Sezzle files antitrust suit against Shopify
BNPL provider Sezzle has sued Shopify, alleging that the e-commerce marketplace has been stifling competition on its platform.
0
In a suit filed in the US District Court for the District of Minnesota, Sezzle says Shopify violated antitrust laws.
Shopify has been engaging in "monopolistic and anticompetitive business practices in order to stifle competition" for BNPL options, says the suit.
The Canadian shopping giant "used its market power" to make its own BNPL options the default provider on merchant sites, alleges the lawsuit.
Shopify rolled out Shop Pay Installments in 2021 through a partnership with BNPL provider Affirm.
Sezzle claims Shopify "rigged the checkout process on merchants' websites to make it extraordinarily difficult for consumers to use any alternative BNPL providers".
Meanwhile, "Shopify used its power to force millions of merchants to enter into anticompetitive contracts, which penalised them (by charging them) for using Sezzle," states the suit.
Sezzle is seeking trebled damages and an injunction preventing Shopify from continuing the practices alleged.
Charlie Youakim, CEO, Sezzle, says: 'This action is an important step in ensuring that merchants and consumers have access to diverse and innovative payment solutions of their choice.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
British manufacturers snub US after Trump's trade war
The US has dropped out of the three most desirable markets for British manufacturers for the first time in decades, as Donald Trump's trade war dents confidence in the world's biggest economy. UK industrial leaders now prefer the EU, Asia and the Middle East as their top three 'growth' markets globally, according to trade body Make UK – relegating the Trump's America to fourth spot. It is the first time since Make UK began the survey in 1988 that the US has not been the second most attractive market for British manufacturers. The EU has consistently been ranked in first place. The drop in enthusiasm underlines the extend to which Mr Trump's ongoing trade war has affected how companies now view America as a place to do business. Despite Mr Trump's push to bring more manufacturing jobs to America, just 4pc of companies polled by Make UK – which represents 20,000 businesses – said they would consider setting up a US manufacturing facility. Seamus Nevin, Make UK's chief economist, said: 'There has clearly been an immediate and striking shock to the system as far as the special trading relationship with the US is concerned for manufacturers. 'It remains to be seen whether this is a one off drop in sentiment while trading relations enjoy a reset or, whether this is the first sign of a permanent fracture in relations with manufacturers' biggest market.' The drop in enthusiasm comes despite Sir Keir Starmer having agreed a trade deal with the US last month. The deal, which is yet to come into force, was hailed by the Government as a 'landmark agreement' that would save thousands of jobs and make it easier for British firms to do business across the Atlantic. However, Mr Nevin said: 'Even when the trade deal comes into force, UK goods will now be more expensive and moving forward companies may just decide that it's now easier to turn their gaze towards markets elsewhere where there are fewer barriers to doing business.' UK exports to US fall by £2bn It comes after official data last week showed that UK exports to the US fell by £2bn in April – their largest decline on record. Almost two thirds of companies surveyed separately by Make UK said they expected their US export volumes to drop amid the trade war, while a similar amount said they expected a negative hit to their business more broadly. Almost a third said they were thinking about changing their supply chains and sourcing arrangements. The US president has pitched his tariff blitz as a painful but necessary step to lower America's reliance on overseas imports and encourage inward investment. However, sentiment among US manufacturers has soured too, dropping to its lowest level since the pandemic – according to the US's National Association of Manufacturers. This is despite the repeated promises by Mr Trump that his policies will boost the domestic industry. Make UK also warned of worsening prospects for British manufacturers at home after growth forecasts for the sector were slashed from 1pc to -0.5pc for 2026. As well as the impact of Mr Trump's trade war, companies are facing increased employment costs after Rachel Reeves increased employers' National Insurance (NI) contributions in her October budget, which took effect in April. Mr Nevin added: 'While at first glance the headline numbers may not look too bad, manufacturers are facing a gathering storm of huge uncertainty in one of their major markets, a skills crisis and eye watering energy costs which are providing a harsh reality for many.' In a separate survey released on Monday, a poll showed foreign investors had become significantly less enthusiastic about investing in Britain. The number of investors planning to invest in Britain dropped from 62pc in March to 52pc in May, a separate survey by auditor Ernst & Young found. However, 54pc said they expect the UK's attractiveness to increase in the next three years, in a sign that Donald Trump's policies are encouraging investors to look beyond the US for opportunities.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump's ‘revenge tax' could threaten foreign investment into US, analysts say
Foreign investment into the US could be threatened by Donald Trump's new 'revenge' taxes, analysts have warned. A provision within the president's One Big Beautiful Bill Act will allow the US to apply higher taxes on foreign individuals, businesses and investors connected to jurisdictions that impose 'unfair foreign taxes' on US individuals and companies. Companies listed on the London Stock Exchange could choose to avoid the measure by redomiciling in New York. Section 899, as it is called, classes digital service taxes and 'diverted profits taxes' as unfair, along with any taxes that target US entities. It would allow US authorities to impose an additional tax starting at 5% and increasing by five percentage points annually, up to 20%. Max Yoeli, a senior research fellow in the US and the Americas programme at Chatham House, says section 899 'threatens to further alienate foreign investors'. It could chill investment into the US by calling into question its 'fundamental openness', he added. The Italian bank UniCredit agrees that section 899 could further damage foreign investor sentiment towards US dollar-denominated assets. It could backfire on the US, it says, given the large amount of domestic assets held by foreigners. 'The list of countries that would fall into this category is long and encompasses most European countries, including Italy and Germany,' UniCredit told clients, saying that foreign investors had more than doubled their holdings of US assets over the past decade. 'Not only would this additional tax serve to finance corporate tax reductions, but it would also likely be used as a negotiating tool for the US in trade deals, especially as Republicans seem willing to withdraw from the global minimum tax framework.' UniCredit also fears the dollar's safe haven status could be undermined if there are fresh tax disputes between the US and other countries. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act was passed by the US House of Representatives last month. The Senate is yet to approve the bill, with the White House setting a deadline of 4 July. George Saravelos, the global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, warned last month that section 899 could allow the US administration to transform its trade war into a capital war by 'explicitly using taxation on foreign holdings of US assets as leverage to further US economic goals'. UK companies could certainly fall foul of section 899, as Britain operates a digital services tax aimed at tech multinationals, and a diverted profits tax designed to clamp down on tax avoidance by multinationals. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Goldman Sachs has calculated that UK corporates are 'particularly exposed' to section 899, as roughly 30% of the revenues of companies listed on the FTSE 100 are generated in the US. However, as companies that are majority-owned by US shareholders are exempt, City bosses may consider moving their stock market listing to New York, to dodge section 899. 'This ownership dynamic not only mitigates tax risk but also reinforces the strategic case for relisting in the US, where investor bases are deeper and more aligned with US revenue exposure,' the Goldman Sachs analysts said. According to Goldman, the large UK companies with the most significant exposure to the US, and who are not majority-owned by US investors, are the media group Pearson, the business services group Experian, the pest control business Rentokil and the pharmaceuticals manufacturer Hikma. Ashtead Group, Compass and Melrose also generate a large proportion of their sales stateside, but as they have majority US ownership they should be exempt from section 899. French companies could also be at risk, as Paris operates a digital services tax on the revenues that large tech companies generate in France.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Not the time to mess with EU-US trade, EU's Costa says
KANANASKIS, Alberta, June 15, Reuters) - Europe and the United States should focus on how the bloc takes more responsibility for its defence rather than creating economic uncertainty through trade tensions, European Union President Antonio Costa said on Sunday. Speaking to reporters with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen ahead of a gathering of G7 leaders in the Canadian Rockies, Costa said the two days of meetings provide an opportunity to talk about "some problems" between the allies and friends. "The main issue between Europe and the United States is precisely about European defence, and we should focus on (this)," Costa said, referring to Washington's rebalancing of foreign policy towards countering China. "Because this is the main issue we should avoid introducing other issues that undermine our economic capacity to assume greater responsibility on our own defence." U.S. President Donald Trump backed away from his threat to impose 50% tariffs on imports from the European Union next month, restoring a July 9 deadline to allow for talks between Washington and the 27-nation bloc to produce a deal. Trump's haphazard imposition of tariffs across the world has created uncertainty among key U.S. allies, and raised pressure on the global economy. Speaking alongside Costa, von der Leyen said the trade talks with Washington were now focussing on the details, but there was no guarantee of a deal. "That's why this is not the right moment to create uncertainty on economics. It is not the right moment to create problems on trade, because we need to strengthen our economic basis," Costa said. "We are talking about the most relevant trade relations in the world, then we need to protect this and focus on what is the most important which is to have a good agreement between the EU and the United States about the burden sharing on defence." Underscoring Costa's comments, von der Leyen said the G7 had to avoid protectionism. "This is an important message. A message that the G7 can send to the markets and to the world," she said.
