
Horizons at 106: Former hotel now fully staffed as transitional housing space
It's been over a year since the Newfoundland and Labrador government announced it would be leasing a hotel in St. John's as a new transitional housing facility.
The facility — Horizons at 106 — had 73 residents as of Feb. 24 and successfully put 14 people into permanent housing.
John Abbott — the former housing minister who has resigned from cabinet to run for leadership of the province's Liberal Party — provided an update on Monday in the House of Assembly.
"The program is working. We are providing the supports that they need in a transitional housing facility," he said. "We will continue to invest in it and we have also looked at that model and how we can apply that across the province."
However, advocate Mark Wilson says he has heard from some of the facility's residents, who say they have concerns about the number of security guards and access to visitation. He also said several people have submitted applications to live there and are still waiting on an answer.
Wilson also says the hotel is an expensive Band-Aid solution.
He said the provincial government is spending $13 million a year for the building's lease and facility operations. That number divided by 87 — the number of people who have lived in the facility in the last year — works out to be roughly $155,000 per person.
"You could buy a home here in this community for $220,000," said Wilson, pointing to the boarded up empty public housing unit behind him on Livingstone Street.
"I think the houses here that are owned by N.L. Housing would probably house roughly 40 people."
Facility in full swing
But Horizons at 106 is in full operation.
Simone Lilly, senior director of community investments at End Homelessness St. John's, says the progress has been incredible.
"We're really thrilled to see, kind of, the project itself sort of now kind of reach its potential," she said, adding that he facility demonstrates the transition pathway for individuals stuck in the shelter system.
"We're able to really work with folks to tackle some of those roots of the issues."
The facility is fully staffed, with full-time and casual support workers, security, hospitality staff, health staff and administration.
There is also now an area with computers and support needed to help individuals take the first step on their housing journey. Staff also help individuals with getting a government ID or with their taxes.
They have other kinds of programming like recreation, resume clinics, budgeting and time management workshops.
In terms of health-care services, residents have their needs assessed upon arrival. They then receive support through the facility's primary care clinics, blood collection services, occupational therapy and on-site social worker.
Lilly said health-care supports don't end when residents leave Horizons.
"We set someone up for success so their health needs could then continue to be supported," she said.
The building has a capacity of 100 residents, and has steadily had around 75.
Lilly says they're constantly evaluating their ability to take on more people.
"We'd like to see 100, but I also want to make sure that whoever's there on site is feeling comfortable and the building can truly support that individual," she said.
More housing stock needed
With waitlists for housing and emergency shelters full across the city, Lilly says Horizons has played a role in unclogging the system.
However, she says more housing stock is needed to solve homelessness.
"I think we can't ignore the fact that there is a housing crisis that doesn't change … with one project like Horizons," said Lilly.
Wilson says transitional housing, like Horizons, is only part of the solution, but isn't sure if it is helping tackle the housing crisis.
He says he's also concerned about what will happen to the facility when the lease is up in December, 2026.
In an emailed statement to CBC News, End Homelessness St. John's executive director Doug Pawson said the group is going to keep working with the government about what the future of Horizons will look like.
"The goal is to continue housing and supporting folks, but knowing there's such a demand in shelter suggests this option can be transformative for those who most need additional health and housing support," Pawson said.
CBC News asked the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation if it had an idea about what will happen when the lease is up.
In a statement, spokesperson Marc Budgell said it is too early to make any decisions.
"Horizons at 106 is a temporary interim measure while we are creating other long-term transitional and supportive housing options. This includes the recent expansion of The Gathering Place, which has begun accepting residents," Budgell said.
Community consultations requested
Wilson thinks there hasn't been enough public consultation by the government to come up with ways to tackle homelessness.
"I can't think of any public consultation processes or meetings where the government has actually come out and said 'what can we do here?'" he said.
PC MHA Joedy Wall also called for a public consultation in January, but it was aimed at the concerns from neighbourhood residents about an alleged rise in criminal activity in the area.
Lilly said some of those problems have nothing to do with Horizons, but that End Homelessness St. John's is open to participating in a neighbourhood meeting.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada Standard
13 hours ago
- Canada Standard
How far-right ideas in Canada are working their way into mainstream politics
The fortunes of the Conservative Party and its leader Pierre Poilievre in Canada's April 2025 election seemed to have shifted dramatically after United States President Donald Trump called for Canada to become the 51st state. Political pundits regarded Mark Carney and the Liberal Party's victory - along with the failure of Poilievre to retain his own seat - as a "Trump slump" and a repudiation of both Trump's and Poilievre's style of politics. But is that an accurate assessment? The Conservative Party received its largest vote share since Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Exit polling data suggested stronger support for the Conservative Party among people aged 18-34 than among people aged 55 and older. Although Trump has said Poilievre is "not a MAGA guy," some political analysts have likened the rhetoric of Poilievre and other Canadian Conservatives to American Republicans who lean towards far-right Christian nationalist politics.. As an inter-religious humanities scholar of the U.S. far right, I have observed alarming parallels between the rise of the far right in mainstream politics in the U.S. and the scene in Canada. Read more: A 'Trump slump' has lifted the left in Canada and now Australia - what are the lessons for NZ? In the U.S., both scholars and news media have been highlighting the connections between far-right Christian ideology and politics. Trump's first presidential term ended with the Jan. 6, 2021 violent attack on the U.S. Capitol. Scholars like Matthew Taylor, author of The Violent Take it by Force , have pointed to Christian nationalism and other far-right ideologies as factors that motivated the rioters. In February 2025, Trump appointed televangelist Paula White-Cain to head the newly created White House Faith Office. White-Cain's appointment followed an executive order establishing a task force to eradicate anti-Christian bias. Thea appointment adds to the the narrative that U.S. Christians are facing persecution, a refrain since at least the 1970s and heightened during Barack Obama's presidency. Scholars have linked the assertion that "Christianity is under attack" to the rise of Christian nationalism in mainstream politics. Read more: Trump may have emboldened hate in Canada, but it was already here American sociologists Andrew Whitehead and Samuel Perry define Christian nationalism as "a cultural framework that blurs distinctions between Christian identity and American identity, viewing the two as closely related and seeking to enhance and preserve their union." It's tempting to read "Christian idenity" and "American identity" and assume it does not affect Canada. But Christian nationalist ideologies were present during the so-called Freedom Convoy in Ottawa in 2022. According to Canadian scholars, national identity is blurred in online spaces, allowing U.S. nationalist ideals to take hold in Canada.] Christian nationalism is not synonymous with Christianity or any specific branch of Christianity, like evangelical Christianity. According to U.S. sociologist Daniel Miller, Christian nationalism is not a set list of ideological or religious beliefs. Instead, Miller says, Christian nationalism emerges when people identify with "a very narrow, idealized prototype of the 'real or 'authentic' American." He says two mechanisms connect people to Christian nationalism. The first is perceived loss of power by the people who historically held power. This is known as a "power devaluation crisis." The second is a narrative of decline - known as a a "declensionist narrative" - which asserts that American society has declined since the 1960s and needs repair and reclamation. Poilievre is not open about his religion and does not call for Canada to be a Christian nation. But whether Poilievre intends to stir up Christian nationalists, some of his rhetoric has indicated support for the classic definitions of Christian nationalism. According to Miller, support for Christian nationalism is not always direct. It can be activated by stoking a crisis of lost power, like the decline of the "traditional" family or by asserting a narrative of decline, like "Canada is broken." For example, Poilievre's 2025 campaign mobilized both of the narrative mechanisms that attract Christian nationalist mentioned by sociologists: a power devaluation crisis and the narrative of decline. In the lead-up to his 2025 campaign, Poilievre repeatedly called Canada "broken.". He cited increased crime, addiction, high grocery prices and more as evidence of Canada's brokenness, accusing the Liberal government of erasing Canada's past. When Poilievre calls Canada "broken," it affirms the world view of Christian nationalists. Another strategy Poilievre reportedly adopted from Trump was his work to court conservative Christians. In an 2024 interview with The Tyee , religious right scholar Carmen Celestini of Waterloo University said Poilievre had "ramped up" his presence at churches. Additionally, The Globe and Mail reported there were fewer photos ops of Poilievre visiting mosques in 2024. Of course, visits to churches are not enough to signal alignment with Christian nationalists. And Poilievre has not espoused any Christian evangelical ideals in any public speech. But it's still important for Canadians to remain alert about Christian nationalists and their ambitions to become part of mainstream politics. A study from the U.S. has linked the rise in Christian nationalist ideologies to attacks on religious minorities. The 2024 qualitative data from the study indicates that when politicians rhetorically supported Christian nationalist values, there was a increased violence against minority groups. According to Statistics Canada, the violent crime rate in Canada rose 13 per cent from 2021-2022.. Police-reported hate crimes increased 32 per cent from 2022 to 2023. Crimes targeting religion rose 67 per cent in 2023, primarily targeting Jewish and Muslim communities. While I know of no studies showing the rise of the far right is directly leading to violence in Canada, Canadians should be aware of the pattern in the U.S. Research shows that growing Christian nationalists and far-right world views south of the border are, in fact, connected to a rise in violence.


Toronto Sun
a day ago
- Toronto Sun
KINSELLA: PM Mark Carney's top 5 stolen Conservative policy planks
Ascertaining Carney's motive isn't difficult: Under Trudeau, the Liberal Party (and the government it led) had careened wildly to the left Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, left, and Liberal Leader Mark Carney. Photo by Bryan Passifiume / Greg Southam / Postmedia Network 'Pierre Poilievre, call 911. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account A banker has broken into your place, and is stealing all of your ideas.' It's a bit of an exaggeration to make a point, of course — Liberal leader Mark Carney hasn't stolen all of the Conservative leader's ideas. But it's mostly true. Ascertaining Carney's motive isn't difficult: Under Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party (and the government it led) had careened wildly to the left. The Grits had become unmoored from their historic positions on a host of issues, and had devolved into a pious, preachy woke-ist cult, one that ceaselessly lectured everyone about how they should run their lives. As predicted in this space, Trudeau left, Donald Trump arrived, and Carney appeared at precisely the right moment. He immediately commenced stealing Conservative policy planks. Here's a roundup of the top five stolen items. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Defence. Poilievre promised to spend 2% of our gross domestic product on defence by the year 2030. He promised a 'warrior culture.' This week, Carney pledged to meet, and beat, Poilievre's defence spending number: He would reach the elusive 2% threshold this fiscal year. Not half-a-decade from now. Carney's announcement, made days before the G7 leaders' summit in Kananaskis, Alta., caught everyone by surprise. The Tories, in particular, were clearly flummoxed. The best Poilievre could do was yammer on about the need for a budget, so they could see how Carney was going to pay for what they had been calling for. Yawn. Taxes. For the two years leading up to the 2025 election, Poilievre had been promising to 'axe the tax.' It was his mantra, and it worked — hordes of voters flocked to his side. It worked so well, in fact, it convinced the unlikeliest Canadian of all: One Mark Carney, who 'axed the tax' mere hours after he was sworn in as Prime Minister of All Canada. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Carney was transparent about his policy appropriation. He did it right out in the open, signing what the CBC called 'a prime ministerial directive.' It was a bit of performative Trump-style politics — something else that Carney purloined from Poilievre. Likewise, in the selfsame week, Carney cancelled the capital gains tax inclusion rate increase, something else that the Conservatives had been promising to do, for months. The Conservative reaction? Stunned silence. Read More Trade. In the final week of March, before the official start of the election campaign, Carney solemnly addressed a battery of microphones. 'The old relationship we had with the United States based on deepening integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperation is over,' he intoned. 'It's clear the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner … there will be no going backwards.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Liberal leader's words went around the globe, and went further than Poilievre had been prepared to go, too. The Conservative leader had been critical of Trump's tariff madness, but he adamantly refused to turn his back on the Americans, and kept holding out for a new trade deal with Trump. Liberals mocked him for it. Well, that was the election, and this is now. As my colleague Brian Lilley revealed in a big scoop days before anyone else, we now learn that Carney's government has been quietly negotiating with Trump — to, surprise surprise, sign a new trade deal. 'No going backwards,' had said Carney, who immediately commenced going backwards. The Tory reaction? Unknown. Perhaps they were calling Crimestoppers. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Pipelines. Right after being sworn in as The Minister Not In Charge Of Pipelines, Steven Guilbeault started pontificating on pipelines. There's no need for 'an entire new pipeline,' said the former Greenpeace leader. That position mostly conformed with the pipeline stance of the Trudeau regime. Not Carney's, however. Carney had — again — peered over Poilievre's shoulder, and copied what he saw. If Guilbeault had been testing his new boss, the test failed. Carney appeared on CTV and cut Guilbeault's legs out from under him. Said Carney: 'If you want a simple answer on 'Will I support building a pipeline?' Yes. That's the simple answer.' The Conservative reaction: Zero. Immigration. Under Trudeau, the number of migrants to Canada soared to historic levels. A housing and services crisis resulted, which wasn't fair to Canadians or the newcomers. Poilievre called Trudeau's immigration policy unsustainable. On the campaign trail, Carney said precious little on the subject. In power, however, Carney has now unveiled a sweeping security and immigration bill, the Safe Borders Act, and he calls Trudeau-era immigration levels 'unsustainable.' Which is what Poilievre had called it. We could go on, but you get the point. Mark Carney is a closeted Progressive Conservative, and a bit of a copycat. The aforementioned Brian Lilley had the best summary: 'Pierre Poilievre won the argument — even if Carney won the election.' Toronto Blue Jays World Editorial Cartoons Relationships Olympics

Globe and Mail
2 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Advocates question tax-cut bill's plan to shield federal parties from provincial privacy laws
The federal government's tax-cut-focused legislation, Bill C-4, is facing strong criticism from privacy advocates over the inclusion of an unrelated section that would shield federal parties from provincial privacy laws. Federal parties develop in-depth profiles of Canadians based on door knocking, phone calls and other means in an attempt to identify likely supporters. But how political parties gather this information, how they protect it and what they use it for is largely unregulated in Canada. The timing of the government's move appears to be linked to a legal battle playing out in British Columbia. Last year, B.C.'s Supreme Court ruled against the federal Liberal, New Democratic and Conservative parties, saying they are subject to the investigative powers of provincial privacy commissioners. The three national parties were challenging the legality of an investigation by the B.C. Privacy Commissioner. A hearing on the matter by the B.C. Court of Appeal was planned to begin June 24, though that may now be rescheduled. In a statement to The Globe and Mail, B.C. Privacy Commissioner Michael Harvey said he is disappointed the federal legislation has been introduced 'almost literally on the steps of the courthouse,' which he said risks further delays to an already protracted process. 'While we have not conducted a full legal analysis, the bill appears to create privacy rules that apply up to 25 years ago. This on its face is absurd,' he said. Conservatives raise privacy concerns over powers in government's border security bill Michael Geist, the University of Ottawa's Canada Research Chair in Internet Law, said it was extraordinary to bury these new rules in an affordability measures bill, and to apply them retroactively 25 years to the year 2000. 'Varying privacy rules that place political parties beyond the scope of virtually any privacy law in Canada is enormously problematic given how voracious the parties have been when it comes to collecting the data of Canadians,' he said. 'It is possibly the weakest possible conception of rules governing the privacy rights of Canadians when it comes to political parties.' The Canadian Civil Liberties Association said the section of the bill raised serious questions about privacy. 'This proposal, tacked onto a law that's focused on affordability, fails to provide any meaningful safeguards against the often intrusive privacy practices that have become all too common features of modern political campaigns,' said Tamir Israel, director of the CCLA's privacy, surveillance and technology program. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne introduced Bill C-4 last Thursday, promoting it as a three-point plan to reduce costs for Canadians, including an cutting income taxes, waiving the GST on new homes of up to $1-million for first-time home buyers, and removing the federal fuel charge. But the legislation includes a fourth section that Mr. Champagne didn't mention in his promotional material related to the bill. Opinion: Alarming privacy threats are buried in the Liberal border bill Part 4 of the bill would amend the Canada Elections Act to state that federal political parties 'cannot be required to comply with an Act of a province or territory that regulates activities in relations to personal information ...' unless the party's personal information policy 'provides otherwise.' Instead, the proposed legal change says political parties must comply with their own policies for protecting personal information. It says these policies must state the types of personal information the party collects and have a designated privacy officer to oversee compliance with the policy. Mr. Champagne did not mention the Elections Act changes on Friday when he gave an opening speech in the House of Commons promoting the bill. Neither his office nor the Liberal Party immediately responded to a request for comment. During the debate after the minister had left, NDP MP Lori Idlout asked Conservative MP and democratic reform critic Michael Cooper for his thoughts on the inclusion of Elections Act changes that have 'nothing to do with affordability.' Mr. Cooper replied that he takes Ms. Idlout's point that it would have been more appropriate to have introduced those changes in a separate bill. But he added that he supports the substance of the proposed privacy changes. 'I do support those amendments: to have a uniform system in place with respect to privacy laws falling exclusively under federal jurisdiction, as they pertain to federal political parties,' he said. The proposed changes are similar to elements that were contained in Bill C-65 in the previous Parliament. That legislation was specifically focused on updating the Canada Elections Act. It was introduced in March, 2024, but never advanced beyond second reading and died on the order paper when that Parliament was dissolved earlier this year. Prof. Geist published an analysis that said the C-65 proposals were stronger than the latest version, which drops an earlier requirement to inform Canadians about data breaches. Lawyer Bill Hearn, external general counsel to the Centre for Digital Rights, an organization created by Canadian entrepreneur Jim Balsillie that has been supporting a group of B.C. residents at the centre of the provincial privacy case, said he's confident the courts will ultimately declare the Liberal proposal unconstitutional. Ann Cavoukian, Ontario's former three-term privacy commissioner, said the proposal, in a bill focusing on tax cuts, 'makes no sense whatsoever' and is 'alarming.' 'Personal information is supposed to be strongly protected and used only for the purposes for which it was collected,' she said in an interview.