followed his own advice. Why is there so much of this now? On the Conservative side, it is largely a function of the growing population of ex-leaders – nine in all (from Major to Rishi Sunak), of whom six served as prime minister. They've usually been the more bitter critics of one another, with the Liz Truss-Kemi Badenoch spats currently being the most entertaining, and serious, because the very word 'Truss' terrifies the voters, but attempts to slap her down make the Tories look divided. It's only fair to add that John Major, David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, and Sunak are being remarkably restrained as Badenoch continually trashes their reputations. Labour has far fewer extant former prime ministers, and fewer former leaders. In addition, they tend to be more polite, and the most potent dissident among them, Corbyn, is now outside the family. The problem comes if they start to become the focus for rebellions, and make the Labour Party look even more divided than it actually is. None, however – not even Corbyn – can match Truss for high-profile delusion.
