
Lowering your blood pressure could slash your risk of dementia by 15% – the 14 lifestyle tweaks to make today
SLASHING high blood pressure could help protect against dementia, new research suggests.
People with high blood pressure who took medication and accepted coaching to lower it reduced their risk of the brain disease by 15 per cent, scientists found.
1
Nearly a million Brits have dementia and it is the leading cause of death.
The new study, published in Nature Medicine, today, backs up what experts have long stressed: that dementia is not an inevitability of ageing.
'Antihypertensive treatment can prevent dementia in patients with uncontrolled hypertension," said Prof Jiang He, co-author of the study from University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
"Given the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension worldwide, this effective intervention should be widely adopted and scaled up to reduce the global burden of dementia."
Around one in three adults in the UK suffer from high blood pressure, also called hypertension.
It can be caused by poor diet, lack of exercise, smoking, or stress, according to the NHS.
Hypertension can raise the risk of dementia by damaging blood vessels in the brain, which reduces blood flow and can lead to strokes or brain damage.
The new study builds on earlier findings, including research published in The Lancet last year that revealed that half of dementia cases could be prevented with 14 healthy habits.
Reducing high blood pressure was one, along with lowering cholesterol and good education and mental stimulation.
'Looking after our heart and blood vessel health is something we can all do to improve our overall wellbeing and reduce our risk of dementia," Dr Julia Dudley, from Alzheimer's Research UK, said.
Five simple tests that could indicate dementia
"With no current treatments available on the NHS to slow or stop the diseases that cause dementia, there has never been a more pressing need to promote good brain health and to gain a deeper understanding of how we can reduce our risk of developing dementia."
The trial, led by researchers in China and the US, involved nearly 34,000 people over 40 with uncontrolled high blood pressure across 326 rural Chinese villages.
Half were given intensive blood pressure care - free or low-cost meds, lifestyle coaching – such as weight loss, alcohol reduction and reducing salt intake advice.
They were also equipment and instructions to monitor blood pressure at home.
The other half had usual clinical care - meaning participants' blood pressure was managed in their normal clinical settings.
Lifestyle changes were recommended and some took blood pressure-lowering drugs.
But this group did not receive free at-home blood pressure monitors, medications, or coaching.
After four years, those on the intensive programme were 15 per cent less likely to develop dementia.
They also had a 16 per cent lower risk of cognitive problems without full-blown dementia.
Researchers said both groups were similar at the start, so the results are likely reliable.
However, Prof Joanna Wardlaw, from the University of Edinburgh, said the study doesn't show whether it was the blood pressure meds or the lifestyle changes that made the difference - it's likely a mix of both.
Other experts said longer studies are needed, and the approach should be tested in other countries too.
"Further studies are needed to understand how other risk factors like genetics interact with factors like high blood pressure to influence dementia risk,' Dr Julia added.
'It will also be interesting to see whether the interventions trialled in this study can work in other populations across the world," she added.
Prof Tara Spires-Jones, the director of the Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences at the University of Edinburgh, said the research 'provides further strong evidence supporting the importance of managing blood pressure and other cardiovascular risks to protect the brain during ageing'.
She added: 'It is important to note that treating high blood pressure was not a foolproof guarantee as some people receiving treatment still developed dementia.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
One million blood donors needed to meet demand and avoid 'red alert' shortage, NHS warns
The NHS has warned the UK needs one million regular blood donors to maintain supply and avoid a "red alert" - which means supplies are so low there is a threat to public safety. Last July, officials issued an "amber alert" for stocks of O negative and O positive blood after cyberattacks hit London hospitals. NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said blood stocks have remained low since. Dr Jo Farrar, NHSBT chief executive, said: "Our stocks over the past 12 months have been challenging. If we had a million regular donors, this would help keep our stocks healthy - you'd truly be one in a million. "Please book an appointment today, experience how good it feels to save lives, and come and do it again in a few months." The NHSBT added just 2% of the population - under 800,000 people - sustained the whole of England's blood supply over the past 12 months. It said there is a "critical" need for more donors who have O negative blood, the universal type used in emergencies or when a patient's blood type is unknown. It is typically carried by air ambulances and emergency vehicles - and makes up around 16% of hospital blood orders. There is also a need for more black donors, who are more likely to have specific blood types which can help treat people with sickle cell disease. Health Minister Baroness Merron said: "The NHS is in urgent need of more lifesaving blood donors from all backgrounds. "We are working alongside NHS Blood and Transplant to make donating blood easier than ever before, opening up new donor centres and making appointments available closer to home." Women can donate blood once every four months and men can do so once every three.


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Nurses to vote on pay deal amid concerns of industrial action
Around 345,000 members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) will be asked if the pay award is enough in what was described as the biggest single vote of the profession ever launched in the UK. Last month, the Westminster government accepted the recommendation of the Pay Review Body, giving nursing staff In England's NHS a pay rise of 3.6%. Royal College of Nursing general secretary Professor Nicola Ranger (RCN/PA) The RCN described the award as 'grotesque', saying it will see nursing staff receive a pay rise 'entirely swallowed up by inflation' – with doctors, teachers, prison officers and the armed forces all receiving a bigger increase. An identical award was made in Wales, while in Northern Ireland, the Health Minister has announced his wish to implement a 3.6% pay rise, but this is still to be agreed. The RCN said the vote will be crucial in determining the next steps, which could include a ballot for strike action. The vote will include RCN members working in the NHS in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Speaking from an international nursing conference in Helsinki and on the launch of the vote, Professor Nicola Ranger, RCN general secretary, will say: 'I'm with nurses from around the world today asking why it is our ministers in the UK who have once again put nursing at the back of the queue when it comes to pay. 'Nursing is an incredible career, but despite being the most valued profession by the public we continue to be weighted to the bottom of the NHS pay scale and are set to receive one of the lowest pay awards. 'It is time to show that nurses are valued and, from today, hundreds of thousands of nursing staff working in the NHS will give their verdict on whether 3.6% is enough.' The RCN said nursing staff in England have faced more than a decade of pay erosion since 2010/11, with pay down by a quarter in real terms. As a result, there are more than 26,000 unfilled nursing posts, while student recruitment has 'collapsed' and the numbers quitting is 'skyrocketing', said the RCN. Professor Ranger will add: 'Over a decade of pay erosion has had a devastating impact on our profession, forcing increasing numbers into quitting while putting off the nurses of the future. 'When our members vote, they won't just be voting on the fairness of the award for themselves, but if it's enough to turn our profession around.' NHS workers including nurses staged a series of strikes under the previous Conservative government in bitter disputes over pay.


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Prevention is better than cure when it comes to dealing with corruption
Put measures in place to lessen the risk of financial crimes occurring, says Sally Clark Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Prison sentences were handed out in Glasgow last week to four men involved in a £6 million corruption and bribery investigation involving health boards across Scotland. This case, which underlines the importance of compliance and ensuring anti-financial crime prevention mechanisms are implemented and regularly monitored, exposed a series of fraudulently-awarded NHS contracts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Oricom Ltd, a company founded by Adam Sharoudi and Gavin Brown, secured deals to provide telecoms and video conferencing equipment to NHS trusts in Lothian, Grampian, Lanarkshire, Greater Glasgow & Clyde, and Ayrshire & Arran between 2010 and 2017. However, amid concerns about how the contracts were awarded, Oricom's offices were later raided by investigators including those from NHS Scotland Counter Fraud Services. CMS logo new The follow-up investigation found the company had been given 'commercially sensitive information' by former NHS employees Alan Hush and Gavin Cox. They received nearly £90,000 in cash and a range of other gifts, including luxury hotel stays, concert tickets, and holiday vouchers in return. The High Court heard how Hush helped Oricom land a number of business deals with the NHS including a £750,000 contract with NHS Lothian. Meanwhile, Cox helped the company secure contracts with NHS Lanarkshire. Overall, Hush was given £18,231 worth of cash bribes and gifts, while Cox received more than £70,000 of illicit rewards from the company. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After being found guilty of a string of charges including bribery, corruption, fraud, and money laundering, Oricom founders Sharoudi and Brown were sentenced to eight and seven years' imprisonment respectively. Sally Clark is an Of Counsel and disputes resolution specialist, CMS Hush, who was telecommunications manager at NHS Lothian, then NHS Scotland video conferencing manager, was ordered to serve eight years while Cox, former head of IT and infrastructure at NHS Lanarkshire. received a six-year sentence. This case highlighted how basic procurement procedures were circumvented to ensure a company paying bribes was awarded contracts. This may be a familiar bribery tale, but is a strong reminder that putting in place avoidance measures to prevent corruption and other forms of financial crime is preferable to taking steps to deal with such violations. In this case, the police and NHS counter-fraud investigation began in 2015, and a decade-long journey culminated with a trial which heard 65 days of evidence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad No business or organisation wants to face the potential legal costs, reputational damage, and prospect of immense disruption that accompanies a financial crime investigation. Those being investigated are typically required to provide materials under warrant, which includes the interrogation of computer systems by law enforcement agencies. Staff may also be required to provide witness statements and respond to ongoing queries from investigating authorities, all of which requires significant time and resource. Being involved in a law enforcement investigation can generate exceptional anxiety amongst staff members who are required to provide witness statements and give evidence in court. This also brings further business disruption with people being diverted from their core focus within a business or organisation. As this NHS case highlights, putting regularly monitored measures in place to prevent the prospect of financial crimes occurring is a much more preferable alternative to dealing with the fallout of failing to do so. The introduction of section 196 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 should further underline this message – under this new provision, a business or organisation can be prosecuted for economic crimes that are perpetrated by senior managers who are on their staff.