Canada's First Nations launch constitutional challenge of legislation
General view of the Peace Tower over Centre Block on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada September 17, 2020. REUTERS/Blair Gable/File Photo
TORONTO - A group of Canada's First Nations has launched a constitutional challenge to recently passed laws that would fast-track approval of infrastructure projects like mines and oil pipelines, arguing the measures violate the government's obligations to Indigenous people.
The two new laws -- one in the province of Ontario and one at the federal level -- 'represent a clear and present danger to the Applicant First Nations' self-determination rights" and violate the government's obligation to reconcile with Indigenous peoples, according to a notice filed in Ontario Superior Court on Monday.
The nine First Nations involved in the lawsuit are located across Ontario and comprise Alderville First Nation, Apitipi Anicinapek Nation, Aroland First Nation, Attawapiskat First Nation, Fort Albany First Nation, Ginoogaming First Nation, Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug, Oneida Nation of the Thames and Wabauskang First Nation.
Parliament passed the federal legislation speedily late last month. It would let the government select infrastructure and resource projects in the "national interest' and then decide whether some laws apply to them.
Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney aims for the law to fulfill a campaign promise to speed up approvals of what he calls nation-building projects, including mines and oil pipelines.
The Ontario law, passed in early June, allows the government to declare "special economic zones" that make some projects exempt from other provincial laws.
Environmentalists oppose both laws, saying they sidestep legislation meant to mitigate ecological harms while Indigenous groups argue they run roughshod over their rights to self-determination and the government's duty to consult.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business US tariffs may last well after Trump; crucial for countries to deepen trade ties: SM Lee
World Trump says Indonesia to face 19% tariff under trade deal
Singapore 'Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction
Singapore Las Vegas Sands' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong
Multimedia Telling the Singapore story for 180 years
Life Walking for exercise? Here are tips on how to do it properly
Singapore CDL's long-time director Philip Yeo to depart after boardroom feud
Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years
The national law lets Canada 'unilaterally ram through projects without meaningful engagement with First Nations,' the court filing reads.
Canada is committed to upholding its commitments and obligations to Indigenous peoples, a spokesperson for Canada's Privy Council Office wrote in an email, adding that Carney will meet with First Nations, Inuit and Metis in coming weeks.
"Canada's goal is to pursue projects in the national interest in partnership with Indigenous Peoples," the email said. "Indigenous equity participation in major projects is a central focus of this initiative."
The Ontario government said it has begun talks with First Nations aligned with its economic development goals and will continue consultations this summer. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Australia's Tasmania on track for minority government in the state after poll
Find out what's new on ST website and app. SYDNEY - Australia's island state of Tasmania appeared headed for a minority government on July 20 as vote counting continued after an election that did not produce a clear winner. The conservative Liberal government was on track to win more seats than the main Labor opposition in the new parliament but would likely fall short of a majority after the July 19 election, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. The strong performance by the Liberals under Mr Jeremy Rockliff, premier since 2022, comes after the party suffered a heavy defeat at the May national election, which saw Anthony Albanese-led Labor returned for a second term with an increased majority. Mr Rockliff said in televised remarks from state capital Hobart that the July 19 vote showed Tasmanians 'have no confidence in the Labor party to form government and they have voted to reindorse our Liberal government'. The result for Labor, on track to win nine seats out of a possible 35, was shaping up as the worst-ever result for the party in Tasmania, Guardian Australia reported. The election, triggered by a no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff, came less than two years after the state's most recent poll in which the Liberals were unable to win a majority of seats. Tasmania is the only Australian state that uses proportional representation to elect its lower house and has a long history of minority governments. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tampines regional centre set to get more homes, offices and public amenities Multimedia How to make the most out of small homes in Singapore Life US tech CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay 'kiss cam' video Asia From toy to threat: 'Killer kites' bring chaos to Indonesian airspace Opinion I thought I was a 'chill' parent. Then came P1 registration Singapore 'God and government are the only things beyond our control,' says Group CEO Business Me and My Money: He overcomes a $100k setback to build a thriving online tuition business Asia At least 37 killed as tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam's Halong Bay The southern state is a one-hour flight or 10-hour ferry crossing from the mainland city of Melbourne, 445km away. Forty per cent of the island is wilderness or protected areas. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Australia's Tasmania state on track for minority government after poll
SYDNEY - Australia's island state of Tasmania appeared headed for a minority government on Sunday as vote counting continued after an election that did not produce a clear winner. The conservative Liberal government was on track to win more seats than the main Labor opposition in the new parliament but would likely fall short of a majority after Saturday's election, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corp. The strong performance by the Liberals under Jeremy Rockliff, premier since 2022, comes after the party suffered a heavy defeat at May's national election, which saw Anthony Albanese-led Labor returned for a second term with an increased majority. Rockliff said in televised remarks from state capital Hobart that Saturday's vote showed Tasmanians "have no confidence in the Labor party to form government and they have voted to reindorse our Liberal government". The result for Labor, on track to win nine seats out of a possible 35, was shaping up as the worst-ever result for the party in Tasmania, Guardian Australia reported. The election, triggered by a no-confidence vote against Rockliff, came less than two years after the state's most recent poll in which the Liberals were unable to win a majority of seats. Tasmania is the only Australian state that uses proportional representation to elect its lower house and has a long history of minority governments. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tampines regional centre set to get more homes, offices and public amenities Multimedia How to make the most out of small homes in Singapore Life US tech CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay 'kiss cam' video Asia From toy to threat: 'Killer kites' bring chaos to Indonesian airspace Opinion I thought I was a 'chill' parent. Then came P1 registration Singapore 'God and government are the only things beyond our control,' says Group CEO Business Me and My Money: He overcomes a $100k setback to build a thriving online tuition business Asia At least 37 killed as tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam's Halong Bay The southern state is a one-hour flight or 10-hour ferry crossing from the mainland city of Melbourne, 445 km (275 miles) away. Forty percent of the island is wilderness or protected areas. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Russia is gaining ground in Ukraine, but can its economy keep pace?
Analysts say Russia wants to methodically destroy the Ukrainian military, as Moscow slowly advances its own troops. KYIV - Russia's summer offensive in Ukraine is gaining ground as its forces attack on multiple fronts. In June, the country's numerical advantages in troops and air power produced its biggest monthly gains in territory since the beginning of the year. Russia's aims are not simply territorial. Analysts say it wants to methodically destroy the Ukrainian military, as Moscow slowly advances its own troops. The biggest challenge for Moscow may be far from the front lines, as the Russian economy can no longer keep pace with escalating military spending. For Ukraine, its ability to sustain the war may also be decided far away, as the Trump administration sends mixed signals about its desire and ability to continue arming Kyiv's forces. Earlier in July, President Donald Trump said that Nato countries would buy weapons from the United States to give to Ukraine. The ground war Over the past two months, Russian units have been able to step up their attacks on multiple fronts, from Ukraine's Sumy region in the north to the steppes of Zaporizhzhia in the south. Russia now controls more than two-thirds of Ukraine's Donetsk region – the main theatre of the ground war. Russian forces have carved out a 10-mile-deep pocket around the Ukrainian troops defending the crucial city of Kostiantynivka, partly surrounding them from the east, south and west. Russia has also entered the Dnipropetrovsk region of eastern Ukraine for the first time in more than three years of war. Ukrainian soldiers say the Russian army uses two main tactics to advance on the battlefield: pinning down Ukrainian troops with drones, shells and glide bombs before attacking enemy lines with relentless squad assaults. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tampines regional centre set to get more homes, offices and public amenities Multimedia How to make the most out of small homes in Singapore Life US tech CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay 'kiss cam' video Asia From toy to threat: 'Killer kites' bring chaos to Indonesian airspace Opinion I thought I was a 'chill' parent. Then came P1 registration Singapore 'God and government are the only things beyond our control,' says Group CEO Business Me and My Money: He overcomes a $100k setback to build a thriving online tuition business Asia At least 34 killed as tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam's Halong Bay Ukraine responds by sending experienced, drone-equipped units to help plug the gaps, a tactic that has been compared to sending firefighters to contain flare-ups. But Russia's relentless attacks are placing a strain on Ukraine's outmanned army. Those attacks helped Russia make its largest territorial gains of the year in June. According to Deep State, a Ukrainian group that maps the conflict using drone footage and its links with the Ukrainian military, Russia gained more than 214 square miles of Ukrainian territory in June, up from 173 square miles in May. Putting those gains in context, Russia is capturing less than 0.1 per cent of Ukraine's vast territory each month. At that pace, it would take Moscow several years to occupy all of the four Ukrainian regions it declared annexed in 2022. The air war Away from the front lines, Russia has been increasing the toll it inflicts on the Ukrainian population at large by pummeling the country with mass-produced exploding drones. Over the past weeks, Russia has been setting records on the number of drones it sends into Ukraine. Russia recently launched 728 exploding drones and decoys in one nightly barrage, according to Ukraine's air force. As Russia builds up its drone-making infrastructure, military analysts expect Moscow to routinely launch more than 1,000 drones per volley by autumn. Kyiv was the main target earlier this month of an intense overnight bombardment, which killed at least two people and wounded 25 others, according to local officials. The Russian barrages also include cruise missiles and ballistic missiles. Ukraine has a variety of air-defence systems – including improvised systems like fishing nets to snare drones – but the ballistic missiles can be shot down by only one air-defence system in Ukraine's arsenal: American Patriot missiles. But after a series of reversals by the Trump administration – which paused military aid and then agreed to sell weapons to European allies, which will then give them to Ukraine – Ukrainians are hopeful but cautious about whether they can count on US military support. Officials in Nato countries have proposed a plan where the Trump administration could sell weapons to its allies, which would then give them to Ukraine. That would be a financial windfall for the United States, and could also shield Mr Trump from accusations of direct involvement in the war. Last week, Mr Trump said he intended to adopt that strategy. Russia's goals Russia is not only seeking to win new territory in Ukraine. 'Its goal is to destroy Ukraine's military potential, its army,' Mr Valery Shiryaev, an independent Russian military analyst, said in an interview with Redaktsiya, an independent Russian news channel. 'If there is no army – the state would be defenceless.' The Kremlin has repeatedly said that it would continue pressing on in Ukraine until it can coerce Kyiv into accepting Moscow's peace terms. Russia has demanded that Ukraine recognize Russian territorial gains, shrink its military, designate Russian as an official language in Ukraine and formally commit to Ukrainian neutrality, which would rule out joining Nato. These demands are considered completely unacceptable by Ukraine's political leadership and its citizens. The Russian economy Analysts say that Russia may be spending unsustainable sums to fund the war, fuelling inflation, even as its oil and gas industry suffers from low energy prices, caused in part by Trump's tariffs. Oil exports finance about a third of Russia's total federal budget. At the end of June, President Vladimir Putin said that Russia was spending 6.3 per cent of its gross domestic product, or US$172.5 billion (S$221 billion), on its military, which was 'a lot' and that the country had 'paid for it with inflation.' The country's central bank set interest rates at 20 per cent to keep prices in check. 'We are planning to cut the defence expenses next year and the year after, as well during the next three years,' Mr Putin said. If he follows this plan and Russia reduces military spending, its ability to wage war will inevitably suffer. M.M.I., a leading Russian news outlet on Telegram dedicated to the economy, called the situation with the country's budget a 'catastrophe.' Spurred by record-high military expenditures, Russia's budget deficit has reached US$47 billion over the first half of the year. Because of lower prices, oil and gas revenues have dropped by more than 16 per cent, the country's Finance Ministry said. Casualties After releasing a few official death tolls early in the war, Russia stopped publishing any information about its losses. But teams of researchers and experts have sifted through publicly available data, like obituaries and inheritance records, to identify and verify casualties. To date, they have confirmed more than 115,000 deaths in the Russian military. A study in June found that nearly 1 million Russian troops had been killed or wounded in the war. According to Mr Dmitri Kuznets, a military analyst with the Russian news outlet Meduza, which was outlawed by the Kremlin and operates from Latvia, both Ukraine and Russia are now losing between 250 and 300 service members each day, based on available data. In 2025, Russia has still been able to attract an average of about 30,000 new service members per month, according to government statements and an analysis of budgetary data conducted by Dr Janis Kluge, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. But it was able to do so only by spending lavishly on its military, offering outsize sign-up bonuses and salaries. 'Both sides have devoted last year to increase sustainability – so that they could continue fighting no matter what happens,' Mr Kuznets said. NYTIMES
