Deepfake & AI crime surge poses major threat to business trust
Deepfakes move to the mainstream
The report indicates that deepfake-enabled cybercrime has developed in both scale and maturity, with generative AI tools now being used for various malicious purposes. These tools, originally intended to assist content creators, are now leveraged by cybercriminals to impersonate executives, circumvent established financial controls, and compromise internal human resource processes.
According to the research, the accessibility and affordability of AI-generated media have significantly lowered the barrier to entry for cybercriminals. Off-the-shelf platforms producing video, audio, and image deepfakes are now readily obtainable, requiring little technical expertise on the part of users. As a result, digital trust and the reliability of traditional identity verification systems are being challenged by increasingly convincing synthetic media. Andrew Philp, ANZ Field CISO at Trend Micro, said, "AI-generated media is not just a future risk, it's a real business threat. We're seeing executives impersonated, hiring processes compromised, and financial safeguards bypassed with alarming ease. This research is a wake up call - if businesses are not proactively preparing for the deepfake era, they're already behind. In a world where seeing is no longer believing, digital trust must be rebuilt from the ground up."
Research findings documented in the report confirm that attackers can now easily access guides, toolkits, and off-the-shelf solutions intended for content creation but re-purposed for cybercriminal activity. These resources are being actively traded within criminal communities, providing step-by-step techniques for bypassing onboarding checks and utilising plug-and-play deepfake solutions that make sophisticated attacks available to less-experienced perpetrators.
Business risks and real-world impacts
The application of deepfake technologies has been noted in several key areas highlighted by Trend Micro's report. In the financial sector, there has been a rise in attempts to use AI-generated media to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, facilitating anonymous money laundering activities through the use of falsified identification documents and credentials.
Businesses are also facing CEO fraud, where deepfake audio or video is used to impersonate senior executives. These attacks can take place in real time during meetings or conference calls, making detection increasingly difficult for unsuspecting teams. Such incidents expose companies to potential financial loss as well as reputational damage, as sensitive internal information may be compromised.
The recruitment sector is another area singled out for concern. The report details cases where job applicants use deepfake video or audio to impersonate real candidates and pass interviews, thus gaining unauthorised access to confidential systems and data from within organisations.
Growing and accessible cybercrime ecosystem
The research describes a flourishing underground ecosystem built around the proliferation of these AI-powered tools. Tutorials and toolkits for crafting deepfakes and conducting scam operations are widely available, diminishing the need for technical proficiency. Face-swapping tools and voice clones are provided as services, making professional-grade results accessible with minimal investment.
Trend Micro stresses that these trends represent an urgent need for businesses to adopt proactive measures. This includes updating authentication processes, educating employees about the risks of social engineering, and incorporating detection mechanisms for synthetic media into their cybersecurity strategies.
Mitigation and staff awareness
To address the evolving threat landscape, the report advocates for a comprehensive approach focused on minimising risk and protecting internal processes. Specific recommendations include regular staff training to recognise social engineering tactics, a review of existing security authentication protocols, and investment in technology capable of detecting deepfake media.
Trend Micro's study serves as a reminder that as generative AI technology continues to advance and become more accessible, vigilance and adaptability will be critical components in maintaining organisational security and digital trust.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Rural economy is buoying Māori economy after Budget cuts to development funding
The first research, by Stats NZ, looked at 1450 Māori authorities and related businesses at the start of 2025. Like the rest of the economy, Māori businesses have suffered at the hands of this Government. The total number of filled jobs for Māori authorities was 11,870, down 170 jobs or 1.4% annually. The total value of earnings for Māori authority employees was $212 million, a decrease of $8.7m or 4%. This shows the reduction in hours occurring across the rest of the economy is also reaching Māori businesses. When examining the business sales data of Māori firms, the same problems observed across the wider economy are also present. Professional, scientific, technical, administrative and support services were down $18m or 13%. Meanwhile, primary industries were up $11m or 3% annually. The rural economy is supporting the Māori economy as much as primary industries' buoyancy is helping out anywhere else in Aotearoa. The second insight comes from ANZ's Te Tirohanga Whānui Report. That data confirms 2024 was a tough year for Māori businesses. However, it also confirms Māori businesses are 'performing better' than 'many of the country's largest listed companies'. Despite challenges, Māori businesses are performing better than many large companies, showing their resilience. Photo / Alan Gibson There is a resilience not seen in other parts of the economy. As ANZ notes, 'When the Māori economy grows, it strengthens the whole of the New Zealand economy.' Visit Whakatāne and see how Ngāti Awa has underwritten the local economy to the benefit of all. Given the increasing size of the Māori economy – its asset base having nearly doubled to $126 billion in 2023 – you'd think it would form a key part of the Government's economic agenda. But it's not mentioned once during the Minister of Finance's Budget speech. In the last Budget, $20m was cut from Māori economic development initiatives. The only new funding for the entirety of Vote Māori Development was $3m a year for Māori Wardens and the Māori Women's Welfare League. The Government's 'Going for Growth' economic development plan says the Māori economy is important – but that is it. There are no specific programmes to help it grow. There is nothing to help Māori businesses grow into new sectors or help capitalise on their intellectual property. In short, it is left alone. He Kai Kei Aku Ringa: the Māori-Crown Economic Growth Partnership – written initially in 2013 under National and revised in 2023 under Labour, was abandoned when the coalition took office. It looks increasingly likely that the economy is heading backwards again. The Reserve Bank is now forecasting that the economy declined 0.2% last quarter. You would think the Government would be pulling every lever to make sure there was new economic activity and new employment. But this is a Government that has a complete blind spot when it comes to anything Māori. Some $88m was cut in total from direct Māori funding at the last Budget, on top of $97m last year. There is an urgent need to change thinking. The Government is content with ever higher numbers of Māori being in prison, homeless or unemployed. That is not the 'growth, growth, growth' many were hoping for. It does nothing to support a unique and growing part of the New Zealand economy. Nothing to help enterprises and authorities that may be able to reach where other government actions have failed. It is time for a better plan – and one that recognises a remarkably simple fact. The scale of the opportunity in the Māori economy is not being grasped by the Government. We will have spent more on landlord tax relief over the next four years ($2.9b) than we have on the entirety of the Treaty settlement process to date ($2.8b). Budgets are about choices. Choices show values. The Government should value the Māori economy better. That way we all benefit.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
ASB joins ANZ in declining legal settlement proposal, as Winston Peters comes in to bat for them
On Wednesday, journalists received an email from the lawyers representing ANZ and ASB customers, detailing their proposed settlement. The email came through as the funders of the class action were making their case to parliamentarians for why they opposed the law change. Having worked on the class action for four years, they argued it was unfair for the Government to change the rules of the game now - after it had been lobbied by the banks. The retrospective law change could reduce the damages the customers, their lawyers and funders stand to receive from the legal action. ANZ responded straight after the lawyers made their settlement offer public on Wednesday, calling it a 'stunt intended to influence members of Parliament'. 'The litigation funders are worried that MPs have seen through their attempts to exploit a poorly drafted provision in the CCCFA and are desperate to shut down the strong public interest arguments in favour of the amendment,' ANZ said. It said its disclosure error had seen it undercharge customers an average of $2 a month over 12 months. 'There is no consumer harm. ANZ wrote off the amount it was owed and therefore put customers in a better position than had the issue never happened,' ANZ said. 'The proposed settlement appears to be primarily driven by the financial interests of the litigation funders and the proposed resolution does not reflect the nature or scale of the underlying issue.' The litigation funders, LPF Group, will take a cut of between 13% and 25% of the settlement. Peters says litigation funders stand to make 'windfall gains' On Wednesday the Herald reported that New Zealand First deputy leader Shane Jones expressed concern over the retrospective element of the proposed law change, saying his party would take advice before deciding whether to support the bill being passed into law in its current state. However on Thursday, the party's leader Winston Peters defended Commerce and Consumer Minister Scott Simpson during question time in Parliament, saying the 2015 legislation was 'badly drafted' and litigation funders stood to make 'windfall gains' if the law wasn't changed. Act leader David Seymour told the Herald his party supported the bill because it is a part of the Coalition Government. However, he had written to Simpson asking how to respond to constituents concerned about the bill applying to the past. 'Who knows, maybe Scott will change his mind in response to this,' Seymour said. Labour MP Arena Williams took aim at Simpson during question time on Thursday for getting a key detail of the proposed law change wrong during an interview on Newstalk ZB, and incorrectly saying the Government hadn't been lobbied by the banks on the matter. She echoed an allegation made by the litigation funders that Simpson wasn't across the detail when he took the proposed law change to Cabinet, as he had only just been appointed Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister following Andrew Bayly's resignation. ASB and ANZ CEOs to be questioned by politicians Coming back to ASB, it questioned the math behind the proposed settlement, saying it provided 'no certainty to ASB or other banks which may become subject to similar class actions, or to the sector as a whole'. The customers' lawyers said $600m was equivalent to 3.5% of ANZ's profits between 2016 and 2019, and 5% of ASB's profits over this time. They proposed the banks pay the lesser of $600m and 68% of the borrowing costs customers paid through the duration of the banks' breaches. Under the existing law, the banks could be required to reimburse customers 100% of the borrowing costs they paid for the duration of the breaches. If the law is changed, judges will be empowered to use their discretion to issue fair penalties. The starting point won't be the reimbursement of all borrowing costs. Parliament's finance and expenditure committee is considering written and oral submissions from the public on the proposed law change. ANZ's chief executive and general counsel, and ASB's chief executive and board chair are among those who will present to the committee on Monday. The committee will also hear from various consumer groups and legal experts, among others. Jenée Tibshraeny is the Herald's Wellington business editor, based in the parliamentary press gallery. She specialises in government and Reserve Bank policymaking, economics and banking.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
ASB rejects offer to settle class action lawsuit for more than $300m
ASB and ANZ have both rejected an offer to settle a class action lawsuit for more than $300 million. Photo: ASB bank has rejected an offer to settle a class action law suit for historic breaches of credit disclosure laws . The offer on behalf of more than 150,000 customers of the ASB and ANZ was to settle for just over $300 million. ASB has joined ANZ in rejecting the offer as a move to influence MPs considering changes to the credit laws to close historic loopholes and bad drafting. ASB said it did not understand how the offer had been calculated, and that it would not put an end to legal action. The consumers' group said the proposed credit law changes might undermine their claim, while the industry said the loopholes posed a multi-billion dollar risk for the financial system. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
