Sumitomo Mitsui among banks stepping up deals for blended finance
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking (SMBC) and Citigroup are among banks targeting new deals in the market for blended finance, defying a number of headwinds, including a significant decline in government spending on development aid.
Deals blending public and private funds totaled $18 billion last year, down 21% from 2023, according to Convergence, a global network of more than 190 institutions and a data provider for blended finance. Over the past three years, banks doing the most blended-finance transactions include SMBC, Citigroup, BNP Paribas and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, it said in a report released Wednesday.
The deals tend to target environmental and social goals, and rely on public de-risking tools such as guarantees to attract private capital. With climate-focused transactions making up more than 60% of total financing last year, blended finance has been touted as key to raising the $300 billion in annual contributions pledged by countries at the COP29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, last year.
Jeanne Soh, head of structured finance in Asia at SMBC, said she's seen rising interest in blended finance during the past few years. The bank has been working with various development-finance institutions and does around seven to eight deals a year, she said.
SMBC is seeking to grow blended finance-related revenue by about 10% year-on-year, Soh said. "This is going to be a growth sector for us, and a key focus for the bank.'
Citigroup, meanwhile, is looking into a type of blended-finance instrument that would allow sovereign issuers in emerging markets to refinance their debt and put savings toward developmental goals such as food security and education, said Stephanie von Friedeburg, a New York-based managing director in the bank's public-sector group.
The market for these so-called debt-for-development swaps "is really starting to grow,' she said.
At the same time, the market for blended finance faces a shortage of funds as richer nations, including the Netherlands and Germany, cut back on developmental aid. In the United States, President Donald Trump has taken a sledgehammer to USAID, which had been one of blended finance's most active investors.
As a result, the market now finds itself "on a precipice,' Convergence CEO Joan Larrea said in an interview.
Larrea also pointed to other problems that are hampering growth. Blended finance is "plagued by major issues,' she said. That includes a lack of strategy among donors to target private-sector funding, a failure to share data and insufficient standardized structures, which make it harder to scale and replicate transactions, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
6 hours ago
- NHK
Expert tips yields on super-long JGBs to stabilize
Japan's national debt is under scrutiny again as yields on super-long government bonds surge. Newsroom Tokyo's Yuko Fukushima asked an expert what to expect next.
Japan Times
8 hours ago
- Japan Times
South Korean beauty brands bet boom in U.S. demand outlasts tariff pain
Emboldened by roaring online success in the U.S., South Korea's cosmetic startups are expanding their bricks-and-mortar presence in the world's biggest consumer market, confident their mass appeal will offset the hit from tariffs. Brands like Tirtir, d'Alba, Torriden and Beauty of Joseon are in talks with major retailers to stock their U.S. shelves, company executives have said. Korean beauty or "K-beauty" products are able to compete globally on quality, price and snappy marketing and have benefited greatly from the success of the Asian export giant's other consumer hits, namely its music, film and television. "K-culture — things like PSY in the past, BTS, and then Korean dramas and films like 'Parasite' — those really paved the way," Tirtir CEO An Byung-Jun said. "In the U.S. market, there was already growing interest in South Korea. Then Korean cosmetics entered the scene. The quality was good, but the prices were lower than the existing luxury brands like L'Oreal or Estee Lauder." Tirtir's profile shot up last year following the viral online success of its cushion foundation shades designed for dark skin. The product will be sold at some U.S. stores of Ulta Beauty this summer, An said, adding that the firm aims to double U.S. sales this year. Retailers in the U.S. from Sephora and Ulta Beauty to Costco and Target are in talks with Korean cosmetics brands to launch sales in their physical stores, according to interviews with a dozen people including cosmetics company CEOs, executives and industry experts. They also expect Korean brands to weather tariffs better than rivals thanks to higher-margin business models. Many of them outsource production to contract manufacturers like Cosmax and Kolmar, dubbed the Foxconns of fast beauty, to keep costs down. Products are displayed at a TIRTIR store in Seoul on May 23. | REUTERS South Korea overtook Germany to become the world's third-largest beauty product exporter after France and the U.S. in 2024. Four-fifths of its $13 billion cosmetics output are for exports, which have predominantly been driven by e-commerce sales. Yuliet Mendosa, a 25-year-old visiting Seoul from America, is a fan of K-pop boy band BTS, which led her to greater interest in K-beauty products. "They go straight to the point to fix what you need to fix and your skin," she said at an Olive Young store. Changing landscape The U.S. push comes at a tricky time for the world's big exporters with U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs unsettling global trade. But while the levies create uncertainty for Korea's beauty exporters, strong demand is expected to mitigate some of this, executives say. South Korea's dominant beauty retailer Olive Young plans to set up its first U.S. store in Los Angeles as early as this year, said Jin Se-hoon, executive vice president of the company's global platform business. "The U.S., especially California, has by far the most customers for our global online shopping platform," Jin said. He said Washington's tariffs were a burden but not enough to hurt K-beauty's popularity and value-for-money proposition. Their U.S. expansion, despite tariffs, also seeks to sustain momentum after exports to China, the biggest overseas market for K-beauty, fell due to geopolitical tensions and competition. Skincare brand d'Alba, owned by d'Alba Global and known for its vegan mist serum and sunscreens, is in talks with Costco, Ulta Beauty and Target for retail distribution, the company said. A woman takes a photograph of a cosmetic product made by TIRTIR at its store in Seoul on May 23. | REUTERS LVMH's cosmetics chain Sephora plans to launch two new Korean brands, Torriden and Beauty of Joseon, this summer, according to a Sephora spokesperson. Costco, Target and Ulta did not respond to requests for comments. Tirtir's An said the baseline 10% tariff that the U.S. has already imposed is "endurable," although the planned 25% tariff on South Korean products due in July may force the company to raise prices "a little bit." Seoul, a major U.S. ally, is seeking tariff exemptions in trade talks with Washington. The Founders — the maker of Anua skincare products, which hit Ulta Beauty shelves this year —also have more room to absorb higher tariffs than rivals, its strategy team leader Jung Jun-ho said. The company posted an operating profit margin of over 30% last year. Niche brands South Korea replaced France as the biggest cosmetics exporter to the U.S. in 2024, according to official data, driven by online sales through Amazon. The top five Korean cosmetics brands in U.S. e-commerce — which include Beauty of Joseon, Medicube and Biodance — saw online sales grow 71% on average over the past two years, outperforming the overall U.S. market's 21% growth, according to Euromonitor data. The top five French brands — which include L'Oreal Paris, Dior and Lancome — posted 15% growth over that period. Social media has played a big part in Korea's success. "Nowadays a single viral TikTok video or influencer endorsement can turn a product into a global bestseller before it even launches outside Korea," said South Korea-based beauty marketer Odile Monod. But longer-term success will require increased physical store sales, said Jason Kim, CEO of cosmetics distributor Silicon2. There are already signs of growth plateauing for some companies, such as startup COSRX, now part of Korean cosmetics giant AmorePacific, as competition heats up and cheaper alternatives emerge, analysts said. For now, investors remain upbeat about Korean potential, with shares of d'Alba Global more than doubling since their debut last month. "The K-beauty trend is strong," Silicon2's Kim said. "But indie brands will face challenges too."
Japan Times
8 hours ago
- Japan Times
South Korea's new president has a chance to clean up
The election of left-leaning former labor activist Lee Jae-myung as South Korean president Tuesday is just the latest example of how much of the world is moving in the opposite direction to the US. In common with recent elections in Canada and Australia, it's a rebuke of leaders on the right who've fought a rearguard action against the transition to renewables. Lee has promised to phase out coal, limit use of natural gas and accelerate the building of wind and solar. His position on nuclear power, a major success story that was strongly supported by his impeached predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol, remains ambiguous. However, resolving energy policy in South Korea won't be easy. Years of inertia and obstruction of the transition have left the country with a system that's plagued with high costs and has the lowest renewable penetration among developed economies. State-owned utility Korea Electric Power Corp., or Kepco, is wallowing in debt after it was forced to suppress bill prices when Russia's invasion of Ukraine pushed up the cost of liquefied natural gas. In the best of times, it usually depends on government subsidies to sell electricity for less than it spends on fueling, building and servicing its plants. The biggest challenge will come from fixing the crippling costs of renewables. South Korea pays more for its wind and solar than any other major economy. It's the only significant market where you can still build a new coal power plant more cheaply than a new solar or wind generator. If Lee's plans for an energy transition aren't going to become mired in red tape while adding yet more costs to Kepco's teetering balance sheet, it will be slow, unrewarding work. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer came to power last year promising to build 1.5 million homes in five years by breaking through a similar morass of regulatory roadblocks. Homebuilding this year, however, is expected to hit its lowest level in 14 years. The barriers to renewables are legion. Some are natural: South Korea is as densely populated as the Netherlands, but its land is far more mountainous. That means a dearth of the flat sites best suited to solar and wind. The few that exist have to contend with a farming sector that aims to be largely self-sufficient in growing rice for the country's 52 million people. Hillsides where solar can be built are vulnerable to landslides, particularly as a warming climate causes more intense downpours. There are no grid connections to other countries, because South Korea doesn't much trust its neighbors. The more serious barriers are the effect of regulatory capture, though. One little-noticed update from Kepco and the powerful Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy last year largely outlawed new renewable development for seven years in a swath of the south and east, saying fresh generation licenses wouldn't be issued in the region until 103 electricity substations complete their upgrades in 2032. Similarly, onerous rules requiring solar developers to verify the carbon footprint of their panels throughout the supply chain were introduced in 2021 following concerns that Chinese modules were undercutting local manufacturers. That's helped prop up the local industry, but left the country with some of the highest module costs in the world. The carbon footprint of a grid that gets 60% of its power from fossil fuels seems to have been less of a concern. Lee's more vocal backing for offshore wind is a sign of how intractable these problems may be. It's the least price competitive form of clean energy in South Korea, but in a country where the rural lobby is opposed to onshore solar and wind and the green lobby wants a halt to further nuclear development, it's the one that's least likely to upset any interest groups. For all that, Lee has some advantages. The center-left has had control of Seoul's executive and legislative branches for just two years since 2008, from 2020 to 2022 when policy was dominated by COVID-19. He's now got that power, giving him a stronger hand in allowing more renewables onto the grid. Kepco's weakened financial state should mute its objections, too. He will need to move fast, though. Three under-construction nuclear generators near Ulsan and on the east coast must be expedited, while the red tape that's held back solar and wind will need to be slashed. If Kepco needs more bailouts, they should be conditional on it upgrading transmission networks to open up the windy, sun-baked east of the country as a renewables hub. Even costly offshore wind has potential, if prices can be brought down by shortening current decadelong development times. Costs for the technology in the U.K. fell by two-thirds between 2014 and 2019 as the sector grew. There's no reason South Korea can't repeat the trick. David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy.
