Open communication to boost Berea SAPS crime-fighting efforts
KEEPING the lines of communication open is the key to combating crime in the Berea area. This was emphasised by Berea SAPS and Ward 31 councillor Remona Mckenzie following a community meeting at Durban High School recently.
The Berea SAPS crime imbizo was attended by members of the community, Metro Police, Berea Community Police Forum and other crime-fighting structures. Berea SAPS spokesperson, Captain Poobalan Naidoo, said the aim of the meeting was to appraise the community about the station's crime fighting efforts.
He said the community was addressed by the station commander, Colonel Hlengiwe Happiness Gcabashe, and other relevant roleplayers who assist in dealing with crime in the Berea policing precinct. 'The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the needs of the community and to find solutions,' said Naidoo who hailed the meeting a success.
'All relevant issues were discussed and solutions were found to address problems and crime that are being experienced in the area. The community was also informed that the withdrawing of cases by complainants will only be done in court,' said Naidoo. He added that the community was happy with how the station commander dealt with issues, and she encouraged the community to participate in the next imbizo in July.
Aslo Read: Berea SAPS cracks down on crime
Mckenzie expressed the same sentiment, 'Opening dialogue between police and the community strengthens relationships and encourages co-operation.
'These discussions help prioritise policing efforts based on community needs. SAPS public meetings are essential for fostering transparency, accountability, and community engagement in policing. This meeting provided updates on crime trends, safety measures, and strategies to combat criminal activities. We also advised the community of the importance of their involvement,' said Mckenzie.
She encouraged the community to become more involved in crime-fighting and participate in public meetings to make their voices heard.
'It's important that the community attend these meetings; communities can actively shape local policing strategies and create safer neighbourhoods. SAPS use these meetings to report on their activities, ensuring they remain answerable or accountable to the public. The community must voice their concerns, suggest solutions, and collaborate with law enforcement to improve safety. The collaborative efforts within Ward 31 remain crucial in enhancing police visibility and fostering a safer environment for all residents,' said Mckenzie.
For more from Berea Mail, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok.
Click to subscribe to our newsletter – here
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Dirty cops dismissed after kidnapping and extortion arrests
Two SAPS members have been dismissed following their arrest for kidnapping and extortion in a case that has sent shockwaves through Gauteng. Constables Thabiso Pule Paul Molefe (32) and Paseka Matena (33), both members of the SAPS Highway Patrol Unit, were arrested by the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) earlier this year in connection with a case opened in Springs. The two officers were found guilty following internal disciplinary hearings conducted under the SAPS Discipline Regulations of 2016. Both have been sanctioned with dismissal, pending final confirmation by the Provincial Commissioner. Public reaction to the arrests and dismissals has been swift. Ian Cameron, DA Member of Parliament and well-known policing accountability advocate, took to social media to praise the outcome. 'SOME GOOD NEWS: DIRTY COPS OUT,' he wrote, highlighting this as a meaningful example of consequence management in the SAPS. 'The public demands accountability, and this is a step in the right direction. We need a police service that earns the trust of law-abiding South Africans.' Molefe, who is reportedly the son of a former high-ranking police official, and his co-accused Matena, were allegedly involved in a scheme where they kidnapped victims and extorted money from them under the guise of official police operations. Their arrest and dismissal are being hailed as a success for IPID and an important signal that misconduct within SAPS will not be tolerated. The case also underscores growing calls for transparency and reform in the police service. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SAPS disciplinary system fails to address police brutality, eroding public trust in law enforcement
The acquittal of VIP Unit officers who assaulted victims on camera highlights the police's failure to define and enforce standards of conduct. A new Institute for Security Studies (ISS) analysis shows that police face little chance of being sanctioned internally by the South African Police Service (SAPS) for disciplinary offences. The analysis provides context to the acquittal by a SAPS disciplinary process of eight VIP Protection Unit officers who assaulted members of the public. In July 2023, officers were filmed dragging a driver and two passengers out of a vehicle, repeatedly kicking them as they lay on the ground, then rapidly leaving the scene. Although the eight police members face criminal charges for the assaults, the SAPS is unable or unwilling to convict any of them despite the video recording of the incident. The criminal case against the eight officials resumes on 10 June. The decision not to sanction police in a case with such strong evidence will encourage SAPS members to disregard standards regarding the use of force. Excessive and unnecessary force will become even more entrenched than it already is, with the police seen by the public as merely another group of thugs and criminals. The failure to uphold professional standards undermines efforts to build public respect and trust in the police. The SAPS has a legal duty to prevent excessive and unnecessary force. Neglecting this obligation encourages disrespect for the law across the entire spectrum of policing in South Africa. It is also an affront to those police who strive to strengthen public trust in the police by promoting the professionalism of the SAPS. Excessive force The use of excessive force is not a problem of a few 'bad apples' but a routine part of everyday policing in many places across South Africa. International and South African examples of police brutality show that the foremost perpetrators are frequently active frontline officers. Senior commanders, particularly those with a limited grasp of effective policing, often rely on these officers to get results, so there is little possibility that action will be taken against them. Faced with resource and personnel constraints, it may seem easier for the SAPS to neglect constitutional provisions forbidding torture and instead support the public right 'to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources'. Because the criminal justice system is often seen as dysfunctional, many believe the police need to use excessive force in response to high levels of violent crime. Public expressions of support for the killing by police of suspects are one reflection of this. But this support encourages the deterioration of policing standards and is a poisoned chalice for the SAPS. In the unlikely event that they are charged for ill-discipline, almost 80% of SAPS members will ultimately face no sanction. ISS analysis of data in SAPS annual reports and the Safety and Security Sectoral Bargaining Council shows that 6,154 (77.4%) of 7,946 disciplinary cases against SAPS members ended without sanction. Excessive force — from fairly routine assaults to more serious forms of torture — is far more widely tolerated in the SAPS than is officially acknowledged. Disciplinary sanctions aren't often applied for these infringements. Other police offences such as corruption and rape are more likely to result in internal convictions. The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (Ipid) received 3,176 reports of serious assault and 273 reports of torture in the 2023/24 year. The SAPS reported 55 disciplinary convictions for serious assault and 10 for the use of 'unlawful force' or other ill-treatment of a person in custody. It did not indicate the sanctions imposed for these offences. Many victims believe there will be few consequences if they report assaults or torture by police, and that it isn't worth the trouble. Victims and their families are often not able to take legal action, partly because the victims themselves may be under arrest for alleged crimes. Reported cases are probably just the tip of the iceberg. And few victims of police assault or torture lay successful civil claims. The vast majority of these claims are for wrongful arrest, which lawyers find easier to prove than police violence. Most police members are not deterred by civil claims, as those that succeed are paid for by public money from the SAPS budget. The trial of the eight VIP Protection Unit members will now resume, but accountability for the misuse of force by the police is unlikely in the criminal courts, even when recorded on video. Proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt is a much higher standard of proof than in the SAPS disciplinary system. Ipid and the National Prosecuting Authority often cannot meet this standard, particularly when the accused has a capable legal team. Weak disciplinary system At the SAPS Policing Summit in April, discussions consistently highlighted the weakness of the disciplinary system. Police serving in disciplinary hearings as presiding officers or prosecutors (employer representatives) are frequently poorly acquainted with the relevant aspects of the law. This was confirmed at the summit by police trade unions, which often represent accused SAPS members. The SAPS disciplinary system must set clear standards regarding police conduct. Many members allege that disciplinary measures are not consistently carried out and are strongly influenced by favouritism or other factors. Presiding officers may also be colleagues of those facing disciplinary charges. South Africa's police leaders should commit to upholding high standards of conduct and professionalism among their members. Doing so requires a more effective SAPS disciplinary system and a commitment to implementing policies that support the reasonable and necessary use of force, and prevent excessive force by the police. DM
Eyewitness News
5 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Mkhwanazi's war on criminals in KZN may win public approval but at what cost to our constitutional democracy?
'Main suspect in Olorato Mongale's murder dies in shootout with cops'. These were the headlines that South Africans woke up to on the morning of 30th May 2025. Just over a week earlier, Mongale had been killed after being picked up for a date by a man she knew as 'John'. Her body was dumped on a street in Lombardy near Alexandra in the Gauteng Province. Mongale's murder shook South Africa. Here was a young woman, a postgraduate student at Wits University, whose only crime on the day was to go out on a date with a man she was trying to get to know, and within two hours of being picked up outside her complex, she was fighting for her life – a fight that she lost, but whose viciousness would be evidenced in the state of her deceased body. Mongale fought until her fingernails snapped off. One can only imagine the horror that she went through in the final moments of her life in the hands of Philangenkosi Makhanya and Bongani Mthinkhulu - men who, just a few weeks prior, were granted bail after a court appearance following their arrest in Brakpan, Gauteng, for kidnapping and robbing a woman. For many South Africans, the killing of Makhanya, the main suspect in Mongale's murder, was justice. He was fatally shot by KwaZulu Natal (KZN) police while hiding out at a residential complex in eManzimtoti (formerly Amanzimtoti), a coastal town just south of eThekwini (Durban). According to KZN police, following extensive investigation, they were alerted to the hiding place of the murderer, and when police announced their arrival, he shot at them. Police returned fire and he was fatally wounded. Speaking at the scene of the shooting, the provincial commissioner of the South African Police Service (SAPS) in KZN, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, said the suspect was found with tens of identity documents and 20 cellphones in his possession. These are now subject of an investigation and no doubt, belong to women who suffered robberies and possibly worse, in the man's hands. At face value, Makhanya's killing was a just response to Mongale's brutal and senseless murder. But scratch beneath the surface, and a clear pattern begins to emerge. Over the past few months, news of criminals dying in shootouts with KZN police have dominated the headlines. Not a week passes by that we do not read about suspects dying in violent confrontations with the police. Curiously, the story is almost exactly the same – a suspect fires at police as soon as they announce their arrival, and they return fire. The suspect dies in a hail of police bullets and more often than not, no police officer is wounded or killed. Once or twice may be understandable. But the rate at which this is happening in KZN begs the question of whether or not we are witnessing extrajudicial killings in a province that has one of the highest rates of crime in South Africa. Extrajudicial killings, or extrajudicial executions, happen when someone in an official position deliberately kills a person without any legal process. In most parts of the world, particularly in conflict zones such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Nigeria, Syria, Sudan, across Latin America, etc, such killings are usually carried out by militias, death squads or other non-state actors. In these regions, extrajudicial killings often target political opponents, activists, or marginalised groups. This is what makes the case of KZN unique – that those killed are not political opponents or activists, but criminals, usually the hardened who have caused a reign of terror in communities. This is why, unlike in the mentioned conflict zones where the killings are viewed as unjust and a violation of human rights, in South Africa, they are celebrated by millions of people. The reality of the situation is that crime has torn our country asunder. South Africa is one of the most violent places on earth and is consistently ranked among the most dangerous countries in the world for crime, frequently appearing in the top 5 or 10 on various lists. Gender-based violence (GBV) is especially high in the country. Consider the recently tabled crime statistics for the fourth quarter of the 2024/2025 financial year, covering the period from 1 January 2025 to 31 March 2025. During this quarter, sexual offences, including rape and contact sexual offences, along with commercial crime, have shown increases. There were 13 452 sexual offenses, with 10 688 of these being rapes. This translates to 116 rapes per day. And these are only reported cases. Many cases of sexual violence, including rape, go unreported owing to a myriad of factors. To understand how horrific these numbers are, consider that, according to the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), 10 000 cases of rape and sexual violence were reported to protection actors in war-torn eastern DRC in the same period. This means that more women are being raped in 'stable' democratic South Africa than they are in a conflict zone where rape is used as a weapon of war. In recent years, South Africa has introduced several important legal changes aimed at strengthening protections for victims and holding perpetrators accountable. Despite numerous legislative protections, women are still being subjected to unimaginable violence while perpetrators are rarely apprehended. As evidenced with Mongale's killers, perpetrators very often get away with crimes against women by either being granted bail with lenient conditions, if any, or not being prosecuted. In the few instances where prosecution does occur, especially for sexual crimes, conviction rates are extremely low and mandatory sentences are rarely ever given. A 2022 study by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) found that only around 14% of perpetrators of rape are convicted. Other data suggests even lower conviction rates for sexual offenses, with only 5% of adult rape cases and 9%bof child rape cases resulting in convictions. Low conviction rates are just as low for other categories of crime, with the conviction rate for murder sitting at around 6-12%. Regardless of what politicians are saying, South African police are losing the war on crime. The killings committed by police in KZN occur under such conditions – conditions of frustration by a police force that does its best to investigate crimes, only for the weak and ineffective National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to bungle cases. These killings are happening in a state of desperation by communities who must endure the reign of terror that criminals are subjecting residents to. Without an effective strategy to combat the rampant crime that has come to define the face of democratic South Africa, we are left at the mercy of criminals. This is why, when KZN police shoot-to-kill, no-one sheds a tear and instead, hail Lieutenant-General Mkhwanazi and his men as heroes. I will admit that for a minute, I too celebrated the killing of Mongale's murderer. I am a woman and like other South African women, I know too well the horrors of violence and live in a state of debilitating fear and anxiety induced by crime in our country. But in celebrating such killings, we are setting parameters for something very dangerous. The South African state has a legal obligation to protect the right to life – a right that is enshrined in a Constitution that is the cornerstone of our democracy. Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law. Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources. These are inalienable human rights that we must uphold even in a state of anger and frustration. We may celebrate when it is criminals who are denied these rights, but the unintended consequence is that we are embalming a principle that could set parameters for genocide. Today, we clap because it is a murderer who was killed by the police. But tomorrow, emboldened and unaccountable, the same police will be killing innocent people, political opponents, activists and marginalised communities. By then, a precedent will have been cemented, and it will be almost impossible to reverse the tide. At that point, we will understand, too late, the argument of Professor Llyod Sachikonye whose masterpiece, When a State Turns on its Citizens: 60 Years of Institutionalised Violence in Zimbabwe, details how the precedent of violence set in the war of liberation has come to define the violence of the Zimbabwean state, where ZANU-PF rules with a margin of terror. Sachikonye contends that violence is not a light-switch that can be turned on and off at will – that once it is justified, once the precedent is set, it embalms a principle. A precedent, once established, becomes a lasting example that embodies the principle upon which it was based. Furthermore, such killings, while effective in the immediate, do not facilitate justice. They do not allow for meaningful closure for victims and their families, who are left with unanswered questions and are denied the right to confront their perpetrator, which provides immeasurable catharsis. These killings may, in fact, deny justice for some victims altogether, for once you murdered perpetrators, they can no longer reveal crucial details of unsolved crimes. We will never know how many other women Makhanya killed. We may never know how many undiscovered and unmarked graves of murdered women may exist. For some families, justice may never be done. Furthermore, dispensable foot-soldiers may be killed, to applause, while masterminds continue to recruit more willing foot-soldiers for the job. In this way, we could be dealing with symptoms rather than the cause. The solution to rampant crime in South Africa lies in addressing the systemic root causes of crime. It lies in strengthening public interest litigation and in arresting the rot in the NPA and the criminal justice system entirely. Anything less may offer temporary reprieve for communities and victims alike, but it does not cement the principle of justice and the forging of beloved community. Malaika, an award-winning and bestselling author, is a geographer and researcher at the Institute for Pan African Thought and Conversation. She is a PhD in Geography candidate at the University of Bayreuth in Germany.
