logo
How well did Trump and Epstein really know each other? A timeline

How well did Trump and Epstein really know each other? A timeline

Al Jazeera2 days ago
A collection of letters gifted to the deceased, high-profile sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, on his birthday in 2003 includes a birthday note bearing US President Donald Trump's signature, the Wall Street Journal (WSG) reported on Thursday.
Trump denies having written the letter and, on Thursday, told Attorney General Pam Bondi to request a court release of the transcripts of all grand jury testimony in the Epstein case.
The WSJ claims have reignited intrigue about Trump's relationship with Epstein. We break down how closely, exactly, the two men associated with each other over the years.
What was in Trump's birthday letter to Epstein?
According to the WSJ report, Epstein was gifted a leather-bound collection of letters and notes for his 50th birthday in 2003.
This had been compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's associate and partner, who was later charged as Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice in his sexual abuse operation. She was found guilty in 2021 and is now serving a 20-year prison sentence handed down in 2022.
The letter included typewritten text in the third person. It also featured a drawing of a woman's breasts and was signed 'Donald'. The drawing appeared to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker, the WSJ reported.
The letter ended with: 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
Al Jazeera could not independently verify the authenticity of the letter.
Following the revelations about the letter, Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures.
'I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his a** off, and that of his third rate newspaper. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DJT.'
He also wrote: 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!'
Soon after Trump's statement, Bondi announced on X that the Justice Department planned to request the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in court on Friday.
Here's what we know about how well the two men really knew each other.
1980s: Trump and Epstein are friends
in 2002, Trump told the New York Magazine that he had been friends with Epstein since about the late 1980s.
In the 1980s, Trump was a businessman and a real estate mogul.
'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,' Trump said.
'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life,' Trump continued.
1990s: Trump and Epstein are spotted at parties together, flying together
Through the 1990s, the two men were spotted socialising at high-profile gatherings.
In November 1992, Trump threw a party with NFL cheerleaders at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. He had invited NBC to record the event.
The tape from the party, published by NBC online in 2019, shows Trump laughing with Epstein, their conversation drowned by the really loud music.
In 1997, Epstein and Trump were seen together at the Victoria Secret 'Angels' party in New York.
Trump also frequently flew on Epstein's private jets – seven times in total between 1993 and 1997 – according to flight logs presented as evidence during Maxwell's trial.
This included four times in 1993, once in 1994, once in 1995 and once in 1997. The flights were between Palm Beach and New York, and they included a stop in Washington, DC.
2000s: The two continue to party, Trump's name in Epstein files
There are pictures of the two men at a party at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in 2000.
These images also feature Maxwell and Trump's now wife, then known as Melania Knauss.
In January 2024, about 950 pages of court documents identifying associates of Epstein were made public.
Trump was mentioned in these documents, but was not accused of anything.
Virginia Giuffre, one of the women who accused Epstein of sexual abuse, told the court that she was working at Mar-a-Lago when she was recruited by Maxwell to become Epstein's masseuse at the age of 16.
Giuffre said that Epstein and Maxwell groomed her into performing sexual acts with adult men, including Prince Andrew.
Johanna Sjoberg, another woman who accused Epstein of sexual abuse, recalled a 2001 flight from Florida on which she and Virginia Giuffre, then underage, were among the passengers.
Due to a storm, the plane diverted to Atlantic City, where they visited one of Trump's casinos.
Sjoberg said of Giuffre: 'I did not know anything about how old you had to be to gamble legally. I just knew she could not get in because of an ID issue, so she and I did not gamble.'
Giuffre died by suicide in April this year.
2003: Trump's birthday letter to Epstein
The WSJ published the text of a letter allegedly written by Trump for Epstein's birthday. It appears to be in script form:
'Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything.
Donald: Yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is.
Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.
Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.
Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.
Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?
Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.
Donald: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
According to the report, Trump told the WSJ on Tuesday that he did not write the letter, and threatened to sue the publication. 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he told the Journal.
'The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued,' Trump reiterated in a post on his Truth Social platform.
Rupert Murdoch controls the WSJ's publisher, News Corp.
2004: Trump and Epstein have a real estate dispute
In 2004, Trump and Epstein had a falling out over a foreclosed oceanfront mansion in Palm Beach.
The Washington Post reported that Trump had outbid Epstein on the property.
Since that date, there was sparse public evidence of the two men interacting.
2006: Epstein faces criminal charges
In 2005, Florida police investigated claims Epstein had sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl after the girl's parents made the complaint.
Epstein was charged by Palm Beach police officials with multiple counts of unlawful sex with a minor.
However, the State Attorney took the unusual step of referring the case to a grand jury, which indicted Epstein on a single count of soliciting prostitution.
In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to charges involving a single victim. He served 13 months in jail under a work-release programme that permitted him to leave during the day for work and return to jail at night.
2019: Epstein is jailed again and dies in prison
During Trump's first presidential term in 2019, federal prosecutors in New York charged Epstein with sex trafficking.
In July 2019, Trump was asked by a reporter about Epstein, to which he responded: 'Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him. I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach.'
Trump added: 'I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years.'
Epstein died in a Manhattan jail cell on August 10, 2019.
During an interview after Epstein's death, Trump said about the case: 'I want a full investigation, and that's what I absolutely am demanding.'
2025: Trump's shifting stance on the 'Epstein list'
In 2024, while campaigning for the election, Trump said he would release information about the Epstein case.
He also appointed Pam Bondi to be the Attorney General.
During an interview with Fox News in February, Bondi was asked, 'The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients, will that really happen?'
She responded, 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review.'
However, on July 7, the US Department of Justice released a memo stating that a government review had found no evidence that Epstein had a specific 'secret client list'.
The memo also reaffirmed that Epstein had died by suicide, a claim that many conspiracy theorists among Trump's MAGA (Make America Great Again) base disbelieve. They believe Epstein was murdered because he had sensitive information about powerful figures, and that this was covered up.
When Trump and Bondi were questioned by reporters about the July 7 memo, Trump said: 'I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this, where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy, with what happened in Texas,' referring to flash floods that roiled the southern US state over the weekend before the memo was released, killing 109 people.
'It just seems like a desecration,' Trump added.
Trump recently expressed anger towards his supporters over Epstein conspiracy theories.
'Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!' he wrote on his Truth Social platform on Monday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's big beautiful police state is here
Trump's big beautiful police state is here

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump's big beautiful police state is here

On July 4, United States President Donald Trump signed into law his so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which will reduce taxes for the rich, punish the poor, and otherwise propel American plutocracy to ever more noxious heights. Just days earlier, Trump's Vice President JD Vance took to X to underline the key component of the legislation: 'Everything else — the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.' Indeed, the bill allocates the unprecedentedly ludicrous sum of $175bn to anti-immigration efforts, approximately $30bn of which will go directly to the notorious federal law enforcement agency ICE, known in long form as US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Another $45bn is earmarked for the construction of new immigration detention centres, which, as the American Immigration Council notes, 'represents a 265 percent annual budget increase to ICE's current detention budget'. Thanks to these budgetary machinations, ICE now occupies the position of the largest US federal law enforcement agency in history, with more money at its annual disposal than the military of any country in the world apart from the US and China. Given that ICE agents have as of late made a name for themselves running around in masks and kidnapping people, however, one would be forgiven for seeing this sudden windfall to the agency as something less than, um, 'beautiful'. Of course, the fanatical increase in ICE funding is no surprise coming from a president whose obsession with the idea of deporting millions of people has not prompted him to contemplate how, precisely, a US economy fundamentally dependent on undocumented labour will continue to function in the absence of said labourers. Anyway, the arrangement means big bucks for the detention-industrial complex, including detention companies like GEO Group and CoreCivic that are contracted by ICE. A July 4 Washington Post article on ICE's impending 'detention blitz' reported that each company coincidentally happened to donate half a million dollars to Trump's inauguration in January. The Post article also provided other clues as to how US 'democracy' really works: 'On calls with Wall Street analysts this year, Geo Group executives have primed shareholders for a government contract bonanza that could boost annual revenue by more than 40 percent and profits by more than 60 percent.' But since the government cannot come right out and say this is all about money, it has to invent other narratives, such as that ICE is protecting the US from 'vicious criminal illegal aliens'. Never mind that the vast majority of those detained by the agency have no criminal record whatsoever. Among ICE's ever-growing list of victims is a six-year-old Honduran boy with leukaemia, who was arrested in late May at the Los Angeles immigration courthouse where he had come with his family for a scheduled asylum hearing. This month, massive ICE raids on two California farms resulted in more than 360 arrests and the death of 57-year-old Jaime Alanis, a Mexican farmworker who fell from a greenhouse roof during the upheaval. Nor are all of ICE's detainees undocumented; after all, it is hard to be discerning when you are scrambling to meet detention quotas, and when you are well aware of the fact that you are totally above the law. One of the detainees from the farm raids was 25-year-old security guard George Retes, a US Army veteran, no less, who was pepper-sprayed and then jailed for three days, missing his three-year-old daughter's birthday party. He was released with no explanation. Now imagine the landscape with an additional $175bn in 'ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions', to borrow Vance's words. As if manic and arbitrary detention operations and the elimination of due process were not cause enough for concern, ICE is also being utilised as a force for political repression and the criminalisation of dissent. This was seen in the recent spate of abductions of international scholars opposed to the ongoing US-backed Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip, including 30-year-old Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish doctoral student focusing on childhood development at Tufts University in Massachusetts. En route to an iftar dinner in March, Ozturk was surrounded by masked agents, forced into an unmarked vehicle, and disappeared to an ICE detention centre in Louisiana administered by GEO Group – all because she had co-authored an article for the university newspaper the previous year expressing solidarity with Palestinians. In a new essay for Vanity Fair, Ozturk reflects on her 45-day detention in appalling conditions that were only made bearable thanks to the solidarity of her fellow female detainees, hailing from an array of nations. Ozturk writes: 'One time, an officer came and took away all the cookie boxes, claiming we would use them to make weapons. Another time, we were shocked to witness an officer physically push two women in the kitchen.' When Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, recently had the nerve to refer to ICE as 'Trump's modern-day Gestapo', the US Department of Homeland Security threw a tantrum over his 'dangerous rhetoric', and issued a press release asserting that, 'while politicians like Gov. Walz fight to protect criminal illegal aliens, ICE officers will continue risking their lives to arrest murderers, kidnappers, and pedophiles'. This was itself 'dangerous rhetoric', no doubt, coming from the folks who are kidnapping doctoral students, six-year-old leukaemia patients, army veterans, and so on. Although undocumented workers might be the most immediate and visible victims of the super-funding of ICE stipulated by the One Big Beautiful Bill, the consequences for US society as a whole cannot be understated. At the end of the day, a rogue agency snatching people off the street while entire communities live in fear does not denote a 'land of the free', particularly when the president appears to view anyone who disagrees with him as potentially eligible for criminal punishment. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, has observed that 'you don't build the mass deportation machine without building the police state first'. And if we consider the Cambridge dictionary entry for police state – 'a country in which the government uses the police to severely limit people's freedom' – it seems the US already fits the definition to a big beautiful T. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

Trump signs stablecoin regulations into law, a major crypto milestone
Trump signs stablecoin regulations into law, a major crypto milestone

Qatar Tribune

time13 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Trump signs stablecoin regulations into law, a major crypto milestone

Agencies US President Donald Trump on Friday signed a law to create a regulatory regime for dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies known as stablecoins, a milestone that could pave the way for the digital assets to become an everyday way to make payments and move money. The bill, dubbed the GENIUS Act, passed in the House of Representatives by a vote of 308 to 122, with support from nearly half the Democratic members and most Republicans. It had earlier been approved by the Senate. The law is a huge win for crypto supporters, who have long lobbied for such a regulatory framework in a bid to gain greater legitimacy for an industry that began in 2009 as a digital Wild West famed for its innovation and speculative chaos. 'This signing is a massive validation of your hard work and pioneering spirit,' said Trump at a signing event that included dozens of government officials, crypto executives and lawmakers. 'It's good for the dollar and it's good for the country.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, in a statement, said the new technology would buttress the dollar's status as the global reserve currency, expand access to the dollar economy and boost demand for US Treasuries, which back stablecoins. Stablecoins are designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 US dollar peg, and their use has exploded, notably by crypto traders moving funds between tokens. The industry hopes they will enter mainstream use for sending and receiving payments instantly. The new law requires stablecoins to be backed by liquid assets - such as US dollars and short-term Treasury bills - and for issuers to disclose publicly the composition of their reserves monthly. Crypto companies and executives argue such legislation will enhance stablecoins' credibility and make banks, retailers and consumers more willing to use them to transfer funds instantly. The stablecoin market, which crypto data provider CoinGecko said is valued at more than $260 billion, could grow to $2 trillion by 2028 under the new law, Standard Chartered bank estimated earlier this year. The law's passage culminates a long lobbying effort by the industry, which donated more than $245 million in last year's elections to aid pro-crypto candidates including Trump, according to Federal Election Commission data. The Republican president, who has launched his own coin, thanked executives for their support during the 2024 presidential campaign, saying, 'I pledged that we would bring back American liberty and leadership and make the United States the crypto capital of the world, and that's what we've done.' Democrats and critics have said the law should have blocked big tech companies from issuing their own stablecoins, which could increase the clout of an already powerful sector, contained stronger anti-money laundering protections and prohibited foreign stablecoin issuers. 'By failing to close known loopholes and protect America's digital dollar infrastructure, Congress has risked making the US financial system a global haven for criminals and adversarial regimes to exploit,' said Scott Greytak, deputy executive director of Transparency International US. Big US banks are internally debating an expansion into cryptocurrencies as regulators give stronger backing to digital assets, but banks' initial steps will focus on pilot programs, partnerships or limited crypto trading, Reuters reported in May. Several crypto firms including Circle and Ripple are seeking banking licenses, which would cut costs by bypassing intermediary banks. Backers of the bill have said it could potentially give rise to a new source of demand for short-term US government debt, because stablecoin issuers will have to purchase more of the debt to back their assets. Trump has sought to broadly overhaul US cryptocurrency policies, signing an executive order in March establishing a strategic bitcoin reserve. The president launched a meme coin called $TRUMP in January and partly owns crypto company World Liberty Financial.

Could Trump's threats against Brazil backfire?
Could Trump's threats against Brazil backfire?

Al Jazeera

time15 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Could Trump's threats against Brazil backfire?

US threatens 50-percent tariffs unless Bolsonaro's prosecution is dropped. There's deepening conflict between the United States and Brazil over the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro. US President Donald Trump threatened 50-percent tariffs – 'unacceptable blackmail', says Brazil's President Lula da Silva. So what's next? And who stands to win or lose? Presenter: Adrian Finighan Guests: Graziella Testa – Professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation Vinicius Rodrigues Vieira – Professor at the Armando Alvares Penteado Foundation Michael Shifter – Senior fellow at the Inter-American Dialogue

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store