Man planning to bomb Toronto synagogues 'to kill as many Jews as possible' gets house arrest as punishment
Article content
Waisuddin Akbari, 41, was ordered to stay at home for 60 days, followed by three years of probation, after voicing clear, hate-filled threats last year.
Article content
Article content
Article content
The 'light sentence' shows the urgent need to reform Canada's hate crime laws, said Jaime Kirzner-Roberts, a director with the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies.
Article content
'At a time of rampant antisemitism in Canada and elsewhere, it sends an alarming message that threats to slaughter Jews and bomb synagogues may be met with leniency. That is extremely disappointing and profoundly unsettling for our community,' Kirzner-Roberts said after Akbari's sentencing.
Article content
The court heard community impact statements from five Jewish community groups that outlined a deep sense of fear and despair as news of the threats spread.
Article content
'The result of the unprecedented rise in antisemitism has left a palpable dread hanging over the community. This atmosphere of despair is only amplified by the actions of Mr. Akbari,' Richard Robertson, a director with B'nai Brith Canada told court at the sentencing hearing.
Article content
Article content
'Jewish Canadians did not and do not feel safe in their own communities. The constant threat of attack has left members of the community in perpetual fear for their wellbeing and has led to members of the community questioning their future as Canadians.'
Article content
Article content
Edward Prutsch, judge at the Ontario Court of Justice in Newmarket, north of Toronto, defended his decision in his reasons for sentencing.
Article content
'It is important to be clear about what Mr. Akbari is — and is not — being sentenced for. He is not being sentenced for taking any material steps to act on the threats he made. There is no evidence before me of the collection of weapons, explosives, maps, planning or coordination.
Article content
'Indeed, following his arrest, police conducted extensive checks and searches on Mr. Akbari to ensure the safety of the community was not still at risk. Mr. Akbari's guilt is based on empty threats he communicated to a stranger, mistakenly assuming (he) would be sympathetic to Akbari's own warped and hateful worldview. There was no effort to publicize his threats beyond the conversation,' Prutschi wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
12 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
UCLA says Trump administration has frozen $584 million in grants, threatening research
The Trump administration has suspended $584 million in federal grants for the University of California, Los Angeles, nearly double the amount that was previously thought, the school's chancellor announced Wednesday. UCLA is the first public university whose federal grants have been targeted by the administration over allegations of civil rights violations related to antisemitism and affirmative action. The Trump administration has frozen or paused federal funding over similar allegations against private colleges. 'If these funds remain suspended, it will be devastating for UCLA and for Americans across the nation,' Chancellor Julio Frenk said Wednesday in a statement, noting the groundbreaking research that has come out of the university. The departments affected rely on funding from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy, Frenk said. The U.S. Department of Education did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press requesting comment. The Trump administration recently announced the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division found UCLA violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 'by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.' The announcement came as UCLA reached a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who sued the university, arguing it violated their civil rights by allowing pro-Palestinian protesters in 2024 to block their access to classes and other areas on campus. The university has said that it is committed to campus safety and inclusivity and will continue to implement recommendations. The new UC president, James B. Milliken, said in a statement Wednesday that it has agreed to talks with the administration over the allegations against UCLA. 'These cuts do nothing to address antisemitism,' Milliken said. 'Moreover, the extensive work that UCLA and the entire University of California have taken to combat antisemitism has apparently been ignored.' Milliken said the 'cuts would be a death knell for innovative work that saves lives, grows our economy, and fortifies our national security. It is in our country's best interest that funding be restored.' As part of the lawsuit settlement, UCLA said it will contribute $2.3 million to eight organizations that combat antisemitism and support the university's Jewish community. It also has created an Office of Campus and Community Safety, instituting new policies to manage protests on campus. Frenk, whose Jewish father and grandparents fled Nazi Germany to Mexico and whose wife is the daughter of a Holocaust survivor, launched an initiative to combat antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias. Last week, Columbia agreed to pay $200 million as part of a settlement to resolve investigations into the government's allegations that the school violated federal antidiscrimination laws. The agreement also restores more than $400 million in research grants. The Trump administration plans to use its deal with Columbia as a template for other universities, with financial penalties that are now seen as an expectation.
Toronto Sun
12 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: A Palestinian state won't lead to peace in the Mideast
Prime Minister Mark Carney listens to a journalist's question during a press conference on Parliament Hill following the Cabinet Policy Forum, in Ottawa on May 21, 2025. Photo by DAVE CHAN / AFP via Getty Images The latest call for the creation of a Palestinian state by Prime Minister Mark Carney and the leaders of many other countries is a classic example of politicians believing they have to say something and this is something. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The political fraud inherent in this call, however, is the implication that creating a Palestinian state will end the suffering of the Palestinians and ensure Israel's security. A peace deal requires credible leaders on all sides of the conflict who genuinely want peace, which doesn't exist in Israel today. Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza — one half of the proposed Palestinian state, along with the West Bank and East Jerusalem — in 2005, using its army to forcibly remove 9,000 Jewish settlers in 21 settlements, plus four Jewish settlements in the West Bank. None of this led to peace. Far from it. Ever since then, Hamas has controlled Gaza and used it as its base for terrorist operations and missile attacks on Israel. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Simply put, Hamas doesn't want a viable Palestinian state living in peace beside a secure Israel. It wants Israel cleansed of Jews — Judenfrei — as the Nazis called it — which is in its founding charter. Carney's choice to preside over the creation of a Palestinian state — Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas — is a discredited, 89-year-old antisemite and periodic Holocaust denier whose authority is limited to the West Bank and not Hamas-controlled Gaza. Polls show Abbas is deeply unpopular among Palestinians, who regard his Fatah party, which has received billions of dollars in foreign aid, as corrupt. They want him to resign. On the other side, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposes the creation of a Palestinian state, intends to expand Israeli settlements in the West Bank and may be about to re-occupy Gaza, escalating the war yet again, which some military commanders oppose This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Israeli parliament recently passed a symbolic motion to annex the West Bank — where 700,000 Jewish settlers live illegally, according to international law, among an estimated 3.3 million Palestinians. Netanyahu's supporters view him as the only Israeli leader tough enough to counter the threat posed to Israel not only by Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups, but by terrorist-sponsoring Iran, whose nuclear facilities were recently bombed by Israel and the U.S. Netanyahu's opponents say he is corrupt. He's on trial for 2019 charges of breach of trust, taking bribes and fraud. Despite his claim of being Israel's 'Mr. Security,' the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaust — by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023 — occurred on his watch. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Netanyahu has been accused of propping up Hamas as a bulwark against the creation of a Palestinian state by Abbas. In fact, Israel promoted Hamas in the 1980s — disastrously — as a bulwark against the Palestine Liberation Organization, headed by the late Yasser Arafat, forerunner of the Palestinian Authority. To be sure, the myth promoted by Israel's enemies that one cannot criticize Israel without being accused of antisemitism is absurd and ignores that some of the harshest critics of the occupation are Israelis. Read More Many are in Israel's security forces. One example was the late Avraham Shalom, director of Israel's internal security service, the Shin Bet, in the 1980s. He described Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank as 'brutal … similar to the Germans in World War II. Similar, not identical … We've become cruel to ourselves as well, but mainly to the occupied population, using the excuse of the war against terror.' RECOMMENDED VIDEO World Celebrity Columnists Golf Editorial Cartoons
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Holy site visit by Israeli minister escalates Gaza war backdrop
TEL AVIV, Israel: Israel's far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, sparked renewed outrage over the weekend by leading prayers at Jerusalem's most contested religious site, an act that drew swift international condemnation and heightened tensions amid Israel's ongoing war in Gaza. Ben-Gvir, a prominent ultranationalist settler leader, has made repeated visits to the hilltop compound—known to Jews as the Temple Mount and to Muslims as the Haram al-Sharif—since the Gaza war began. The site, revered in Judaism as the location of the First and Second Temples and home today to the Al Aqsa Mosque, Islam's third-holiest shrine, has long been a flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Confrontations there have often spiraled into broader violence. Since Israel's capture of East Jerusalem in 1967, Jews have been allowed to visit the compound but not pray there, in line with a long-standing status quo arrangement. Palestinians view high-profile Jewish visits—particularly by political leaders—as deliberate provocations and potential steps toward asserting Israeli control over the mosque. Although most rabbis forbid Jewish prayer at the site, a growing movement has pushed to change that, with Ben-Gvir among its most vocal advocates. The visit on August 3 coincided with Tisha B'Av, a Jewish day of mourning for the destruction of the ancient Temples. Israeli media reported it was the first time a sitting minister had openly led prayers at the site, a move widely seen as breaking with convention. Ben-Gvir used the occasion to reiterate his hardline positions, calling for Israel to take full control of the Gaza Strip, establish sovereignty there, and promote what he described as "voluntary" migration of Palestinians from Gaza—plans Palestinians say amount to forced displacement. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded by insisting that the official status quo at the Temple Mount "had not changed and will not change to allow Jewish prayer." Trained as a lawyer, Ben-Gvir became known for defending Jewish extremists accused of attacking Palestinians. His media-savvy persona propelled him into politics, winning a Knesset seat in 2021. After the 2022 elections, his Jewish Power party joined Netanyahu's far-right coalition, securing him the post of national security minister, where he oversees Israel's police. Since then, he has championed arming Jewish citizens, taken a hard line on anti-government protests, backed Netanyahu's judicial overhaul, and openly rebuked U.S. leaders. His latest visit to the holy site is likely to deepen both domestic and international criticism of Israel's far-right policies.
