
Diverticular Disease Demystified: Myths, Risks & Modern Care
Hello. I'm Dr David Johnson, professor of medicine and chief of gastroenterology at Eastern Virginia Medical School and Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. Welcome back to GI Common Concerns .
Diverticulosis and diverticulitis are both incredibly common conditions. It's estimated that over 70% of people aged 80 or older who undergo colonoscopy will have diverticulosis. Approximately 4% of those will develop diverticulitis in their lifetime, and roughly 15% of those cases will be complicated disease.
Patients frequently ask what they can do to prevent diverticulitis or its recurrence, and the evidence to inform such conversations has evolved in recent years. This video provides an update on where we are presently.
Rethinking Dietary Causes
We've long emphasized diet in the management of diverticulosis and diverticulitis, and we considered it axiomatic that patients need to avoid corn, nuts, and seeds. However, a 2008 prospective cohort study in men challenged that approach, observing no association between consuming those dietary components and the risk of developing diverticulosis or diverticular complications.
Although that study was performed exclusively in men, the lifetime risk for diverticulitis is actually higher in women, at approximately 5% vs 3.1%, respectively.
A recent prospective analysis published in Annals of Internal Medicine from researchers at University of North Carolina adds important insights. It used validated dietary questionnaires in a large cohort of women [who had a sister with breast cancer but did not have breast cancer themselves at enrollment]. This allowed investigators to determine incident cases of diverticulitis over time, without the risk of recall bias.
Researchers identified more than 1500 incident cases of diverticulitis for nearly 415,000 patient years of follow-up. They reported no association between a primary diagnosis of diverticulitis and consumption of corn, nuts, or seeds, including fresh fruits with seeds. Similarly, there was no link between those foods and the development of complicated diverticulitis resulting in abscess surgery or fistula.
Collectively, these findings indicate that our patients do not necessarily need to avoid these foods. Instead, we can advise them to adopt an anti-inflammatory diet, such as the Mediterranean diet, which this recent study in women indicated had risk-reduction benefits. My own patients find these diets very easy to follow and quite practical.
Modifiable Risk Factors for Recurrence
The recurrence rate for diverticulitis is notably high. Within the first year after complete recovery, 8% of patients have an episode of recurrence, and approximately 20% within 10 years. The risk increases with subsequent episodes. After a second episode, it rises to 18% at 1 year and 50% at 10 years. After a third episode, the risk for recurrence is 40% at 3 years.
Therefore, it's important to identify for our patients anything they can prospectively and proactively do to prevent a recurrent episode. There are several commonsense risk factors our patients should avoid.
Smoking reduction or abstinence has proven benefits. Alcoholism, but not alcohol in and of itself, is associated with a higher risk. Chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is a known risk factor. Guidelines recommend the avoidance of regular NSAID use, although aspirin should be continued when justified for cardiac indications.
Weight reduction, particularly among those with truncal obesity, seems to reduce the risk for diverticulitis. Vigorous physical activity also has an inverse, beneficial relationship for diverticulitis.
Identifying all these approaches is a good, simple way to help patients going forward.
Symptoms, Scans, and Supplementation
The guidelines are shifting around the rush to use antibiotics for episodes of recurrence. For uncomplicated diverticulitis, antibiotics don't seem to do better than not using antibiotics.
In general, we have shifted toward advising that patients adopt a clear liquid diet, avoid antibiotics, and inform us if they experience any alarm features, particularly fever or worsening pain.
Exceptions to the recommendations to avoid antibiotics are made for patients who are frail, have multiple comorbidities, are immunocompromised, or have laboratory findings of severe inflammation, including C-reactive protein > 140 mg/L or a white blood count > 15,000. In such patients, antibiotics are still indicated right away.
The extent of diverticulitis involvement on a CT scan would also be an indication for antibiotics. However, we don't want to rush to recommend a CT scan in all patients. This reflects our increasing awareness of the radiogenic risk of CT scans and abdominal CT scans, which I discussed in a recent video. CT scans are really overutilized, and we potentially need to take a step back in when we use them.
Vitamin D status is another important factor, which I touched on in a recent article. Low vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk for diverticulitis. I routinely check the vitamin D levels in my patients and generally recommend vitamin D supplementation, given its very low risk and potential prophylactic value in patients with a history of diverticulitis.
Genetic Predisposition
There's a strong genetic predisposition for diverticulitis, which we often overlook in our discussions with patients. Over 30 genetic loci have been associated with diverticulosis, and at least four seem to be associated with diverticulitis.
This is key when considering patients with a family history of diverticulitis, including their siblings. In monozygotic twins, the risk is higher than in dizygotic twins, accounting for about 50% of the recurrence risk for diverticulitis. We need to be proactive when asking about family history in order to identify patients who are at greater risk for disease development or recurrence.
Lastly, I always tell my patients that intermittent, lingering symptoms, such as cramping, are quite common. About 45% of patients experience intermittent symptoms after recovery, which is mostly attributable to visceral hypersensitivity. There may also be a microbiome-related explanation for motility-related muscular changes related to diverticular disease.
We can assure patients that they don't need to be alarmed by such symptoms, nor must they seek out immediate help from their healthcare provider. These symptoms are different from the acute and persistent worsening pain typified for diverticulitis. Instead, we can consider treating them with antispasmodics or low-dose antidepressants to manage their symptoms.
I hope this overview gives you practical, evidence-based tools for discussing the management of diverticular disease with your patients. These conversations can be a lot more meaningful when supported by the latest data, allowing us all to do a better job.
I'm Dr David Johnson. Thanks for listening, and I look forward to chatting with you again soon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Skeptical Intelligence Is Crucial In The Age Of AI
Skeptical Intelligence In boardrooms, strategy offsites, and investor summits, the conversation invariably turns to artificial intelligence. Will it take our jobs, supercharge our growth, or expose hidden risks we've never anticipated? Amid the hype, one truth emerges: in a world awash with machine-generated insights, the uniquely human ability to question, probe, and test assumptions—what we might call Skeptical Intelligence—could be our most indispensable asset. Yet despite billions spent annually on leadership development, few executives can precisely define what it means to think skeptically, let alone how to develop it. To understand why Skeptical Intelligence deserves a seat alongside IQ and Emotional Intelligence, we need to revisit how these earlier concepts reshaped our understanding of human capability—and then explore what a third pillar might entail. The Age of IQ For much of the 20th century, intelligence meant only one thing: IQ. It was the gold standard, the quantifiable metric by which students were sorted, employees were promoted, and national rankings were compared. The concept of general intelligence originated with Charles Spearman in 1904, who observed that individuals who performed well on one type of cognitive test tended to do well on others. This statistical correlation suggested a broad, underlying mental capacity. Alfred Binet in France and later Lewis Terman at Stanford created IQ tests that could numerically represent this capacity, leading to the IQ boom of the 20th century. IQ proved remarkably good at predicting certain kinds of success: academic performance, logical problem-solving, and even long-term earnings. But by the 1980s, cracks began to appear. Why did some top scorers flounder in the real world while others with merely average IQs thrived? The Rise of Emotional Intelligence The first serious challenge came from Howard Gardner, whose 1983 book Frames of Mind introduced the theory of multiple intelligences. Gardner argued that musical, spatial, kinesthetic, interpersonal, and intrapersonal intelligences were just as real and valuable as linguistic or logical-mathematical skills. This pluralistic view was controversial but set the stage for even more focused alternatives. In 1990, two psychologists, Peter Salovey and John Mayer, proposed the concept of Emotional Intelligence. They defined it as the ability to perceive, understand, manage, and use emotions effectively. In their view, emotions were not a distraction from rational thinking but a vital component of it. But it was Daniel Goleman who truly ignited the global conversation. His 1995 bestseller Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ argued that self-awareness, self-regulation, empathy, and social skills often trump raw cognitive horsepower in leadership and life. Goleman's work popularized the idea that a high EQ could distinguish great leaders from merely smart ones. Corporations embraced the concept eagerly. Emotional intelligence trainings became standard fare in leadership programs at GE, IBM, and Goldman Sachs. Consulting firms created entire practices around measuring and developing EQ. And yet even with these advances, the dominant paradigm still focused on how well we feel and connect—not necessarily how well we question. Enter Skeptical Intelligence In the last few years, a new concern has emerged. As machine learning systems become capable of astonishing feats—drafting legal briefs, diagnosing diseases, predicting consumer churn—our natural tendency is to trust them. Algorithms, after all, seem less biased, less emotional, more data-driven than we are. But recent high-profile failures—facial recognition systems that couldn't recognize dark-skinned faces, loan algorithms that penalized women, language models that hallucinate references—have underscored that AI can be deeply flawed. And these flaws are often subtle, buried inside complex statistical models that even their creators struggle to fully interpret. The result? The need for a new kind of human intelligence: the capacity to critically interrogate the outputs of sophisticated systems. This is where Skeptical Intelligence comes in. Skeptical Intelligence is not the same as mere contrarianism or reflexive doubt. It is a disciplined approach to questioning that combines curiosity, critical thinking, epistemic humility (knowing what you don't know), and a toolkit for evaluating evidence. If IQ is about solving well-defined problems and EQ is about navigating social and emotional landscapes, Skeptical Intelligence is about resisting easy answers and probing beneath the surface—especially when powerful technologies tempt us to outsource our judgment. We can draw on decades of research in critical thinking and cognitive psychology to sketch out its potential components. Scholars like Robert Ennis, Richard Paul, Rita McGrath, Eric Reis, and Linda Elder have long studied what it means to think critically. Their frameworks emphasize abilities such as: In this sense, Skeptical Intelligence can be thought of as a disposition for critical thinking applied rigorously to the modern data and AI landscape. Why We Need Skeptical Intelligence Now Paradoxically, the better AI gets, the more tempting it is to disengage our skeptical faculties. Machine learning models often produce outputs accompanied by confidence scores or impressive-looking graphs, which can lull decision-makers into a false sense of certainty. A 2022 study by Harvard Business School found that managers were significantly more likely to accept flawed AI recommendations if they were presented with visually compelling dashboards—even when inconsistencies were apparent. This is not merely a theoretical risk. Consider the 2020 incident when a widely used recruiting algorithm at a Fortune 500 company was found to downgrade resumes from women because the training data contained historical biases favoring male candidates. Or the series of fintech apps that misclassified minority borrowers as high-risk based on opaque clustering techniques. These failures happened not because executives were malicious or incompetent, but because they lacked sufficient Skeptical Intelligence to interrogate the models. Warren Buffett famously said, 'It's good to learn from your mistakes. It's better to learn from other people's mistakes.' In the AI era, it's best to preempt mistakes altogether by cultivating a culture of healthy skepticism. This does not mean ignoring AI insights. Rather, it means creating systems of 'trust but verify'. Leaders high in Skeptical Intelligence know how to ask pointed questions of data scientists and to challenge assumptions without falling into endless analysis paralysis. The Practice of Skeptical Intelligence Imagine a CFO reviewing an AI-driven forecast that predicts a 12% uptick in demand for a new product line. Instead of simply applauding or rubber-stamping the recommendation, the CFO trained in Skeptical Intelligence would ask: Or picture a marketing VP using a generative AI tool to craft campaign messages. Someone with strong Skeptical Intelligence wouldn't just check grammar—they'd probe for embedded stereotypes, test multiple prompts for consistency, and cross-check factual assertions. Skeptical Intelligence also means knowing when to consult outside experts, when to run pilot tests before full-scale rollouts, and when to keep a human in the loop for judgment calls that have ethical or reputational stakes. Building Skeptical Intelligence in organizations How can today's companies cultivate this emerging form of intelligence? Skeptical Intelligence as a Superpower When historians look back at the early decades of the AI revolution, they may marvel at how readily humans deferred to machines—sometimes with spectacular results, sometimes with catastrophic consequences. The leaders who thrive will be those who balanced innovation with interrogation, speed with scrutiny. IQ and EQ remain foundational. But Skeptical Intelligence—the disciplined, curious, humility-infused ability to question even the smartest systems—may prove to be the crown jewel of human capability in the algorithmic age.


CBS News
36 minutes ago
- CBS News
Luigi Mangione's attorneys accuse prosecutors of illegally obtaining his medical records
Attorneys for Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing United HealthCare CEO Brian Thompson, say Manhattan prosecutors wrongfully obtained his medical records. Mangione's attorneys claim the Manhattan DA's office improperly compelled Aetna to turn over confidential information in violation of health privacy laws. "The District Attorney falsely made up a court date-May 23, 2025-and drafted a fraudulent subpoena that if Aetna did not provide documents on that date, it would be in contempt of Court," Mangione's attorney Karen Agnifilo wrote in a letter to the judge. "Because the District Attorney has taken possession of, and at least partially reviewed, Luigi Mangione's confidential doctor-patient privileged and HIPAA protected medical records, and further because the District Attorney misused the subpoena process to obtain these protected records, this Court should impose an appropriate sanction after conducting a full evidentiary hearing to uncover the extent and nature of the significant privilege and HIPAA violation intentionally caused by the prosecutors." Sources in the Manhattan DA's office say it requested limited information, but Aetna sent them additional materials in error, and that they deleted the materials as soon as they became aware of them. Agnifilo requested a hearing on the matter, and that, depending on the findings of the hearing, the judge consider "a range of appropriate sanctions, to include dismissal of the charges." It's not the first time Mangione's defense team has sought for charges to be dismissed. Back in May, Agnifilo alleged evidence in the case was illegally obtained, that the terror charges against Mangione didn't apply, and that concurrent state and federal charges violate the double jeopardy clause. Mangione has pleaded not guilty to murder and terror charges in Thompson's killing. He's due back in court in September.


Fox News
36 minutes ago
- Fox News
Bristol Palin says her facial paralysis struck 'completely out of the blue' with no warning signs
Bristol Palin is giving fans an update on her ongoing health struggle. During an Instagram Q&A, Palin was asked specific questions about how she is dealing with her battle with facial paralysis and what specific symptoms she felt prior to experiencing the weakness in her facial muscles. "I woke up and it was paralyzed completely out of the blue – no warning, wasn't sick didn't get the v@x, no recent Botox ... just paralyzed," she said in response to one question asking about what symptoms she felt. The answer was posted over a video of herself showing the difference between the left and right sides of her face, adding a timestamp of January 20, 2025. The former reality TV star was later asked how she is handling the diagnosis emotionally, to which she replied she thinks she is "handling it well," but admitted "I can't look at pictures of myself rn." Palin also shared her paralysis is "probably 70% back to normal." Other fans shared concern that the paralysis could be permanent, to which Palin replied there is a possibility, "but I don't think it will be." "It is slowly improving," she wrote in her response. "My doctor thinks it will be another 3 months before I'm *hopefully* back to normal." Palin first announced she was experiencing sudden facial paralysis on her Instagram stories in January. In the story, she recalled waking up one morning "with a little weird sensation in my face," and after only a few hours, "the entire left side of my face was numb and just paralyzed." After seeing a doctor and undergoing multiple tests, "nothing came back in all the results" and she was prescribed "steroids" and "other medications" at the time. One of the possible causes could be "a case of Bell's palsy," which doctors noted could have been brought on by stress or lack of sleep. Bell's palsy is a condition that causes "sudden weakness in the muscles on one side of the face," according to the Mayo Clinic. The weakness is typically short-term, and the exact cause is unknown. A few months after sharing her struggles with facial paralysis, Palin took to social media in April 2025 to share that she was one year sober. "365 days without alcohol.. *which sounds dramatic because I've never been a big 'drinker,'" she wrote on her Instagram story, per the Daily Mail. "But this year of having a completely sober mind has allowed me to reevaluate a lot," she continued. "I don't want to alter the state of my mind, and don't want to 'take the edge off' of anything. 10/10 would recommend." Fox News Digital's Lauryn Overhultz contributed to this post.