The recent poll makes it clear – the EU door is open for Scotland
YouGov polled 2000 folks in Germany, and 1000 in Denmark, Spain, Italy and France asking: 'If Scotland voted for independence from the rest of the UK and asked to join the European Union, would you support or oppose allowing it to do so?'
In Denmark, 75% support, 6% oppose; Germany, 68%/10%; Spain, 65%/13%; Italy, 64%/11%, and France, 63%/13%.
I include the 'oppose' figures because it really is a slam dunk across all five countries: if people aren't actively in favour there are plenty don't know/don't cares, and little actual opposition.
READ MORE: Police remove pro-Palestine protesters from John Swinney's Edinburgh Fringe show
If anything, I'd love to see the numbers for all EU states and suspect they'd be similar, with potential Irish, Polish and other Scandinavian figures likely to be particularly intriguing.
So we should be wary of the breathless 'we're Scots, everyone loves us!' attitude you'll find at the panglossian end of the Yes spectrum. There will be a serious negotiation and they'll argue hard for their interests (as indeed will we), but the upshot is clear – they want us in.
The poll (and I really would urge reading it in full) also asked the question about the UK rejoining, and the numbers were less enthusiastic, but still remarkably positive given the last few years of nonsense, ranging from 51% in Italy to 53% in France, 60% in Spain and 63% in Germany.
But, opposition was higher as were don't knows/don't cares.
A salutary note for the UK's remainiacs, though – the EU deal you left isn't the one you'll get back.
The UK had the financial rebate on the EU budget, opt-outs on passport-free travel, joining the euro and some aspects of judicial co-operation, and when asked about the UK joining but keeping them, all states bar Denmark (which has a couple of opt-outs too) were opposed.
The UK, if it rejoins, will need to get over itself and join as a full, normal member.
That causes no problems for Scotland given there are several dozen reasons why, like Ireland, we wouldn't want the opt-outs anyway (except for Schengen passport-free travel given, like Ireland, we only have one land border and let's assume the UK does not join any time soon).
Even more salutary, the poll also asked 2000 or so UK folks whether they were in favour of rejoining, and 57% think they should keep the opt outs.
Precisely the exceptionalist attitude that got the UK into this mess. So, for Scotland, game on.
The last couple of weeks also showed other reasons why joining is urgent.
The EU Commission president Dr Ursula von der Leyen came to Scotland to meet with visiting US president Donald Trump and agreed – or at least agreed in general terms yet to actually be agreed – a trade pact with the US.
Where unease over the potential impact of the handshake has been voiced in various member state capitals, it is clear that the EU acting with one voice was taken seriously, to the extent the current US administration takes anything seriously.
But more on that as the actual details emerge, closer to home, the first draft of the catchily named Multiannual Financial Framework was unveiled, the EU budget for 2028-2034.
At €1.78 trillion (yes, trillion), it is a big old number but only 1.26% of the EU's Gross National Income.
This is still a significant increase, and while this is only the EU Commission's first proposal and it will be hotly debated by the member states and EU Parliament, it shows a more assertive EU Commission, and more spending on an EU level.
It was only released late last Tuesday so a lot of analysis will be done on the coming weeks, but a few things are clear.
There will be a significant increase in EU defence, both in procuring new kit and in defence research and development spending. Scotland's universities and defence companies risk being excluded.
The budget for renewables technology, research and the move to the just transition is in for significant increases – and again, our companies and researchers risk being left out – as well as on the infrastructure spending where Scotland has an urgent need for better grid connections to sell our abundant clean green energy.
Agriculture and European food production continue to be supported, with €291 billion being ring-fenced for direct payments to farmers as part of a €387bn budget for other supports.
NOT many Scots farmers voted for Brexit, but even so, have endured the triple whammy of having lost subsidy and access to the single market as well as being on the chopping block for any future UK trade deals, there's plenty of good news for Scots farmers in joining the EU.
Cohesion policy – the EU structural funds Scotland made such good use of in building infrastructure and training – take a hit, with a smaller budget and less prominence.
But it's still €392bn and non-members won't get buttons from it.
The EU is moving on apace in a fast-changing world, and where the UK Government has made some steps in achieving a better mood music, there's no substitute for actual membership.
I would welcome the UK getting serious about rejoining the EU, but in my heart of hearts, I just can't see it because too many UK politicians are running scared of populists.
Scotland, however, has it all to play for.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Nicola Sturgeon says Israel committing 'nothing short of genocide'
The former first minister also said she was 'proud' that the SNP-led Scottish Government was considering a full state boycott of Israel, as The National revealed on Thursday. Sturgeon's statement came after a number of her Glasgow Southside constituents wrote to question her 'surprising silence' on the Israeli occupation of Palestine. A template letter drafted by Scotland for Palestine – a pro-Palestine and pro-Scottish independence group – said: 'As a constituent who stands against apartheid, occupation, and genocide, I am writing to ask you to tell me what concrete steps you will take to help end the illegal occupation of Palestine and the Palestinian genocide?' The group aimed to push Sturgeon into speaking publicly on the issue ahead of her appearance at the Govanhill Book Festival on Friday, August 8. A spokesperson for Scotland for Palestine said: 'Nicola Sturgeon has a reputation as someone who will speak out in a forthright manner and with integrity. As a former first minister for Scotland and a heavy-weight politician she has an unrivalled platform and reach. READ MORE: David Pratt: Netanyahu makes more enemies by the day within Israel's military 'However, after almost two years in what is one of the darkest eras in history including a complete breakdown of international and humanitarian law, she seems to have been very quiet. 'What does she have to say about the current situation in Palestine and the part the SNP is playing in the widely documented political and financial backing of Israel?' Responding, Sturgeon was unequivocal. 'What we are witnessing in Gaza is nothing short of a genocide,' she said. 'The killing of civilians, the targeting of children, the destruction of entire communities. It is a moral outrage, and the world must not look away. "As someone who has always stood up for human rights and international law, I want to be clear: the root cause of the devastating cycle of violence in Gaza is the decades-long illegal occupation of Palestine – and that must end. Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon has described Israel's actions as 'genocide' (Image: PA) 'I am proud that we have a Scottish Government that is standing up firmly for the people of Palestine – calling for an immediate and lasting ceasefire, calling for the recognition of Palestine as a sovereign state, demanding a ban on UK Government arms exports to Israel, considering imposing a state boycott on Israel, and demanding increased humanitarian aid to Gaza and Palestinian refugees. 'The people of Scotland have shown profound solidarity with the Palestinian people, and we must all ensure that Scotland remains a voice for justice on the global stage.' The former SNP leader's comments come after John Swinney, the current First Minister, also described Israel's actions in Gaza as a genocide. Speaking to journalists after an Edinburgh Fringe event which was repeatedly interrupted by pro-Palestine protesters, Swinney said: 'It's quite clear that there is a genocide in Palestine – it can't be disputed.' Experts including Israel-based right group B'Tselem, dean's professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown University Omer Bartov, UN special rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese, and Amnesty International have concluded that Benjamin Netanyahu's government is committing genocide. READ MORE: Israel 'using Hamas as pretext to commit genocide', B'Tselem says Netanyahu is wanted for arrest by the International Criminal Court on suspicion of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Israeli prime minister is reported to be considering a full occupation of Gaza, with US president Donald Trump already having backed plans for a 'clear out' of the region – as well as saying that occupying Gaza is 'up to Israel'. The US and Israel have taken control of aid distribution points in the Palestinian region through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an American contractor led by evangelist former Trump adviser Johnnie Moore. US president Donald Trump has largely supported Israel's actions in GazaIsrael facilitated the establishment of four GHF sites in May after blocking the entry of all food, medicine and other goods for two-and-a-half months. A whistleblower told the BBC in July that he had witnessed tanks and machine guns at GHF sites firing on Palestinian women and children who posed no threat. 'I witnessed the Israeli Defense Forces firing a main gun tank round from the Merkava tank into a crowd of people,' Anthony Aguilar said. 'I witnessed mortar rounds being fired at the crowds of people to keep them controlled.' READ MORE: End 'deadly' Gaza aid scheme after hundreds of Palestinians killed, NGOs say The UN human rights office said last week that some 1400 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid since May, mostly near GHF sites but also along UN convoy routes where trucks have been overwhelmed by crowds. It says nearly all were killed by Israeli fire. Hamas-led militants killed some 1200 people, mostly civilians, in the October 7 attack and abducted another 251. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Of the 50 still held in Gaza, around 20 are believed to be alive. Israel's retaliation has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which the UN and independent experts consider the most reliable source for the number of war casualties. Images taken from aid planes over Gaza have shown the region devastated, with schools, hospitals, universities, roads, and other infrastructure completely destroyed.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
We're witnessing the slow extinction of the human race
'When the facts change', economist JM Keynes is supposed to have said to a critic, 'I change my mind. What do you do, sir?' In a vast swathe of countries, there are more deaths each year than births. Across the world, annual population growth has dropped from more than 2 per cent 60 years ago to less than 1 per cent and falling. Populations are ageing and shrinking with calamitous ramifications for economic dynamism and for the viability of welfare states. The facts have certainly changed, but contra Keynes, opinion – never mind action – is lagging well behind. Only slowly is humanity waking up to the possibility of a future in which history comes to an end, not in the kind of liberal utopia imagined by political theorist Francis Fukuyama, nor in the bang of the nuclear apocalypse feared during the Cold War, but in the whimper of the last person turning off the lights. Somewhere, some group or other with a pro-natal urge is likely to keep humanity going. But if the examples of the worst performing societies in East Asia are replicated – where a hundred parents make 33 children who make 11 grandchildren – the end of the human race altogether is not impossible. In the UK, where fertility rates have been below replacement level for more than half a century, feeble demography lies at the root of many if not most of the country's woes. Britain's increasingly upside-down population pyramid means society is less creative, productive and entrepreneurial, suffering from stultifying economic growth and placing ever greater burdens on the state. But ministers have been cautious even to comment on the matter. Keir Starmer was one of the first frontline politicians to have anything to say about the birth rate and the best he could muster amounted to little more than 'nothing to do with me'. Although many governments are uneager to dip their toes into controversial and turbulent demographic waters, it is nevertheless incumbent on those of us who understand the issue to think about what policies might be adopted so that when, one day, the authorities in countries like the UK wake up to the population emergency (as they already have in many other places, from China to France) they have an idea of what to do about it. Unlike hiking up interest rates to clamp down on inflation, this is not an easy matter. The mechanisms required to e ncourage people to have more children are not obvious and the remedies will not feed through into the workforce for the best part of 20 years. But the fact that it is difficult should not be a counsel of despair or inaction. The first reaction of many identifying a problem is to demand the government throw money at it. But as we know, many governments have precious little money to throw at anything. So, as my fellow author Philip Pilkington and I will argue in a forthcoming book on demography and economics, the whole way that government spends money, the whole of the welfare state, will need to be redesigned around the family, encouraging, incentivising and nurturing the formation of the unit within which children can be born and flourish. And the tax system should be redesigned around it, too. Those bearing the costs of producing a future cohort of workers are effectively bearing the costs of the existence of a future economy. Without children today, there will be no workers or taxpayers when today's cohort of the economically active age and retire. Reorienting the state, nation and economy towards families and childbearing – that is, towards the state, nation and economy having any kind of future – will take multiple forms. Childcare will need to be made more available and affordable. Planning restrictions which prevent the widespread creation of housing suitable for families will have to be smashed. Un-means-tested benefits for the elderly will need to be amended. The tax and benefits system penalising those who want to have children will require a complete overhaul. But however important it is for governments to start acknowledging the problem of too few births and doing something about it, economic incentives alone will not fix this problem. There is evidence that a suitable tax system stimulates family formation, that affordable childcare encourages working mothers to have more children, and that baby bonuses do indeed stimulate childbearing. But the effects are modest. In the UK, plenty of young people today say that they cannot afford to have children, and with housing out of the reach of many, nurseries wildly expensive by international comparisons, and the tax burden on young families indefensible, they deserve our sympathy and assistance. But in parts of the UK where housing is relatively cheap, the birth rate is not noticeably higher than where it is expensive. In countries where childcare is highly subsidised (Germany, the Baltic States), the problem has not improved. Recent data from the US shows that, while the better-off still have more children than middle-earners, the drop-off in arrivals on the maternity wards is affecting even the wealthiest. What is required, above and beyond any changes to tax and spend, is a cultural revolution which transforms coupling-up and having children from a distant aspiration to an urgent priority. Films and novels, internet influencers and education should orient around this goal. So many influences from the cultural sphere today are negative. Sex education focuses on prevention and disease rather than positively encouraging planned pregnancy. Instagram accounts are more focused on kittens than kids. Changing the culture is even harder than changing the material incentive structure, but it is the only way we stand a realistic chance of returning to a world in which the average couple having an average of two or three children is the norm. It is the only alternative to a terminal decline and a long farewell.
Glasgow Times
6 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Number of parades held in Glasgow revealed: here's how many
For the last year, 2024/25, there were 240 public processions across the city. The majority were held by loyalist protestant organisations, outnumbering all the others combined. For the 12 months, there were 153 from just three organisations. READ NEXT:Derelict landmark city centre Glasgow building sold to developer The Orange Order held the most with 118 parades, the Apprentice Boys of Derry held 25, and the Black Institute organised 10. There were five Irish republican marches and two held by Trade Unions. A council report stated there were 12 organised by Bands, one funeral and 67 categorised as Other. The total was lower than the year before when 264 were held, mostly due to the Orange Order holding more with 135 processions and the others remaining mostly the same. The decrease in processions was 9%. READ NEXT:Pro Palestine protester has 'draconian' city centre ban lifted Most of the processions were held in the Anderston/City/Yorkhill ward, with 105. There were 40 in Calton where a lot of Orange Order and Apprentice Boys of Derry parades start and end. Govan had 22 and Partick East/Kelvindale, where Kelvin Way and Kelvingrove Park is, had 16. A council report by Mairi Millar, director of legal and administration, stated: 'While the vast majority of processions pass without difficulty and in compliance with the requirements set out in the Code of Conduct, it is acknowledged that in a small number of cases there have been complaints and concerns regarding the conduct of participants or followers. 'It is also recognised that there are a number of challenges to the city posed by processions, which include disruption to public transport and traffic flow, particularly where the procession passes through the city centre, as well as disruption to businesses, retail and tourism.' The council said procedures are in place to deal with any issues before marches take place. The report added: 'In order to mitigate the impact of larger-scale processions as much as possible, multiagency meetings are held to review the procession management plan, stewarding plan and arrangements for assembly and dispersal. 'A debrief meeting may be held after the procession to review the management of the procession and compliance with the Policy and Code of Conduct, with any learning points identified for future similar processions. 'Where issues have been identified with regard to the proposed route or timing of a procession, agreement on proposed changes are normally reached through negotiations and discussions led by the council's Processions Officer.'
