European car sales slump in June as automakers woes deepen
July 24 (Reuters) - New car sales in Europe fell more than 5% in June, the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) said on Thursday, in a reflection of the global challenges faced by automakers.
Tesla lost market share for a sixth consecutive month despite a rise in overall sales of electric cars, while the four best-selling groups in Europe, Volkswagen, Stellantis, Renault and Hyundai , all sold fewer cars than in June 2024.
European auto makers have booked multi-billion losses and issued profit warnings as they struggle to handle competition from China, U.S. import tariffs of 25%, and domestic regulations aimed at speeding up the EV transition.
Sales in the European Union, Britain and the European Free Trade Association fell 5.1% in June from a year earlier, to 1.24 million cars, ACEA data showed.
Registrations at Volkswagen, Stellantis, Renault and Hyundai dropped 6.1%, 12.3%, 0.6% and 8.7%, respectively.
Tesla's sales were down 22.9%, and its market share contracted to 2.8% from 3.4% a year ago.
The share of brands not accounted for by the ACEA, including BYD and other Chinese carmakers, more than doubled to 4.5%.
In the EU, total car sales fell 7.3% year-on-year, even as registrations of battery electric (BEV), hybrid electric (HEV) and plug-in hybrid (PHEV) cars rose 7.8%, 41.6% and 6.1%, respectively.
The three types of electrified vehicles accounted for 59.8% of EU passenger car registrations in June, up from 50% a year earlier.
Overall sales in Germany, France and Italy fell 13.8%, 6.7% and 17.4%, respectively, while they rose 6.7% in Britain and 15.2% in Spain.
"While drivers clamour for cleaner, cheaper cars, dynamic new brands are stepping up to fill the gap left by some incumbents who have been too slow to give the customers what they want," said Ben Nelmes, founder of EV data analysis firm New AutoMotive. (Reporting by Alessandro Parodi; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
How Trump and Putin reached a new make-or-break moment on Ukraine
WASHINGTON—President Trump has long believed the crux of foreign policy is two leaders in a room making historic deals. Pulling off a cease-fire in Ukraine with Russian President Vladimir Putin would be the kind of diplomatic coup he has long craved. It remains a long shot. The leaders could meet as soon as next week to pursue a peace agreement following months of maneuvering. But their approaches remain at odds. Trump has urged Putin to stop the war but has shown little interest in the specifics of a deal. The Kremlin boss has rebuffed all appeals to halt the fighting, except on his terms. After months of failed efforts to forge a deal, first by coercing Kyiv and later by wooing Putin, Trump has come around to the belief that heightened economic pressure on Moscow might be the only way to get an agreement. To sway Putin, Trump has embarked on a more confrontational course, threatening sanctions on countries that purchase Russian energy. He targeted India, a major buyer of Russian oil, with 50% tariffs on its goods shipped to the U.S. Other nations that import Russian oil and gas, including China, could see their duties raised by Trump's Friday deadline for an agreement. But even Trump seemed less than optimistic Thursday following talks earlier in the week between his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and Putin in Moscow. 'We're going to see what he has to say," Trump told reporters of Putin. 'That's going to be up to him." The White House is working on arranging a meeting with Putin but would like a three-way meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. 'President Trump would like to meet with both President Putin and President Zelensky because he wants this brutal war to end," she said. The Russian leader said he is only open 'in principle" to talks with Zelensky. 'We are still far from creating such conditions," said Putin, who has frequently called into question Zelensky's legitimacy. Putin wouldn't have to agree to meet Zelensky for Trump to see him, the White House said. If the Trump-Putin summit happens, it could prove the biggest test of Trump's dealmaking skills this term. Trump returned to the White House vowing he could stop the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, later claiming he was merely joking. Privately, Trump is fuming at his failure to halt the war 200 days into his second presidency, according to aides. He has slowly come to recognize that a settlement must take account of Zelensky's bottom line and that of key European governments, who insist they won't recognize Russian control over any conquered territory—a key Kremlin demand—as part of an agreement. There is the added concern that Putin may not be serious about reaching a deal. 'Putin has made it clear that the Ukraine war is more important to him than the relationship with the U.S.," said Alina Polyakova, president and CEO of the Washington-based Center for European Policy Analysis. Another challenge for Trump will be navigating talks with a Russian leader who has a quarter-century of experience dealing with various U.S. presidents and has proved himself skilled in influencing them. If Trump meets with Putin and emerges empty-handed, he will have to decide whether to increase pressure on Russia, despite his skepticism that economic or military moves would alter the Kremlin's calculus, or follow through on a threat he had made repeatedly to abandon the peace process. Either way, Polyakova said, 'the war keeps dragging on." Russian President Vladimir Putin and Steve Witkoff, President Trump's envoy, in Moscow this week. Trump entered his second term confident his rapport with Putin would overcome the complexities of the war Russia launched in February 2022. The president's supporters say he has been wrongly caricatured as too cozy and deferential to the Russian leader. 'People have misunderstood Trump's approach," said Fred Fleitz, who was a senior National Security Council official during the first term. 'It isn't that Trump likes dictators. He believes America has to coexist with Russia. Since we're not going to war, how do we deal with them?" Trump and Putin have held multiple calls and passed numerous messages through intermediaries, U.S. officials and other people familiar with their communications said. Their conversations, according to a senior administration official, have been typically friendly. Trump often discusses his aim of a revived U.S.-Russian relationship propelled by growing economic cooperation. Putin lists his grievances and core desires, mainly international recognition of Russia's control over Crimea and the Donbas region, much of which it has seized from Ukraine. Their calls extend for hours sometimes due to lengthy Putin monologues and the need for translations, current and former U.S. officials said. Trump, usually impatient and anxious to chime in, listens attentively, aides said. 'Putin does this very methodically," John Bolton, Trump's third national security adviser during the first term, said of the former KGB officer. 'He's very knowledgeable, he knows what he's talking about. When he wants to try and influence somebody, he just talks and talks and talks." Putin has carefully studied the new Trump administration and understands where Russia's leverage with the president lies, said Fiona Hill, who was a top Russia aide in the White House during Trump's first term. 'Putin's done his homework. He's had years of figuring out who Trump is," she said. Part of that homework was determining how to prosecute his war while sending signals of openness to diplomacy. Russia still attacks Ukrainian cities and infrastructure with long-range missiles and drones, killing civilians with regularity. The conflict along the roughly 750-mile front line remains a grinding war of attrition, with Russia's summer offensive clawing gradual gains against a staunch and stretched Ukrainian defense. Moscow's lead in air power and troop numbers have given it the upper hand in the fight, U.S. and European officials quietly admit, though Russia's glaring weakness remains its heavily sanctioned economy. Trump's frustrations with Putin started to seep into the open at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit in June, when he called his Russian counterpart's refusal to end the war 'misguided." 'I'm very surprised. Actually, I thought we would have had that settled easy," Trump told reporters. A July 3 phone call lasted barely an hour—far shorter than their previous chats. The call lacked the warmth with which they normally spoke to each other, the senior administration official said. There wasn't a flashpoint, but Trump ended it feeling perplexed, adding to his gnawing sense of being dragged along. Trump later acknowledged that Putin would say one thing in their conversations about his interest in halting the war and yet do another thing. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'And I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit.'" A frustrated Trump announced last month that he would give Putin 50 days to complete a cease-fire with Ukraine, later shortening the deadline to Friday. Failure to do so would lead the U.S. to sanction some of Russia's top energy customers, a strategy aimed at choking off Moscow's major remaining sources of revenue for its war effort. Administration officials and close presidential confidants said Trump and Putin didn't have a single, major blowup this year. Instead it was a 'series of moments," in the words of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.), that ultimately convinced Trump that 'Putin was trying to play him." 'You see now a turning of the page, and Putin has nobody to blame but himself," Graham said. But there are concerns in the U.S. and Europe that Putin floated the idea of a meeting to continue stringing Trump along, not to settle for peace. Putin might propose that Russia officially control some of the Ukrainian territory it occupies in exchange for a withdrawal of his forces from other parts of Ukraine, said a senior European diplomat and a Ukrainian official. Trump, eager for a deal, might urge Ukraine and allies to accept the offer. Kyiv and other European governments would likely reject the plan, the official said, playing into Putin's hands because Trump, rarely concerned with the details of a peace settlement, might then blame Ukraine for continuing to fight. Trump could cut off intelligence and military support for Ukraine, as he did earlier this year, setting back Zelensky's efforts to align himself more closely with Trump following a combative Oval Office meeting in February. The U.S. could also remove itself from the diplomatic process entirely, leaving Moscow and Kyiv to continue what Trump has long labeled 'Biden's war." But those who know Trump suspect he will keep pursuing the most prized deal of his early presidency, where success or failure could define his legacy. 'He wants to be the guy who gets deals," said Marc Short, a first-term senior White House aide. 'That is his brand." Write to Alexander Ward at Alex Leary at and Matthew Luxmoore at
India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
Billions of dollars flowing into US: Trump after sweeping new tariffs take effect
United States President Donald Trump on Thursday celebrated the official rollout of his wide-ranging new tariffs, targeting imports from more than 90 countries. In a late-night post on Truth Social, just as the higher tariff rates came into effect, Trump said: 'It's midnight!!! Billions of dollars in tariffs are now flowing into the United States of America!'The new tariffs, ranging from 10 per cent to 50 per cent, officially began at 12:01 am on August 7, when US Customs and Border Protection started collecting the revised Trump described the moment as a turning point in US trade policy, claiming that revenues were largely coming from nations that had 'taken advantage of the United States for many years, laughing all the way.''The only thing that can stop America's greatness would be a radical left court that wants to see our country fail!' he added in another rollout followed a week of uncertainty after Trump delayed implementation of most tariffs just hours before an earlier August 1 deadline. According to the New York Post, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent projected that annual tariff revenues could exceed USD 300 countries are seeing steep penalties, while Brazil and India face tariffs as high as 50 per cent. Trump framed Brazil's hike as retaliation for the prosecution of his political ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro. India was targeted over its continued purchase of Russian oil, with Trump initially threatening a 25 per cent tariff before increasing it to 50 per not all US trade partners faced equal treatment. Eight major countries, including Japan, South Korea, and the EU, secured negotiated reductions to 15 per cent. The UK received a 10 per cent rate, while Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Philippines saw duties adjusted to around 19–20 per has also hinted at using tariffs as leverage in future trade showdowns, particularly with China, where an August 12 deadline looms for a possible agreement. Without a deal, tariffs on Chinese goods could rise to a staggering 245 per the administration sees the tariffs as a tool to 'reset the global trading order,' economists warn of broader market disruptions and potential cost increases for American consumers.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hans India
14 minutes ago
- Hans India
India's response to Trump's bombast must be strong
When politics or, worse, rhetoric eclipses prudence, the consequences are usually unpleasant. With his unconventional approach to politics and policy implementation, US President Donald Trump has embarked on a course that is sometimes charted more by bombast and impulse rather than facts and reason. His announcement of 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods a few days ago was a function of Trumpian peculiarity. And more peculiar was his announcement on Wednesday to double the tariff to 50 per cent, citing India's oil imports from Russia. Interestingly, the US tariff on Chinese imports was a lot less. While the initial 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports has come into effect on Thursday, the additional tariff will be levied three weeks later. These tariff announcements were rash because they did not take into account the multifarious nature of deep and growing ties between the world's two largest democracies. New Delhi's reaction has been measured. It was only when the Trump administration's statements and actions became intolerable that the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued a strong statement, saying the targeting of India was 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.' It went on to say that India would take all actions necessary to protect its national interests. Recently, the MEA also exposed the hypocrisy of the US and the European Union over ties with Russia. 'The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently,' it said. Also, the US 'continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' Thus, the Narendra Modi government has not only convincingly refuted Trump's allegations but also exposed the doublespeak of the developed world. Still better, it has done so without indulging in pomposity, which was the characteristic feature of foreign policy in the past. The government must continue that tone and tenor. To be sure, there are elements, both within the ruling dispensation and without, that would urge the government to up the ante. Such anti-American and anti-West activists and organisations are both on the Right and the Left, not to forget those in between. Recently, RSS affiliate Swadeshi Jagran Manch, which is doctrinally opposed to America and capitalism, castigated Trump for his 'coercive tactics' of threatening penalties against India for trade ties with Russia. 'If Washington believes that such coercive tactics can sway India's decisions, it must recognise that today's India is not the India of a decade ago,' Manch co-convener Ashwani Mahajan said in a statement, obliquely crediting Modi with bold leadership. And, of course, the Congress party, which for decades followed anti-America policies (some of which still extant), gleefully said that the 'country is now bearing the cost of Narendra Modi's 'friendship'. It was referring to the 'Howdy, Modi!' event in Texas in September 2019. On Thursday, Prime Minister Modi said that India would never compromise on the interest of farmers, fishermen and dairy sector. He went on to say that he was prepared to bear a significant personal cost if necessary. This statement came a day after Trump doubled tariffs on Indian imports. However, Modi must ensure that goading by professional anti-US activists and taunts by opponents do not colour his government's foreign policy. But our response to Trump's bombast must be measured and at the same time, strong.
