logo
Auto-enrolment window still tight despite three-month deferral, says Mercer

Auto-enrolment window still tight despite three-month deferral, says Mercer

Irish Times05-05-2025

Employers have been urged not to long-finger preparations for the introduction of a mandatory
workplace pension scheme
after the Government announced a three-month delay in its introduction.
Caitriona MacGuinness, DC and private wealth leader at
Mercer Ireland
, said a delay had been widely anticipated in recent weeks after employer groups and payroll service providers had told the Government in a series of meetings in recent weeks that they may not be ready in time for the originally-planned September 30th start date for pension auto-enrolment.
'A common theme emerging from discussions with clients in recent months was that the implications of AE (auto-enrolment) were more complex than originally anticipated,' Ms MacGuinness said.
'The September 30th start date, following so closely after the summer months, was also placing considerable pressure on employers to communicate effectively with employees. The delay now gives some welcome breathing room.'
READ MORE
However, she warned companies needed to continue to work towards implementation.
'The timeline to the introduction of auto-enrolment remains fairly short, especially when you consider the summer months,' she said. 'I think January 1st is achievable, but there is a lot to do.'
The danger is, with the logic of a January 1st start now generally accepted, any further delay would see the whole project put back by a full year.
100 days of Trump: 'It's like The Karate Kid, tax on, tax off, tariffs on, tariffs off'
Listen |
42:49
Hitting the new target requires the Government also to move quickly on decisions in its control, like the appointment of investment managers, she said.
Auto-enrolment will mean all workers aged between 23 and 60 who earn above €20,000 across one or more employments automatically enrolled in a private pension scheme, called
My Future Fund
. They will initially pay 1.5 per cent of their gross salary into the fund with that figure matched by their employer and the State adding €1 for every €3 the worker invests.
Contributions will rise to 3 per cent in 2029, 4.5 per cent in 2032 and 6 per cent from 2035. Around 800,000 workers across the State are expected to be affected by the move.
One of the more difficult challenges is for employers who already operate an occupational pension scheme but who have staff that are not signed up to it – either by choice or because they have not completed a probationary period.
Many employers are keen to avoid the cost and administrative burden of running two separate pension schemes. Widening their current arrangements to accommodate all staff is seen as the preferred option, but they cannot force staff who have opted out previously to now join.
Ms MacGuinness said the early and extensive communication with employees is essential in such cases. 'Encouragement is the watchword,' she said. 'Some have been very successful in persuading their employees, but there is no standard approach. It depends on the number of holdouts as a proportion of the overall size of the existing scheme.'
Employers can either persuade all staff to join the existing scheme as is, adjust the rules of the scheme to permit them to join at the contribution rates that will be mandated under auto-enrolment or set up a parallel option under the centralised auto-enrolment programme.
On the challenge of explaining to staff how the scheme will work and its impact on their take-home pay, she said: 'It is complex to explain to employees, but people will become aware of the benefits over time.
'We just have not seen sufficient take-up of employees saving for their futures.'
Ms MacGuinness said employers should have made all necessary strategic decisions no later than July of this year with employee engagement completed no later than November to allow for onboarding of staff, especially where they will be joining existing schemes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government to withhold support for motion to end Central Bank facilitation of Israeli war bonds
Government to withhold support for motion to end Central Bank facilitation of Israeli war bonds

Irish Examiner

time21 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Government to withhold support for motion to end Central Bank facilitation of Israeli war bonds

The Government will not be supporting a cross-party motion demanding the Central Bank end the facilitation of Israeli war bonds and will instead table its own counter motion. Four opposition parties have come together to back the motion and have called on Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to provide the Government TDs with a free vote when it comes before the Dáil on Wednesday. The Social Democrats, Sinn Féin, Labour and People Before Profit-Solidarity have united behind the motion that demands that the Government enact emergency legislation to explicitly force the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds. It also calls on the coalition to advise the bank that "by acting as the enabling cog in Israel's fundraising machine in the European Union it is putting the state at risk of a charge of complicity in genocide". The motion stresses that since October 2023 the bonds have been advertised as war bonds with the slogan 'stand with Israel – Israel is at war'. The website marketing the bonds contains a video by Israeli President Isaac Herzog who lauds 'the crucial role of Israel bonds during this time of conflict and war". Last month, a similar Sinn Féin bill which sought to stop the Central Bank facilitating the sale of Israeli war bonds was defeated after the Government voted against the draft legislation. Sinn Féin TD Seán Crowe said the gap between the vote on the Sinn Féin Bill and this motion has given TDs 'time to reflect'. Mr Crowe asked: Is there anyone in Ireland comfortable with the fact that we're facilitating this blood money coming into our country and being spent on weapons that are killing men, women and children? Calling on the Government leaders to allow backbench TDs a vote of conscience, Social Democrats TD Sinéad Gibney said: 'We have failed as an international community to prevent a genocide from happening so now we have to do everything in our power to make sure that we stop it.' She added: 'We are urging the Government to allow a free vote, a vote of conscience, because we believe that this is something that many TDs will support if given the opportunity. 'And we absolutely urge the Government to support this motion.' Labour TD Duncan Smith said adopting the motion would send a "clear signal" that Ireland is "morally and ethically" against Israel's bombardment of Gaza and that "Irish people do not stand for the selling of Israeli war bonds". Humanitarian aid blockade Meanwhile, Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris has made an urgent call to end the blockade and allow humanitarian aid into Gaza. "Ireland has consistently called on Israel to lift its blockade and allow unimpeded access of humanitarian aid at scale into Gaza, in accordance with international law and humanitarian principles," Mr Harris said in a statement. "The UN and humanitarian organisations must be allowed to work independently and do their job. It is a shame on the world and international community that people are starving in Gaza." Praising activists aboard the Madleen, which was blocked by Israeli forces on route to Gaza, Mr Harris said: "The question we should be asking today is not a debate about the merits or not of the flotilla but how it has come to this; that the world is turning a blind eye to starving children in Gaza." Read More Watch: Surveillance footage shows crew on Gaza aid boat putting hands up as Israeli forces seize vessel

Rental reform plan will add to homelessness, landlords claim
Rental reform plan will add to homelessness, landlords claim

Extra.ie​

time37 minutes ago

  • Extra.ie​

Rental reform plan will add to homelessness, landlords claim

New plans to reform the rental housing market are unfair and will have a serious negative effect on rentals, according to the Irish Property Owners Association, the body representing the country's landlords. The new two-tier reform, which proposes to lift the cap in rent pressure zones and provide for minimum six-year leases, is being debated in the Dáil tonight and considered by Cabinet tomorrow. The controversial measures are aimed at encouraging landlords to enter the market and increase the number of rental homes, but the Property Owners Association say it will have the opposite effect. Pic: Shutterstock They have urged the Government 'to consider the impact of, in effect, banning short-to-medium term letting of less than six years' and of the implications for owners of large, multiple tenancies who wish to sell the property. They also ask if the new reforms will include exemptions for homeowners going into nursing homes who want to rent their home for less than six years. 'The IPOA is concerned that the Government's proposed reforms are over-complicated and that the proposed 6-year minimum security of tenure will have a serious negative impact on private, non-institutional landlords, and on the rental market. The IPOA fears that the Government may not have fully considered some of the implications and consequences of the proposals,' spokeswoman Mary Conway said. Mary Conway. Pic: Supplied 'The proposed changes are unfair on the individual who – for good reason – wishes to, and needs to, rent out their home for a short period and points to a flaw on the part of the Government thinking which – by going after institutional landlords – has ignored the implications for individual, private landlords. 'We believe that in seeking to address political concerns about the role of institutional landlords (who are predominantly active in the Dublin region), the Government may be punishing individual landlords, particularly the types of landlords who are the drivers of rental supply in provincial towns and rural areas outside of the large cities.' Ms Conway added. Pic: Shutterstock The proposal to lift the cap on rent in rent pressure zones has been heavily criticised by renters and housing charities. Instead of limiting rent increases to 2% a year the rent will now be tied to the rate of inflation, meaning a higher increase in rents. The Government believes lifting the current rent cap will encourage large landlords to enter the Irish market, but critics and opposition politicians say it will lead to more homelessness if the cap is lifted. As a mark of Ireland's dysfunctional rental market, three-bedroom houses and apartments in Tallaght are now renting for a staggering €3,000 monthly.

Government set for crunch Rent Pressure Zone talks - here's what we can expect
Government set for crunch Rent Pressure Zone talks - here's what we can expect

Irish Daily Mirror

time43 minutes ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Government set for crunch Rent Pressure Zone talks - here's what we can expect

The Government is facing a turbulent week as it finally looks set to make a decision on the contentious Rent Pressure Zone legislation. As the plan to reform the renter rules is discussed at Cabinet on Tuesday, the opposition has warned of widespread protests to the reforms. Rent Pressure Zone (RPZ) legislation was introduced in 2016. It limited the amount by which rents in RPZs could be increased to 2 per cent or the level of inflation, whichever is less. The legislation is due to lapse at the end of this year, with the Programme for Government committing to 'review the effectiveness' of RPZs. Pending Cabinet approval on Tuesday, it is expected that rent caps of 2% will stay in place for existing dwellings. A new six-year tenancy rule will be implemented, along with a restriction on no-fault evictions. After six years, the rent can be increased to match market rates. In a major change, landlords will also be allowed to increase the rents between tenancies. However, the rent cap will not apply to new-build apartments, as part of a Government push to increase the supply of apartments being built. The Irish Mirror understands that additional protections will be put in place for tenants. This will include limiting the situations in which a person can be evicted from a property. For smaller landlords, tenants can be told to leave the property if it is being sold or if family is moving in. However, the Irish Mirror understands that the list of eligible family members could be tightened. For larger landlords, they will be allowed to remove tenants if they break contractual agreements only. People Before Profit's Paul Murphy suggested that the Government's actions will drive rents even higher. He said: 'Rents nationally recently surpassed an average of €2,000 per month for the first time. 'The average rent in Dublin is now €2,500 per month and the rate of increase has accelerated to the highest rate in 20 years'. 'But the government's response to record-high rents is to change the RPZs to enable landlords to drive rents even higher. 'These are the actions of a government that is relentlessly focused on serving the needs of developers and landlords first, last and always. It should also be repeated that Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Lowry group TDs in the Dáil include many landlords'. Sinn Féin's housing spokesman, Eoin O Broin, meanwhile, told RTÉ's Morning Ireland that the Government was 'gaslighting' renters. "When the Taoiseach said yesterday that this was a balanced package to protect renters and encourage investment, he is deliberately misleading the public," Mr Ó Broin said. "He is gaslighting renters, and I'm not even sure he fully understands the extent to which they're putting huge numbers of people, young people, people approaching pension age, at enormous risk with even greater financial hardship, and in many cases, at risk of homelessness.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store