Detroit Schools Have Highest Cuts to Federal Funding in Michigan
Detroit schools are facing some of the deepest cuts to federal funding in the country as The White House withholds $6.2 billion of funds nationwide.
The appropriations were already approved by Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump.
But the administration informed states that they would be withholding the funding for five programs that support educator development, student enrichment programs, migrant education, English learners and 21st-century learning centers.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
While data isn't available for the program supporting migrant education, federal data organized by New America shows that Michigan stands to lose $81.6 million across the other four programs – accounting for more than $65 per student in the state.
The deepest cuts are in areas represented in Congress by Democrats, with those school districts facing a loss of $45 million compared to nearly $36.6 million in areas represented by a Republican.
That's an average of $7.5 million per school district in Democratic areas compared to $5.2 million per district in Republican areas.
Michigan's seven Republican members of Congress represent 713,666 students, while the six Democrats in Michigan's congressional delegation represent 530,785 students.
On average, school districts represented by a Democrat would lose about $84 per student, while school districts represented by Republicans would lose about $51 per student.
That's a reversal from the national trend, where the average school district represented by a Republican would lose 1.6 times as much funding per pupil than those represented by a Democrat.
That's in part because while 91 of the 100 school districts nationwide facing the deepest cuts are in Republican congressional districts, Detroit is one of the ten districts with the most funding at risk.
They would lose the third most funding nationwide for student support and enrichment programs and the sixth most funding for education development.
In total, the district has more than $16 million on the line.
U.S. Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Detroit) represents the hardest hit congressional district, which stands to lose about $210 per student, followed by U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Detroit) at about $87 per pupil.
The school district has the highest poverty rate across the 46 states for which data was available at 46.9%.
Detroit Public Schools Superintendent Nikolai Vitti could not be reached for comment.
Zahava Stadler is the project director of the Education Funding Equity Initiative in the Education Policy Program at New America.
She told Michigan Advance that highly impoverished districts are likely to face significant cuts since poverty rates are a consideration for some federal grants.
'Higher poverty districts are going to be hit again and again and again as the federal government dithers over whether or not to release all of these individual funding streams to which school districts are legally entitled,' Stadler said.
The federal government withholding the already-allocated funding has made it even more difficult for schools to plan their budgets after the Republican-led Michigan House of Representatives failed to pass a budget by their deadline of July 1.
Even if school districts are able to maintain the programs through other funding sources, Stadler said they wouldn't be able to then reimburse those funds later on if the federal funds came through.
'Money can't just get moved around at will,' Stadler said. 'Federal dollars have rules. And the administration is throwing districts into chaos as they are rapidly approaching a new school year.'
Beyond the programs themselves having an impact on students, Stadler said the fight over funding also symbolizes the wrong message for the students who benefit from them.
'The message that these kids are getting is that their country doesn't want to invest in them, their schools aren't able to invest in them,' Stadler said. 'And that is a really difficult and tragic thing to hear as a young person who is just trying to grow and thrive in a community of which they're a member.'
Michigan Advance is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Michigan Advance maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jon King for questions: info@michiganadvance.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
🚨Shock at Boca: Riquelme dissolves the football council
No one can deny that the eye of the storm at Boca is centered around the Football Council, which includes Jorge Bermúdez, Mauricio Serna, Raúl Cascini, and Marcelo who were supposed to organize the sports side to bring back success were far from achieving the goal and are now the main ones blamed for the football debacle during the worst moment in the blue and gold's history. Now, Hugo Balassone confirmed that, in light of this, Juan Román Riquelme will dissolve the organization. The only one who will remain in that role is "Chelo" Delgado, but it is not ruled out that there could be new members. One of the names that has started to emerge is Carlos Navarro Montoya. This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Americans think Paramount is cancelling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve
More favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." More Americans disapprove (40%) than approve (33%) of Paramount's controversial decision earlier this month to cancel CBS's long-running late-night program with host Stephen Colbert, according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll. And while CBS has claimed the decision was 'purely … financial' — adding that it was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount' — more Americans believe that politics rather than money was the real reason behind it. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults was conducted in the immediate aftermath of Paramount's Late Show announcement, from July 24 to July 28 — a period that coincided with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally agreeing to sign off on the company's proposed $8 billion mega-merger with the Hollywood studio Skydance. Colbert is a sharp critic of President Trump, and skeptics have accused Paramount of cancelling the Late Show not because late-night talk shows are losing money but because the company wanted to appease the Trump administration and get its Skydance deal over the line. Last October, Trump sued Paramount for the way CBS's 60 Minutes program edited an interview with his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris — and earlier this month, Paramount decided to settle with Trump and pay $16 million to his future presidential library, even though several legal experts said the case was frivolous. Colbert — who is scheduled to keep hosting the Late Show until it goes dark next May — mocked the settlement on-air, calling it a 'big fat bribe.' 'As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I'm offended, and I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company,' Colbert told his audience. 'But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.' The new Yahoo/YouGov poll shows that more Americans agree with Colbert's theory of why his show was cancelled than agree with other, more 'purely financial' explanations. When asked why CBS and Paramount are canceling the Late Show — and instructed to select all the reasons that apply — the share who select 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with the Trump administration' (37%) and 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump' (36%) is greater than the share who select 'the Late Show is losing money (32%), 'the Late Show is losing viewers' (30%) and 'the late-night format is losing relevance' (26%). Partisan preferences are clearly playing a role in the reaction to the Late Show's demise. Far more Americans think Colbert is liberal (53%) than think he's moderate (10%) or conservative (3%), and Democrats (72%) are six times more likely to disapprove of the decision than Republicans (12%). Still, there is no consensus that Colbert has gone overboard politically. In fact, more Americans (35%) say he is "about right" politically than say he's "too political" (28%). And more also favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." That might help explain why a majority of Americans still say they watch Colbert's content — either 'always' (5%), 'occasionally' (21%) or when they 'see clips online' (27%). The rest (47%) say they never watch Colbert. Finally, when Americans are asked to select up to three of their favorite late-night talk show hosts, Colbert (25%) ties Jimmy Fallon (25%) for first place, with Jimmy Kimmel (22%), Jon Stewart (19%), John Oliver (11%) Seth Meyers (7%), Bill Maher (7%), Andy Cohen (3%) and Taylor Tomlinson (2%) trailing behind them. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Internet Is Losing It Over A Video Of Trump Being Drowned Out By Bagpipes In Scotland
President Donald Trump has supplied the internet with plenty of ammunition over the years to poke fun at him with his many awkward moments, but his latest unexpected moment has social media users cracking up. On Monday, a clip of Trump greeting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer outside of the president's Turnberry golf course in Scotland during his visit to the country began making the rounds online. The pair were meeting to discuss the trade agreement they announced in May and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, among other topics. In the footage, Trump, who is seen standing outside of the golf course with Starmer, attempts to speak with the press, but his words are drowned out almost entirely by the sound of bagpipes. The bagpiper was reportedly hired by Trump to perform at his golf course as Starmer arrived, according to the Daily Beast. People on X, formerly Twitter, teased Trump over the moment. Trump tried to flex in Scotland, And got drowned out by bagpipes couldn't script it better:A disgraced president, flanked by scandals, trying to rewrite history…And the soundtrack is a national rejection played at full volume. — Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) July 28, 2025 The one instance where bagpipes are less annoying — House of Cards (@sparkelsedwards) July 28, 2025 Scotland is being drowned out by bagpipes — Anonymous (@YourAnonNews) July 28, 2025 This may be the first time he's ever been shut up. — The Prophecy (@TheTrueXProphet) July 28, 2025 This may be the first time he's ever been shut up. — The Prophecy (@TheTrueXProphet) July 28, 2025 Meanwhile, Trump marked the end of his trip to Scotland on Tuesday by opening a new golf course in Aberdeen, Scotland. Related... Radio Host Calls Out 'Liberal Media' For Slamming Trump-Epstein Relationship, Overlooking This 1 Prominent Democrat The Trump Administration Wants To Walk Back A Host Of Climate Regulations Ghislaine Maxwell Sends List Of Demands To GOP Lawmakers In Exchange For Testimony