logo
Pandemic darlings Moderna, BioNTech are now on two different paths

Pandemic darlings Moderna, BioNTech are now on two different paths

CNBC6 days ago
The Covid-19 pandemic turned Moderna and BioNTech into household names almost overnight. Now the two companies are on different paths.
Both Moderna and BioNTech helped pioneer mRNA, or messenger RNA, technology. Moderna staked its entire identity around mRNA, while BioNTech saw it as one piece of a broader portfolio focused on immunology and oncology. The pandemic gave both companies a chance to prove mRNA's promise of using the body's own immune system to protect against viruses or treat diseases.
Covid vaccines have generated roughly $45 billion in sales for each company, earning them each about $20 billion since their rollout in late 2020. But despite parallel booms after the pandemic, the vaccine makers have since taken their businesses in different directions — and Wall Street has noticed.
The two companies have spent their Covid vaccine windfall differently: Moderna doubled down on its mRNA pipeline, while BioNTech used the money to do deals and diversify, including into one of the hottest emerging areas of cancer drugs. Today, Moderna has about $8.4 billion in cash; the German-based BioNTech has €15.9 billion (or $18.2 billion).
The divergence of the two companies is even more stark in their stock performance. Over the past year, Moderna shares have slid about 72%; BioNTech shares have gained nearly 29%.
"Just their name was made based off the pandemic and the vaccines that they very quickly brought to people around the world to help get us through that period of time," said Evercore ISI analyst Cory Kasimov. "But the approach they're taking now and the outlook for these two companies is distinctly different at this point."
Investors will get a fresh look at both companies' performance as they post quarterly results in the coming days. Moderna is set to report Friday morning, followed by BioNTech on Monday morning.
Moderna used its Covid cash to build out its mRNA portfolio, particularly vaccines. It invested in shots for flu, RSV and lesser-known viruses like cytomegalovirus and norovirus.
"From our perspective, the pandemic really showed that the science of what we're doing worked, and the natural sort of response to that was to continue down that path and do more," said Moderna President Stephen Hoge.
Funding such a large pipeline wasn't cheap. The company has started slashing expenses as sales of its Covid vaccine slide and its RSV vaccine struggles to find a foothold. But the clock is running, said Leerink analyst Mani Foroohar.
"We're moving into a time where being a vaccine company is going to be more expensive, tedious and onerous," Foroohar said, citing changes at the Food and Drug Administration under the leadership of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has expressed skepticism about vaccines.
Foroohar in 2022 pointed out what he saw as a Shakespearean tragic flaw in Moderna's business model. That shortcoming, in his view, is that Moderna scaled its pipeline assuming mRNA technology would be the tool for all problems instead of a solution for some problems.
Hoge said Moderna's "really good at making mRNA medicines" and decided to focus on doing that. "The reality is that we think over the last 10 years, that focus has actually made us successful, and in the pandemic, it certainly had a big impact and obviously was something that sets us up for the more diverse pipeline we have right now," Hoge said. "So we recognize that we may be going through some cycles, but we're pretty confident in the long-term trajectory we're on, and we're looking forward over the years ahead to showing with all these additional medicines what we're really capable of."
Meanwhile, BioNTech decided to use the proceeds from its Covid vaccine to diversify. Out of the limelight as partner Pfizer took the lead on selling the companies' shot, BioNTech expanded into promising new cancer technologies.
Most importantly, it acquired a bispecific antibody targeting the proteins PD-L1 and VEG-F. That technology promises to build on – and possibly best – the success that Merck has found with Keytruda, a cancer drug with nearly $30 billion in sales last year alone.
That thesis still needs to be proven in large, global clinical trials, but BioNTech is already seeing that deal pay off. Bristol Myers Squibb in June announced it would pay up to $11 billion to partner with BioNTech to codevelop the experimental drug, which BioNTech acquired for a fraction of that. BioNTech in 2023 initially paid Biotheus $55 million up front to license the drug outside China before acquiring the company outright earlier this year for up to $1 billion.
"[BioNTech] found an asset, they developed it, and then they got a pharma partner, it's like a dream," said BMO analyst Evan David Seigerman. "So they're really strategic in that, and I think they're adding a lot of diversification, which makes the story a lot less risky if you're just focused on mRNA, vaccines and Covid, and that's super risky, in my view."
At the same time, hopes are high that BioNTech's bispecific antibody drug will work, meaning any disappointment ahead could hurt the stock. Investors are watching forthcoming Phase 3 trial results from Summit Therapeutics, which is testing a similar drug for lung cancer. Those data could help — or hurt — BioNTech's stock while it awaits data from its own studies, which could take until 2028.
For Moderna, investors want to see if sales of its Covid and RSV vaccines can rebound. The company is also seeking FDA approval for an mRNA flu shot. But at this point, the most intense focus is on Moderna's Phase 3 trial for a personalized cancer treatment for melanoma, said RBC Capital Markets analyst Luca Issi.
Moderna may be able to share the first interim data as soon as next year, Hoge said, though the company can't promise an exact date since it's an event-driven study. That means enough people in the trial need to relapse before Moderna can analyze whether its treatment kept cancer from returning longer. If the treatment succeeds, it could launch in 2027 or 2028, Hoge said.
That leaves Moderna largely dependent on its vaccines until then. An ongoing patent dispute over Moderna's Covid-19 shot could also eat into the company's cash, analysts say, adding they expect the legal proceedings to play out next year.
Time will tell whether the divergent strategies win over Wall Street long term.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. Cuts mRNA Vaccine Funding
RFK Jr. Cuts mRNA Vaccine Funding

Buzz Feed

time7 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

RFK Jr. Cuts mRNA Vaccine Funding

I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.

Online grocer Weee must pay Mass. workers misclassified as contractors
Online grocer Weee must pay Mass. workers misclassified as contractors

Axios

time7 minutes ago

  • Axios

Online grocer Weee must pay Mass. workers misclassified as contractors

An online grocery delivery company must pay Massachusetts delivery drivers nearly $800,000, settling allegations that it misclassified the workers and denied them earned sick time. Why it matters: Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell continues to take companies using delivery drivers as independent contractors to task, long after the high-profile battles with ride app companies like Uber and Lyft over employee classification. Driving the news: A California-based Asian online supermarket called Weee agreed to an $865,000 settlement with Campbell's office over allegations that 164 workers were misclassified as independent contractors. The bulk of that money is restitution for the workers, who Campbell's office says weren't able to earn sick time or take advantage of other protections afforded to full-time employees. The remaining $80,000 covers fines the company agreed to pay, per the settlement agreement Campbell signed last Thursday. Weee did not immediately respond to an inquiry from Axios.

Claire's files second bankruptcy petition in 7 years
Claire's files second bankruptcy petition in 7 years

UPI

time8 minutes ago

  • UPI

Claire's files second bankruptcy petition in 7 years

Retailer Claire's filed for bankruptcy protection on Wednesday amid declining sales and rising costs due to inflation and the potential impact of tariffs on its mostly Chinese-made goods. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 6 (UPI) -- Officials for retailer Claire's filed for bankruptcy protection on Wednesday as its operating costs rise while demand for its goods declines among its youthful customers. A combination of tariffs on the mostly Chinese-produced goods sold by Claire's and inflation has cooled demand among its mostly youthful customers, according to NPR. So has its distribution system of brick-and-mortar storefronts inside malls at a time when its traditionally youthful shoppers prefer buying goods online. Illinois-based Claire's has a $500 million loan due for payment next year, but its declining revenues and profits endanger its stores in the United States and Canada. "Increased competition, consumer spending trends and the ongoing shift away from brick-and-mortar retail, in combination with our current debt obligations and macroeconomic factors, necessitate this course of action for Claire's and its stakeholders," Claire's Chief Executive Officer Chris Cramer said in a prepared statement. Claire's counterpart in Canada likely will file for bankruptcy protection there, but the retailer's North American stores will remain open. "We remain in active discussions with potential strategic and financial partners and are committed to completing our review of strategic alternatives," Cramer said. Claire's filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Delaware. The retailer is noted for its low-cost fashion accessories, jewelry and piercing services. In 2018, the company filed for bankruptcy protection. Elliott Management Corp. and Monarch Alternative Capital now control Claire's, which wiped out $1.9 billion in debt and kept its retail outlets open after securing a $575 million loan, according to CNBC. The retailer cited between $1 billion and $10 billion in assets and liabilities alike in Wednesday's bankruptcy filing. Tariffs on Chinese-made goods could affect Claire's supply chain, and increased competition from ear-piercing service providers is affecting Claire's business among its younger customers. "Competition has ... become sharper and more intense over recent years," GlobalData managing director Neil Saunders recently said. "Retailers like Lovisa [are] offering younger shoppers a more sophisticated assortment at value prices," Saunders said. "This is more attuned to what younger consumers want and has left Claire's looking somewhat out of step with modern demand," he added. Amazon and other online retailers also are negatively affecting Claire's business model, according to Saunders.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store