Senate sends watered-down school cellphone ban to Oklahoma House
Sen. Ally Seifried, R-Claremore, presents her legislative priorities for the Senate Education Committee during a Jan. 27, 2025, news conference at the Oklahoma State Capitol. (Photo by Nuria Martinez-Keel/Oklahoma Voice)
OKLAHOMA CITY – The Oklahoma Senate on Thursday passed a measure that would require school districts to ban cellphones and personal electronic devices next school year.
But districts could choose to continue or discontinue the policy in following years.
Senate Bill 139, by Sen. Ally Seifried, R-Claremore, moves to the House for consideration after a 30-15 vote on the amended measure in the upper chamber.
The measure was amended to restrict the ban to just next school year rather than all subsequent years.
'I am confident that once districts go phone-free for one year, students, parents and educators will see the undeniable benefit of a cellphone-free learning environment,' Seifried said.
A similar but more restrictive House measure already awaits Senate action. It would require school districts bar all cellphone and personal devices on campus in perpetuity.
Sen. Mark Mann, D-Oklahoma City, said while the measure is well-intended, any policy should be dictated by the local board in consultation with parents, teachers and the superintendent. Mann is a former school board member.
But Sen. Adam Pugh, R-Edmond, said the addiction to cellphones and digital technology is 'the crisis of this generation' that is 'ruining young people's academic and educational experiences.'
The addiction contributes to mental health issues, he said.
'What used to stop now in the classroom goes all the way to the bedroom because kids cannot escape when they are digitally connected,' Pugh said. 'Any problem that's happened in school follows them home.'
School leaders asked that the Legislature take up the issue so policies are consistent, Pugh said.
Removing the devices will increase student performance and behavior issues go down, Pugh said.
Sen. Dave Rader, R-Tulsa, said senators will remember their vote on the bill.
'We need to take this opportunity because this changes things,' Rader said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
The ‘big, beautiful' bill creates a $5 billion tax shelter for private school donors
The budget reconciliation bill passed by the House last month, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act, ' contains an unconventional provision establishing an unprecedented tax shelter designed to shift resources from public schools to wealthy people and private schools. The provision allocates $5 billion a year in federal tax credits for donors to organizations that provide private and religious school vouchers. While the bill cuts benefits for other charitable donations, it triples the tax benefit for private school voucher donations. This unique dollar-for-dollar rebate is something no other charity has ever gotten from the federal government. Other donors may be taken aback to learn that policymakers have singled out private schools for a reward three times larger than what can be received for gifts to pediatric cancer research, flood clean-up or assisting veterans exposed to chemicals. More alarming still, this provision creates a profitable tax shelter for wealthy people who agree to help funnel public funds into private schools. This is because rich donors will avoid the capital gains tax entirely if they make a gift of stock. Savvy tax advisors will instruct stockholders to avoid selling and to instead donate those holdings, getting a one-for-one return from the federal government — while avoiding hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars in capital gains taxes. This is the quintessential definition of a tax shelter, encouraging affluent people with no interest in school vouchers to direct contributions this way, not out of conviction but for profit. Usually, when policymakers do this, it is an inadvertent by-product of hasty legislative decisions, not an intentional giveaway. This, too, is a norm being broken with this bill. The provision expands vouchers nationwide, even in states — such as Kentucky, Nebraska and Colorado — where voters recently rejected vouchers at the ballot box. American voters have actually said no to vouchers in every state where they've been put on the ballot, which may be why voucher proponents are sneaking a big expansion into a must-pass federal bill. Vouchers, in addition to being unpopular, expensive. My organization, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, estimates that this provision alone would as drafted reduce federal tax revenue by $23.2 billion over the next 10 years, or by $67 billion if it is extended beyond its four-year expiration date, as Republicans would likely attempt to do. Because state income taxes largely piggyback on federal law, this provision would reduce state revenue by between $459 million and $1.1 billion over the decade, depending on extension. Of the 10-year state and federal tax cuts from this provision, between $2.2 billion and $5.3 billion would be in the form of capital gains tax avoidance, depending on extension. Had this provision been in effect in 2021, for example, Elon Musk could have cut his capital gains tax bill by $690 million. In all, while cutting tax benefits for charities across the board, the reconciliation bill creates an unprecedented giveaway that would enrich the wealthiest Americans, particularly those whose income comes from stock. It would weaken public budgets and public schools, siphoning money to private schools that are allowed to reject many students. Combined with other enormous cuts to public programs and tax cuts for the rich, this is an untenable combination. Amy Hanauer is executive director of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's spending bill heads to Senate where Republicans plan strategic adjustments to key provisions
The "Big, Beautiful Bill" may face major changes when the Senate begins debate next week. Look for Senate Republicans to pare down state and local tax deductions—known as SALT—which are important to House Republicans from California and New York. Republican Lawmakers Stand Firm Against Musk's 'Kill The Bill' Assault On Trump's Agenda Almost no Senate Republicans care about SALT. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., says he'd oppose the bill if the Senate strips SALT. Fiscal hawks want further Medicaid changes to achieve additional savings, but Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Jim Justice, represent states with high percentages of their constituents on Medicaid. House Republicans Push For Spending Cancellations As Elon Musk And Conservatives Demand Deeper Budget Cuts Read On The Fox News App Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., wants to alter the no-tax-on-tips provision, arguing it's unfair to workers outside tipped industries. The Senate may also cut House provisions on AI and federal judges, as these policy issues don't comply with special Senate budget article source: Trump's spending bill heads to Senate where Republicans plan strategic adjustments to key provisions
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Oklahoma committee begins search for textbook adhering to controversial social studies standards
Nuria Martinez-Keel Oklahoma Voice OKLAHOMA CITY — An ousted member of the state's top school board will lead the process to approve K-12 textbooks that align with controversial new academic standards for social studies. Former Oklahoma State Board of Education member Kendra Wesson will continue as the chair of a key committee that chooses all state-approved textbooks for public schools. She has been State Superintendent Ryan Walters' designee to lead the committee since she joined the state Board of Education in January 2023. 'Serving in this role and being able to still help my state is what it's all about, right?' Wesson said. 'It's not about (having my) name in lights. It's about doing the serving and coming in and being who I am and consistently being who I am. So, I value it very much.' Wesson, of Norman, said she brings high integrity to the role and has enjoyed the committee and its staff, so 'it meant a lot to me to be able to stay here.' Walters said he has full confidence in her ability to lead the textbook adoption process. 'Kendra is pro-student, pro-education reform and a pro-Trump conservative who will uphold pro-American principles throughout this process,' Walters said in a statement. 'I look forward to working with her as we are posed to introduce the best academic standards in the country to Oklahoma classrooms this fall.' Gov. Kevin Stitt replaced three state Board of Education members, including Wesson, on Feb. 11 while complaining the board had fallen victim to 'needless political drama.' The three removed members had voted with Walters to advance a now-defeated proposal to have public schools collect students' immigration status, an idea Stitt opposed. What Oklahoma's textbook committee will do during the adoption cycle Wesson and the State Textbook Committee gathered Friday, June 7, for an orientation meeting to initiate the 2025-26 adoption cycle, a process that determines which textbooks the state will approve for the next six years. The committee last met Feb. 7 to conclude the 2024-25 cycle. Like with the state Board of Education, the governor appoints all members of the 13-member textbook committee except for one — the state superintendent, who can choose a designee to serve as the committee's chair in his place. The committee, mostly made up of educators, will receive sample products by July 1 from textbook publishers interested in selling to Oklahoma school districts. The number of companies bidding in the small-market state has dwindled in recent years while political debates over classroom content grew. After the July 1 deadline, teams of subject-matter experts will begin quality reviews of the submitted learning material in August before making recommendations to the textbook committee, said Carolynn Bristow, project manager of educational materials for the Oklahoma State Department of Education. The process culminates in the committee's Nov. 14 vote to approve a list of textbooks aligning with the newly enacted standards for social studies education. The committee also will vote on instructional materials for personal financial literacy courses. The state will execute contracts with publishers in February after the board's final meeting of the adoption cycle. Wesson said the committee will follow the typical textbook adoption process and doesn't anticipate any differences from previous cycles. The committee and its review teams will adhere to a pre-approved rubric to evaluate textbook materials, she said. The rubric checks for classroom usability and compliance with state academic standards. Last year, the committee also added social and moral questions to the rubric asking whether the submitted materials 'degrade traditional roles of men and women,' promote 'illegal lifestyles' or neglect the importance of religion in preserving American liberties. 'We have a great team here at (the state Education Department) that keeps us on track, and that's why that rubric is there, to keep everybody on the same page,' Wesson said. 'And so you will always find this committee, especially, following that process.' Oklahoma's new social studies standards cast doubt on 2020 election results, require biblical teaching The new social studies standards, which dictate what public schools must teach to students in history and government classes, have been the source of significant public scrutiny this year. The standards now require schools to educate students about biblical teachings and Judeo-Christian values that influenced the American colonies and founding fathers, which Walters has said is crucial to ensuring students understand the full context of the country's history. Language casting doubt on the integrity of the 2020 presidential election results also is required teaching. Stitt's three new appointees to the state Board of Education said they were unaware of the 2020 election language at the time they voted on the standards on Feb. 27. Walters said he is responsible for adding the new content, but he didn't acknowledge it until weeks after the board vote. Despite bipartisan concerns among the state Legislature, the Republican supermajority in the state House and Senate permitted the standards to take effect. A lawsuit in Oklahoma County District Court contends Walters' administration failed to uphold proper transparency procedures. Wesson said the State Textbook Committee won't have any issues finding textbooks that align with the new social studies standards, even with the new content that has made headlines. 'We're not going to have a problem there at all,' she said. Oklahoma Voice is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oklahoma Voice maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Janelle Stecklein for questions:info@ Follow Oklahoma Voice onFacebook andTwitter.
