
AI Won't Replace Marketers — But It Will Replace Lazy Ones Unless You Learn to Use It Strategically
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Let's get one thing straight: AI is not your next CMO. It's not your marketing strategist, creative director or content lead. At best? It's an intern. Fast, capable, eager to please — but absolutely in need of guidance. The problem is, too many marketers are tossing vague prompts into ChatGPT, crossing their fingers, and hoping for brilliance. When the output reads like a warmed-over blog from 2017, they blame the tool.
AI isn't the problem. Your expectations are.
If you want to stop wasting time on generic AI content and start using these tools to produce real results, this article will show you how to take control, give better direction and turn AI into a true force multiplier.
Related: AI for the Underdog — Here's How Small Businesses Can Thrive With Artificial Intelligence
AI isn't autopilot — it's an amplifier
We're drowning in AI hype. Tools like ChatGPT promise to reinvent marketing workflows — but too often, marketers approach them like vending machines. Insert a prompt, collect "strategy." That's not how this works.
Generative AI is an amplifier. It scales what you give it. Weak input? You get weak output. Ask it to build a Facebook campaign without audience insight, brand guidelines, or a goal, and it will gladly hand you the same template it served a health tech company five minutes earlier.
AI doesn't think. It predicts. And that means it will always serve you the average — unless you guide it to something better.
Treat AI like the intern it is
If you hired a marketing intern and asked them to develop a six-month editorial strategy with zero context, you wouldn't expect brilliance. You'd expect flailing. Confusion. Buzzword soup.
AI is the same. It doesn't need less instruction — it needs more.
Start every prompt with precision:
Who are you speaking to?
What are you trying to achieve?
What's the tone, structure, and voice?
What should it avoid?
"Write a blog post about dog nutrition" is a shrug. "Write a 700-word blog post for millennial pet parents who care about clean ingredients, backed by 2024 data, using an informative, science-forward tone" is a brief. The difference is night and day.
Feedback isn't optional — it's how you train the tool
AI doesn't learn like we do. It doesn't internalize your brand after one good result. You have to teach it repetitively and with intention.
When I'm using AI for content development, the first draft is never the final. I review it like I would a junior team member's work: highlight weak phrasing, call out clichés, remove filler and refine tone. Then I adjust the prompt and rerun it.
The first draft might be 60% there. The second? Closer. By the third, it starts sounding like us.
This isn't overkill. It's the job. And the time it saves on the back end more than makes up for the up-front coaching.
Stack your tools like your tech
One tool won't cut it. ChatGPT is great for drafting, but weak for real-time data sourcing. For stats or current events, I turn to Perplexity or Gemini. For creative visuals, I reach for Midjourney or Canva's AI suite. Jasper helps when I need quick templates or structural support.
Think of it like your tech stack: you don't use your CRM for email automation or your analytics platform for design. Each AI tool has its strengths. Learn them, stack them and stop expecting one tool to do the work of five.
AI won't replace marketers — it exposes lazy ones
Here's the hard truth: AI won't eliminate marketers. It will reveal the ones who've been phoning it in.
If your strategy is "publish to publish," if your content reads like a generic checklist, if you're still clinging to SEO tricks from 2019, AI will beat you. Not because it's brilliant, but because it's fast and average, and average is all you've been delivering.
The marketers who thrive with AI are the ones who still lead. They think, challenge, shape and coach. AI is their accelerator, not their replacement.
Related: I Teach AI and Entrepreneurship. Here's How Entrepreneurs Can Use AI to Better Understand Their Target Customers.
The real edge isn't speed. It's judgment
At my agency, we use AI daily to accelerate brainstorms, tighten positioning and scale content production. But every result still runs through human hands. Strategy, empathy, intuition — that's still us.
Because AI doesn't feel. It doesn't understand cultural nuance or read between the lines of a buyer's hesitation. It can't see what's not in the data. That's your job.
So no, don't hand your marketing strategy to AI. But do hire it as your hardest-working intern. Train it. Push it. Give it guardrails and goals. Because when used right, AI can supercharge what you do best. But only if you're still in the driver's seat.
Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Some questions about that global AI race
Just how far is the U.S. ahead of China in the AI race? The conventional wisdom is that the U.S. has an edge on China in artificial intelligence — and President Donald Trump's ambitious new AI policy is built around keeping it. 'America is the country that started the AI race,' Trump said during a speech in July. 'And as president, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.' But some big questions are swirling around that whole argument — like, how far ahead the U.S. really is, and what it means to have a lead at all. 'When people make claims like that, they're making political statements,' said Chris Miller, a Tufts University economic historian who wrote the book 'Chip War.' What it means to have an 'edge' is ill-defined: it could be technological, economic or geopolitical. 'I don't know how to answer that,' said Suresh Venkatasubramanian, who served in the Biden White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, when DFD asked if the U.S. is ahead. 'There's so many dimensions.' 'American [AI] models are about 3 [to] 6 months ahead of Chinese models,' White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks told DFD in a statement — though he added that when it comes to semiconductors, the U.S.' lead 'grows to years.' There's also the proposition that China is ahead in some ways — in part because the U.S.' chip export controls arguably led DeepSeek, a Hangzhou-based startup, to make breakthroughs in developing more efficient AI algorithms. Depending on which dimension you care about, the race could steer policy in very different directions. In general, it's hard to argue that America isn't currently leading the AI race. The San Francisco Bay Area is unquestionably the global AI talent and business capital. The largest AI companies are American, and so are their biggest customers. OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude are the most popular generative AI systems among users worldwide. Under the hood, American AI chips are the most advanced in the world (though they're largely manufactured in Taiwan). China is hungry for America's semiconductors, undertaking extensive smuggling operations to get around U.S. restrictions. Even chips purposefully designed to be less advanced than their cutting-edge models are a hot commodity — the president lifted bans on their sales to China in trade negotiations. America also has better computing infrastructure, with around ten times more data centers than China. However, China has proved in recent months that it's within striking distance of the U.S.' AI models. While Silicon Valley's chatbots still top performance charts, China's are running ahead on some metrics. DeepSeek set off shockwaves in January when it unveiled its V3 model that uses a tenth of the computing power required for those in America. In July, the Beijing-based company Moonshot AI released its Kimi K2 model, which could outperform ChatGPT and Claude in coding at a fraction of the cost. Alibaba, also based in Hangzhou, debuted a model just a couple of weeks ago that bested American LLMs in logical and mathematical problem solving. China is making strides in computing power as well. Huawei came out with a showstopping processing system known as CloudMatrix 384 in late July, which trumps Nvidia's competing product in memory capacity and bandwidth. (AJ Kourabi of the research firm SemiAnalysis offered a caution on its importance in the AI race, telling DFD it's 'still extremely difficult to train on.') Pinpointing exactly where the U.S.-China race is getting close isn't just a high-tech debate exercise. It's driving policy. Some of the concerns are clearly baked into Trump's AI Action Plan. China's easy access to electricity is what enables systems like CloudMatrix 384 to run — it's packed with a ton of less efficient chips, but you can brute force performance with more energy. You can draw a straight line from that concern to the plan's warning that China has 'rapidly built out their grid,' and its recommendations to further loosen environmental regulations so that the U.S. can keep up. The plan also suggests taking the brakes off the AI industry by overriding state laws (a controversial idea that showed up in the Big Beautiful Bill this summer). And during a speech on the plan, Trump blamed copyright laws for slowing down training of AI models. Though the plan itself doesn't address copyright, AI companies have long complained the rules stifle their competitiveness. The debate over chip exports is also a point of tension — one where national security hawks are in direct conflict with the go-go business types, though both have an argument that they're helping the American cause. Tighter restrictions on high-end chips mean that China lacks access to the best technology, and is hamstrung at the most advanced end of AI development — but pro-business officials and influential CEOs argue that disseminating chips more broadly gets the world hooked on the U.S.' AI tech stack. In some ways, however, this 'AI race' framework isn't all that helpful for setting priorities, and could ultimately be self-defeating. We don't really know what we're sprinting towards. 'This is an infinite race,' Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in April. Also, beating China could be a pyrrhic victory. Trump's AI plan writ large looks a lot like a centrally planned industrial policy: companies buy closeness to Trump, and get rewarded for it. The AI plan fuses state and industry in a way that leaves out a lot of the AI debate that Americans arguably would prefer to have. Data centers are causing utility bills to rise and drying up well water for the people living around them, and AI has been increasing unemployment rates. Many critics of the AI rush think the U.S. may be boosting the industry by shutting off dialogue about those things — winning the race, but becoming less American in the process. A senator questions Intel on ties to China Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) is inquiring into reports about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's involvement with China-backed semiconductor firms and a criminal case regarding one of his former companies, POLITICO's Anthony Adragna reports. Cotton sent a letter on Tuesday to the chair of Intel's board of directors, Frank Yeary, about the 'security and integrity of Intel's operations.' Cotton asked whether the company knew about subpoenas issued to Tan's previous company, Cadence Design Systems, before it hired him. The company pleaded guilty last week on charges that it illegally exported chip design tools to a university linked to the Chinese military, and agreed to pay more than $140 million in penalties. 'Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem,' an Intel spokesperson said in a statement. Intel was awarded up to $7.86 billion in federal grants under the 2022 CHIPS Act, in addition to another $3 billion for the secure enclave program. California strikes down an election deepfakes ban A federal judge in California struck down one of the country's strictest laws on AI-generated deepfakes in a win for Elon Musk's X, POLITICO's Chase DiFeliciantonio reports. Judge John Mendez on Tuesday overruled a law prohibiting online platforms from hosting deceptive election-related deepfakes during the runup to a vote. California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the law last year after chiding Musk for sharing a manipulated video of then-Vice President Kamala Harris on X. The creator of the video, Christopher Kohls, brought the legal challenge on First Amendment grounds. X later joined the case. Mendez did not rule on the First Amendment arguments raised in the case, but rather made the decision based on Section 230 of the Communications Act, which shields platforms from liability for content posted by third parties. Mendez also signaled that he intends to overturn another law requiring labels on digitally altered campaign materials. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Columbia University Libraries Modernize Library Infrastructure with EBSCO FOLIO
~ Leading Academic Institution Transitions from Legacy Systems to a Unified Open Platform to Improve Access, Insights and Service Delivery ~ IPSWICH, Mass., Aug. 6, 2025 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- The Columbia University Libraries have officially gone live with FOLIO, replacing multiple legacy systems with a single, unified platform. Backed by the EBSCO FOLIO team at EBSCO Information Services (EBSCO), the transition to an open-source system aims to address evolving research needs and simplify library services through a single, interoperable solution. FOLIO allows Columbia Libraries to manage resources more flexibly while integrating with essential tools, including the Libraries' Blacklight-based CLIO unified discovery system, EBSCO Discovery Service™ (EDS) and GOBI® Library Solutions. Columbia will also utilize EBSCO's Full Text Finder, Locate and MARC Update services to streamline access, fulfillment and metadata management. The implementation further improved efficiency by connecting FOLIO to Columbia's multiple enterprise accounting systems and reducing duplicate data entry. To complement these integrations, Columbia is adopting Panorama™, EBSCO's library analytics platform, to gain real-time insights into resource usage and user engagement. These analytics will guide collection development, budget planning and user-centered service design. These technologies strengthen Columbia's foundation for scalable, open infrastructure, supporting workflows across discovery, access and analytics. Ann Thornton, Vice Provost and University Librarian, says FOLIO brings strategic value beyond the back end. "The FOLIO platform reflects Columbia Libraries' values — interoperability, openness and responsiveness to research. Equally important was our confidence in EBSCO as a trusted implementation partner. Their support enabled a smooth migration and positions us to adapt to evolving scholarly needs." Heather Macfarlane, FOLIO Implementation Manager at EBSCO, highlights the scope and teamwork involved. "Unifying Columbia's systems under FOLIO required detailed planning, customized setup and close cooperation. The outcome is a modern platform better aligned with the Libraries' shared goals and infrastructure. Columbia's team approached each stage with precision and vision, and their launch shows what's possible when the institution leads and technology supports." About EBSCO Information Services EBSCO Information Services (EBSCO) is a leading provider of online research content and cutting-edge search technologies serving libraries, healthcare and medical institutions, corporations, and government agencies worldwide. As an AI-enabled services leader, EBSCO offers comprehensive solutions from research, acquisition management, subscription services and discovery services to clinical decision support and patient care, learning, and research and development, EBSCO provides institutions with access to content and resources to serve the information and workflow needs of their users and organizations. Our commitment to AI-driven innovation positions EBSCO at the forefront of the industry, enabling us to meet the evolving needs of the information services landscape. For more information, visit the EBSCO website at: Visit our blog at EBSCOpost or follow us on X, Facebook, LinkedIn and Instagram. For more information, please contact: Erica Gilson Senior Communications Specialist egilson@ Media Contact Erica Gilson, EBSCO Information Services, 978-414-0385, egilson@ View original content: SOURCE EBSCO Information Services Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's the Salary You Need So You Are Not Just Surviving in America's 50 Biggest Cities
There's getting by in the big city, and there's living comfortably. There's also how you define 'comfortably' when it comes to your annual income. Read Next: Find Out: Bringing in twice the average annual cost of living is one measure. Among the 50 most populous U.S. cities, that means making anywhere from $63,000 a year to $280,000. To give you an idea of how much you'll need to live comfortably in each of these cities, GOBankingRates has blended data from the U.S. Census, Zillow, and the Federal Reserve. The comfortable salary needed for each city has been calculated by doubling the cost of living. Here's a list of the 50 most populous U.S. cities, counting down from No. 50 to No. 1. In addition to the salary needed to live comfortably, we've included population, the average annual cost of living, and other details for each city: 50. Aurora, Colorado Population: 390,201 Annual cost of living: $59,176 Comfortable salary needed: $118,351 You'll find Aurora just east of Denver. As of May 2025, a single-family home here is worth about $500,000 on average. Learn More: Check Out: 49. Tampa, Florida Population: 393,389 Annual cost of living: $51,976 Comfortable salary needed: $103,953 You can still find single-family homes in Tampa for less than $400,000, with the average value sitting at $395,000 as of earlier this year. The median household income of around $71,000 is significantly lower than the 'comfortable' salary of about $104,000. Try This: 48. Arlington, Texas Population: 394,769 Annual cost of living: $46,645 Comfortable salary needed: $93,290 The seventh most populous city in Texas, Arlington has a median household income of $72,000 a year. Single-family homes here are worth $321,000 on average, slightly less than nearby Dallas. 47. Wichita, Kansas Population: 396,488 Annual cost of living: $36,221 Comfortable salary needed: $72,443 Single-family homes in Wichita will cost you less than most of the other cities in our list, with average values coming in around $200,000. Wichita's household median income sits around $63,000 a year. 46. Bakersfield, California Population: 408,366 Annual cost of living: $51,677 Comfortable salary needed: $103,354 Bakersfield gets a livability score of just 57 from AreaVibes, second lowest among the cities in this list. A single-family home here is still worth about $400,000 on average, and the median household income sits at $77,000. Bakersfield gets a livability score of just 57 from AreaVibes, second lowest among the cities in this list. A single-family home here is still worth about $400,000 on average, and the median household income sits at $77,000. 45. Tulsa, Oklahoma Population: 412,322 Annual cost of living: $37,755 Comfortable salary needed: $75,511 Among the 50 most populous cities in the U.S., Tulsa is the only city that showed a slight decrease in percentage of residents age 65+, between 2022 and 2023. Tulsa's household median income comes in around $58,000. 44. Minneapolis Population: 426,845 Annual cost of living: $47,579 Comfortable salary needed: $95,158 Minnesota's most populous city has a median household income around $80,000. The average single-family home here is worth $358,000. For You: 43. Oakland, California Population: 438,072 Annual cost of living: $84,401 Comfortable salary needed: $168,802 The average value of single-family homes in Oakland has dipped by about $70,000 over the past year, the largest decrease among major U.S. cities. That average value still sits at $829,000, however. The median household income here is $97,000. 42. Miami Population: 446,663 Annual cost of living: $73,432 Comfortable salary needed: $146,863 As of last May, a single-family home in Miami is worth around $667,000. The median household income here comes in around $59,000, significantly lower than the average annual cost of living. 41. Virginia Beach, Virginia Population: 457,066 Annual cost of living: $53,483 Comfortable salary needed: $106,966 Virginia Beach saw a small population decline between 2022 and 2023. The median household income here is $92,000. 40. Long Beach, California Population: 458,491 Annual cost of living: $91,653 Comfortable salary needed: $183,305 Long Beach's percentage of residents age 65 and up ticked up 0.7% between 2022 and 2023 — the largest increase in our list. The median household income here is around $84,000. 39. Raleigh, North Carolina Population: 470,763 Annual cost of living: $54,114 Comfortable salary needed: $108,228 Raleigh gets a livability score of 84 from AreaVibes, tied for the highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. As of last May, the average single-family home here was worth $484,000. Trending Now: 38. Colorado Springs, Colorado Population: 483,099 Annual cost of living: $54,413 Comfortable salary needed: $108,827 You'll find Colorado Springs about 70 miles south of Denver in central Colorado. The median household income in Colorado Springs is $83,000, around $8,000 less than Denver. 37. Omaha, Nebraska Population: 488,197 Annual cost of living: $43,496 Comfortable salary needed: $86,991 You can still find single-family homes for less than $300,000 in Omaha, with average values sitting at $295,000 as of last May. Omaha's median household income is $73,000. 36. Atlanta Population: 499,287 Annual cost of living: $56,838 Comfortable salary needed: $113,676 The capital of Georgia — and the unofficial capital of the South — has a household median income of $82,000. Single-family homes here are worth $456,000 on average. 35. Mesa, Arizona Population: 507,478 Annual cost of living: $55,442 Comfortable salary needed: $110,884 Fast-growing Mesa saw a 17 percent increase in population age 65+ from 2022 to 2023, the second highest jump among the cities in our list. The median household income in Mesa is around $79,000, and the average single-family home is valued at $454,000. 34. Kansas City, Missouri Population: 508,233 Annual cost of living: $40,452 Comfortable salary needed: $80,905 Single-family homes in Kansas City are relatively affordable compared to most of the other cities in our list, with average values of just over $250,000. Kansas City's median household income is about $67,000. Explore More: 33. Sacramento, California Population: 524,802 Annual cost of living: $60,000 Comfortable salary needed: $120,000 California's capital city has a median household income of $84,000. The average value of single-family homes here ($497,000) is much lower than it is in the state's other major cities. 32. Tucson, Arizona Population: 543,348 Annual cost of living: $45,904 Comfortable salary needed: $91,808 Tucson's household median income is $55,000, the fourth lowest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. A single-family home in Tucson is valued at $342,000 on average. 31. Fresno, California Population: 543,615 Annual cost of living: $51,638 Comfortable salary needed: $103,276 AreaVibes gives Fresno a livability score of 63, the second lowest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Still, its population ticked up 0.4% between 2022 and 2023. 30. Albuquerque, New Mexico Population: 562,488 Annual cost of living: $45,349 Comfortable salary needed: $90,698 Just over 17% of Albuquerque's residents are age 65 and up, the third highest percentage among the cities in our list. The median household income here comes in at $66,000. 29. Milwaukee Population: 569,756 Annual cost of living: $38,219 Comfortable salary needed: $76,438 Among the 50 most populous U.S. cities, Milwaukee has the third-lowest household median income — $52,000. Single-family homes in Milwaukee are worth $221,000 on average, and the median household income is around $52,000. Be Aware: 28. Baltimore Population: 577,193 Annual cost of living: $37,306 Comfortable salary needed: $74,612 Baltimore's population declined 1.3% between 2022 and 2023, the second largest drop among the cities in our list. As of last May, the average value of a single-family home in Baltimore was $187,000. 27. Memphis, Tennessee Population: 629,063 Annual cost of living: $32,690 Comfortable salary needed: $65,381 Memphis has the second-lowest median household income ($51,000) among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Its 'comfortable' salary is the second lowest in our list. 26. Detroit Population: 636,644 Annual cost of living: $31,609 Comfortable salary needed: $63,217 Detroit's household median income of $40,000 is the lowest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities, and its 'comfortable' salary is the lowest in GBR's list. Single-family homes in the Motor City are valued at $78,000 on average. 25. Portland, Oregon Population: 642,715 Annual cost of living: $64,008 Comfortable salary needed: $128,016 The average value of a single-family home in Oregon's largest city comes in around $570,000. Portland's median household income is $89,000. 24. Las Vegas Population: 650,873 Annual cost of living: $57,400 Comfortable salary needed: $114,800 Las Vegas saw a population increase of about 1% from 2022 to 2023. The average value of a single-family home here was $462,000 as of last May. Read More: 23. Boston Population: 663,972 Annual cost of living: $86,439 Comfortable salary needed: $172,878 The median household income in Massachusetts' capital city is $95,000. Single-family homes in Boston are worth $859,000 on average. 22. Washington, D.C. Population: 672,079 Annual cost of living: $80,645 Comfortable salary needed: $161,289 The nation's capital has the fourth highest median household income in this list, coming in at $106,000. Single-family homes here are worth $772,000 on average. 21. El Paso, Texas Population: 678,147 Annual cost of living: $38,249 Comfortable salary needed: $76,497 Single-family homes in El Paso are worth $232,000 on average, one of the lowest figures among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. El Paso's median household income is $59,000. 20. Oklahoma City Population: 688,693 Annual cost of living: $37,609 Comfortable salary needed: $75,219 Single-family homes in Oklahoma City are relatively inexpensive compared to other major U.S. cities, with average values at $208,000. Oklahoma City's median household income sits at $67,000. 19. Denver Population: 713,734 Annual cost of living: $65,461 Comfortable salary needed: $130,921 The Mile High City has a median household income of $92,000. The average value of a single-family home in Denver has inched above $600,000. Consider This: 18. Seattle Population: 741,440 Annual cost of living: $92,061 Comfortable salary needed: $184,122 The average value of a single-family home in Seattle has reached $969,000 — the fifth highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Seattle's median household income is $122,000. 17. San Francisco Population: 836,321 Annual cost of living: $129,872 Comfortable salary needed: $259,745 Famously expensive San Francisco has the second highest 'comfortable' salary needed in our list, along with the second highest median household income ($141,000). Single-family homes here are worth a whopping $1.4M on average. The City by the Bay saw a population decrease of 1.7% between 2022 and 2023 — the steepest drop among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. 16. Indianapolis Population: 882,043 Annual cost of living: $38,606 Comfortable salary needed: $77,212 As of last May, the average value of a single-family home in Indiana's capital stood at $238,000. The median household income in Indianapolis comes in around $63,000. 15. Charlotte, North Carolina Population: 886,283 Annual cost of living: $51,765 Comfortable salary needed: $103,530 North Carolina's largest city saw a 1.3% population bump between 2022 and 2023. The average value of a single-family home here is $414,000, and the median household income is $78,000. 14. Columbus, Ohio Population: 906,480 Annual cost of living: $41,226 Comfortable salary needed: $82,452 Ohio's capital has an average single-family home value of $273,000 and a median household income of $66,000. Learn More: 13. Fort Worth, Texas Population: 941,311 Annual cost of living: $45,555 Comfortable salary needed: $91,110 Fort Worth's population jumped nearly 2% between 2022 and 2023, the largest increase among the cities in our list. The average value of a single-family home in Fort Worth is just over $300,000. 12. Jacksonville, Florida Population: 961,739 Annual cost of living: $44,731 Comfortable salary needed: $89,462 Jacksonville's AreaVibes livability score of 84 is tied for the highest in our list. The household median income here is $67,000, and the average single-family home is valued at just over $300,000. 11. Austin, Texas Population: 967,862 Annual cost of living: $62,863 Comfortable salary needed: $125,726 Austin is a young city, with only about 10% of its population age 65 and up. That's the lowest percentage among cities in this list. Single-family homes in Austin are worth $592,000 on average — about $35,000 less than a year ago. 10. San Jose, California Population: 990,054 Annual cost of living: $140,115 Comfortable salary needed: $280,229 Among the most populous U.S. cities, it doesn't get much more expensive than San Jose. This Silicon Valley city tops our list for annual cost of living, 'comfortable' salary needed, median household income ($142,000), and average single-family home value ($1.6M). 9. Dallas Population: 1,299,553 Annual cost of living: $47,589 Comfortable salary needed: $95,177 'Big D' is the third most populous city in Texas, trailing only San Antonio and Houston. Single-family homes in Dallas are worth $332,000 on average, and the median household income is $68,000. Check Out: 8. San Diego Population: 1,385,061 Annual cost of living: $106,761 Comfortable salary needed: $213,522 Sunny San Diego's 'comfortable' salary is the third-highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Single-family homes here are worth $1.2M on average. 7. San Antonio Population: 1,458,954 Annual cost of living: $40,362 Comfortable salary needed: $80,724 San Antonio's median household income sits at $63,000. The average single-family home here is valued at $258,000. 6. Philadelphia Population: 1,582,432 Annual cost of living: $42,610 Comfortable salary needed: $85,220 Philadelphia saw a population decrease of 0.7% between 2022 and 2023. The household median income here comes in around $61,000. 5. Phoenix Population: 1,624,832 Annual cost of living: $54,082 Comfortable salary needed: $108,164 Arizona's capital saw a population increase of about 1% from 2022 to 2023. Its median household income sits at $77,000, and single-family homes here are valued at $429,000 on average. 4. Houston Population: 2,300,419 Annual cost of living: $43,438 Comfortable salary needed: $86,876 Sprawling Houston, one of four U.S. cities with a population over 2 million, has a median household income of $63,000. As of last May, single-family homes in Houston were worth $278,000 on average. Read More: 3. Chicago Population: 2,707,648 Annual cost of living: $46,725 Comfortable salary needed: $93,450 The Windy City's median household income comes in around $75,000. Single-family homes in Chicago are worth $315,000 on average. 2. Los Angeles Population: 3,857,897 Annual cost of living: $100,266 Comfortable salary needed: $200,532 The nation' second-most populous city gets a livability score of 67 from AreaVibes, the third-lowest score in our list. A single-family home in LA is still worth $1M on average. 1. New York Population: 8,516,202 Annual cost of living: $92,576 Comfortable salary needed: $185,152 New York City's 1.2% population decline between 2022 and 2023 was the third highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. The Big Apple's average annual cost of living (about $93,000) is significantly higher than its median household income ($80,000). Ashleigh Ray and Sydney Champion contributed to the reporting for this article. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed the 50 largest U.S. cities by population and determined the salary needed to live comfortably in each location. GBR determined the top 50 cities by population using the U.S. Census American Community Survey (the most recent available). Using the same survey, GBR sourced 2023 and 2022 data for the total population, population age 65 and over, total households, and household median income. One-year changes in percent and amount were calculated for each variable. The single-family home value was sourced from the Zillow Home Value Index from May 2025 and May 2024. By assuming a 10% downpayment and using the national 30-year fixed mortgage rate of 6.75 as sourced on July 21 from Federal Reserve Economic Data, the average mortgage cost was calculated. With the average mortgage cost and average expenditure cost, the average total cost of living was calculated for each city. Using the 50/30/20 rule, which states that needs should not exceed 50% of total household income, the total cost of living was doubled to find the comfortable cost of living. The cities were then sorted to show the largest one-year increase in total population. All data is up to date as of July 21, 2025. More From GOBankingRates How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on Here's the Salary You Need So You Are Not Just Surviving in America's 50 Biggest Cities Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data