Decision on sentence to teacher who upskirted girl pupils at school
But the former maths teacher, from Bellshill, in North Lanarkshire, appealed against the sentence imposed on him at Airdrie Sheriff Court in May.
READ NEXT: 'Terrible orange b*****d': Son of ex-Celtic player attacked cop amid ticket row
READ NEXT: Man brutally attacked boy, 13, with knife on way home from mosque
Solicitor advocate Ann Ogg told judges at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh: "The imposition of a custodial sentence was both inappropriate and excessive."
She argued that the sheriff who jailed Dixon had erred in choosing to deal with him by sentencing him to imprisonment, but if the court was not with her on that submission the jail term was too long.
Miss Ogg said it was accepted that there was a breach of trust in the offending but maintained that there was significant mitigation.
She said Dixon was a first offender with a good work record who was assessed as a low risk of further general offending.
She told the court: "Significantly the appellant lost his employment and career as a maths teacher." She said character references showed he was "very highly regarded".
She said Dixon's mental health was impacted by tragedies that occured in his personal life and added: "These offences were very much out of character for the appellant."
Miss Ogg said that Dixon was assessed as suitable for a community payback order with supervision and conduct requirements and unpaid work.
But Lord Matthews, sitting with Lord Armstrong, refused the appeal against the sentence as Dixon followed the proceedings by a TV link to Addiewell jail in West Lothian.
Dixon committed the offences at a secondary school in North Lanarkshire in March 2023 when he took pictures of a 12 year old girl and then targeted a 15 year old pupil.
A classmate of the older girl realised what Dixon was doing and reported her concerns before police were called in.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Anita Rose killer was free to roam streets before beating dog walker to death
Roy Barclay was found guilty last week of murdering 57-year-old Anita Rose, who died in hospital from her horrific injuries after being attacked in Brantham last July Police left a "violent" killer to stroll the streets for two years despite him breaching his licence. Roy Barclay was found guilty last week of murdering 57-year-old dog walker Anita Rose, who died in hospital from her horrific injuries in Brantham, last July. Jurors were told that Barclay was on the run from police when he attacked Ms Rose, having previously been jailed 10 years for a committing grievous bodily harm with intent. He had been living in makeshift camps, which breached his licencing conditions, that stated he should live at a fixed address. The 56-year-old was jailed following an attack on pensioner Leslie Gunfield, then 82, after he told Barclay he would inform security about him going through rubbish bins at a Co-op supermarket in Walton-on-the-Naze, Essex. He was later released on parole in 2020. But despite not living at a fixed address, Barclay was able to use his bank cards to order items online, and left dozens of reviews on Google Maps, showing his location was in Suffolk and Essex. Police failed to arrest Barclay for the breach for two years. Ex-Met Police officer Peter Bleksley told The Sun:"This was an utterly avoidable and preventable murder. "He clearly should have been a priority. His previous violent offending - not only should he not have been released halfway through his sentence, I think he pulled the wool over the eyes of the Parole Board - but a man with that kind of violent history, should be a priority. "These people should not be walking the streets of Britain. Proper analytical examination of his postings, of his behaviours, his lifestyle, should have meant he could have been found." At court, jurors had heard evidence that injuries to Anita's brain were similar to those inflicted by 'high speed car crashes'. Barclay opted to give no evidence in his defence, a move the prosecution said saw him maintain a 'wall of silence' throughout his trial. Prosecutor Christopher Paxton KC said Barclay made internet searches after Ms Rose was attacked which included 'Can barbed wire be swabbed for DNA?' and 'How long does DNA last at a crime scene?' The prosecutor told jurors: 'Roy Barclay made that search on barbed wire because he killed Anita by the barbed wire fence. These internet searches alone are evidence enough for you to be sure of Roy Barclay's guilt.' Mr Paxton said Barclay also read numerous press articles relating to the attack on Ms Rose. He added: 'While for the next four days Anita fought for her life – Roy Barclay stalked and followed every twist and turn of the news. He did so because he is Anita's killer. 'He was looking and relishing in what he had done.' The prosecutor said Barclay had kept a 'treasure trove' of Ms Rose's items including her jacket and phone.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Evil monster' killed disabled Eastenders star and two sons with axe in 'barbaric' way
Arthur Simpson Kent was given a whole life order after brutally murdering his partner, ex-Eastenders star Sian Blake, and her two young sons - but he tried to cover up his horrifying crimes with cold calculation Christmas was quickly approaching when former Eastenders star Sian Blake, 43, a mother of two, received some truly devastating news and learned that she had a terminal illness. Sian - who starred as soul singer Frankie Pierre in 56 episodes of EastEnders between 1996 and 1997 - had been diagnosed with motor neurone disease back in December 2015, after symptoms first began to appear two years earlier. But this heartbreaking news was only the start of an unbelievable tragedy that was about to unfold for her family. Sian, who had quit acting and working as a sign language interpreter and voiceover artist shortly after receiving her upsetting diagnosis, went to visit her mother in Leyton, East London. The ex-soap star asked her mum if she and her sons could move back in as she considered selling her own home in Erith, South-East London - in part to pay for care, but also because of her "unhealthy" relationship with her "controlling" partner, Arthur Simpson Kent. Sian was planning on leaving Arthur, but after going back to the home she shared with the part-time drug dealer, things took a terrible turn just a day after her visit home. Arthur learned that Sian was going to leave their relationship, taking sons Zachary, eight, and Amon, four, with her. In the kitchen, the family kept a "small axe" and Arthur - who later claimed "something snapped" - grabbed it while Sian was bent down and looking at the floor. He repeatedly hit her head, brutally taking the former actress's life. Due to her illness, she was also suffering from weakened arms and hands, which would have meant she was totally unable to fight him off. Arthur then used the same axe to kill the two little boys, who Sian was "besotted with" and said "completed her", her mum said later. The evidence showed that Arthur "killed each of them in turn with heavy, deliberate, repeated blows with a blunt instrument not since recovered, and then by cutting and stabbing them with a bladed weapon in a way that ensured their deaths." Despite claiming to have "snapped", Arthur was methodical and calculated in an attempt to cover up his brutal crimes. He moved all three of his family's bodies, carefully wrapping them in plastic, before burying them in shallow graves in the garden. He then cleaned his home in an attempt to hide the evidence of his violence, even going so far as "partially painting" the house to cover up blood. But Arthur's cover-up didn't stop there. He took Sian's phone and sent messages to her family pretending to be her, to try and buy himself some time, telling her sister Ava that she was going away for a few weeks. However, the police were contacted and visited the property in Erith, which saw Arthur come up with another lie to try and cover his tracks, claiming that his partner had "gone to Cambridge to see a friend" and was "fed up" with her family. After the police left, Arthur ran. He took Sian's car and ditched the vehicle in East London, before going to a pal's house where he tried to get a flight out of the UK - but wasn't able to. The friend of the former hairdresser refused to put him up, believing he was in some kind of trouble due to drug dealing. He turned to another friend, asking for help, writing in a message, "I can't go into details about what I have done but I only have 2 choices. Go to Ghana one way or die." A pal's card was used to book a coach to Glasgow, where Simpson Kent then travelled to Amsterdam on to Ghana. By December 19, just a few days after murdering his family, he was in Accra - and the picture painted by witnesses of Arthur whilst he was there isn't one of the grieving widower. Over New Year's Eve, he is said to have been "really partying" before taking two women for breakfast the following day. When someone he had met in Ghana recognised him from reports, Arthur tried to bribe them into staying quiet with an iPad and cash. Police finally caught up with him on 9 January, when he claimed to Ghanaian police that his actions had been a kind of 'mercy killing' and one that Sian had agreed to, with Arthur claiming she had "no meaningful life" left. Arthur, once brought back to the UK, pleaded guilty to all three counts of murder, though his legal team still used Sian's illness as a sick defence for his crimes. The murderer said he "felt as if I had just been pushed off a diving board and was falling". He said: "I grabbed hold of a small axe that was kept on a ledge in the kitchen. Sian's head was bent low down and she was bent over looking at the floor. I approached her from the side and hit her at the back of the head as hard as I could and she fell unconscious at the first blow. After that I hit her repeatedly on the head." "My mind was blank and I was focusing on doing and not thinking. It was like I was there but not there." He was handed down a whole life order for his crimes, with the judge rejecting his defences of mental health issues. Sian's mum said he was an "evil monster" and "It's difficult to put into words how much we have suffered as a result of their murder and how we will continue to suffer for the rest of our lives. "We are all living a life sentence, we are all living a nightmare. I would give my life for another moment with my daughter."
Scottish Sun
20 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Ex-Peppa Pig boss ‘loses £300,000 after he was sacked for brandishing a pen at his boss' in five-year court battle
Ex-Peppa Pig exec still fighting in court five years after being sacked PIG PEN Ex-Peppa Pig boss 'loses £300,000 after he was sacked for brandishing a pen at his boss' in five-year court battle Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AN EX-Peppa Pig exec has lost £300,000 after being sacked for threatening his boss with pen. Mark Dowding, who earned up to £160,000 a year at toy giant The Character Group PLC, was given the boot and left with a hefty bill after a five-year court battle. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Mark Dowding former group finance director of Peppa Pig toy company The Character Group PLC took the company to an employment tribunal Credit: Champion News Service 5 The Character Group PLC are makers of Peppa Pig plushies and Doctor Who toys Credit: Champion News Service 5 Despite the ruling, the former Peppa Pig exec launched several appeals Credit: Champion News Service The former chief financial officer, who may be forced to sell his home and pension, was dismissed in 2017 after a breakdown in trust, following a heated row with his boss where he allegedly pointed a pen in a threatening way. He took the company, makers of Peppa Pig plushies and Doctor Who toys, to an employment tribunal, claiming he was unfairly dismissed and that the pen incident was fabricated. But in 2020 Employment Judge Omar Khalil said: "The tribunal concludes that the incident as described by [Mr Dowding's boss] did occur, which included the claimant pointing towards him brandishing a pen in a threatening manner." Despite the ruling, the former Peppa Pig exec launched several appeals. LEGAL BATTLE Despite the ruling, Dowding launched several appeals and a High Court claim, running up eye-watering legal costs. One remaining claim is still live- but he's now been told it will be struck out unless he coughs up the £288,000 he owes from his failed legal bids. High Court judge Richard Spearman KC said the financial blow puts Dowding at risk of losing his £850,000 home and his pension, his only regular income. The judge quoted Greek tragedy writer Sophocles, saying: "It is a painful thing to look at your own trouble and know that you yourself and no one else has made it'. He added: "That, in my view, is the predicament in which the claimant Mr Dowding now finds himself." THE PEN INCIDENT Mr Dowding joined The Character Group in 2012 and was earning £110,000 plus a potential 50 per cent bonus by the time of his dismissal. The 2017 incident unfolded during a heated meeting with his boss, Mr Shah. Judge Khalil said: "Their discussion became heated and voices were raised. "The claimant accepted in evidence he raised his voice first. "Mr Shah also alleged that the claimant had pointed a pen towards him, causing Mr Shah to retreat. "This was set out in his email, which followed this altercation on the same day. "In that email, Mr Shah said: 'You raised your voice towards me in a threatening manner and pointed a pen in my face whilst rolling forward towards me with your chair. I had to roll my chair back to prevent injury to my face'.' THE FIGHT GOES ON After losing at tribunal, Dowding refused to back down, instead filing a flurry of appeals and launching a High Court claim. In December 2023, an order was made securing his legal costs against the equity in his Rotherhithe Street home in south London. Judge Spearman said: "Essentially as a result of the way in which he chose to plead his case and to contest the efforts of TCG to restrict that case to what is properly arguable, a number of substantial orders for costs were made against Mr Dowding in July 2024. "Mr Dowding sought, but was refused, permission to appeal against those orders to the Court of Appeal. "According to the disclosure Mr Dowding has provided, his only source of income is his personal pension, and his only substantial assets are his personal pension fund and the equity in his home. "He now faces losing that fund, and maybe also his home, to meet those costs orders. "He is in a very unhappy position because, on the disclosure he has made, he can ill-afford to meet these costs liabilities: either his home may be forfeit or his pension may be forfeit - possibly, if things go on the way they have, both. "That is a consequence of bringing and pursuing expensive litigation which has all been unsuccessful, resulting in the costs orders." 5 After losing at tribunal, Dowding refused to back down, instead filing a flurry of appeals and launching a High Court claim Credit: Champion News Service
