My Angry, Sensitive Skin Always Looks Better After I Use This Face Spray
The Tower 28 SOS Rescue Spray always calms my skin when I'm dealing with a breakout or redness.
It can be purchased for as low as $12 for a travel size.
The SOS Rescue Spray contains hypochlorous acid, a natural anti-inflammatory and antibacterial.
While nobody likes dealing with breakouts, it is comforting that no one is alone in their acne. After all, it's the most common skin condition in the US, affecting 50 million Americans every year. And with June being National Acne Awareness Month, I got to thinking about my own acne journey and what has recently made the biggest difference whenever a pimple pops up.
As a wellness writer, I recognize that we're all inundated with face skincare recommendations on social media. While this makes health advice easy to find, that information is hard to trust. That's why I'm always on the lookout to test and assess highly recommended products to see if they actually make an impact.
One product I've been seeing all over my feed is the Tower 28 SOS Rescue Spray, a toner that utilizes hypochlorous acid to calm skin, reduce redness and protect your skin against harmful bacteria. I got to try the spray and have found that it is, in fact, worth the hype. Whenever I get a breakout, I use this spray and wake up the next day with skin that isn't as irritated and red, and my breakouts are less noticeable.
My experience with Tower 28 SOS Rescue Spray
Since I have sensitive, rosacea-prone skin, I am always hesitant to add a new skincare product to my routine. However, I decided to give the SOS Rescue Spray a try after I saw that it's accepted by the National Rosacea Society and National Eczema Association and recognized by the National Psoriasis Foundation. After using it for several months, I can safely say that my skin has not had an unwanted reaction.
This is the standard size (4oz) product.
Anna Gragert/CNET
The Rescue Spray comes in a spray bottle, which makes it easy to apply. This type of application also makes the product more sanitary since you don't have to use your hands. I know a few people who use this spray after a sweaty workout, so I imagine it's helpful not to have to wash your hands before use if you're on the go.
This product is also free of many things, which is another green flag for those of us with sensitive skin. It's vegan, cruelty-free, fragrance-free, alcohol-free and oil-free. Though the SOS Rescue Spray can be used for all skin types, Tower 28 does mention in its product description that "the most visible changes will be seen after consistent use in sensitive/problem skin types." Just make sure you do a patch test first.
This spray is also dermatologist-approved and has a pH of 4.5.
Anna Gragert/CNET
The Rescue Spray can be applied both day and night in place of a toner or as needed during the day (even over makeup). If I'm dealing with a breakout -- usually hormonal -- I will spray this toner on my face at night after I cleanse and dry my skin. To get a more precise application, I will sometimes spray it into my palm and then pat the product on my skin, concentrating it on areas where I'm breaking out. I will wait for it to dry down before I apply my moisturizer on top with an eye cream and retinol.
Since hypochlorous acid is an oxidant and vitamin C is an antioxidant, the acid can degrade the effects of vitamin C if used in the same skincare routine. However, according to Tower 28, you can use the Rescue Spray before any other active (like vitamin C) if you allow it to dry down first. "The hero ingredient in SOS Spray (hypochlorous acid) is super fast acting and once it dries down it won't interact with any of your other skincare products (including actives like vitamin C!)," says the brand.
Though Tower 28 states that results can take anywhere from three days to three months, I noticed results the next day after using the product. My skin was less red, and my breakouts were less pronounced and obvious, so it appeared that the spray did calm my irritated, inflamed skin.
In addition to blemishes and after a workout, the brand also states that the SOS Rescue Spray can be used for sunburns, rashes, eczema and post-procedure.
The specs
Price: $12 to $68
$12 to $68 Sizes: travel (1oz), standard (4oz), duo (4oz and 1oz) and jumbo (16oz refill)
travel (1oz), standard (4oz), duo (4oz and 1oz) and jumbo (16oz refill) Features: vegan, cruelty-free, alcohol-free, fragrance-free, oil-free
vegan, cruelty-free, alcohol-free, fragrance-free, oil-free Skin types: all skin types, including sensitive/problem skin types
all skin types, including sensitive/problem skin types Sustainability: cruelty-free, vegan, bottle made from 100% post-consumer recycled resin, refill offered
cruelty-free, vegan, bottle made from 100% post-consumer recycled resin, refill offered Application type: spray
spray Ingredients: water, sodium chloride, hypochlorous acid
water, sodium chloride, hypochlorous acid Benefits: soothes irritated skin, reduces the appearance of redness, protects skin from harmful bacteria
soothes irritated skin, reduces the appearance of redness, protects skin from harmful bacteria Seals: National Rosacea Society accepted, National Eczema Association accepted, recognized by the National Psoriasis Foundation
CNET's buying advice
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
22 minutes ago
- Medscape
Dire Warnings, Rosy Future: Medicare at 60
The creation of Medicare in 1965 was hailed as a watershed for the social safety net, offering millions of older Americans financial security and freedom from worry about their medical expenses. But critics of the legislation cast dire warnings about what the law would do to the nation's physicians, the doctor-patient relationship, and even the country's way of life. Who was right? To mark the 60th anniversary of Medicare, Medscape asked leaders in healthcare, American history, and public policy to reflect on the words of the program's earliest champions and critics. Comments have been edited for length and clarity. Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kennedy, August 14, 1960. Then-Senator John F. Kennedy , spoke in support of a national insurance program for the elderly at an event on August 14, 1960: "Three out of every five of these [people over age 65] — more than 9.5 million people — must struggle to survive on an income of under $1000 a year. …This poverty and hardship turn into heartbreak and despair when illness threatens. Medicines and drugs are more expensive than ever before — hospital rates have more than doubled — doctor bills have skyrocketed. …Those over 65 suffer from chronic diseases at almost twice the rate of our younger population — they spend more than twice as many days restricted to bed — and they must visit a doctor twice as often." Commentary Keith Wailoo, PhD, Henry Putnam University professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University and past president of the American Association for the History of Medicine: "An important backdrop behind JFK's comment is reflecting 10 years prior on the failure of President Harry Truman's national health insurance proposals. The frustrations and the stories he's telling were evident after World War II. Keith Wailoo, PhD "He's describing a landscape where — in the course of the war — private insurance became more attached to employment, wage freezes meant that companies couldn't raise wages, unions lobbied and employers argued that benefits could be increased, and as a result of a momentous Supreme Court ruling, health insurance became increasingly a byproduct of employment. Healthcare costs were rising, and insurance was becoming a passage point to getting hospital care. "The face of the poor and medical needy were the elderly by 1960. They were not working, and because of advancing life expectancy, there was more infirmity and yet they were locked out of the system. "So we've recreated the world, and with that we have also changed people's expectations about what they can hope for." Ronald Reagan and the American Medical Association, 1961 audio recording on LP. In 1961, Ronald Reagan released a speech against a proposed bill that would cover hospital costs for the elderly. The effort was later revealed to be part of a campaign by the American Medical Association (AMA) to quash efforts to create a national health insurance program. Reagan said: "[The bill] was simply an excuse to bring about what they wanted all the time, socialized medicine. … First, you decide that the doctor can have so many patients, they're equally divided among the various doctors by the government. But then the doctors aren't equally divided geographically. So a doctor decides he wants to practice in one town, and the government has to say to him, 'You can't live in that town. They already have enough doctors,' and from here, it's only a short step to dictating where he will go." Commentary Reid B. Blackwelder, MD, associate dean for graduate medical and continuing education, DIO, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, and past president of the American Academy of Family Physicians: "Reagan's warning that nationalized health insurance would lead to government direction for where physicians practice has not happened. Physicians have the freedom to accept insurance or not and to practice anywhere they want. Sadly, our country is facing increasing healthcare deserts for various reasons. Reid B. Blackwelder, MD "We already had a serious and growing access problem for patients. Now, patients in rural areas especially are losing even more access to primary care physicians and specialists as rural hospitals shut down and physicians like obstetricians stop practicing outside of urban areas. "Ironically, Medicare is perhaps the most lenient health insurance in terms of providing that freedom of choice Reagan described for patients. Because Medicare is popular and widely accepted by patients and physicians, patients can readily choose the physician they want, including subspecialists. On the other hand, for-profit insurance has created significant limits on which physicians a patient may select based on acceptance of that insurance and cost. It can be difficult for a patient to see the physician of their choice." Dr Edward Annis ( left ), holding an anatomical model of a human heart, speaks with TV host Johnny Carson ( right ) on the The Tonight Show , December 11, 1963. Edward Annis, MD , chairman of the AMA 's speakers' bureau — and later president of the association — appeared in a televised May 21, 1962, address about the proposed King-Anderson bill, an early iteration of what would become the legislation that created Medicare. Annis said: 'It wastefully covers millions who do not need it, it heartlessly ignores millions who do need coverage. It is not true insurance. It will create an enormous and unpredictable burden on every working taxpayer. It offers sharply limited benefits. And it will serve as a forerunner of a different system of medicine for all Americans.' Commentary Jonathan Oberlander, PhD, professor of social medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and editor of the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law: "The AMA's overheated rhetoric against Medicare did not age well. Doctors would later face challenges to their clinical autonomy, as Annis had feared, but that intrusion came from private managed care insurers trying to control skyrocketing costs, not Medicare. "Yet the AMA was right about one thing. Although they didn't admit it during the 1960s, Medicare's architects saw the program as the first step to universal health insurance, and after covering the elderly, they hoped to next turn to children and eventually cover everyone via government insurance. Medicare for All was the aspiration. "That did not happen, and although Medicare expanded eligibility in 1972 to cover persons with permanent disabilities and end-stage renal disease — six decades after the program's enactment — its primary beneficiaries are still older Americans, an outcome that would have stunned its creators. "After Medicare's enactment in 1965, the AMA's opposition to the program faded, much to Annis' consternation. Forty years later, he still expressed regret that the association did not take a more 'militant' stand highlighting the program's problems." Dr Edward Annis (right) with Dr Arthur Fleming. Annis continued: "This King-Anderson Bill is a cruel hoax and illusion. … It will come between the patient and his doctor." Commentary Reid B. Blackwelder, MD, associate dean for graduate medical and continuing education, DIO, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, and past president of the American Academy of Family Physicians "The special and powerful relationship between patients and physicians is a real thing. Medicare did not damage it. Other insurance coverage did not damage it. Having any insurance coverage is one of the foundations of getting to good health outcomes. The other is having a source of comprehensive care. Patients need both. "The very real threat to the physician-patient relationship that is accelerating today is from legislative intrusions into the patient room. When laws are passed that make even just exploring options with patients around things like reproductive health a criminal offense, government has overstepped. "When laws are enacted that require a physician to call their lawyer rather than a specialty consult before providing life-saving care, we have entered a new and dangerous era of governmental oversight. Recent laws have done more damage to the sanctity of the physician-patient relationship that Medicare actually helped improve." Rep. Durward Gorham Hall, 1969 Representative Durward Gorham Hall, MD (R, Missouri), made these remarks below during debates on Medicare in the House of Representatives: "This conflict is testing whether art and science of medicine will be permitted to grow and flourish in freedom and competitively, or whether progress in medicine will be stunted and shriveled by an excess of Government control." Commentary Jonathan B. Jaffery, MD, MS, MMM, chief healthcare officer at the Association of American Medical Colleges: "By supporting the training of physicians, Medicare helps create the physician workforce for future generations of Americans, crucial for the care of an aging population. And through iterative developments over the last 60 years, such as Coverage with Evidence Development or the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovations, the Medicare program — coupled with federal investments in biomedical research — has been able to support innovations in both medical technologies and models of care delivery that continue to improve the lives and well-beings of millions. Jonathan B. Jaffery, MD "The reality is, prior to 1965, many elderly Americans with healthcare needs were forced to rely on financial support from their families or spend all their life's savings, hope for charity care, or forego care altogether. And of course, the cost of care has only skyrocketed, so that in 2025 even very high-net worth individuals would struggle to cover the costs of a lengthy hospitalization or extended illness, let alone the price tag of many new life-saving medications." Hall continued: "The result will inescapably be third-party intrusion in the practice of hospitalization and medicine. His diagnostic and therapeutic decisions would be subject to disapproval by those controlling the expenditure of tax money." Commentary G. William Hoagland, senior vice president, Bipartisan Policy Center, former executive at Cigna, and former US Senate staffer "Representative Hall was prescient in his observation about the future of healthcare resulting from the creation of Medicare. The 60-year history of the Medicare program, particularly since the enactment of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act in 1982, the Medicare Modernization Act in 2003, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010, has resulted in the 'corporatization' of healthcare. G. William Hoagland "Today, Medicare Advantage, dominated by 'third-party' corporate insurance companies, has transferred the physician's independent decisions to actuaries and corporate financial decision makers. The result has also been horizontal consolidation of what were locally controlled entities to nationally or regionally controlled corporations along with vertical consolidation of payers and care delivery entities. "The impact of these changes, along with dramatic scientific advances in diagnosis with advanced treatment protocols, precipitating higher healthcare utilization, has not been to reduce costs but to in fact increase healthcare costs." President Lyndon Johnson ( left ) flips through the pages of the Medicare bill so former President Harry Truman ( right) can see it. Following passage of the Social Security Amendments of 1965 out of the Senate by a vote of 68-21, President Lyndon B. Johnson said: "It will help pay for care in hospitals. If hospitalization is unnecessary, it will help pay for care in nursing homes or in the home. And wherever illness is treated — in home or hospital — it will also help meet the fees of doctors and the costs of drugs." Commentary Bruce Leff, MD, professor of medicine and director of the Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore: "Johnson's statement regarding care at home was appropriate for the mid-1960s. To this day, skilled home healthcare remains the most used home-based service by Medicare beneficiaries. "Since Medicare was enacted, a bevy of evidence-based home care delivery models have been developed and proven. These home-based models span the care continuum including home and community-based services, home-based primary care, transitional care, and home-based palliative care. Bruce Leff, MD "Unfortunately, Medicare payment policies incentivized the centralization of care in facilities and a facility-centric culture of care delivery. Care delivery hasn't kept pace with the needs of an aging population with a high prevalence of homebound older Americans or with the advances that enable even hospital care to be delivered to patients in their preferred setting, their homes. "The hospital of the future will comprise of emergency departments, operating rooms, and intensive care units. Most other care can and will be provided in the home setting. We have all the pieces to develop this future home-based care vision. Achieving this vision will require a culture shift with associated payment and regulatory enhancements, ongoing attention to improvements in technology, logistics, and data management." An elderly woman shows her gratitude to President Lyndon B. Johnson for his signing of the Medicare healthcare bill in April 1965. Johnson continued: "Older citizens will no longer have to fear that illness will wipe out their savings, eat up their income, and destroy lifelong hope of dignity and independence. For every family with older members, it will mean relief from the often-crushing responsibilities of care." Commentary Gretchen Jacobson, PhD, vice president, Medicare program, Commonwealth Fund: Gretchen Jacobson, PhD "One third of Medicare beneficiaries said in 2023 that it was difficult to afford healthcare costs. More than 1 in 5 beneficiaries reported in 2023 delaying or skipping needed healthcare because of the cost. Similarly, some Medicare beneficiaries trade off paying for other necessities to pay for needed healthcare. The lack of a limit on out-of-pocket spending on hospital and physician services for traditional Medicare has, for most traditional Medicare enrollees, necessitated purchasing supplemental insurance coverage. Yet, the limited availability of this supplemental coverage has resulted in more beneficiaries enrolling in Medicare Advantage and high underinsurance rates among those in traditional Medicare without supplemental coverage. "Medicare beneficiaries who do not have a family caregiver and cannot afford to pay out-of-pocket for a formal caregiver are typically forced to deplete their financial resources to qualify for Medicaid coverage, the largest payer for long-term care in the US."
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: RFK Jr, top health officials announce new measures to combat dangerous opioid
Secretary RFK Jr., joined by Deputy Secretary O'Neill, FDA Commissioner Dr. Makary, and Senator Mullin, hosts a press conference to unveil new federal actions targeting the opioid 7-OH to protect Americans.
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Broc Shot Becomes the First Supplement to Receive the Seal of Recognition From the National Psoriasis Foundation
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Broc Shot is the first supplement to earn the Seal of Recognition from the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF). This recognition highlights Broc Shot's support for skin health from within, offering a natural, gentle and non-irritating option for those living with psoriasis-prone skin. A Breakthrough for Psoriasis: Broc Shot Earns First-Ever NPF Supplement Seal. What is Psoriasis-prone skin? Currently, over 8 million Americans—about 2-3% of the global population—live with psoriasis. This lifelong inflammatory disease is not a simple skin rash. It impacts the skin, joints, and other organs, and is often misunderstood as merely a cosmetic issue. Nearly 60% of those with psoriasis-prone skin report it significantly affects their daily lives. Psoriasis is also linked to other health issues, including heart disease, metabolic syndrome, depression, and psoriatic arthritis. While severity varies, many people experience a notable impact on their quality of life. Conventional treatments like corticosteroids or UV therapy are common but can cause side effects such as dryness, irritation, or long-term skin sensitivity. Additionally, these treatments may lose effectiveness over time and can contribute to other health concerns. Introducing Broc Shot: Natural Supplement Powered by Sulforaphane to Calm Skin from Within Broc Shot is a unique supplement formulated with natural sulforaphane, a compound derived from whole broccoli seed powder. Sulforaphane has been clinically studied for its ability to support cellular health 1 and help the body respond to oxidative stress 2 and inflammation 3 —key drivers of skin issues like psoriasis. In 3 distinct studies, sulforaphane was clinically demonstrated to improve psoriasis-prone skin. What is Sulforaphane and How Sulforaphane Can Help Psoriasis-Prone Skin Sulforaphane is a sulfur-rich phytochemical found in cruciferous vegetables with the highest levels derived from broccoli seeds. Sulforaphane has over 1000 peer reviewed studies and articles demonstrating its ability to repair and nurture our gut, detoxify the body and reduce and prevent inflammation. Sulforaphane benefits include: - Supports Cellular Health: Sulforaphane is clinically studied to help the body respond to oxidative stress and inflammation — two root causes of psoriasis flare-ups. - Supports Immune Balance for psoriasis-prone skin: May help slow the rapid skin cell turnover process seen in psoriasis. - Supports Detoxification and Gut Health: Natural sulforaphane enhances the body's ability to neutralize environmental toxins and supports gut barrier integrity, which can influence skin health. "NPF is pleased to recognize Broc Shot and its potential to support the overall health of people with psoriasis," said the National Psoriasis Foundation. "This is the first supplement to earn the NPF Seal, and Broc Shot in conjunction with proper treatment can help our community live healthier lives." Broc Shot is a simple daily ritual—just one sachet mixed with water— delivering 12 mg of natural sulforaphane. As one of the most effective supplements for psoriasis-prone skin, Broc Shot offers a non-irritating, long-term solution backed by science. Whether you're newly exploring sulforaphane benefits or looking for gentle support to help minimize skin flare-ups, Broc Shot is a trusted option to support healthier skin from within. Broc Shot is Non-GMO certified, Vegan, pesticide-free, gluten-free, plastic-free and never stabilized. 'We are honored that the National Psoriasis Foundation has awarded Broc Shot its Seal of Recognition. Our mission is to deliver a potent, natural source of sulforaphane to support rapid and lasting improvements in skin health. This recognition affirms our commitment to providing those with psoriasis-prone skin a safe and effective solution—and it inspires us to keep innovating science-backed formulas that truly make a difference in people's lives,' said Benjamin Silver, co-founder of Broc Shot. About Broc Shot: Broc Shot is dedicated to providing natural, science-backed supplements that support overall health and wellness. Founded on the principles of transparency and quality, Broc Shot features natural sulforaphane derived from whole broccoli seed powder, formulated to help promote detoxification and gut health, and reduce inflammation. Committed to innovation and safety, Broc Shot is Non-GMO certified, vegan, pesticide-free, gluten-free, and plastic-free in compostable packaging. For additional information about Broc Shot, visit About the National Psoriasis Foundation: NPF is the leading research, advocacy, and support organization representing more than 8 million people in the U.S. and over 125 million people worldwide who live with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. The mission of NPF is to drive efforts to cure psoriatic disease and improve the lives of all those affected. NPF is committed to creating a world free from the burdens of psoriatic disease and immediately optimizing the health of our constituents. 1 2 3
