2 Harvard grad students to complete anger management after assault during campus protest, DA says
A judge ordered two Harvard University graduate students to complete an anger management program and complete 80 hours of community service in connection with the assault of a student during a protest in 2023, Suffolk County District Attorney Kevin Hayden's office said.
Elom Tettey-Tamaklo and Ibrahim Bharmal, both 28, must attend an eight-hour class on conflict resolution, Judge Stephen McClenon ordered during a pre-trial diversion decision, Hayden's office said in a statement on Tuesday.
Tettey-Tamaklo and Bharmal were at a pro-Palestinian protest at the Harvard Business School campus on Oct. 18, 2023, the statement read, 11 days after Hamas attacked Israel and war broke out in Gaza.
Yoav Segev, a first-year business school student at the time of the incident, tried to walk through the protest, Hayden's office said. In his impact statement, Segev said he was born in Qatar and is the son of Israeli diplomats.
'Mr. Tettey-Tamaklo and Mr. Bharmal physically assaulted me and restricted my ability to access a campus space that I had every right to... while I was attempting to walk through what is effectively my front lawn as I left my apartment to go take an exam,' Segev wrote.
Bharmal wore a yellow security vest and called himself a 'marshal,' and '[behaved] as though he had the right to decide who could and could not access public campus spaces despite having not been given such authority by the University or law enforcement,' Segev described.
The two graduate students covered Segev's head with keffiyehs and shouted at him to 'exit' before they surrounded and assaulted him, Hayden's office said. They chanted 'shame' and blocked Segev's path.
The incident lasted over five minutes and was captured on video, Segev said.
'There were many people filming the protest that day but to my knowledge I was the only visible Jew and the only individual assaulted or who had their access restricted to a public space by a 'marshal,'' Segev said. '... After they assaulted and traumatized me, they refused to take any responsibility for their actions. They could have reached out to me to apologize. They did just the opposite.'
Segev said that Tettey-Tamaklo and Bharmal mischaracterized him as the aggressor and turned their case to the media. But they 'believe they were acting in a private security capacity and are above the law, using force to determine who can and cannot be in public spaces — deciding to exclude the visibly Jewish student," Segev said.
McClenon issued his order after hearing a victim impact statement read by Segev, a first-year business school student at the time of the incident.
'After they assaulted and traumatized me, they refused to take any responsibility for their actions. They could have reached out to me to apologize. They did just the opposite. They took their case to the media, slandering me in the process. They publicly declared that they were 'proud of their actions,' failed to cooperate with law enforcement by identifying their fellow assailants, and have failed to show an ounce of remorse or take any accountability whatsoever,' Segev said.
'Their assault was not a rash incident at a bar,' Segev continued. 'Their actions and public commentary afterwards demonstrate that the defendants believe they were acting in a private security capacity and are above the law, using force to determine who can and cannot be in public spaces — deciding to exclude the visibly Jewish student.'
He was willing to forgive them, but Segev said that they 'traumatized me by making my life miserable through their media campaign.'
Segev listed four points on what he wants written from them: to admit that they committed assault toward him, to admit he did nothing wrong before or during the incident, to stop talking about him to the press and to apologize for the assault and their statements to the media.
Every Suffolk County resident 'has the right to move freely, the right of free expression, and the right to be free from physical harm,' Hayden said in the statement.
A criminal complaint was issued for Tettey-Tamaklo and Bharmal by a Boston Municipal Court Brighton clerk on May 8, 2024.
'Mr. Segev is an entirely innocent victim,' Hayden said in his statement. 'He did nothing wrong leading up to this incident and nothing wrong during this incident. He had a Constitutional right to walk across the campus of his school without being accosted or assaulted. As such, we were prepared to go to trial to seek accountability from the two defendants and justice for Mr. Segev.'
ACLU demands court order release of Tufts grad student in ICE custody
6 Mass. colleges targeted in federal probe into campus antisemitism
'Last-minute crisis' holding up cease-fire approval, Israel's Netanyahu says
Biden says he and Trump speak as '1 team' on cease-fire deal in Gaza
Cease-fire in Gaza still not reached, Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu says
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Judge sides with Trump DOJ to keep Mahmoud Khalil in detention
Judge sides with Trump DOJ to keep Mahmoud Khalil in detention Show Caption Hide Caption Supporters protest for Mahmoud Khalil's release from ICE detention Supporters demanded the release of Mahmoud Khalil while he attended a hearing at the LaSalle Immigration Court in Jena, Louisiana. A federal judge ruled the Trump administration could keep Mahmoud Khalil in custody under a secondary legal argument. On June 13, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz, of New Jersey, rejected the 30-year-old Palestinian Columbia University graduate's request to be released after three months in immigration detention. On June 11, Farbiarz initially ruled Khalil couldn't be detained by Secretary of State Marco Rubio's determination that he threatened American foreign policy interests. But Farbiarz left open other options for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to hold Khalil. Ahead of a court-ordered deadline to respond on June 13, Justice Department lawyers argued Khalil could be held for misrepresenting information on his permanent residency application, under a federal immigration statute lawyers have presented to the court. "Khalil is now detained based on that other charge of removability," Justice Department lawyers wrote in a June 13 letter submitted to court. "Detaining Khalil based on that other ground of removal is lawful." They said Khalil now has options to seek his release with the charge pending. Farbiarz sided with that assessment and said the secondary charge hasn't been blocked by the court. He said, "a number of avenues are now available to" Khalil, "including a bail application to the immigration judge presiding over the immigration case." Khalil's lawyer, Amy Greer, said that the government was using 'cruel, transparent delay tactics' to keep him away from his wife and newborn son on their first Father's Day, on June 15. 'Instead of celebrating together, he is languishing in ICE detention as punishment for his advocacy on behalf of his fellow Palestinians,' Greer said in a statement. The Justice Department had no comment beyond the filings, an agency spokesperson said in an email. The government had until June 13 to appeal the judge's initial ruling. Justice Department lawyers pushed Khalil to follow the administrative actions instead of filing in federal court. "These administrative processes are the proper avenues for Khalil to seek release, not having a federal district court hold that the government cannot detain Khalil on a charge that the Court never found to be unlawful," the government lawyers said in the letter. In his original June 11 ruling, Farbiarz Khalil's request to temporarily block federal officials from deporting him under Rubio's determination. On June 13, he extended the government's time to respond to appeal his decision. Justice Department lawyers instead brought up the second argument. Khalil's legal team sent a letter to Farbiarz the morning of June 13, requesting that the client be freed since the appeal from the government did not meet the morning deadline. Khalil has been held in an immigration detention center in Louisiana since March. His lawyers have fought for his release to be with his wife and newborn son, Deen. However, a June 12 email sent to Khalil's lawyers by Brian Acuna, director of the New Orleans ICE Field Office, stated that he had "no information [that] your client will be released or a time for that," court records showed. His lawyers instead needed to contact ICE's Office of Chief Counsel on that matter, the email said. Immigration agents arrested Khalil, a green card holder married to an American citizen, on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment building in Manhattan. A Palestinian born in Syria, Khalil was a spokesman and negotiator for pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia. Khalil was not accused of any crime. Noncitizens can be deported if the Secretary of State finds that their presence threatens U.S. foreign policy interests, even if their beliefs, statements or associations are "otherwise lawful," the Trump administration argued. They cited a rarely used provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 as the basis. Farbiarz ruled against the Secretary of State's determination and said the secondary argument — that he omitted information on his application to enter the country — "almost surely flows" from Rubio's determination. On June 13, Farbiarz said Khalil hadn't given factual evidence as to why it could be unlawful to detain him on the secondary charge.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump embraces Israeli strike after arguing against it
President Donald Trump spent the bulk of this week saying he hoped Israel wouldn't strike Iran. But by Friday, he was all in. The president had hoped for more time to negotiate with Tehran over its nuclear program, but once Israel launched the massive attack, Trump embraced the new dynamic, using it as leverage to try to seal the deal he wanted all along. 'He didn't want them to go now,' a senior administration official said about Israel. 'He understands they're a sovereign nation, and he will support them because they're our ally,' added the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive situation, 'but he wanted more time.' The administration's shift in tone in the first 24 hours after the attack underscores the balancing act the president is engaged in as he tries to assuage various factions in the administration while still maintaining pressure on Iran. The messaging served to assure Israel that the United States had its back, nod to the hawkish faction of the Trump coalition and try to calm the jittery MAGA isolationists who have long been wary of Middle East entanglements. The constant, however, was Trump's desire to bring Iran back to the table even as the Islamic Republic vowed retribution. 'There is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' Trump posted on Truth Social, his first public remarks after the Israeli attack. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left.' Trump's offer to Iran doubled as a 'direct push to Israel' to tap the brakes, the senior administration official said. But by Friday afternoon, with Iran firing dozens/hundreds of rockets toward Israel, the administration left little doubt that it was ready to support Israel's defense, a marked shift from the relatively neutral statement Secretary of State Marco Rubio released immediately after Israel's attack. 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' Rubio said Thursday night in a statement. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense.' But by Friday morning, Trump was calling reporters and making it clear that he knew about Israel's plans in advance, describing it as a 'very successful attack' in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. The initial administration messaging was, 'we yellow-lighted it,' said Curt Mills, executive director of The American Conservative magazine. 'Today they said we greenlit it. Or they moved toward a light green.' The senior Trump administration official insisted that while Washington had been informed of Israel's plans ahead of time, the United States had no role in helping plan the attack. 'We did not help plan and they didn't give us every detail,' said the person, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive conversations within the administration. 'We purposely did not want to know the details,' they said, adding that the United States had the chance to participate in the action against Iran, but opted not to join. Though Trump might have preferred more time to negotiate, he appeared frustrated that talks had stalled, signaling early this week that time for Iran was running out. 'They are good negotiators, but they're tough,' he said Monday at the White House. 'Sometimes they can be too tough, that's the problem. So we're trying to make a deal so that there's no destruction and death. We told them that. I have told them that. I hope that is the way it works out. It might not work out.' The 'too tough' negotiations came as an influential group of hawkish conservatives lobbied Trump furiously to bless the Israeli government's efforts to destroy Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's attack further exposed a rift inside Trumpworld between those hawks, who see Iran as an existential threat to Israel, and the isolationists wary of Middle East entanglements informed by the long and costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "A lot of people in the MAGA movement, and ones that have really invested a lot in electing Trump and [Vice President JD] Vance will be incredibly disappointed if this turns into a larger war and it will lead to some fractures," said a former Pentagon official granted anonymity to speak about the internal dynamics of the president's foreign policy team.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Slotkin on Israel-Iran attacks: ‘Spiral of violence'
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — As by Iranian missiles Friday in retaliation for the deadly Israeli attacks on the nation's nuclear and military structures, U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich) is voicing her concerns that the conflict could lead to a larger conflict that puts the entire Middle East at risk. Israel attacks Iran's nuclear and missile sites, Iran responds with drone strikes Slotkin, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, released a statement Friday, expressing worry that the conflict and the drastic effects it could have if it were to become a 'spiral of violence' leading to consequences for the Middle East and the United States: 'The strikes in the Middle East create a moment of uncertainty, and there's no doubt that American troops and civilians in the region — particularly friends and family of Michiganders — are at risk of being caught in the crossfire.'But while it's too early to tell how this will all play out, Israel has struck a blow against the hardline Iranian government, a state sponsor of terror that has long held out the threat of a potential nuclear weapon over the region.'Iran has fired ballistic missiles at U.S. bases and Israel for years, and I have seen up close how Iran's proxy forces have been responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans across the Middle East, and countless civilians.'But here's the thing: as with all conflicts, there's serious danger of a spiral of violence that leads to real consequences for the U.S., and people in the region. Addressing that risk typically takes professionals with a depth of experience. It's essential that the Administration manage the situation — and that's the point that concerns me most.' U.S. Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), June 13, 2025 What to know about Israel's major attack on Iran Israel attacked Iran Friday with warplanes and drones that it had previously smuggled into the country, using them to attack key facilities and kill military generals and scientists—saying these measures were necessary before Iran was able to build an atomic weapon. In exchange, Iran retaliated by sending a swarm of drones at Israel, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning of 'severe punishment.' Israel attacks Iran's capital with explosions booming across Tehran 'Don't think that they hit and it's over. No. They started the work and started the war,' Khamenei said in a recorded message. 'We will not allow them to escape safely from this great crime they committed.' The Associated Press contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
