
Stephen Flynn says Labour's fiscal regime 'destroying Scottish jobs'
In May, Harbour Energy in Aberdeen cut 250 onshore jobs, citing the Energy Profits Levy (EPL) as the reason.
READ MORE: Chancellor Rachel Reeves visits Scotland to promote defence and energy plans
The firm, which has been a vocal critic of the EPL since its introduction in 2022, blamed 'the Government's ongoing punitive fiscal position and a challenging regulatory environment'.
Following the nationalisation of Scunthorpe Steel, billions spent thus far on English nuclear power plants and the saved Prax refinery in Lincolnshire, SNP Westminster Leader Stephen Flynn has warned Rachel Reeves must protect Scottish jobs and change the damaging fiscal regime.
Commenting, Flynn said: "The Labour Party appear to have an ideological desire to sink the North Sea with a fiscal regime that is clearly costing jobs and investment, while putting at risk both energy security and the ability to actually deliver a meaningful energy transition.
READ MORE: Call for community ownership of forests to combat corporate influence
'Meantime, the very same Labour Party are happily flying in behind new airports for London and have been all too keen to write blank cheques for a steel plant in Scunthorpe, a nuclear power station at Sizewell and an oil refinery in Lincolnshire.
"The challenge for Rachel Reeves today is simple – end a fiscal regime that is destroying Scottish jobs and finally tell us how her Government intend to deliver on that pre-election promise to lower energy bills by £300.
"This week the SNP Scottish Government approved the colossal Berwick Bank offering a mere glimpse into what is possible in Scotland, just imagine what we could do in an independent country that puts Scottish energy jobs and lower bills first at every turn."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jodie Kidd makes rare public appearance with her lookalike son Indio, 13, as they attend the Space NK London launch party
Jodie Kidd made a rare public appearance with her son Indio while attending the opening of Space NK's new Oxford Street store in London on Thursday. The English fashion model, 46, was joined by her 13-year-old son, whom she shares with her ex-partner, former Argentinian polo player Andrea Vianini, at the event, held at the site previously occupied by Topshop. The proud mum put one arm around her son as the pair posed for the cameras ahead of the star-studded launch party. For the outing, Jodie looked effortlessly chic in a structured aqua blue blazer adorned with gold buttons. She teamed the stylish blazer with a classic black top and light blue slim-fit denim jeans. To complete her look, the beauty sported a pair of purple loafers with tassel detailing and toted her essentials in a mini black backpack. The 46-year-old English fashion model looked effortlessly chic in a structured aqua blue blazer adorned with gold buttons at the event, held at the former Topshop location Meanwhile, her son Indio sported a black hoody with skull and butterfly graphic prints and faded blue denim jeans. He completed his look with a pair of white Nike trainers as he beamed alongside his mum. Beauty retailer Space NK opened its huge new West End flagship store on Oxford Street on Thursday, in the space once occupied by Philip Green's store. The 4,600 sq ft superstore at 214 Oxford Circus is the company's biggest outlet yet. The store, set on one floor, will feature Space NK's new 'beauty experience concept' and stock its entire range of luxury beauty and skincare brands. Space NK previously promised the London flagship would allow customers 'to explore the very best that beauty has to offer.' Chief Executive Andy Lightfoot told Cosmetics Business earlier this year: 'With our active customer base now reaching two million and our growth continually outperforming the market at over 30%, 'We saw that now was the time to answer our customers' demand for a true flagship in the West End. 'Oxford Street is one of the preeminent shopping destinations in the world, and 214 Oxford Circus in particular is an iconic store. An iconic location for our new central London flagship store. He added: 'The mission with our flagship to push boundaries once again on what can be achieved with an instore shopping experience – and another page in the story of Space NK, as well celebrate 30 years a leading British beauty retailer.' Space NK was founded in 1991 by entrepreneur Nicky Kinnaird, whose initials gave the company its name, with its first store opening in Covent Garden in 1993. It is now owned by investor Manzanita Capital. In May last year, Sky News reported the chain was exploring a sale and had appointed investment bankers to manage the process, valuing it between $374 million and $500 million.

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
New chief executive announced for education body in Wales
Dr Gwenllian Lansdown Davies, who currently leads Mudiad Meithrin, will take up the role as head of Wales' new professional learning and leadership body for the education sector. The organisation, launching on September 1, 2025, will support the development of teaching staff and education professionals in Wales. Lynne Neagle, cabinet secretary for education, said: "I am pleased to welcome Dr Gwenllian Lansdown Davies as the new chief executive of the new professional learning and leadership body. "Gwenllian brings with her a wealth of experience and I look forward to working together as we focus on improving professional learning for our education sector. "The professional learning and leadership body will provide a high quality and nationally consistent approach to professional learning across Wales and will include a focus on improving literacy, numeracy and wellbeing, alongside long-term change programmes including support for additional learning needs and improving the teaching of Welsh in our English-medium schools. "I would like to thank Tegwen Ellis for her contribution to educational leadership over recent years, particularly in her role as the chief executive of the National Academy for Educational Leadership. "Her dedication and vision have made a lasting impact on the sector. "The professional learning and leadership body will incorporate some of the functions of the National Academy for Educational Leadership alongside a wider range of national professional learning opportunities." Dr Lansdown Davies said: "Having spent 11 years in the Welsh-language early years, childcare and play sector, I look forward to starting this new role and making a tangible impact by working alongside the education sector and delivering both local and national priorities." The new body will deliver professional learning to support educators and advisors in maintained schools and Pupil Referral Units across Wales.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves said this flagship policy would raise money - it may end up doing the opposite
What do we do about the non-doms? It's a question more than a handful of people have been asking themselves at the Treasury lately. It had seemed simple enough. In her first budget as chancellor, Rachel Reeves promised a crackdown on the non-dom regime, which for the past 200 years has allowed residents to declare they are permanently domiciled in another country for tax purposes. Under the scheme, non-doms, some of the richest people in the country, were not taxed on their foreign incomes. Then that all changed. Standing at the despatch box in October last year, the chancellor said: "I have always said that if you make Britain your home, you should pay your tax here. So today, I can confirm we will abolish the non-dom tax regime and remove the outdated concept of domicile from the tax system from April 2025." The hope was that the move would raise £3.8bn for the public purse. However, there are signs that the non-doms are leaving in such great numbers that the policy could end up costing the UK investment, jobs and, of course, the tax that the non-doms already pay on their UK earnings. If the numbers don't add up, this tax-raising policy could morph into an act of self-harm. With the budget already under strain, a poor calculation would be costly financially. The alternative, a U-turn, could be expensive for other reasons, eroding faith in a chancellor who has already been on a turbulent ride. So, how worried should she be? The data on the number of non-doms in the country is published with a considerable lag. So, it will be a while before we know the full impact of this policy. However, there is much uncertainty about how this group will behave. While the Office for Budget Responsibility forecast that the policy could generate £3.8bn for the government over the next five years, assuming between 12 and 25% of them leave, it admitted it lacked confidence in those numbers. Worryingly for ministers, there are signs, especially in London, that the exodus could be greater. Property sales Analysis from the property company LonRes, shows there were 35.8% fewer transactions in May for properties in London's most exclusive postcodes compared with a year earlier and 33.5% fewer than the pre-pandemic average. Estate agents blame falling demand from non-dom buyers. This comes as no surprise to Magda Wierzycka, a South African billionaire businesswoman, who runs an investment fund in London. She herself is threatening to leave the UK unless the government waters down its plans. "Non-doms are leaving, as we speak, and the problem with numbers is that the consequences will only become known in the next 12 to 18 months," she said. "But I have absolutely no doubt, based on people I know who have already left, that the consequences would be quite significant. "It's not just about the people who are leaving that everyone is focusing on. It's also about the people who are not coming, people who would have come, set up businesses, created jobs, they're not coming. They take one look at what has happened here, and they're not coming." Lack of options for non-doms But where will they go? Britain was unusual in offering such an attractive regime. Bar a few notable exceptions, such as Italy, most countries run residency-based tax systems, meaning people pay tax to the country in which they live. This approach meant many non-doms escaped paying tax on their foreign income altogether because they didn't live in those countries where they earned their foreign income. In any case, widespread double taxation treaties mean people are generally not taxed twice, although they may have to pay the difference. In one important sense, Magda is right. It could take a while before the consequences are fully known. There are few firm data points for us to draw conclusions from right now, but the past could be illustrative. 3:06 The non-dom regime has been through repeated reform. George Osborne changed the system back in 2017 to limit it to just 15 years. Then Jeremy Hunt announced the Tories would abolish the regime altogether in one of his final budgets. Following the 2017 reforms there was an initial shock, but the numbers stabilised, falling just 5% after a few years. The data suggests there was an initial exodus of people who were probably considering leaving anyway, but those who remained - and then arrived - were intent on staying in the UK. So, should the government look through the numbers and hold its nerve? Not necessarily. Have Labour crossed a red line? Stuart Adam, a senior economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the response could be far greater this time because of some key changes under Labour. The government will no longer allow non-doms to protect money held in trusts, so 40% inheritance tax will be due on their estates. For many, that is a red line. 1:57 Mr Adam said: "The 2017 reform deliberately built in what you might call a loophole, a way to avoid paying a lot more tax through the use of existing offshore trusts. That was a route deliberately left open to enable many people to avoid the tax. "So it's not then surprising that they didn't up sticks and leave. Part of the reform that was announced last year was actually not having that kind of gap in the system to enable people to avoid the tax using trusts, and therefore you might expect to see a bigger response to the kind of reforms we've seen announced now, but it also means we don't have very much idea about how big a response to expect."