Two women linked to fatal Wynberg court shooting denied bail
Shireen Matthews, the alleged mastermind in the killing of Dingalomoya Chintso, and alleged gun smuggler, Wanay Farao, appeared in front of a magistrate on Thursday.
They are the only accused, out of five, who chose to apply for bail in this matter.
ALSO READ:
• Wynberg court shooting: NPA to oppose bail for 5 accused
• Wynberg court shooting: Police confident they've arrested both gunmen
Chintso, a taxi operator from Vrygrond, was shot and killed inside the courthouse after appearing in court for a murder case.
Delivering judgment at the Wynberg Magistrate Court, the magistrate agreed with the prosecution that, if granted bail, the pair would attempt to flee trial.
The court heard that both accused were on the run and evading police after the 8 April shooting.
The magistrate also ruled that lawyers for the two accused did not provide the court with exceptional circumstances to permit their release on bail.
"In other words, both applicants have not discharged the onus set upon them in terms of section 60 (11a) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1997. In the result, the bail applications of both first and second applicant is denied."
All five accused will remain behind bars, and the case has been postponed to 19 September for further investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
Dead man's estate wins R800k from police minister
Six months imprisonment on false charges ends in big payout after his death and 'intolerable' conditions The South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg recently awarded R800 000 in damages to the family of Thomas Mashudu Mulaudzi, who died in 2021 before seeing justice for his unlawful arrest and detention that lasted nearly six months in 2015-2016. Judge Seena Yacoob delivered the judgment on 16 July 2025, ordering the minister of police to pay damages with interest dating back to 2016, plus legal costs. The case was brought by Mulaudzi's sister, Patience Lutendo Mulaudzi, who serves as executrix of his deceased estate. Mulaudzi, 44, 'died in 2021, apparently from complications arising from the Covid-19 virus', according to the judgment. He passed away five years after being found not guilty and discharged from charges related to a truck hijacking he had no involvement in. Background of the case The ordeal began on 21 December 2015 when Mulaudzi was working as a dispatch clerk at Diplomat Warehouse. He was called to his superior's office and arrested without being told what charges he faced. Police handcuffed him and took him to where his employer's hijacked truck was parked. Despite having no connection to the hijacking, Mulaudzi was denied bail because police provided the magistrate with incorrect address information. The judgment said that 'bail was denied because the police told the magistrate that Mr Mulaudzi had provided an incorrect address. However, he had not. The police had mixed up his address with that of the driver of the hijacked truck.' This error resulted in his detention at Modderbee Prison for nearly six months. Yacoob noted that 'the conditions in the prison were deplorable' and this was 'common cause' between both parties, supported by reports from the judicial inspectorate on correctional services. ALSO READ: Germiston woman granted bail after teen's death in hit-and-run Impact on family and life The unlawful detention had devastating consequences on Mulaudzi's family life. As a widower, he was solely responsible for three minor children. The court found that the children 'were left home alone when he was arrested' and 'he was only able to arrange for their care the following day'. The psychological impact was severe. Yacoob recorded that Mulaudzi 'testified that he would have liked to have died in prison because he was being accused of something he did not do'. The judge described how 'the effects of the arrest and detention on Mr Mulaudzi were clearly extremely traumatic and catastrophic'. The arrest damaged Mulaudzi's reputation and dignity, particularly as it occurred at his workplace. When he was eventually released, the judgment noted that 'he did not get his job back because it had already been filled'. At a subsequent CCMA hearing, his employer claimed he was involved in a hijacking. However, there was no evidence of his involvement. ALSO READ: NPA secures preservation order in unlawful blue lights case Previous legal findings In 2018, Judge J Twala determined that Mulaudzi's arrest and detention were unlawful. Yacoob said that 'my brother Twala J determined in 2018 that the arrest and detention of Mr Mulaudzi was unlawful and that the first defendant, the Minister of Police, is 100% liable for Mr Mulaudzi's damages arising therefrom'. Twala dismissed claims of malicious prosecution and assault but upheld the unlawfulness of the detention. The recent judgment focused solely on determining the quantum of damages, as liability had already been established. Yacoob noted that 'the matter is now before me to determine the quantum of damages for which the minister is liable' and that ultimately 'Mulaudzi was discharged because there was no evidence against him'. Expert medical evidence Mental health experts retained by both parties agreed that Mulaudzi suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder as a direct result of his arrest and detention. Yacoob described the effects as 'clearly extremely traumatic and catastrophic'. The judge described how Mulaudzi was transformed from being 'a gainfully employed, respectable member of his community and a caring father' into someone denied basic respect and proper legal procedures. The court emphasised the broader trauma of incarceration, noting 'the 'ordinary' consequences of being incarcerated in one of South Africa's overcrowded and under-resourced prisons, with all autonomy removed'. ALSO READ: 'David vs Goliath': Meta agrees to hand over child porn channel creator information Criticism of state conduct The judge strongly criticised the manner in which state officials handled the case, both during the original proceedings and the damages assessment. 'They were unprepared, produced evidence erratically and called irrelevant witnesses,' the judge wrote, emphasising that this criticism applied more to the minister's officials than to legal counsel. The judge noted that 'unfortunately, the same is still applicable nearly seven years later'. Despite common cause evidence and similar submissions from both sides regarding appropriate damages, settlement proved impossible. The court found that 'the matter could not be settled simply because the minister (or the minister's authorised representative) declined to give the appropriate instruction'. This resulted in unnecessary legal costs and the consumption of scarce judicial resources. Yacoob observed that 'court resources, which are notoriously insufficient', were applied to 'determine a matter that could easily have been settled'. ALSO READ: Gauteng High Court rules National Dialogue can continue Damages assessment Legal representatives for Mulaudzi's family argued for damages between R700 000 and R1 million, while the state submitted that R500 000 to R700 000 would be appropriate. The judge emphasised that quantum determination 'is not a mathematical exercise and that it is not a simple calculation of a daily, weekly or monthly rate'. She said the assessment must consider the arrest circumstances, detention conditions, duration and the violation of basic human rights, while balancing this against the fact that damages come from public funds. After considering all factors, Yacoob determined that 'the appropriate amount to be R800 000.' 'I am satisfied that a slightly higher award is justified,' Yacoob said. Punitive costs order Beyond the damages award, Yacoob imposed a punitive costs order against the state, requiring payment of the plaintiff's legal costs on an attorney and client scale. The judge acknowledged that he 'would ordinarily be wary of granting a punitive costs order against the state, as it is public funds at issue and the state has many responsibilities'. However, he justified the order by finding that the way the minister's officials behaved was deserving of a punitive costs order. The court ordered the minister of police to pay R800 000 plus interest of 10.5% from 30 August 2016, to be paid within 20 days of serving. Additionally, the judge ruled that the state cover all plaintiff's legal costs, including expert witness fees and interpreter fees, with interest from the tax date to the payment date. READ NEXT: George building collapse 'was entirely preventable' – report
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Germiston woman granted bail after teen's death in hit-and-run
Martha Christina was granted bail after allegedly killing 13-year-old Thando Mahlangu in a hit-and-run at a cultural ceremony. The accused allegedly drove into a crowd, killing Thando Pretty Mahlangu (pictured) and fleeing the scene in Germiston. Picture: Facebook A Germiston woman, who faces culpable homicide charges for allegedly killing a 13-year-old girl in a hit-and-run during a cultural ceremony, has been released on bail. Martha Christina appeared in the Germiston Magistrate's Court, where she was granted R3 000 bail. She faces charges of culpable homicide and failure to stop at the scene of an accident in connection to Thando Mahlangu's death on 28 June. Teen's hit-and-run death The charges stem from an incident when the accused allegedly drove her car into a crowd of people at Dinwiddie in Germiston. Among those present were young girls participating in a traditional coming-of-age ceremony. Christina's vehicle allegedly struck Thando, also known as Pretty, who later tragically succumbed to her injuries. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Phindi Mjonondwane said Christina allegedly failed to stop at the scene and drove off immediately after the collision. ALSO READ: Zimbabwean man killed in brutal hit-and-run in Rivonia As part of her bail conditions, the accused cannot leave the Gauteng province without informing the investigating officer. The case was postponed to 20 August to allow for further investigations. 'The NPA is committed to ensuring justice, particularly in cases involving the loss of young lives, by working closely with law enforcement to uphold accountability and the rule of law,' Mjonondwane said. Earlier this month, members of the Azanian People's Organisation (Azapo) in Katlehong visited the Mahlangu family to offer their condolences and seek the family's blessing to honour Thando's memory through a campaign of solidarity. Parties, residents united to demand justice Together with members of the EFF, MK Party, ANC, and Thando's friends from the broader community, they organised a protest at the Germiston police station to demand accountability and a thorough investigation into the incident. They also demonstrated outside the home of the alleged perpetrator. 'Witnessing such diverse political organisations and community members standing shoulder to shoulder, transcending their usual boundaries, was a powerful testament to the shared sense of loss and outrage,' the Azapo Katlehong members posted on social media. ALSO READ: Teenage boy (15) killed in alleged hit-and-run in Centurion 'Their unity in demanding justice for Pretty reflects not only the depth of the tragedy but also the enduring strength and solidarity of the Katlehong community as it mourns the heartbreaking loss of such a young and promising life.'
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
NPA secures preservation order in unlawful blue lights case
The suspect who was driving the car that was illegally fitted with blue lights was an illegal immigrant and has been deported. The North West High Court has granted the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) a preservation order which relates to an SUV unlawfully fitted with blue lights. The order was granted to the NPA's Asset Forfeiture Unit on Wednesday, allowing it to seize the silver Toyota Fortuner valued at about R600 000. Driver arrested in Vryburg This comes after a suspect was arrested for unlawfully using blue identification lights along the N18 near Vryburg on 27 April. According to NPA communications officer Sivenathi Gunya, the arrest was made in terms of regulations 176 and 185 of the National Road Traffic Regulations, 2000. '[The regulations] prohibit the unauthorised fitting or display of blue lights reserved exclusively for emergency and law enforcement vehicles,' Gunya said in a statement. 'According to the law, only specific personnel are permitted to use such lights when performing official duties.' These include members of the South African Police Service, municipal police, provincial and municipal traffic officers, and the military police of the South African National Defence Force. More woes for the suspect To make matters worse, the suspect was in the country illegally. ALSO READ: Thrrr…Phaaa: Musician Selaelo Selota's Mercedes frozen as SIU probes misuse of lottery funds In addition to the blue light offence, he was also charged and convicted under section 49 of the Immigration Act, 2002 for being in South Africa without valid documentation. He was subsequently deported by immigration enforcement procedures. 'Ruling sends a strong message' Gunya said the NPA welcomes the court's decision as a firm affirmation of the rule of law and a critical step in combating the abuse of state-like authority. 'The ruling sends a strong message that the justice system will not tolerate actions that endanger public safety, erode trust in legitimate law enforcement, or create fear and confusion on our roads.' 'A serious threat' Dr Rachel Makhari, North West director of Public Prosecutions, said the outcome reaffirms the NPA's commitment to tackling so-called blue-lights bullies who intimidate road users and undermine public safety. 'These individuals often act with impunity, posing a serious threat to both the physical safety of citizens and the credibility of law enforcement agencies,' Makhari said. 'The NPA, through its Asset Forfeiture Unit, will continue to take decisive action to dismantle this form of organised criminality by seizing their tools of trade, particularly unlawfully used vehicles, and pursuing the appropriate legal remedies. She said the state prosecuting agency remains steadfast in its duty to uphold the law and protect communities from people who seek to exploit systems of authority for criminal gain. NOW READ: Fake commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazis pop up online
