Marches Partnership priorities agreed by Monmouthshire
Monmouthshire and Powys agreed to form a voluntary partnership with English neighbours Herefordshire and Shropshire in September 2023.
The Marches Forward Partnership is intended to help the border counties contribute to economic growth and recognise issues they have in common and that cross the different boundaries everyday.
Monmouthshire County Council's cabinet has now backed the agreed vision and collective ambition for the Marches Forward Partnership.
The Marches Proposition document sets out three immediate priorities which are support for food production, a Marches Environmental Investment and Innovation Platform which will address challenges such as water quality and flood risk and to attract private investment while a health group will consider pilot projects to make early interventions on health inequalities and the transport group will look to improve cross-border transport.
The councils hope their work can help it attract £1.5m in funding from the UK and Welsh governments.
The four councils have contributed around £100,000 each with Monmouthshire's contribution to date just over £95,000 which it took from its allocation from the UK Government Shared Prosperity Fund.
Its contribution in the current financial year will be between £54,000 and £61,553 which will come from its own capital budgets.
Conservative opposition leader Councillor Richard John described the council's contribution as 'funded by the UK Government' and asked what confidence it had the partnership has the support of the UK Government which has recently withdrawn funding for other 'pan-regional' development projects including the Western Gateway Partnership.
Deputy leader, Labour's Paul Griffiths, said the Marches Partnership is in a 'different position' to the Western Gateway, which was directly funded by Westminster to work across South Wales and the West of England, but said deputy prime minister Angela Rayner's department has asked to be part of some of its working groups.
'It is an expression of genuine interest and a desire to be an active partner,' said Cllr Griffiths.
Cabinet member Sara Burch said she thought the partnership is a 'real opportunity' for the food economy and tourism.
Monmouthshire's cabinet also agreed to a partnership board, from the member councils intended as a 'light touch governance arrangement' and to an evaluation of the partnership's progress after 12 months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Nigel Farage's vow to reopen mines in Wales 'a backward-looking vision'
Nigel Farage's vow to reopen mines in Wales 'a backward-looking vision' The Reform UK leader was in Port Talbot on Wednesday where he vowed to reopen the town's steelworks and bring coal mining back to the Welsh Valleys Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) Reform UK chief Nigel Farage has outlined a series of proposals including the abolition of the default 20mph speed limit, prioritising "Welsh people" for housing queues and reinstating coal mining in Wales. Wales Online readers are, on the whole, not convinced. Moreover, he has declared his party's aim to "reopen Port Talbot's steelworks". Despite Tata Steel currently owning the operational steelworks, the remaining blast furnaces were shuttered in 2024 with plans to construct an electric arc furnace for steel recycling. This transition is resulting in the loss of thousands of jobs. At a press conference in Port Talbot, when pressed about the funding for reigniting the blast furnaces - an idea deemed unfeasible by industry specialists - he acknowledged that the total cost would be "in the low billions", meaning it would need substantial investment from the UK Government. Farage, in a WalesOnline article, mentioned that Reform UK's would "allow coal, if suitable, to be mined in Wales". When asked if people would actually want to work down mines, he responded that they would if they were paid enough. The latest opinion poll in Wales indicates that his party is on track to secure its first seats at the Senedd in the forthcoming May 2026 election. Currently, the party's presence in Wales is limited to councillors, yet a recent YouGov/Barn Cymru survey for the election for the Welsh Parliament next May places Reform UK as runner-up with 25% of the vote. They are trailing narrowly behind Plaid Cymru, who are forecasted to receive 30%, and passing Labour which stands at 18%. Moreover, Reform said they would stop any properties from being used as accommodation for asylum seekers, will end funding for the Welsh Refugee Council, and will abolish the Welsh Government's "Nation of Sanctuary" policy. Article continues below He further pledged to establish an Elon Musk-inspired department aimed at reducing costs. He said: "A Reform UK Senedd will also save hundreds of millions each year by cutting bureaucracy, waste and bad management. The establishment of Welsh DOGE will help us uncover where there is woke and wasteful spending and we will make sure those funds are redirected to frontline services." Commenter Shane1976 says: 'I cannot believe how gullible people are. Where is the money coming from to [reopen] the steel works and the mines? Where are the miners coming from? This man promised the world with Brexit and Welsh voters believed him and Wales is worse off for it.' Ironside agrees: 'It was Mr Farage's idea to leave the EU in the first place when he was with UKIP and the Brexit Party. He fooled the British people, including myself, that leaving the EU would make things better instead Brexit has been a total disaster for the UK and Wales." Thebear2025 adds: 'I honestly do not believe him. He is just saying what he thinks the people of Wales want. While I think Labour definitely have to go, I don't think Reform is the answer to our prayers and will backtrack once in power the same as the other parties do.' Tigerbay replies: 'Reform will do well in Wales, but only because of the mess the other parties are making!' Exess60 wonders: 'As far as the steel works goes, do the good long suffering people of Port Talbot really want to revert to the filthy fog that blemished their environment and caused so much ill health for over a century? Surely that was yesterday, not the future!' DaisyDD writes: 'We want mining again in the Valleys. Our lads need work and it kept our communities together. Face it we are getting ready for war and need to be more self-sufficient for our steel. Opening Port Talbot's blast furnaces with coal again is a great idea. It should never have been allowed to close.' Numbersontheleft replies: 'I am not a Reform supporter but there are a lot of really good points in Farage's speech. It's simply wrong that steel will no longer be made in Wales. "Getting rid of the nation of sanctuary, blanket 20mph and the extra 36 MSs are policies any sane party should be supporting. And who wouldn't support improved efficiency and reduced waste in our public sector. The other parties are trying their best to rubbish Reform, but they are clearly worried that Farage is saying the things their voters want them to be saying.' Robo78 believes: 'It sounds like Nigel Farage wants to give us the jobs that no one else wants to do; this will enlarge our brain drain, not tackle it. What we need in Wales is a coherent, long-term strategy that links skills training to meaningful local employment. "Proposals like Farage's often present a narrow, backward-looking vision: one focused on recreating large-scale, traditional industrial jobs that are no longer economically viable, rather than planning for how these vital skills can be integrated into a modern, diverse Welsh economy.' Numbersontheleft retorts: 'So you think steel making, welding, plumbing, robotics, electrical trades, and industrial automation are jobs nobody else wants to do? Whilst in the real world, Wales and Britain desperately need construction trades to build homes and infrastructure. Also manufacturing the things we use, instead of importing goods manufactured in other countries.' Article continues below Would you like to see heavy industry back in the South Wales Valleys? Is Reform the answer to Wales' woes? Have your say in our comments section.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Reeves clashes with Sky News presenter over calls for grooming gangs apology
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the priority was helping victims of systematic sexual exploitation 'not people's hurt feelings about how they've been spoken about' Rachel Reeves clashed with Sky News presenter Sir Trevor Phillips after the Government dropped its opposition to a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal. The Chancellor said the priority was helping victims of systematic sexual exploitation 'not people's hurt feelings about how they've been spoken about' when asked to apologise to critics. It comes after Keir Starmer previously hit out at opposition politicians calling for an inquiry, accusing them of "jumping on a bandwagon" and "amplifying what the far-right is saying" to gain attention. But the Prime Minister confirmed on Saturday that he had accepted a recommendation from Baroness Louise Casey for a full probe after tasking her to carry out an audit. Her findings are expected to published this week. The Government initially resisted calls for a national inquiry into grooming gangs, arguing it had been looked as part of a seven-year probe into child sexual abuse in England and Wales by Professor Alexis Jay, which reported in 2022. Widespread sexual abuse of young girls in a number of English towns was uncovered over a decade ago, with victims repeatedly failed by the police and child protection. The scandal hit the headlines again in January after Elon Musk seized on reports that Home Office Minister Jess Phillips had rejected calls for a public inquiry, in favour of allowing councils to launch local probes. The tech billionaire launch an onslaught of online attacks against Keir Starmer and Ms Phillips, including reposting a call for her to be jailed. Asked if there will be an apology for people who were criticised for raising the issue of grooming gangs, Ms Reeves said: "What is the most important thing here? It's the victims." She added: "It's not people's hurt feelings about how they've been spoken about. The most important thing here is the victims of these evil crimes." Sir Trevor hit back: 'The reason this matters is because those people who raised these matters on behalf of victims, who cannot often speak for themselves, were accused by government ministers of 'total nonsense, misinformation and racism'. Surely that's important as well?' But Ms Reeves said: 'The most important thing is the victims themselves, and we have been busy as a government implementing the 200 or so recommendations of the previous inquiry.' Prof Jay's inquiry (IICSA) looked at child sexual abuse in a number of different setting. It included abuse by organised groups following multiple convictions of sexual offences against children across the UK between 2010-2014, including in Rotherham, Cornwall, Derbyshire, Rochdale and Bristol. But there has never been a public inquiry solely focused on grooming gangs. The PM said he would commission a national public inquiry, which will be able to compel witnesses to give evidence. It is understood that it will be national in scope, co-ordinating a series of targeted local investigations. An independent report in 2014 found that more than 1,400 children in Rotherham, south Yorkshire were exposed to sexual abuse and violence between 1997 and 2013 by gangs of predominantly British Pakistani men. Up to 1,000 girls were abused over 40 years in Telford, Shropshire, by men of south Asian heritage, an inquiry found, after a lengthy investigation by the Sunday Mirror. Chairman Tom Crowther QC said concerns had been ignored for decades due to "nervousness about race". Another high profile report found children were left at the mercy of grooming gangs in Rochdale between 2004 to 2013, carried out by predominantly Asian men. A Home Office study in 2020 found data on the ethnicity of perpetrators was significantly limited and research found "group-based CSE (child sexual exploitation) offenders are most commonly White." The report added: "Some studies suggest an over-representation of Black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending."
Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
First Minister Eluned Morgan says rail funding for Wales is 'a sea change from where we've been'
First Minister Eluned Morgan says rail funding for Wales is 'a sea change from where we've been' 'We would have been £6 billion worse of. This makes up £5 billion better off' Eluned Morgan speaking on Politics Wales on Sunday morning (Image: BBC Wales / Politics Wales ) Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan has been speaking about the "at least £445m" announced by UK Labour to help improve the Welsh rail network. The announcement was made by Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in her spending review on Wednesday, June 11. There are plans for five new stations in Cardiff, Newport and Monmouthshire as a result, as well as improvements in north Wales. The money includes £348m to be spent between 2026 and 2030, with the rest over ten years. The money will be spent by both governments because parts of the network in Wales are controlled by the Welsh Government and other parts of it by the UK government. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The announcement follows years of criticism from Welsh Labour of underinvestment in the Welsh railway network under the UK Tories. The funding should mean that there will be a significant sum of funding for rail in Wales that should allow investment in both maintenance and also improvements, but some have questioned whether the cash will go far enough. Speaking on Politics Wales on Sunday morning Ms Morgan welcomed the news, calling it a "sea change" for Wales' rail network. Article continues below She said: "Well, let's compare to where we have been in the past and had we continued on the trajectory we were under with the Tories. "We would have been £6 billion worse of. This makes up £5 billion better off - and that makes a difference. "These are not numbers on a spreadsheet, these are differences in our communities where we can invest in our NHS, invest in rail, we can invest in infrastructure and we can make people more secure. "It will make a difference and it is a sea change from where we've been in the past." You can read more about the new station plans here. Article continues below Former Welsh Government deputy transport minister Lee Waters said previously of the extra cash for Wales: 'This is a big number for Wales and is more than the Welsh Government calculates it would have had from a fair share of the HS2 project. "We now need to make sure we get a change to how funding works for rail so that this is the beginning of a pipeline of investment into the future.'
