
CVD Plus Excess Weight Increases Breast Cancer Risk
The short answer is no for CVD and yes for type 2 diabetes, a recent analysis suggested.
Women with excess body weight who developed CVD had a significantly higher risk for breast cancer, according to the study, published earlier this month in Cancer . The researchers, led by Heinz Freisling, PhD, reported that each 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a 31% higher risk for breast cancer in women who developed CVD vs a 13% higher risk in women without CVD.
However, women with excess body weight who developed type 2 diabetes did not have a higher risk for breast cancer than women who did not develop diabetes.
These findings indicate that 'weight control/prevention measures are particularly important for women with a history of CVD,' explained Freisling, with the Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization.
Research on how cardiometabolic diseases, such as CVD and type 2 diabetes, affect the association between adiposity and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women is limited.
Earlier work by the team had found an additive interaction between obesity and CVD and overall cancer risk as well as obesity-related cancer risk but no such additive interaction between obesity and type 2 diabetes with cancer risk. However, the research did not address whether CVD or type 2 diabetes modified the relationship between body weight and breast cancer risk, the researchers noted.
In the current analysis, Freisling and colleagues analyzed individual participant data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition and UK Biobank on 168,547 postmenopausal women who did not have cancer, type 2 diabetes, or CVD at the outset.
After a median follow-up of nearly 11 years in both cohorts, 6793 postmenopausal women developed breast cancer.
Pooled data from both cohorts revealed that, with BMI increases of 5 kg/m2, women who developed CVD had a higher risk for breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31) than those who did not develop CVD (HR, 1.13). The combination of overweight (BMI ≥ 25) and CVD was estimated to lead to 1.53 more cases of breast cancer per 1000 people per year than expected.
However, type 2 diabetes did not modify the relationship between adiposity and breast cancer risk.
What might explain the different associations?
'We know from animal studies that CVD can lead to cancer growth through biological pathways that are not shared with adiposity. For example, a stressed heart muscle releases proteins into the blood stream that can trigger cancer growth,' Freisling said.
However, 'we know from other studies that excess adiposity and diabetes affect breast cancer risk through similar biological pathways,' which 'may result in the same increase in cancer risk,' Freisling said.
Overall, these findings could inform risk-stratified breast cancer screening programs, Freisling and colleagues noted. But it's unclear how weight loss in women with and without CVD would affect their breast cancer risk. 'This should be investigated in future studies,' Freisling said.
Stephanie Bernik, MD, who was not involved in the research, said the findings are 'interesting' but cautioned against drawing any firm conclusions from the study.
'I think the bottom line is we need to look into it a little more deeply and uncover the mechanism for the association,' said Bernik, chief of the breast service at Mount Sinai West and associate professor of surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City. 'For now, perhaps physicians could be more aware that if someone has obesity and cardiovascular disease, they may be at higher risk for breast cancer.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
39 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Puraffinity and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Partner to Advance PFAS Remediation Technologies
US Army and Puraffinity will conduct a series of laboratory and field trials. LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, July 20, 2025 / / -- Puraffinity, a leading innovator of advanced adsorbents for the removal of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), announces a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). The goal of the collaboration is to conduct research and field demonstrations involving Puraffinity's Puratech G400, an adsorbent material developed for the treatment of PFAS-contaminated waters. Under this agreement, ERDC and Puraffinity will conduct a series of laboratory and field trials. These trials will compare the performance of Puratech G400 with other PFAS treatment technologies such as Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) and Ion Exchange Resins (IEX). The primary objective is to explore Puratech G400's potential in improving treatment outcomes and reducing operating expenses (OPEX) and capital expenditure (CAPEX) in PFAS remediation. The research will target contamination sources from legacy facilities, including aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF). The key research objectives include: • Conducting laboratory and pilot-scale testing using real-world PFAS-contaminated water samples from both Department of Defense (DoD) and non-DoD sites. • Developing performance data to inform potential future applications on DoD installations and other settings. • Evaluating the use of Puratech G400 as a complementary or polishing step to existing destruction technologies. 'This collaboration with the ERDC marks a significant milestone in our mission to deliver innovative, scalable, and sustainable PFAS treatment technologies,' said Vincent Caillaud, CEO of Puraffinity. 'We are proud to work alongside one of the world's foremost research institutions to generate robust performance data and contribute meaningfully to the field of PFAS remediation.' The research initiative forms part of a broader strategic effort, reflecting Puraffinity's commitment to scientific rigor and collaborative innovation with government, industry, and academic stakeholders addressing the global PFAS challenge. Ade Alao Puraffinity [email protected] Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The 3 Stages Of 'Teen Separation', According To A Psychologist
A clinical psychologist has identified three stages teens go through when 'separating' from their parents – and it's resonating with a lot of people on social media. In a video shared on TikTok, Dr Lucie Hemmen said 'one of the most triggering things about teenagers is their separation process' from their parents, which often happens in a handful of stages (more on that in a moment). First of all, why do teens distance themselves from their parents? Adolescence occurs between the ages of 10 to 19 – it's the period between childhood and adulthood where tweens and teens experience 'rapid physical, cognitive and psychosocial growth', according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). As part of this, teens can begin pushing away from their parents, which adolescent therapist Ashley Hudson said is part of a typical developmental process. 'Teenagers want and subconsciously push for independence. Their biological clock ticks inside of them saying, 'Hey! You've got to figure out this adulting thing, because you are going to be on your own soon',' she explained. This might mean your teen is pushing back on boundaries, engaging in risky behaviours or simply spending more time with friends or romantic interests. This period is all about finding out who they are as a person outside of the family unit – and for parents, it's tough. The child you have nurtured and who might've idolised you for years all of a sudden doesn't want to know. What are the three stages of separation? Dr Hemmen said the first stage you might notice as your teen begins to pull away is disagreements. 'So a lot of times when a kid turns 13 or 14, their parent says: 'Oh my god, everything is an argument',' she explained. During arguments, the key advice for parents is to try and stay calm – as parental aggression is likely to be mirrored with teen aggression. The NHS advises ensuring your body language reflects your willingness to listen, and to give your teenager personal space during an argument. If things get very heated, don't be afraid to take time out. Explain you are going for a walk and will come back again in half an hour. The second stage of teen separation, added Dr Hemmen, is withdrawal. 'They often spend more time in their rooms because they're really craving independence,' she explained. This might also look like spending more time with friends. Again, teens withdrawing is a normal part of their emotional development – they're going off on their own, forming 'their own opinions, identity and values', according to psychologist Dr John Townsend. When this begins to happen, coaching site Reach Out urges parents not to take it personally – instead, keep an eye on your teen while also giving them the space and time to 'handle their own lives' (easier said than done, we know). Of course, sometimes withdrawal can be a red flag, which is why it's important for parents to avoid taking their foot completely off the pedal. If you're worried about your child, don't be afraid to be present, patient and share open-ended and emotionally neutral questions or statements like, 'I've noticed you seem quieter lately. That's totally OK, but I just want you to know I'm here anytime you want to talk'. (You can find more helpful, therapist-approved advice here.) Lastly, stage number three of teen separation is bending the rules and pushing the limits, according to Dr Hemmen. 'Let's face it, there's a spectrum. Some teenagers do this a little bit, some teenagers do it a lot. Obviously it's very triggering when they go way off road,' said Dr Hemmen. 'But the positive intention in that behaviour for teenagers is to explore the world and to think for themselves – and they often learn a lot about boundaries through crossing them and living with the impact of that.' Parents of teens are relating hard In response to the video, one parent wrote: 'I miss my sweet baby boy! Having a teenage boy is like trying to have a relationship with a guy that's not interested.' Their comment clearly resonated with a lot of people, as it had over 400 likes at the time of writing. Another said: 'I'm in stage 3 and I'm learning to walk a fine line of still parenting and letting my daughter grow up.' Making space for a teen's autonomy can clearly pay off in the long run though, as one parent commented: 'I learned that when I didn't push back, but openly encouraged and supported their autonomy and normalised and accepted their priorities and values being different than mine, they really matured.' Hang on in there! Related... Therapist Shares 5 Phrases To Use When Teens 'Talk Back' Martin Lewis Urges Parents Of Teens To Do 1 Thing When They Turn 18 WTF Does 'Crashing Out' Mean When Teens Say It?
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
I changed my whole diet to conquer Samsung's antioxidant index; here's how it works
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. One of the few Galaxy Watch 8 exclusives is its antioxidant index, which measures nutrients through your skin to determine whether you're eating healthily. I took it personally when Samsung estimated that I had "Low" antioxidants, so I spent the past week eating as healthily as possible to see if it made a difference. Samsung's multicolored health sensors look for carotenoids, the pigment that gives fruits and veggies their bright red, orange, or yellow coloring; once in your body, they counterbalance the "oxidative stress" generated from poor lifestyle habits like smoking, drinking, overeating, and stress. Hence the name "antioxidants." Generally speaking, the antioxidant index is intended to determine whether you're consuming your WHO-recommended 400g of fruits and vegetables per day. For health-conscious individuals who dislike logging their food daily, the Galaxy Watch 8 offers valuable context. But since I thought I was eating healthily enough, I decided to cram carotenoid-rich foods into my diet for a week to see whether Samsung would be able to detect the changes properly. How the Antioxidant Index score works on the Galaxy Watch 8 Your body stores carotenoids in the skin, where the Galaxy Watch 8's optical sensors can spot and measure them. Samsung told TechRadar that your wrist has too many capillaries, so your blood confuses the results; pressing your thumb against the sensor will "push away all the blood" and make it easier to check your carotenoid levels. Carotenoids are just one type of antioxidant, but their pigmentation allows Samsung to detect them. We've emailed Samsung to ask if it might eventually track other antioxidants, but for now, carotenoids are the best estimate to check non-invasively if your body has other healthy vitamins and nutrients. So, what foods have carotenoids? Samsung suggests root vegetables (carrots, sweet potatoes), leafy greens (spinach, kale), citrus fruits (oranges, mangoes), tomatoes, and bell peppers. Other carotenoid-rich foods include pumpkin, squash, cantaloupe, and corn; most red, orange, and yellow produce will likely have some. Samsung used data from clinical trials at Samsung Seoul Hospital to determine the "correlation between fruit and vegetable intake and the accumulation of carotenoids in the skin." Adequate antioxidant levels get a score of 75–100. People with "Low" scores (50–75) consume 50–99% of the recommended daily amount, so about a 2% increase per point. Very Low (0–49) is "less than 50%." Samsung also warns that your score may fall during "periods of severe stress or when drinking or smoking," so it's about lifestyle as much as nutrition. The company says it may change the criteria with "future clinical results," but the gist is that you want a score of 75 to match recommended levels. Everything above that is just gravy, while lower scores leave you vulnerable to "cell damage, excessive aging, inflammation, worsening eyesight, and chronic diseases such as cancer" over time. Raising my Antioxidant Index score on my Galaxy Watch 8 Samsung warns that it can take "up to 2 weeks for your antioxidant index to reflect an increased intake of fruits and vegetables," so I knew that eating a boatload of carotenoids wouldn't instantly level me up. But I wanted to see if there was an obvious impact from a changed diet in the short term. I stuck to my normal diet for the first day, and my reading stayed consistent. Starting on Monday, I raided my grocery store for carotenoid-rich fruits and veggies, then spent the next five days eating salads, bell peppers, cantaloupe, and other healthy produce, well above the recommended five servings per day. My score did start to course-correct, but slowly. I looked into the benefits of raw vs. cooked veggies and realized that raw vegetables are high in vitamins and fiber but low in beta-carotenes. You get the most carotenoids from cooked vegetables paired with healthy fats, like cooking oil. I'm more of a raw veggies guy than a stir-fry guy, which may be part of my problem. So I tried to incorporate more cooked veggies, paired with meats or peanut butter, during the final stretch. Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 54 53 56 65 61 65 65 I climbed from an antioxidant index score of 53 (56% of recommended antioxidants) to 65 (80%) in a week. In theory, one more week of healthy eating will bring me to my target score of 75, on pace with Samsung's two-week estimate. I can't quantify how accurate Samsung's antioxidant index is without a blood test, but this experience did, at least, show that this sensor isn't just some pseudoscientific guesstimate. It can tell that I'm eating healthier. On the other hand, it feels demoralizing that my antioxidant index score has stalled out in the last few days, despite eating so healthily. I could have cheated and taken dietary supplements to raise my score, but Samsung warns that these can have "harmful side effects" and "increase your risk for cancer and heart disease," so you and I should stick to the healthy-eating path. The main problem with Samsung's antioxidant index Most Android watches have food logging in their apps, but I dislike calorie-counting and having to quantify every meal. I do care about eating healthy, however, and only the Galaxy Watch 8 and Galaxy Watch Ultra have a tool like this, thanks to the BioActive sensor. I'm glad to have this tool as a baseline for my health. Here's the main issue with the antioxidant index: there are more antioxidants than just carotenoids. Other types, such as flavonoids, polyphenols, and lycopene, are found in a wide range of fruits, vegetables, beans, and teas, and they all help remove the "free radical" molecules that contribute to aging and disease. Carotenoids are a key indicator of your health, one that helped me recognize a dietary deficiency. However, since Samsung cannot track other non-pigmented antioxidants as easily, your actual "antioxidant score" might be higher than Samsung can accurately assess with a smartwatch. But this isn't a criticism! It's merely a reminder that you shouldn't ignore the healthy foods that don't have carotenoids just because Samsung doesn't reward you for eating them. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 uses its BioActive sensor to track several new metrics, including your circadian rhythm for Bedtime Guidance, Vascular Load for heart health and stress, and the aforementioned antioxidant index. It's a fast smartwatch with valuable health and fitness insights. View Deal The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic has the same BioActive sensors as the Watch 8, but with a stainless steel case, rotating bezel for exact controls, doubled storage, and a third Quick Button for shortcuts. Choose this option if you care about eating healthy and looking more stylish. View Deal