logo
2025 Pacing As Earth's Second Warmest Year Behind 2024, Report Says

2025 Pacing As Earth's Second Warmest Year Behind 2024, Report Says

Yahoo5 days ago
The first six months of 2025 were Earth's second warmest on record, keeping 2025 on a pace to finish slightly behind 2024 for the planet's warmest year, according to just-released data from several agencies.
June's warmth: June 2025's globally average temperature was 1.76 degrees Fahrenheit above the 20th-century average, only 0.42 degrees cooler than the record warmest June in 2024 and 0.18 degrees cooler than the second warmest June in 2023, according to a report released Thursday by NOAA.
Separate analysis from the European Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) and NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies also found Earth had its third warmest June, behind the two previous Junes.
Only Behind Last Year: With the first six months over, 2025 has a roughly 2 in 3 chance to be the planet's second warmest year on record, climate scientist Zeke Hausfather estimated in a post on Bluesky.
NOAA similarly concluded "95% confidence" of a second to fourth warmest year on record in 2025 in their temperature rankings outlook. NOAA global temperature records date to 1850.
Each month in 2025 has been at least among the top three warmest of those respective months, according to NOAA. January was the planet's warmest in 176 years, NOAA found.
2024 was the planet's warmest year in records dating to the late 19th century, according to both NOAA and NASA.
(For even more granular weather data tracking in your area, view your 15-minute details forecast in our Premium Pro experience.)
Above The Threshold? June 2025 was only the third in the last 24 months in which global temperatures were not more than 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above the pre-industrial (1850-1900) levels, according to the C3S.
Despite that, the most recent 12-month period through June was more than 2.7 degrees above late 19th-century temperatures.
That doesn't necessarily mean we've broken above the 2.7 degree limit agreed upon in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement.
According to climate scientists, that would require that threshold to be topped for over a decade. But they also stress it means we're closer to that threshold than ever before.Highlights: June was the warmest on record in Japan, as well as in dozens of cities in South Korea. It was the second warmest June in France and the United Kingdom.
Spain smashed its national June heat record on June 28, when a high of 114.8 degrees was measured in El Granado, according to NOAA.
In the U.S., it was the hottest June on record in Raleigh, North Carolina, and Yakutat, Alaska, according to the Southeast Regional Climate Center.
As you can see on the map below, parts of western Europe, Australia and Asia were record warm in the first six months. Hawaii had its hottest January-June on record, according to NOAA.
Oceans still warm: Global ocean temperatures are still much warmer than in any years from 1979 through 2022, C3S found.
C3S noted that since March 2023, global daily sea surface temperatures have been warmer than in other years prior.
Among patches of ocean record warmth in the first six months of 2025 included swaths of the Philippine Sea, the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii, the northeast Atlantic Ocean near Ireland, the U.K. and Scandinavia, the western Mediterranean Sea, the Arctic Ocean from Greenland to Canada and the southern Indian Ocean.
Despite all that, 2025's ocean warmth has been less extreme than the off-the-charts ocean warmth of 2023 and 2024, which included both record tropical Atlantic warmth and an El Niño, the periodic warming of water in the equatorial eastern and central Pacific Ocean.
Jonathan Erdman is a senior meteorologist at weather.com and has been covering national and international weather since 1996. Extreme and bizarre weather are his favorite topics. Reach out to him on X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Facebook and Bluesky.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NASA-Funded Greenland Survey Reveals ‘Crazy' Amounts Of Ocean Warming
NASA-Funded Greenland Survey Reveals ‘Crazy' Amounts Of Ocean Warming

Forbes

time25 minutes ago

  • Forbes

NASA-Funded Greenland Survey Reveals ‘Crazy' Amounts Of Ocean Warming

Pieces of ice in front of glacier, barren mountains, Knud Rasmussen Glacier, in far northwest ... More Greenland. Preliminary data from a NASA-funded Greenland survey point to a two-degree centigrade rise in regional ocean water temperatures in less than a decade. For the first time ever, a team of researchers took the data from a subglacial Greenland channel in February of this year using a custom-built, remotely operated vehicle equipped with sonar, laser-ranging and a mass spectrometer. Preliminarily, what we've been able to show is, at least during this year, ocean water in this region is almost two degrees warmer than it was less than 10 years ago, Britney Schmidt, a Cornell University astrobiologist and the ongoing Icefin project's principal investigator, tells me in Reykjavik. It's crazy amounts of warming; we're losing this ice very rapidly and it's much warmer than I would have expected; two degrees in 10 years is insane, she says. The ROV allows us to find channels that are bringing water out from underneath the ice sheet which has huge climate implications, Schmidt tells me during the recent European Astrobiology Institute's BEACON 25 conference in Iceland. But it also has astrobiological implications, because you're bringing samples from under the ice sheet that we otherwise can't get to, she says. This ROV exploration is also trailblazing the way for NASA's potential subsurface lander missions to the icy moons of Europa and Enceladus. At the same time, this research is providing the most current data on climate change in our Northern hemisphere. One of these glaciers has been moving back at about a kilometer a year; others are moving faster, but this system is quite unstable, so we're rapidly losing ice, says Schmidt. NASA-funded and partly funded by the private Simons Foundation, one aim of the research is to simulate the types of exploration, decision making, and analyses that might be required for a mission one of our solar system's icy moons. Cornell University astrobiologist Britney Schmidt gives her presentation at the recent European ... More Astrobiology Insitute's BEACON 25 conference in Iceland. Schmidt is pictured here with an image of Icefin, a underwater robotic operated vehicle (ROV). Retreating Glaciers Working from temporary headquarters atop Greenland's ice cap, the team made its measurements earlier this year by deploying the ROV into subsurface channels and steering the ROV upstream underneath the ice sheet. The team worked near or on three glaciers, including the Knud Rasmussen Glacier on Greenland's Northwestern Coast We're able to resolve exactly how the ocean is getting into these channels and how much fresh water is affecting the base of the ice, says Schmidt. That allows us to put much tighter constraints on how melting is happening, she says. Ice Melt Even so, Greenland has been rapidly losing ice for the last 100 years due to direct human-caused effects in the Northern hemisphere. Three glaciers are calving (or losing) ice directly into the ocean. In the cold part of the season, the team can drive out on snowmobiles to these environments, Schmidt explains in her BEACON 25 talk. The team first drills a hole in the sea ice, then we deploy the vehicle vertically through the ice, then drive it under the ice horizontally, as Schmidt explains in her talk. Future Icy Moon Exploration The ways in which we're exploring beneath the ice are analogous to the types of things we'd need to develop to explore Jupiter and Saturn's icy moons, says Schmidt. You'd melt through the ice shell to be able to pull water samples and decide which samples are interesting and then pass the most interesting ones through to in-situ life detection instrumentation, she says. At the same time, this work is helping the team develop new sample handling systems that oceanographers and climatologists can use on Earth. Mass spectrometers pull in samples of material and analyze their chemistry. in this case, it's what's called a membrane inlet (semi-permeable) mass spectrometer, says Schmidt. It's pulling dissolved gases out of the water and analyzing their composition, she says. That allows us to do is to understand what's going on underneath the ice and measure just how much melting is happening underneath the glaciers, she notes. This basic research will also help further NASA's laundry list of tech development needed to manage eventual subsurface sampling of Europa and Enceladus. How would a subsurface rover on the icy moons of Europa or Enceladus communicate back to Earth? It would probably need a tether or a set of acoustic transponders that can transit through the ice to allow it to radio back to the surface and then radio out back to Earth, says Schmidt. But it's possible, she says. But before such ambitious space missions to Europa or Enceladus, there's practical work to do here on Earth. One involves enabling AI for the Icefin ROV so that it can make at least some of its own exploration decisions in situ. We have a long way to go on under-ice robotic autonomy, both from just how to keep vehicles safe to how to understand the environment, says Schmidt. That's kind of a frontier, not just for space exploration, but also for Earth exploration, she says.

Discover where the Eagle might have landed: How to find Apollo 11's backup sites on the moon
Discover where the Eagle might have landed: How to find Apollo 11's backup sites on the moon

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Discover where the Eagle might have landed: How to find Apollo 11's backup sites on the moon

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. On July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong announced his historic arrival on the ancient lava plain of Mare Tranquillitatis with the following message to NASA: "Houston, Tranquility Base here, the Eagle has landed." Armstrong's words, spoken less than seven hours before he and fellow NASA astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin took humanity's first steps on the surface of another world, marked a watershed moment in human history. However, the now famous phrase could easily have been uttered from the opposite side of the lunar disk from Tranquility Base. In February 1968, NASA's Apollo Site Selection Board revealed five potential landing sites for Apollo 11 — whittled down from a list of 30 — including two that were on the opposite side of the lunar disk from Tranquility base, in Oceanus Procellarum (the Ocean of Storms). Each of the 3-by-5-mile (5-by-8-kilometer) landing zones were subject to intensive orbital imaging and were ultimately selected based on a number of diverse criteria. For example, each site had to be located within 5 degrees of the lunar equator in order to expend the least amount of fuel and have no large hills or deep craters along the lander's approach, which could have confused its landing radar. Each site also had to have a slope of less than 2 degrees, with relatively few craters and excellent lighting during the selected landing windows. Site 2 in the Sea of Tranquility was eventually selected as the prime landing site, while two of the remaining shortlisted zones were designated as contingency landing zones to be targeted should the launch of Apollo 11's gigantic Saturn V rocket be delayed. Read on to discover the locations of the five landing zones considered as the setting for humanity's first steps on another world. The general lunar region containing each site can be found easily with the naked eye during the correct moon phases, but we've also included a more precise map for those observing the moon through a telescope. A 6-inch scope will allow you to spot the larger craters needed to hone in on the locations of the candidate sites. Happy hunting! Candidate Site 1 —Mare Tranquillitatis (34° East, 2°40" North) The first shortlisted site for the Apollo 11 landing can be found on the southern shore of the Sea of Tranquility and is best viewed as the moon approaches its first quarter moon phase, or during the full moon, when the entirety of the lunar surface is lit from the perspective of Earth. First, locate the dark expanse of the Sea of Tranquility (Mare Tranquillitatis) located slightly above the lunar equator in the eastern region of the lunar surface. If you struggle, simply take a look at the graphic below! This lunar feature is an enormous basaltic plain, which formed billions of years ago when lava flows flooded gigantic impact basins, before hardening in the frigid space environment. The Sea of Tranquility is large enough to be seen easily with the unaided eye. Using a telescope, you can also locate the prominent Maskelyne Crater (shown below) and draw an imaginary line east until you hit a brighter patch of terrain jutting up from the south. Apollo 11's first candidate landing zone can be found in the patch of lunar mare bordering this outcrop to the east. Candidate Site 2 —Tranquility Base (23°37" East, 0°45" North) Tranquility Base, the site of Apollo 11's historic 1969 landing — can be found to the southwest of the Sea of Tranquility and, like its predecessor, is best viewed in the buildup to the first quarter and full moon phases. For a closer look, first find the tightly clustered Ritter and Sabine craters on the western edge of the lunar sea. Next, draw an imaginary line three times the width of the Sabine Crater from the lower edge of the impact site leading to the right. This will give you the approximate location of humanity's first footprints on another world. Candidate Site 3 —Sinus Medii (1°20" West, 0°25" North) Our third Apollo 11's landing site candidate is situated in the Sinus Medii region smack in the center of the Earth-facing lunar surface. The region containing the landing zone is almost equidistant between the northern edge of Ptolemaeus, and the smaller Ukert crater to the north is best viewed during the weeks straddling a full moon. Sinus Medii would have been the site of the Apollo 11 landing had the mission's Saturn V launch been delayed by just two days from its historic date of July 16, 1969 to July 18. Candidate Sites 4 & 5 —Oceanus Procellarum (36°25" West, 3°30" South, 41°40" West, 1°40" North) Oceanus Procellarum plays host to the final two Apollo 11 landing zones considered in the runup to the historic mission, which are best viewed during the moon's third quarter, or full moon phases. Both can be found below the bright impact ejecta thrown out in the creation of the Kepler Crater to the north and to the right of the Flamsteep P formation. Had the Apollo 11 Saturn V launch slipped to July 21 1969, then humanity's first steps on the moon would have been left in the regolith coating Oceanus Procellarum instead. 'Procellarum Base' just doesn't have the same ring to it, does it. Editor's Note: If you capture the site of Apollo 11's shortlisted landing sites and want to share them with readers, then please send your photo(s), comments, and your name and location to spacephotos@ Solve the daily Crossword

Does red light therapy help with anti-aging?
Does red light therapy help with anti-aging?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Does red light therapy help with anti-aging?

(NewsNation) — With the help of social media, red light therapy has become a popular treatment for skin conditions, wrinkles, redness, scars and acne. But before TikTokers, there were astronauts. NASA originally began working with red light therapy, a non-invasive treatment that uses red or near-infrared light, on plant growth in space and later found it helped heal astronauts' wounds. RLT is accessible in some dermatologists' offices, which offer in-office treatments. Devices are also sold for at-home treatment. AI pen can detect Parkinson's disease through handwriting Regular RLT treatments may help with improving skin health and cosmetic appearance by increasing collagen in the skin, increasing circulation between blood and tissue cells, and reducing fine lines and the severity of wrinkles in the skin, a National Institutes of Health study found. RLT has not been associated with any side effects if used short-term and with a dermatologist consultation. The treatment also does not use ultraviolet (UV) lights, which has been linked to increased cancer risk. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store