Couple Sentenced to Jail for Smuggling Dogs into Singapore from Malaysia for Sale
A couple was jailed on Wednesday, June 4, for smuggling dogs into Singapore from Malaysia.
Soon Boon Khong and Reina Wong Si Qi, both 28, will each serve three weeks' jail term after they pleaded guilty to two charges of importing a dachshund and a pomeranian without a licence on Feb 2, 2023.
Two more accusations of smuggling two dogs the day before, a poodle and a pomeranian, were considered for punishment.
The two had posted canines for sale online, and a woman named Tok Su Wen contacted them to purchase a dachshund.
Earlier, Tok was fined S$7,000 (US$5,400) in the first prosecution against a buyer for abetting animal smuggling.
On Feb 2, 2023, Soon had driven from Malaysia to Singapore at 6 p.m., with Wong in the front passenger seat. The pomeranian and dachshund were hiding behind a sack beneath the front passenger seat.
In mitigation, the couple's lawyer, Tan Cheng Kiong, stated that his clients only trafficked dogs on February 1 and 2, 2023, with no further evidence of further smuggling.
He noted that the canines had not been mistreated and were free of canine diseases.
The lawyer urged the court to penalize rather than imprison the pair because they were first-time offenders. Tan suggested that jail would be more appropriate for repeat offenders, as well as cases involving cruelty or syndicates.
He emphasized the pair's young age and stated that they had learned their lesson. Tan advocated for the couple to get a "very short sentence" as an option.
Addressing the court, Wong stated that the two had checked the dogs' vaccination status to assure their health.
District Judge Wong Li Tein ruled the pair more culpable than Tok since Tok committed the crime on her alone, whereas the accused couple smuggled for trade and profit.
Both had advertised their businesses, showing that the crimes were not opportunistic, Judge Wong stated.
She stated that the offenses constituted a public health danger that Singapore's densely populated community could not bear. The judge believed that a jail term was warranted.
An offender who imports an animal without a license faces up to 12 months in jail, a fine of up to S$10,000, or both.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
‘I felt a bullet': Palestinians recount deadly shooting near new Gaza aid site
Palestinians gather to collect what remains of relief supplies from the distribution centre of the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in Rafah on June 5, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS KHAN YOUNIS, Gaza Strip – Hungry and desperate, they raced to secure just one box of food. After nearly three months without any aid entering the Gaza Strip, Palestinians had learned that an Israeli-backed aid site would open in Rafah. Israel promised an orderly system that would improve on the United Nations' efforts to distribute much-needed food to Palestinians in Gaza. Almost from the beginning, things went horribly wrong. On the night of May 31, Mr Mohammed Abdulal, 30, travelled 18 miles (29km) and joined thousands of people aggressively pushing their way forward, trying to reach the aid site. Israeli forces formed a wide perimeter around the site, which was overseen by US private security contractors. Suddenly, he heard a hail of gunfire, forcing people to flee in every direction, their terrified screams filling the night sky. A bullet ripped through Mr Abdulal's face, leaving him writhing in pain. 'I only took two steps before I felt a bullet tear into my right cheek and neck,' he said. 'I started shouting: 'People, I'm wounded. Help me.'' The rollout of the new aid effort over the past week by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an effort conceived in Israel and endorsed by the United States, was supposed to help Palestinians get aid while keeping it out of the hands of Hamas. Instead, the effort, criticised by multiple aid groups and the United Nations, has devolved into scenes of chaos and death. The New York Times spoke to eight witnesses who described how attempting to reach the sites had become a life-threatening endeavour. The exact details of the deadly incidents remain murky. The Israeli military has acknowledged firing 'warning shots' toward Palestinians but has not taken responsibility for killing them. Multiple witnesses blamed Israeli forces for the deadly fire, which Gaza health officials say killed dozens of Palestinians trying to secure aid. The procedures for getting the new aid have often been unclear for Palestinians facing widespread hunger after Israel blocked food from entering Gaza. Many have sought to beat the huge crowds flooding the distribution sites by arriving as early as possible, often after walking long distances. While the UN relied on hundreds of distribution sites across Gaza, the Israeli-backed effort has only four, creating a bottleneck. Some Palestinians have tried to advance in the line by taking shortcuts to the aid sites outside the officially marked path, but people both on and off that path appeared to have come under fire, according to three of the witnesses. And people arriving early have been told to come back later by Israeli drones, but many have ignored those calls, worried that they will lose their spot in line, the witnesses said. Mr Mohammad Saqar, 43, said he had braved the shooting on June 1 by crouching low to the ground to avoid getting shot at, even as people were struck nearby. When he finally reached the site, he described a mad scramble as crowds rushed to grab the cardboard boxes of aid strewed in piles on the ground. 'It's like a race for food,' Mr Saqar said. 'Those who win the race get the aid.' Two days later, on June 3, a similar scene unfolded. Amid the crowd, Mr Walid Abdeen, 16, was shot in his upper body when gunfire erupted as he and thousands of other people approached the aid site. He suffered damage to his spleen and kidneys. 'We want food,' he said, struggling to speak after undergoing emergency surgery. 'I had to try to help my family.' Despite the violence, Israeli officials have argued that the new system enables food to reach Palestinians without benefiting Hamas. In contrast, many Palestinians say the United Nations – which governed the aid distribution process for most of the war – was far more humane with its approach, despite its imperfections. The UN and other prominent aid groups have boycotted the new distribution system, accusing Israel of using aid as a part of its military strategy. 'The people are desperate and hungry,' Mr Abdulal said. 'That's why they came.' The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is spearheading the latest aid effort, has sought to downplay the significance of the shootings, saying it has provided more than 100,000 cardboard boxes of food 'without a single incident.' But the group temporarily shut down all its sites on June 4, in an apparent acknowledgment that it had faced challenges in distributing aid, before reopening them the following day. The Israeli military has offered mixed messages. It has both denied shooting civilians in the vicinity of the distribution site and acknowledged firing warning shots toward 'suspects' who were approaching soldiers nearby. It was still unclear whether there were other sources of gunfire in the area. Asked who shot the Palestinians on June 1, a military spokesperson referred to an earlier statement that did not answer the question. A UN briefing paper circulated before the foundation's initiative was launched last week warned of 'overcrowded distribution sites' and said that Israeli forces or American contractors might 'use force to control crowds.' The memo also cautioned about the potential for 'organised and opportunistic looting' near the hubs. Mr Jalal al-Homs, 35, said he left a tent in southern Gaza where his family was sheltering around 1.30am on June 1. Accompanied by his brother, he walked for two hours through darkness to Rafah, where he joined throngs of people trying to secure food. Israeli military vehicles, he said, could be seen in the distance, and drones could be heard hovering in the sky. It was Mr al-Homs' fourth attempt this week to get a box, he said. On previous trips, he said, all the aid had been taken by the time he made it into the distribution site. Mr Al-Homs said people were trying to push their way to the front of the crowd before the shooting began around 4.30am. 'It felt like it came from all over,' he said. His brother was shot in the leg, he said, and taken to a hospital, where he underwent surgery. Despite the danger, Mr al-Homs said, he had few options other than returning to the distribution site so that he could feed his two sons and two daughters. 'This system isn't just at all – it requires me risking my life for food,' he said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Used in Covid-19 shots, mRNA may help rid the body of HIV
The new study describes the use of mRNA as a tool to flush HIV out of its hiding places. PHOTO: UNSPLASH Used in Covid-19 shots, mRNA may help rid the body of HIV NEW YORK - The technology that powered Covid-19 vaccines may also lead scientists to a cure for HIV. Using mRNA, Australian researchers said they were able to trick the virus to come out of hiding, a crucial step in ridding the body of it entirely. The research, published last week in Nature Communications, is still preliminary and so far has been shown to be successful only in a lab. But it suggests that mRNA has potential far beyond its use in vaccines as a means to deliver therapies against stubborn adversaries. Short for messenger RNA, mRNA is a set of instructions for a gene. In the case of Covid-19 vaccines, the instructions were for a piece of the coronavirus. In the new study, they are for molecules key to targeting HIV. Dr Sharon Lewin, director of the Doherty Institute at the University of Melbourne, who led the study, called mRNA a 'miraculous' tool 'to deliver things that you want into places that were not possible before.' Vaccines deploying mRNA instruct the body to produce a fragment of the virus, which then sets off the body's immune response. In the United States, the shots were initially hailed for turning back the pandemic, then viewed by some with suspicion and fear. Some officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, have falsely said that they are highly dangerous and even deadly. Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services sought to limit the vaccine's availability to pregnant women, children and healthy younger adults. The administration also cancelled a nearly US$600 million (S$773.72 million) contract with the drugmaker Moderna to develop an mRNA shot for humans against bird flu. 'The fear right now is not rational,' Dr Lewin said, adding that 'mRNA vaccines have been given to millions of people around the world, so we have a very good understanding of their risks.' The new study describes the use of mRNA as a tool to flush HIV out of its hiding places. Other uses could involve providing proteins missing from those with certain diseases or correcting genetic errors. Dr Frauke Muecksch, a virologist at Heidelberg University in Germany who was not involved in the work, called mRNA a 'promising, absolutely powerful technology.' Although most people may have only heard of mRNA's use in science during the pandemic, scientists have been working with it for more than 20 years, she said. 'I think it's not just therapeutically very powerful, but also for basic science, for research, it opens up a lot of avenues,' she added. Potent antiretroviral drugs can now control HIV, suppressing it to undetectable levels. Still, minute amounts of the virus lie dormant in so-called reservoirs, waiting for an opportunity to resurge. A cure for HIV would involve ferreting out all of this virus and destroying it, a strategy that has been called 'shock and kill.' A significant hurdle is that the virus lies dormant in a particular type of immune cell, called a resting CD4 cell. Because these cells are inactive, they tend to be unresponsive to drugs. The few drugs scientists have previously used to rouse the virus in these cells were not specific to HIV and had unwanted side effects. 'It's fair to say the field's been a little bit stuck,' said Dr Brad Jones, a viral immunologist at Weill Cornell Medicine who was not involved in the latest research. In 2022, Dr Jones and his colleagues found that the immune boost from the mRNA vaccines awakened latent HIV in people living with the virus. (Other research has shown that mRNA vaccines also activated dormant viruses including Epstein Barr.) 'You get just a little bit of a gentle nudge with some of these vaccines, and it's enough to coax some of these latent viruses out so they can be killed,' Dr Jones said. Dr Lewin and her colleagues had for years experimented with other ways to activate HIV, but had no luck in resting cells. Seeing the success of the Covid-19 vaccines, which used lipid nanoparticles – tiny spheres of fat – containing mRNA, her team tested similar particles. They used the particles to deliver two different sets of molecules: Tat, which is adept at switching HIV on, and CRISPR, a tool that can 'edit' genes. The researchers showed that in resting immune cells from people living with HIV, the approach coaxed the virus out of dormancy. 'It's very, very hard to deal with these cells, so I think this really targeting the right population of cells is what makes this paper special,' Dr Muecksch said. It's unclear whether the new approach can successfully awaken all of the dormant HIV in the body, and what side effects it might produce. Dr Lewin said that 'mRNA will almost certainly have some adverse effects, as every drug does, but we will investigate that systematically, as we do for any new drug.' In this case, she said, side effects may be more acceptable to people living with HIV than having to take medications for the rest of their lives. The researchers plan to test the method in HIV-infected animals next, before moving into clinical trials. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Far right Proud Boys seek $129 million over US Capitol riot convictions
Former Proud Boys leaders Joseph Biggs and Enrique Tarrio speak to reporters on Feb 21 outside the Capitol in Washington. PHOTO: REUTERS Far right Proud Boys seek $129 million over US Capitol riot convictions MIAMI, Florida - Five members of the far right Proud Boys convicted of orchestrating the US Capitol riot filed a lawsuit on June 6 seeking US$100 million (S$129 million) in damages for alleged violations of their constitutional rights. The suit, filed in a federal court in Florida, claims the five were victims of 'corrupt and politically motivated persecution' intended to punish political allies of President Donald Trump. Among the five plaintiffs is former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, who was sentenced to 22 years in prison for directing the Jan 6, 2021 assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden. Tarrio, whose sentence for seditious conspiracy was the longest doled out to Capitol rioters, was among the more than 1,500 Trump supporters pardoned by the Republican president on his first day in office. In their suit, the Proud Boys members said they were victims of 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump.' They accused government prosecutors of 'evidence tampering, witness intimidation, violations of attorney-client privilege, and placing spies to report on trial strategy.' It said their convictions were 'the modern equivalent of placing one's enemies' heads on a spike outside the town wall as a warning to any who would think to challenge the status quo.' The Proud Boys members demanded a jury trial and punitive damages of US$100 million. The Trump administration agreed in May to pay nearly US$5 million to the family of a woman shot dead by a police officer during the Jan 6 attack on the Capitol. Ashli Babbitt, 35, was shot as she tried to climb through a window leading to the House Speaker's lobby during the assault on Congress by Trump supporters. Ms Babbitt's estate filed a wrongful death suit last year seeking US$30 million. The case had been scheduled to go on trial, but the Justice Department reversed course after Mr Trump won the November 2024 election and entered into settlement talks. The Capitol assault, which left more than 140 police officers injured, followed a fiery speech by then-president Trump to tens of thousands of his supporters near the White House in which he repeated his false claims that he won the 2020 race. He then encouraged the crowd to march on Congress. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
