Marches Partnership priorities agreed by Monmouthshire
The Marches Forward Partnership is intended to help the border counties contribute to economic growth and recognise issues they have in common and that cross the different boundaries everyday.
Monmouthshire County Council's cabinet has now backed the agreed vision and collective ambition for the Marches Forward Partnership.
The Marches Proposition document sets out three immediate priorities which are support for food production, a Marches Environmental Investment and Innovation Platform which will address challenges such as water quality and flood risk and to attract private investment while a health group will consider pilot projects to make early interventions on health inequalities and the transport group will look to improve cross-border transport.
The councils hope their work can help it attract £1.5m in funding from the UK and Welsh governments.
The four councils have contributed around £100,000 each with Monmouthshire's contribution to date just over £95,000 which it took from its allocation from the UK Government Shared Prosperity Fund.
Its contribution in the current financial year will be between £54,000 and £61,553 which will come from its own capital budgets.
Conservative opposition leader Councillor Richard John described the council's contribution as 'funded by the UK Government' and asked what confidence it had the partnership has the support of the UK Government which has recently withdrawn funding for other 'pan-regional' development projects including the Western Gateway Partnership.
Deputy leader, Labour's Paul Griffiths, said the Marches Partnership is in a 'different position' to the Western Gateway, which was directly funded by Westminster to work across South Wales and the West of England, but said deputy prime minister Angela Rayner's department has asked to be part of some of its working groups.
'It is an expression of genuine interest and a desire to be an active partner,' said Cllr Griffiths.
Cabinet member Sara Burch said she thought the partnership is a 'real opportunity' for the food economy and tourism.
Monmouthshire's cabinet also agreed to a partnership board, from the member councils intended as a 'light touch governance arrangement' and to an evaluation of the partnership's progress after 12 months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Reform UK's rise reveals how out of touch Keir Starmer and John Swinney really are
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is a strange form of criticism to brand some parties dismissively as 'populist'. Political parties operating in a democratic landscape need to be popular or they will not get elected. Why would any political party or leader of a party want to be branded as 'elitist' or 'condescending'? Being unpopular is what became of the old Liberal party. When it was replaced by the Labour party, did that make its leaders – Keir Hardy, Arthur Henderson and Ramsay MacDonald – populists? In time, they became popular and Labour eventually formed governments, so what's changed? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One thing that has certainly changed is how the established parties are very similar. Of course they and their die-hard supporters will seek to argue they are very different, but it is becoming increasingly obvious to many people that, since the arrival of Edinburgh's own Anthony Blair, there really has not been a great deal of difference in many of the policies or laws that have become embedded in modern Britain. Keir Starmer jokes with John Swinney and Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan at a meeting in Edinburgh last year (Picture: Andy Buchanan/WPA pool) | Getty Images The 'Uniparty' Indeed it is easier to find policies that started with one party in government and have been followed through by the party replacing it. This has led to Labour and the Conservatives being branded as the 'Uniparty' – a term which in most respects should include the Liberal Democrats too (who were in power with the Conservatives between 2010-15). An example of this phenomenon is the treatment of Northern Ireland by successive Conservative governments since the Brexit vote of 2016. Theresa May started by conceding the Northern Ireland Backstop because the European Union threatened the imposition of a border with the Republic of Ireland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This was changed by Boris Johnson's government to become the Northern Ireland Protocol, and although early economic data showed that it was resulting in trade displacement, and although article 16 of that Protocol allowed for it to be suspended in such circumstances, Rishi Sunak gave up on standing up to the EU and instead doubled down on the concessions with his Windsor Framework. In typical Uniparty style, Labour cheered on this process just as it did with other bilateral policies like ending non-dom tax status and raising taxes to dangerously harmful levels where revenues would begin to fall. This week under Labour, the second of two physical border posts opened in Belfast, the first already completed in Larne. These border posts are to inspect GB goods going into Northern Ireland. Even in the 'Green Lane', such goods are treated like exports to a foreign country, requiring an export number, customs paperwork with a compulsory percentage pulled-over for physical checks. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, despite our governments telling us repeatedly that all the backstops, protocols and frameworks would prevent a hard border, our political elite – of all mainstream parties – have agreed to a concrete-and-steel border within and between our country. Surely, as only the EU wanted a border, it should have been the EU that built one where its jurisdiction started, not inside the UK. Time and again, we are deceived by governments doing the opposite of what they say they will do as if we might not notice. Sturgeon should have abandoned gender self-ID Another example of the detachment of our elite political class came from the former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon who has said she should have paused her legislation on self-ID. No Nicola, you should not have paused it, you should have abandoned it and instead sought to enshrine the rights of women – as defined by their sex – so, unequivocally, they would have safe spaces they could call their own. No ifs, buts, maybes or pauses, just a recognition that the public was not supportive of her ideologically driven policy. You might call Sturgeon's approach an elite, condescending, arrogant position – I'm with the populists who campaigned long and hard to protect a women's right to a private safe space. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The pursuit of Sturgeon's policy by her replacement, Humza Yousaf, was just as undemocratic as hers, and the Janus-faced approach of John Swinney in facing one way and then another rather than firmly enforcing the Supreme Court decision condemns him too. The populist approach would have been for him to withdraw the Scottish Government's legal defence, but in true patronising style the SNP establishment new better. UK control of policies Back to Brexit and last week we found that an academic poll which asked where decisions that affect people's lives should be made revealed our main established parties are still trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Carried out by YouGov for Queen Mary University London, it found that Labour, Conservative and even Liberal Democrat and Green voters gave majority support for all 20 areas of policy on taxes, trade, quality standards, border controls etcetera being decided upon by the UK Government alone. Of those 20, 17 had an overall majority for 'the UK alone', while for three it was the largest of the three options. And yet we are told by the Labour government we badly need an EU reset (contrary to the data on trade). Keir Starmer's reset will bring EU laws (present and future) with price increases – and even business taxes that will drive the cost of energy up – yet here we go again with Labour and the Liberal Democrats pushing for a 'reset' and the new Conservative leadership showing little enthusiasm for repudiating it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Again, I'm with the populists. There is nothing wrong in having cordial relationships with one's neighbours but there is no need to concede our hard-won sovereignty to make decisions for ourselves. We should trust the people. Our political parties in Westminster, Holyrood, the Senedd and Stormont need to recognise that popular policies should be reflected in democratic choices. Only then will they challenge Reform UK – which is doing better than all of them because it seeks to listen and speak up for those who feel nobody is listening to them.
Fashion United
4 hours ago
- Fashion United
Stradivarius strengthens its UK network with arrival in North East England
Spanish group Inditex continues to strengthen the international presence of its brands with the opening of the first Stradivarius store in North East England. The brand, known for its affordable and trendy fashion, has opened a 930-square-metre (10,000-square-foot) space in the Lower Red Mall area of the Metrocentre shopping centre, in Gateshead. With operations in more than 60 countries, in the UK market, the geographical distribution of Stradivarius stores is dispersed. It is mainly concentrated in the north and centre of the country. This opening in Gateshead strengthens coverage in a previously underserved area in north-east England. This is a region with a large catchment area that includes Newcastle and Sunderland. It allows the brand to expand its reach beyond the large urban centres in the south of the country. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Nicola Sturgeon memoir: Why I cried for Boris Johnson
However, it is the former issue that brought Ms Sturgeon and Mr Johnson together. The former first minister famously referred to Mr Johnson as a "clown" in an expletive-filled message exchange with her chief of staff Liz Lloyd. That row emerged at the UK Covid Inquiry, with Ms Sturgeon describing Downing Street's announcement of a second Covid-19 lockdown in England as "excruciating". Ms Sturgeon's memoir Frankly was supposed to be released on Thursday, August 14. However it went on sale early in Waterstones on Monday. Read more: In the book, the former first minister wrote: "I find it hard, even today, to look back on Covid without a torrent of emotion. It was the hardest period of my career, possibly my life." She added: "I am still haunted by the impact of the decisions I took and those I didn't take. "I still agonise over what I might have done differently. I think part of me always will." Ms Sturgeon reflects on April 2020, when Boris Johnson was moved to an intensive care unit after contracting the virus, with his symptoms "worsening". The Glasgow Southside MSP wrote of her political rival: "It was a moment in which the existential peril of the pandemic truly hit people. "Whatever the science said, if it could fell even a Prime Minister, no one was safe. "I remember feeling profoundly shaken by it and also fearing the worst. "As I got dressed for work early on Tuesday morning, I wondered if I should wear black. It was horrible. "When I sent Boris good wishes from my lunchtime briefing, I felt myself welling up." Read more: Ms Sturgeon also elaborated on communicative difficulties she had with the former prime minister at the height of the pandemic. In May 2021, the UK Government dropped its 'Stay Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives' advice that had been used by devolved administrations since the beginning of the crisis. This decision was made "without any consultation whatsoever" with governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. By the summer of that year, she said "Johnson wasn't engaging" with devolved administrations. She added: "Whenever he did grace us with his presence, I would be taken aback all over again by how unserious he was. "The fact this was a virus that had come close to taking his own life made his attitude all them more inexplicable." Ms Sturgeon also reflected on how she tried to take the "heat" from Dr Catherine Calderwood, Scotland's former chief medical officer who was forced to resign two weeks after a UK-wide national lockdown was imposed on March 23. She had broken lockdown rules by making two trips to her second home in Fife with her family. Ms Sturgeon said that with "hindsight" she should have told the medic to resign "immediately". She wrote: "Not only would it have avoided hours of mounting public anger, but it would have also have been kinder to her." However, she said: "In an hour-long press conference on Sunday, 5 April, I tried to take as much of the heat as I could." It was after this press conference that Ms Sturgeon received a call from her then deputy first minister John Swinney to ask if "resisting" Dr Calderwood's resignation was the "right thing to do". Ms Sturgeon said she became increasingly uneasy with the decision, writing: "I knew in my gut that I was in the wrong place. I also knew that if I stayed in that place, it wasn't just Catherine's credibility that would be shot. My own would be fatally undermined too."
