HBO's Harry Potter reboot cast: Everything you need to know
More than 32,000 children responded to a public casting call to play the world's three most famous young wizards last year in the hope of landing the role of a lifetime.
Producers whittled down the audition tapes and then ran workshops and screen tests.
The lucky trio have been confirmed as Dominic McLaughlin as Harry Potter, with Arabella Stanton playing Hermione Granger, and Alastair Stout as Ron Weasley.
All are described as being screen newcomers, though McLaughlin is in Gifted, a yet-to-be-aired CBBC series based on Marilyn Kaye's children's novels about kids with superpowers.
Stanton has previously appeared in the stage musicals Matilda and Starlight Express, while Stout's agent (which says he does a 'northern' accent) credits him with appearing in an Albert Bartlett potato advert.
These are the most important casting decisions, as McLaughlin, Stanton, and Stout will be expected to carry the show and deal with huge public scrutiny for years.
Francesca Gardiner and Mark Mylod, the Harry Potter show-runners, said of the trio: 'After an extraordinary search led by casting directors Lucy Bevan and Emily Brockmann, we are delighted to announce we have found our Harry, Hermione, and Ron'.
'The talent of these three unique actors is wonderful to behold, and we cannot wait for the world to witness their magic together onscreen.
'We would like to thank all the tens of thousands of children who auditioned. It's been a real pleasure to discover the plethora of young talent out there.'
Who is in the cast?
Like the films, the series is sure to be a Who's Who of A-list talent, with budgets that dwarf almost everything else on TV.
The first performer to confirm their participation was the Conclave star John Lithgow, cast as Hogwarts' headmaster Albus Dumbledore.
Lithgow, 79, said that he did not expect to be asked to follow in the footsteps of Richard Harris, Michael Gambon, and Jude Law (who all played Dumbledore in the Wizarding World films).
'Well, it came as a total surprise to me. I just got the phone call at the Sundance Film Festival for yet another film, and it was not an easy decision because it's going to define me for the last chapter of my life, I'm afraid,' he said in February.
'But I'm very excited. Some wonderful people are turning their attention back to Harry Potter. That's why it's been such a hard decision. I'll be about 87 years old at the wrap party, but I've said yes.'
HBO has officially revealed its first batch of stars to populate the new Hogwarts.
I May Destroy You star Paapa Essiedu has been cast as potions master Severus Snape, while Ozark's Janet McTeer is to play deputy headmistress Minerva McGonagall, a role that was made famous by the late Dame Maggie Smith and previously linked with Sharon Horgan and Rachel Weisz.
Other stars confirmed to have signed up are Shaun of the Dead's Nick Frost succeeding Robbie Coltrane as gamekeeper Rubeus Hagrid, while the role of cantankerous caretaker Argus Filch is filled by comic performer Paul Whitehouse.
We also have our first villain.
Quirinus Quirrell, the Defence Against the Dark Arts teacher in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone who is later revealed to be under the control of the evil Lord Voldemort, will be portrayed by Luke Thallon.
The 29-year-old is best known as a stage actor.
Who will play Voldemort himself in later series is being kept under wraps, but those said to be in the frame include Oscar-winner Cillian Murphy.
The confirmed Harry Potter cast so far:
John Lithgow (Albus Dumbledore)
Janet McTeer (Minerva McGonagall)
Paapa Essiedu (Severus Snape)
Nick Frost (Rubeus Hagrid)
Paul Whitehouse (Argus Filch)
Luke Thallon (Quirinus Quirrell)
How will the series be different from the films?
HBO boss Casey Bloys has said that the series will be a 'very, very specifically British 1990s production'.
The series is being overseen by Gardiner and Mylod, Brits who are both alumni of HBO's Succession.
One need only look at their track record to know that the series will not merely be a rehash of the films.
Gardiner worked on the TV adaptation of Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials; while Mylod's hits include Game of Thrones and The Menu, a Ralph Fiennes horror satirising fine dining.
It is expected that the series will be darker than the films, with HBO looking for a slightly older viewership than the pre-teens who were the primary target of the cinematic pictures.
Friends of Gardiner – who wrote her master's thesis on the importance of darkness in kids' stories and has spoken of her dislike for patronising children – say that she wants to bring a grittier, 'Wednesday/Tim Burton vibe' to the series.
Perhaps most notably, the characters will be the same age as they are in the books, with each series presumably following the school year.
That means, for instance, that Snape (played by the inimitable Alan Rickman in the films) will be in his early 30s on the small screen. Essiedu is 34; Rickman, by contrast, was 55 when the first film was released.
The exception is Dumbledore, who lived to the ripe old age of 115. Lithgow is unlikely to want to be working in his 12th decade.
Is JK Rowling involved?
Despite selling more than 600 million Harry Potter books and amassing a fortune of almost £1 billion (according to the Sunday Times Rich List), Rowling has become a polarising character in recent years for her public contributions to the transgender debate.
'That's a very online conversation, very nuanced and complicated and not something we're going to get into,' Bloys said at an investor presentation in April 2023. 'Our priority is what's on the screen.'
The 59-year-old author is key to the whole series: she serves as its executive producer and will have the final say on all the casting choices.
Rowling praised HBO for 'preserving the integrity' of her books and said that the new adaptation will 'allow for a degree of depth and detail only afforded by a long-form television series'.
Will the original stars return?
Probably not. Many of the original cast members – including Radcliffe, Grint, and Watson – have criticised Rowling's trans views, while others (including Gambon and Rickman) have died.
Jason Isaacs, who played the villainous Lucius Malfoy in the films, was asked about whether he would mount a comeback to the Wizarding World at the premiere of The White Lotus in February.
'I'm hoping to come back as Hermione,' he said, not entirely seriously. 'I sent my audition tape in and I've yet to hear. But they have my number.'
When will the series be broadcast?
Filming at the Warner Bros studio in Leavesden, Hertfordshire, is not scheduled to start until the summer, so it is unlikely that it will hit our screens before 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
7 days ago
- NZ Herald
Sir Elton John set to perform at Steve Jobs' daughter's lavish wedding
'He will play a selection of his songs, including some of Eve and Harry's favourites. 'A concert from Elton doesn't come cheap. Apparently they've forked out over £1 million to have him perform. 'It's going to be incredibly special.' The couple – who began dating in 2022 and announced their engagement last September – have reportedly got quite the guest list for their 'upper-class English luxury with a cool, modern American vibe' wedding, which Eve and Harry have reportedly co-worked with celebrity events planner Stanlee Gatti, 69, to organise. Eve Jobs announced her engagement to British showjumping gold medallist Harry Charles in September. Photo / Getty Images It is claimed the former Democrat First Lady Kamala Harris, 60 – who is said to be very good friends with Laurence – will be attending, as well as Bruce Springsteen's daughter, American equestrian Jessica Springsteen, 33, and ex-Apple designer Sir Jony Ive, 58. The insider said: 'Kamala Harris, who ran for the [US] presidency last year, is very close friends with Laurene and is on the guest list. Kamala Harris is expected to attend the wedding. Photo / Getty Images 'This is a very quiet place, not far from the Cotswolds. Everyone is used to tourists and famous faces, but this is something else. 'The wedding is being planned like a military operation,' our insider said. 'The itinerary is scheduled so precisely, with guests starting to arrive all this week before the wedding celebrations begin on Thursday. 'Kamala and Bill Gates' daughters, Phoebe and Jennifer, are all on the VIP guest list. Bill Gates' daughter, Jennifer Gates, will also attend Eve Jobs' wedding. Photo / via Instagram 'Matt Helders from the Arctic Monkeys has been invited, too. It's an eclectic mix of stars and will be like a 'who's who' of the rich and famous. 'There are a lot of important American political figures going to be there. No doubt they'll all be Googling each other.' Eve's siblings – her brother Reed Jobs, 33, sister Erin Jobs, 29, and half-sister Lisa Brennan-Jobs, 47, who Steve had with his first wife Chrisann Brennan, 70 – are also expected to attend their wedding, with Harry's dad, London 2012 team jumping gold medallist Peter Charles, 65, and his close and extended family. A nearby village will go on lockdown from Wednesday – the day guests will reportedly fly into Oxford airport on their private jets, with helicopters on the ground ready to whisk them to the secret estate where Eve and Harry will say 'I do'. The source said: 'Eve and Harry's wedding is like a multimillion-pound fairy tale. 'It's a society wedding like no other, and it's turning rural Oxfordshire upside down. 'The sleepy village in which it's taking place feels like it's turning into a no-go zone, with secret service operatives and blokes who look like they work for the FBI.' One of the extravagant wedding venues in the Cotswolds. Photo / Getty Images And the insider claimed Eve, Harry, and Stanlee's organised event will be a wedding like no other. They added: 'Every final detail of the big day has been signed off by Eve and Harry, but this is Stanlee's baby. 'It's the meeting of two soulmates from across the Atlantic, and that will be reflected in the wedding, too. 'The vibe is upper-class English luxury with a cool, modern American vibe. It's going to be like nothing anyone at the wedding has experienced before.'
The Spinoff
22-07-2025
- The Spinoff
And just like that, the Sex and the City spinoff has done the unimaginable
It's gone and killed the hate watch. The woman sat on her couch and steeled herself. Eager to shut out the city and ignore her rotting garden, she lowered the blinds. She sank into her polar fleece dressing gown, picked up the remote and listened for the distinctive static that whispers 'Babe, it's 4pm, time to watch And Just Like That'. Anyone still clinging to the wreckage of the Sex and the City franchise knows about 'the woman'. She is the character Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker) is writing in her new turn as a historical fiction writer in the third season of And Just Like That. She is the return of the once-iconic voiceover from Sex and the City. She has no plot. She has no joy. She has no fun. She is wafting about her inexplicably unfurnished Gramercy Park townhouse like the Grey Lady of Hampton Court, moaning and insufferable. She is an avatar for Carrie. When Just Like That first debuted in 2021, it was not welcomed with open arms. Its predecessor, Sex and the City, the flawed yet ground-breaking show about four women in New York dating and having a lot of sex, ended in 2004. Fans of the show were excited to see their favourite characters (minus Kim Cattrall as Samantha) back after the two-hour and 27-minute-long advertisement for Abu Dhabi that was the second Sex and the City movie. Fans were also wary. Aware of the entertainment industry's penchant for resurrecting and profiting from intellectual property, sequels, prequels and spinoffs often arrive with the baked-in challenge of overcoming a fan base's justifiable cynicism. Sex and the City was also derided when it first aired in 1999, and has been the subject of derision since. In 2013, Brett Martin wrote, 'It might as well have been a tourism campaign for a post-Rudolph Giuliani, de-ethnicized Gotham awash in money. Its characters were types as familiar as those in 'The Golden Girls': the Slut, the Prude, the Career Woman, the Heroine. But they talked more explicitly, certainly about their bodies, but also about their desires and discontents outside the bedroom, than women on TV ever had before.' Sex and the City was a product of its pre-woke time. Its early seasons were raw, politically incorrect, and outrageously unrealistic. It was also the first show to be unapologetic about women's sexuality, discussing 'taboo' topics like masturbation, bisexuality and women having casual sex. It helped transform HBO from a boxing and late-night soft porn channel into a prestige television juggernaut. Sex and the City walked so that Lena Dunham's Girls could run. It became a touchstone and a bona fide cultural phenomenon. It has also enjoyed some of the same revisionist treatment that Dunham's Girls has, as new generations discover it via streaming services and time grants it a more nuanced assessment and deserved canonical status. The first season of And Just Like That presented the women as they grappled with the challenges of middle age. I gave it a wide berth. I am middle-aged. I defended the show to friends and perplexed younger people, saying it was good to see women of that age on screen having sex, dealing with grief and midlife career change. The characters still trotted about in fabulous fashion, and it was a relief to see the show's 'fifth lady', New York City, still standing after the ravages of the pandemic. It was no high art, but like its predecessor, it was meant to be escapist; a night in with old friends. The first season was awkward and, like many television shows debuting during and right after the pandemic, struggled with how to address it without becoming a 'post-pandemic show'. It worked too hard to right the sins of its father. One of the main criticisms of Sex and the City was its lack of characters who weren't white and wealthy. And Just Like That overcorrected, leaning into storylines and characters that were meant to widen the view, but ultimately reduced new characters to near-empty shells of tokenistic representation. It also neutered the show. Early signs of a greater prudishness around the way sex was presented were creeping in. The dialogue lacked zingers, and the characters seemed afraid to say the wrong thing. There were too many side characters introduced and too many children I couldn't care less about, who were sucking up precious airtime. I love plenty of shows about family dynamics, but the children of Sex and the City are irredeemably boring. Steve was reduced to a bumbling fool instead of the strangely attractive working-class man he'd been, and Che Diaz, Miranda's love interest, divided fans. Ultimately, Carrie's grief plot line saved it. That is to say, having a plot line, something usually considered vital yet which would soon vanish from the show, saved the first season. When season two rolled around, I stuck with it, but was becoming increasingly irritated by how little it was doing or saying. Aidan was back, and following the real-life cancellation of Chris Noth, Mr Big – the so-called love of Carrie's life – was erased. The season ended with the ridiculous suspension of Carrie and Aidan's rekindled relationship for five years so Aidan could deal with yet another child I do not care about. Still, I had hope, drawn to the possibility of the next season exploring the very real wisdom of age, unconventional relationships and the letting go of expectation. Season three has been a train wreck. It's hard to put your finger on what this show is now. At times, it feels like a sitcom, with Charlotte (Kristin Davis) and LTW (Nicole Ari Parker) enduring scripts and set-ups where the Benny Hill theme wouldn't feel out of place. At other times, it's a poorly scripted and oddly paced drama. When Aidan reveals something that should shake his relationship with Carrie to the core, or at least push along an interesting storyline about unconventional relationships and expectations, it dies quickly. Carrie does not discuss it with her friends. Instead, she continues wafting about her townhouse, having no fun, going nowhere and patting her pussy (a literal cat – this show has left the sex behind). Budgets have clearly shrunk as we get far less of the fifth lady, its nightlife or its hum. The writers can't be bothered to fill plot holes or avoid plot clangers altogether. There are editing and continuity issues. It feels like no one gives a shit. As a woman approaching her 50s, I no longer want to defend the show based on its representation of women my age or older. I feel like I have less in common with these muddled characters than when I was at least 10 years younger than them, lighting durries off the toaster, and huddling under three sleeping bags in a shitty flat in Dunedin to watch Sex and the City. Precious minutes of screen time are devoted to exposition on plot lines that go nowhere. LTW's son, whom we know precisely nothing about, inexplicably sings three songs at a karaoke birthday party for Charlotte. It does nothing except highlight the squandering of having Patti LuPone (Giuseppe's mother) and Christopher Jackson (LTW's husband, Herbert) in the room at the same time. Both are Broadway stars, and yet they sing nothing. The son sings Fantine's 'I Dreamed a Dream' from Les Mis, and while I don't expect LuPone to drag her cancelled arse up for a reprise, it's a wink and a nod that feels entirely wasted. Miranda (Cynthia Nixon), once sharp, messy and incredibly funny, has been given the Steve treatment, turning up at last week's birthday party as an overly enthusiastic clown. Davis is doing the most comedically and emotionally, but is saddled with her boring kids. The Samantha stand-in, Seema Patel (Sarita Choudhury), is stuck in the same gear as a woman for whom no one is good enough. I don't know what LTW is for, other than wearing insanely large necklaces and couture at work. The greatest crime is the reduction of Carrie Bradshaw into a feeble, humourless, mean and utterly joyless character. Yet again, she is twisting herself into whatever shape is most convenient for the man she loves. Despite success, wealth, age and wisdom, she is regressing. She is awful to her friends and defensive about her relationship. There is a whisper of a possible new love interest with a famed biographer (a gimp room occupant of her townhouse not mentioned when she bought the townhouse in season two). Duncan Reeve, a character name that prompts a jump scare for anyone at The Spinoff, thinks her new book is brilliant, despite it sounding like something I could whip up in ChatGPT in two minutes, and having no plot that we know of. That's especially insulting when you consider Parker herself is a big-time lover of literary fiction, carrying a copy of Becky Manawatu's Āue under her arm in season two, and a recent Booker Prize judge. Perhaps this is all leading to something, maybe it isn't. At this point, I no longer care and have only persisted in watching this season so I could listen to two hours of lively recaps and viciously funny dissection on the Every Outfit podcast. This season, the show has earned the dubious honour of being labelled a hate watch. The act of watching something that you find terrible because you enjoy criticising and mocking it is a phenomenon that social media has turbocharged. My hate watches have fallen into a few different categories in the past. There are the smooth-brained vehicles for Nicole Kidman and her family of wigs. It's passable television, with enough intrigue to keep you going, but not very nutritious. I remember nothing about them except being profoundly irritated by plot holes and bad blonde bobs. There are shows like The Kardashians where the spectacle of living through an era where vulgarity is not just accepted but celebrated is seemingly impossible to turn away from. Each new episode spawns a million memes and a million moans. It's funny until it suddenly starts feeling empty and soulless. You know you're participating in the prolonging of the life of a franchise that's being rinsed for every dollar. What felt like perverse joy is now just grimly perverse. What was meant to glide over you, providing comforting escapism, is rotting your brain. And Just Like That is now so bad, it's car crash television, but I can't keep watching it on that basis. There is enough to be distracted by and plenty of reasons to be cynical about so much in life right now. I don't need it stoked by the corpse of a show that gave me so much joy and was genuinely foundational for women on screen. I have too much to do to spend another minute of my life pretending that the short-lived gratification that comes from communally hating something is a substitute for doing literally anything else with other people. And just like that, I am done with the hate watch.
NZ Herald
20-07-2025
- NZ Herald
The Last of Us Season 3: Here's everything we know ahead of next chapter
Chief Lifestyle and Entertainment Reporter Jenni Mortimer gives an update on all things entertainment. Video / Herald Now Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. The Last of Us Season 3: Here's everything we know ahead of next chapter This article contains spoilers for Season 2 of The Last of Us There were 763 days between the first two seasons of hit TV show The Last of Us, and we've just been given an indication whether that pattern will continue. HBO renewed the series for a third season on April 9 this year before the premiere of the second season, but didn't say when that third season would air. In a recent interview with Variety, Casey Bloys, the HBO chief executive, confirmed the American television service's timeline for the show's next season. He told the publication fans have a bit of a wait ahead, saying 'the series is definitely planned for 2027'. If that schedule eventuates, there will be a similar gap between each instalment of the video game adaptation. Season one wrapped on March 12, 2023 and season two premiered on April 13, 2025. In New Zealand, The Last of Us streams on Neon.
