Trump presses Powell to cut rates during tense visit to Fed
Trump, who called Powell a "numbskull" earlier this week for failing to heed the White House's demand for a large reduction in borrowing costs, wrapped up his visit to the Fed's $2.5 billion building project in Washington by saying he did not intend to fire Powell, as he has frequently suggested he would.
"To do so is a big move and I just don't think it's necessary," Trump told reporters after the visit.
In a post on his Truth Social media site, Trump later said of the renovation, "it is what it is and, hopefully, it will be finished ASAP. The cost overruns are substantial but, on the positive side, our Country is doing very well and can afford just about anything."
The visibly tense interaction at the Fed's massive construction site marked an escalation of White House pressure on the central bank and Trump's efforts to get Powell to "do the right thing" on rates. It happened less than a week before the central bank's 19 policymakers are due to gather for a two-day rate-setting meeting, where they are widely expected to leave their benchmark interest rate in the 4.25%-4.5% range.
The president has repeatedly demanded that Powell slash rates by 3 percentage points or more.
"I'd love him to lower interest rates," Trump said as he wrapped up the tour, as Powell stood by, his face expressionless.
Powell typically spends the Thursday afternoon before a rate-setting meeting doing back-to-back calls with Fed bank presidents as part of his preparations for the session.
His encounter with the president became heated as Trump told reporters the project was now estimated to cost $3.1 billion.
"I am not aware of that," Powell said, shaking his head. Trump handed him a piece of paper, which Powell examined. "You just added in a third building," the Fed chief said, noting that the Martin Building had been completed five years ago.
White House budget director Russell Vought and Trump's deputy chief of staff, James Blair, who have spearheaded criticism of the renovation as overly costly and ostentatious, later told reporters they still have questions about the project. The two men, who joined Trump during the visit, have suggested poor oversight and potential fraud in connection with it.
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, a Republican who sent Powell a letter on Wednesday demanding answers to his own questions about the renovation, also took part in the visit.
Elevated by Trump to the top Fed job in 2018 and then reappointed by former President Joe Biden four years later, Powell last met with the current president in March when Trump summoned him to the White House to press him to lower rates.
The visit on Thursday took place as Trump battles to deflect attention from a political crisis over his administration's refusal to release files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, reversing a campaign promise. Epstein died in 2019.
The Fed, in letters to Vought and lawmakers backed up by documents posted on its website, said the project -- the first full rehab of the two buildings since they were built nearly a century ago -- ran into unexpected challenges, including toxic materials abatement and higher-than-estimated costs for materials and labor.
Speaking outside of the construction site, Trump said there was "no tension" at his meeting with Powell and that they had a productive conversation about rates.
Ahead of Trump's visit, Fed staff escorted a small group of reporters around the two construction sites. They wove around cement mixers and construction machines, and spoke over the sound of drills, banging and saws. Fed staff pointed out security features, including blast-resistant windows, that they said were a significant driver of costs in addition to tariffs and escalations in material and labor costs.
The project started in mid-2022 and is on track to be completed by 2027, with the move-in planned for March 2028.
A visit to the roof of the Eccles Building, a point of particular scrutiny by critics like Scott, who has complained about "rooftop garden terraces," revealed an impressive view of the Lincoln Memorial and the National Mall, according to the pool report.
Staff explained that rooftop seating, although inexpensive, had been removed because of the appearance of it being an amenity and was one of only two deviations from the original plan. The other was the scrapping of a couple of planned fountains.
Market reaction to Trump's visit was subdued. The yield on benchmark 10-year Treasury bonds ticked higher after data showed new jobless claims dropped in the most recent week, signaling a stable labor market not in need of support from a Fed rate cut. The S&P 500 equities index closed largely flat on the day.
Trump's criticism of Powell and flirtation with firing him have previously upset financial markets and threatened a key underpinning of the global financial system -- that central banks are independent and free from political meddling.
His trip contrasts with a handful of other documented presidential visits to the Fed. Then-President Franklin Delano Roosevelt visited the central bank in 1937 to dedicate the newly built headquarters, one of the two buildings now being renovated. Most recently, former President George W. Bush went there in 2006 to attend the swearing-in of Ben Bernanke as Fed chief.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
5 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Why Cambodia Is Losing the Information War With Thailand
The lack of an independent press has made it hard for the government to communicate its side of the story. In the latest conflict along the Cambodia-Thailand border, nationalism has once again spilled into cyberspace. In Cambodia, social media personalities have mobilized to challenge what they see as a global narrative tilted in Thailand's favor, arguing that international media portray Bangkok more sympathetically simply because it is more powerful, better connected, or more geopolitically popular. 'Just because Thailand is bigger and has more media coverage, Cambodia is a villain now?' asked beauty and lifestyle influencer SreyNea Nea. Pop singer and songwriter Sinora Roath echoed the sentiment in a viral video, in which she said, 'Thailand is invading Cambodia because they want more of our temples. Why are you so greedy, Thailand? Your country is bigger than us, you're way more populated, your food is all over the world, you are one of the most visited countries in Southeast Asia, and you still want more? From a country like us? Your media coverage is so big that when you told the world that we're the one invading, the world believed you.' Content creator Chris Dyna added, 'As a small country, it is very difficult for our voices to be heard. Many news outlets are only reporting from or within Thailand, with some news outlets reporting using Thai nationals, showing clear bias in their reports.' From memes to commentary, the dominant tone online is one of frustration with the focus of the international press. But the skew in global perception stems from a fact closer to home: namely, that Cambodia doesn't have a free press. Despite its history of frequent military coups, Thailand is still considered a 'flawed democracy' by the Economist Intelligence Unit and is rated 'partly free' by Freedom House. The country holds regular elections, supports an active civil society, and maintains a relatively diverse media environment, even though all of these operate under notable constraints. The press contends with self-censorship and strict legal limits, especially those imposed by the lese-majeste law, yet critical reporting persists, particularly in English-language and online outlets. For example, Bangkok, unlike Phnom Penh, hosts regional bureaus or correspondents for major international outlets like Reuters, the BBC, the Associated Press, Al Jazeera, the Financial Times, NBC, and others, many of which are associated with the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand (FCCT) in central Bangkok. In Cambodia, by contrast, none of this is true. Despite still holding periodic elections, the country is now widely regarded as an authoritarian one-party state under the control of the Cambodian People's Party (CPP). Over the past decade, the government has systematically dismantled the independent media, culminating in the 2023 shutdown of Voice of Democracy (VOD), one of the last major newsrooms willing to challenge official narratives. Radio Free Asia (RFA) shuttered its Phnom Penh bureau back in 2017, citing 'unprecedented' levels of government intimidation. That same year, authorities closed more than two dozen local radio stations — many of which rebroadcast RFA programs –effectively silencing critical voices on the airwaves. The English-language Cambodia Daily, a longtime pillar of investigative reporting, was also forced to shut down after being hit with a sudden, crippling tax bill. The following year, the Phnom Penh Post was sold under pressure to government-friendly investors. By the time of the 2018 election, when the CPP won all 125 seats in the National Assembly, the country's independent press had been all but extinguished. Journalists who persist in exposing uncomfortable truths – especially around land seizures, corruption, or political abuses – often face surveillance, harassment, exile, or imprisonment. Take the case of Uon Chhin and Yeang Sothearin, two former RFA reporters arrested and charged with providing information to a foreign state, a crime that carries a sentence of up to 15 years. Then there is the case of Mech Dara, a Cambodian investigative journalist known for uncovering online scams and government corruption. In September 2024, he was charged with incitement to commit a felony or cause social disorder over posts he made online. In January, Gerald Flynn, a British environmental reporter with Mongabay, learnt that he had been blacklisted and denied re-entry to Cambodia, apparently in retaliation for his reporting on environmental crimes tied to powerful elites. So if one wonders why there is so little reporting from inside Cambodia during this war with Thailand – why no major outlet seems to be covering our side of the story – this is why. As a Cambodian, I have watched my fellow countrymen grow used to the idea that speech is dangerous, and that certain things simply are not said in public. For years, no one I knew seemed particularly concerned about press freedom. But now, suddenly, there is a nationwide outrage over 'misinformation' and 'foreign media bias,' all because of a perception that the narrative is coming out of Bangkok instead of Phnom Penh. But Cambodia will not win the PR war in the information age by handing influencers identical scripts, without third-party verification or independent journalism. We cannot ask the world to hear us while our government silences every voice that dares to speak independently. As such, this war should be a wake-up call for Cambodian leaders, alerting them to the truth-telling functions of an independent press. By silencing these voices, the Cambodian government has forfeited the credibility needed for others to believe its version of events.
Nikkei Asia
7 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
India's Modi plans first China visit in 7 years, as tensions with US rise
NEW DELHI (Reuters) -- Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday, in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the United States rise. Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization that begins on Aug. 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the U.S. faces its most serious crisis in years after President Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbors are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries. Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10% tariff on imports from members -- which include India -- of the BRICS group of major emerging economies for "aligning themselves with anti-American policies." Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of U.S. efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. Trump's top diplomatic envoy, Steve Witkoff, is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions. Meanwhile, Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to another government source, who also did not want to be named. Doval is likely to address India's defense cooperation with Russia, including obtaining faster access to pending exports to India of Moscow's S400 air defense system, and a possible visit by President Vladimir Putin to India. Doval's trip will be followed by External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to come. U.S. and Indian officials told Reuters a mix of political misjudgment, missed signals and bitterness scuttled trade deal negotiations between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion. India expects Trump's crackdown could cost it a competitive advantage in about $64 billion worth of goods sent to the U.S. that account for 80% of its total exports, four separate sources told Reuters, citing an internal government assessment. However, the relatively low share of exports in India's $4 trillion economy is expected to limit the direct impact on economic growth. On Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5% and held rates steady despite the tariff uncertainties. India's government assessment report has assumed a 10% penalty for buying Russian oil, which would take the total U.S. tariff to 35%, the sources said. India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariffs imposed by Trump becomes clear, all four sources said. India exported goods estimated at $81 billion in 2024 to the U.S.
Nikkei Asia
7 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
US pursues record restrictions on Chinese purchases of American land
The U.S. is cracking down on Chinese ownership of farmland, a move critics say will exacerbate Asian discrimination. © Reuters PAK YIU NEW YORK -- The U.S. is intensifying its crackdown on Chinese ownership of American land in the name of national security, an initiative that critics say will exacerbate discrimination against Asians and further stymie Chinese investment.
