UK police accused of being heavy-handed at protest against BBC coverage on Gaza
One protester told Middle East Eye that he was repeatedly punched by officers late on Tuesday after police attempted to carry out an arrest.
"The way the police acted was so violent. I've never seen this level of brutality towards protesters before," Rajiv Sinha, the director of Hindus for Human Rights UK, told MEE.
"A large group of officers made their way through the crowd in a single-file line to arrest one person. We started pushing back and began chanting 'this is repression' as they dragged the protesters away."
Sinha said the police vastly outnumbered the small crowd, and highlighted footage posted online which appeared to show officers hitting some of those in attendance.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Youth Demand, one of the organisers behind the protest, accused the Metropolitan Police of "extreme policing".
"We were met with extreme policing, but we held it together to rally against the ongoing genocide," the spokesperson said in a video posted on Instagram.
Earlier this year, the police imposed restrictions banning protests outside the BBC during the national March for Palestine in January.
Officers arrested several people for allegedly breaking these restrictions, including Chris Nineham, who serves as the national steward for the National March for Palestine and chairs the Stop the War Coalition.
Ben Jamal, who chairs the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, was also called in for questioning. Both Jamal and Nineham pleaded not guilty to breaking the Public Order Act.
Following the January protest, the police summoned several people for additional questioning, including Raghad Altikriti, who chairs the Muslim Association of Britain. Altikriti spoke to MEE after her police interview on Wednesday, where she condemned the police's attempts at intimidation.
"It was not a pleasant experience being called in for standing up for justice and against oppression, especially when you know you have done nothing wrong," Altikriti told MEE.
"Our strength is driven by the fact that we have been largely peaceful, with even statements by the police confirming that."
A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police told MEE that three people were arrested and no restrictions were imposed.
"One person was arrested on suspicion of assaulting an emergency worker after an officer received minor injuries," the spokesperson said.
"Two people were identified as wanted for conspiracy to commit public nuisance. They were both arrested. However, one of the suspects was later de-arrested."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Majority of Americans believe US should act to help starving Palestinians in Gaza
Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe the US should take action to help Palestinians facing starvation in Gaza, according to the results of a new poll released on Wednesday. The vast majority of respondents, 65 percent, believed that the US should help Palestinians, in contrast to 28 percent who disagreed in the Reuters/Ipsos poll. Republican voters made up almost half (41 percent) of the 28 percent polled who did not think the US should help people in Gaza. Palestinians are currently facing a famine due to Israel's blockade which only allows limited quantities of food, water and fuel into the Strip, in what has been widely condemned as a genocide by human rights organisations, including the United Nations. An Amnesty International report released on Monday said that Israel is carrying out a deliberate campaign of starvation in Gaza, systematically destroying the health, well-being and social fabric of Palestinian life. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The poll was conducted within a few weeks of France, Malta, Australia, Canada and the UK announcing that they planned to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. When asked about the recognition of a Palestinian state, more than half of Americans, 58 percent, believe that every country in the United Nations should recognise Palestine as a nation. A third of respondents, 33 percent, did not believe that UN members should recognise a Palestinian state. Nine percent opted not to respond to the question. Israel deliberately starving Gaza, Amnesty International says Read More » The UK's recognition of a Palestinian state has been made contingent on whether a ceasefire is achieved in Gaza. Hamas has accepted the latest proposal set out by mediators, but Israel has not yet submitted an official response. The proposal is essentially the same as the one Hamas accepted on 1 June before US negotiators pulled out. Israel is said to be reviewing Hamas's response to the deal, which would include a 60-day truce and the release of half of the Israeli captives still alive in Gaza. A majority of Americans, 59 percent, also believe that Israel's military response in Gaza has been excessive, while 33 percent of respondents disagreed with this assessment. The numbers show a steady increase in the number of people who believe that Israel's military response has been disproportionately violent in response to the October 7 attacks since the beginning of the year. In a similar Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in February 2024, 53 percent of respondents believed that Israel's response had been excessive, compared to 42 percent who disagreed. Israel's war on Gaza has killed well over 62,000 Palestinians, while just under 270 have died from starvation. The Reuters/Ipsos survey gathered responses from 4,446 US adults online across the country over six days. Reuters/ Ipsos said the poll had a margin of error of around two percentage points.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Targeted for Gaza protests: The Palestinian still in US custody
Of all the high-profile, pro-Palestine, non-US citizen arrests linked to campus protests made by the Trump administration's immigration authorities earlier this year, Leqaa Kordia is the only one still languishing in a detention centre in Alvaredo, Texas. On Monday, the 32-year-old's lawyers filed an updated petition in her federal lawsuit seeking her immediate release from the Prairieland Detention Facility based on new evidence unearthed last month in a separate case. The case in question is American Association of University Professors (AAUP) v. Rubio, which sought to challenge Secretary of State Marco Rubio's policy of what the plaintiffs describe as a "policy of ideological deportation". It was during the AAUP v. Rubio trial that government officials revealed they leaned on the pro-Israel doxxing site Canary Mission to target particular students for immigration detention. "The evidence shows that the administration's policy of targeting, investigating, surveilling, arresting, confining and seeking the deportation of noncitizens who have expressed support for Palestinians extends to anyone involved in protests on or near campuses, irrespective of affiliation with a campus or immigration status," a statement from Kordia's legal representatives at the Texas Civil Rights Project (TCRP), Muslim Advocates (MA), and the CLEAR Project at the City University of New York (CUNY) said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "This new evidence makes clear that Ms Kordia's targeting is part and parcel of the same, suppressive policy the administration has weaponised against so many others, including Mahmoud Khalil, Rumeysa Ozturk and Mohsen Mahdawi, whose release federal courts have compelled under the First Amendment," the statement continued. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attempted to strip Khalil, Ozturk and Mahdawi of their legal status in the US at the time they were taken away by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents (ICE). For Kordia, the DHS maintains that she was already out of status at the time she was arrested in New Jersey, and issued a statement on 14 March insisting she was "overstaying her expired F-1 student visa", which was terminated on 26 January 2022 for "lack of attendance". US federal judge grants bail to Turkish national Rumeysa Ozturk Read More » The DHS also cited Kordia's arrest by the New York Police Department in April 2024 during a protest against Israel's war on Gaza, organised by Columbia University students. The police, however, had arrested several students at the time, and Kordia was eventually let go after charges against her were dropped. "It is true that at that time she did not have lawful status," Amal Thabateh, a staff attorney at CLEAR who is working on Kordia's case, told Middle East Eye. She thought she was close to becoming a lawful permanent resident because her US citizen family had filed for such a status on her behalf, Thabateh explained. But upon receiving "faulty advice" from a mentor, Kordia voluntarily signed a termination notice, withdrawing from the F-1 visa program, leaving her out of status entirely. "We all know based on how other cases have gone, and just routinely [that] this happens all the time where people have losses in status," Thabateh told MEE. "They're in transition periods... and that's quickly solved and fixed." 'Forgotten prisoner' But that wasn't the case in what is now the era of enforcement under US President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown targeting pro-Palestine voices. "The ways in which the government has criminalised the visa overstay is just another attempt to target Palestinian rights activists," Thabateh said. "The question is not whether overstaying a visa is criminal or a violation, but instead it's whether the ways in which Leqaa has been punished and targeted, whether that is a justification for very innocently following false advice about her immigration status." Kordia arrived in the US from the occupied West Bank in 2016 on a Palestinian Authority passport, was initially a visitor before adjusting her status to a student as she began learning English. Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil files $20m claim against Trump administration Read More » She has lost 200 extended family members to Israel's genocide in Gaza. Thabateh told MEE that Kordia voluntarily went to meet with immigration agents to find out what was happening after learning that people who knew her were being questioned about her life, and that agents had also approached her home. It was during that meeting in Newark, New Jersey, that she was served with a notice to appear in court, and then taken away overnight to the Texas facility. Kordia has frequently described poor and discriminatory treatment at the Prairieland Detention Facility to her legal team, but they say that she's persevering. "I think that her spirits are strong, but the conditions she's enduring are not easy," Golnaz Fakhimi, the legal director at Muslim Advocates, told MEE. Authorities interfered with her ability to observe Ramadan and did not provide accommodations so she could carry out her five daily prayers as a Muslim, Kordia had told renowned Muslim scholar and civil rights activist Omar Suleiman, who was granted a visit with her in May. He had called her "the forgotten prisoner" in an op-ed published earlier this year. "In litigation, the government has taken the position that that her confinement is based on having overstayed a visa, [but] the authority that the government has asserted... is a discretionary authority," Fakhimi said. "She is not someone who, by law, has to be confined." "The underlying policy of the administration to target non-citizens - according to the government's own officials who testified - really zeroed in on association with viewpoints supportive of Palestine," she added. "I think it's pretty clear what there is to see when you read between the lines. They're confining her because they have marching orders to do that pursuant to an umbrella-level policy." On 27 June, US Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford recommended to the federal judge in the case filed against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem - Kordia v. Noem - that Kordia should be released, given the main threat present is one to her own liberty. She remains in custody after a government appeal.
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US imposes sanctions on two more judges and two deputy prosecutors at ICC
The US has imposed sanctions against four International Criminal Court (ICC) officials on the basis that any attempt to "investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute" American or Israeli officials constitutes a threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Two judges and two deputy prosecutors at the international court have been targeted by the US for sanctions. Middle East Eye revealed last week that the two deputy prosecutors sanctioned today, Nazhat Shameem Khan and Mame Mandiaye Niang, had prepared arrest warrants for Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on apartheid charges. However, the prosecutors had not yet filed the applications for the warrants despite them being complete, due to the threat of US sanctions. The US also issued sanctions against two ICC judges, Kimberly Prost and Nicolas Guillou. Gillou authorised the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defence Yoav Gallant, while Prost authorised the ICC's investigation into US personnel in Afghanistan. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions against the officials, saying all four are engaged in the ICC's efforts to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute nationals of the US or Israel, without the consent of either nation. He accused the ICC of being "a national security threat" in a statement and said he was taking measures to protect the US. "The US has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicisation, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty and illegitimate judicial overreach," Rubio said. "The Court is a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare against the US and our close ally Israel." Rubio added it was a policy of the US government to take any necessary actions to protect American troops, US sovereignty and their allies from the ICC's "illegitimate and baseless actions". Rubio then urged countries which support the ICC to resist the claims of what he called a "bankrupt institution", claiming that many of these countries' freedom was acquired through "great American sacrifices". The State Department Press Office told MEE that the US and Israel are not party to the Rome Statute and have not consented to the ICC's authority. It added that the ICC had been abused as "a tool of political and legal warfare" against American soldiers and US national interests, including targeting Israel with "baseless and illegitimate" arrest warrants. The State Department also said that since assuming leadership for the Office of the Prosecutor in May, Shameem Khan and Niang have "continued to support the ICC's lawfare against Israel, including asserting ICC jurisdiction over Israel, and have upheld the ICC's arrest warrants targeting Israeli personnel". ICC Deputy Prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang in The Hague on 22 August 2023 (Piroschka van de Wouw/ AFP) The State Department further said it does not "preview deliberative sanctions actions", but as long as the ICC continues to present a threat to Americans and allies that have not consented to ICC jurisdiction, "all options are on the table". Fears over sanctions The international justice director at Human Rights Watch, Liz Evenson, told MEE the sanctions showed "complete disregard for victims of serious crimes" and called on the EU to use its blocking statute to protect the organisation. "The Trump administration, by sanctioning the ICC deputy prosecutors and two additional judges, is again showing complete disregard for victims of serious crimes across the globe in a misguided effort to shield US and Israeli officials from justice," she said. Deputy prosecutors at the ICC have the power to submit arrest warrant applications to pre-trial judges for examination If the arrest warrants are filed, it would be the first time that the crime of apartheid will have been charged at an international court. The sanctions are the latest attack on the ICC. Since President Donald Trump's executive order was issued in February, the US has now sanctioned nine individuals at the ICC. Karim Khan investigation: Former ICC judges criticise handling of complaint against prosecutor Read More » The US administration sanctioned ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan in February, and he went on leave in May amid a UN investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against him, which he has denied. A major Middle East Eye investigation in early August uncovered extraordinary details of an intensifying intimidation campaign targeting Khan over his investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes. The campaign has involved threats and warnings directed at Karim Khan by prominent figures, close colleagues and family friends, as well as fears for the prosecutor's safety prompted by a Mossad team in The Hague and media leaks about sexual assault allegations. The campaigns took place against the backdrop of Khan's efforts to build and pursue a case against Netanyahu and other Israeli officials over their conduct of the war against Hamas in Gaza and accelerating Israeli settlement expansion and violence against Palestinians in the illegally occupied West Bank. Khan had prepared cases against Ben Gvir and Smotrich before he went on leave in May, numerous sources in the court with knowledge of the matter told MEE previously. In June, the US sanctioned four ICC judges over arrest warrants targeting Netanyahu and Gallant. Two of those judges approved Khan's application for arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders last November. "ICC member countries should strongly condemn these blatant attacks on the rule of law and take all necessary steps to ensure the court can continue its critical work for justice. For the EU, this means using its blocking statute, which aims to shield European companies from the effects of extraterritorial sanctions," Evenson from HRW said.
