Minneapolis mayor to appeal after losing party endorsement to democratic socialist
The move comes after Frey lost the backing of the party in Minnesota affiliated with the national Democratic Party, to state Sen. Omar Fateh (D), who is running to Frey's left.
The support of the city DFL party could be a boost for Fateh as he tries to oust the two-term incumbent mayor, but Frey and his supporters argue that the city convention endorsement process, which took place Saturday, was flawed.
The city's mayoral race is a ranked choice election in which all candidates compete on the same ballot regardless of party. A Democrat is almost guaranteed to win the election in the heavily left-leaning city, and while a party endorsement doesn't clinch victory, it can be an advantage to the candidate.
Fateh won support from at least 60 percent of delegates voting, marking the party's first endorsement of a mayoral candidate in 16 years, the Star Tribune reported.
But the outlet reported that the process was the subject of significant confusion and scrutiny as counting the first round of voting took almost two hours to complete. Fateh led that round with about 44 percent of the vote to Frey's roughly 31.5 percent, leaving them as the only two candidates in contention for the endorsement.
Technology issues led to the slowdown, party officials told the outlet. But motions to conduct the endorsement vote by paper ballots failed.
By the time that a final vote was conducted by raising hands, many of Frey's supporters had left the convention, and Frey's indicated that he will appeal the result to the state party.
'This election should be decided by the entire city rather than the small group of people who became delegates, particularly in light of the extremely flawed and irregular conduct of this convention,' said Frey campaign manager Sam Schulenberg in a statement. 'Voters will now have a clear choice between the records and leadership of Sen. Fateh and Mayor Frey. We look forward to taking our vision to the voters in November.'
The Hill has reached out to the city party and Fateh's campaign for comment.
Fateh said in a post on X that he's 'incredibly honored' to be the endorsed candidate in the race.
'This endorsement is a message that Minneapolis residents are done with broken promises, vetoes, and politics as usual,' he said. 'It's a mandate to build a city that works for all of us.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bipartisan senators push for Trump to keep portions of Biden-era AI rule
Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) urged the Trump administration Thursday to maintain some parts of an artificial intelligence (AI) chip export framework laid out by former President Biden. In a letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the bipartisan duo called for the administration to keep provisions incentivizing companies to maintain most of their computing infrastructure for leading AI models in the U.S. and mandating 'robust' guardrails on data centers abroad. 'While the Diffusion Rule was rightfully criticized for being overly complicated and burdensome, it is essential that the Administration issues a replacement that keeps the center of gravity for AI infrastructure in the United States and imposes strong, robust security requirements on overseas facilities,' the pair wrote. Biden released the AI diffusion rule in his final days in office. The rule, which placed caps on chip sales to most countries other than a select few U.S. allies, faced sharp pushback from the semiconductor industry. The Trump administration rescinded the rule shortly before it was set to go into effect in May, arguing it would 'have stifled American innovation and saddled companies with burdensome new regulatory requirements.' Several months later, the administration has yet to offer a replacement. A group of Republican House members urged Lutnick earlier this month to provide a 'stable exporting structure' to take the place of the diffusion rule. However, a new framework may not be coming. Semafor reported Tuesday that the administration is weighing whether to scrap efforts to replace the rule. This comes after Trump unveiled his AI Action Plan last week, which underscored a shift in policy toward China, focusing less on export restrictions and more on boosting the adoption of American technology abroad. Seemingly in line with this approach, the Trump administration is allowing Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China once again. After initially placing new restrictions on H20 sales in May, the administration gave the chipmaker the green light earlier this month. The decision has faced pushback from multiple fronts, with former national security officials, several Democratic lawmakers and at least one Republican member voicing concerns about the decision.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Bernie Sanders to visit Asheville on Aug. 10 as part of 'Fighting Oligarchy' Tour
ASHEVILLE – Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is planning to speak in downtown Asheville on Sunday, Aug. 10. Sanders' campaign committee announced the event July 30 as part of the longtime Independent senator's 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour. 'Over the course of the next few weeks, I'll be hitting the road to have real discussions across America on how we move forward to take on the Oligarchs and corporate interests who have so much power and influence in this country,' Sanders' campaign site says. The event will be held in downtown Asheville at the Thomas Wolfe Auditorium at Harrah's Cherokee Center. Doors open at 3:30 p.m. and the speaking event begins at 6 p.m., according to the announcement. Sanders previously visited Asheville in 2019 when he was running for the Democratic nomination for president. Sanders' most recent stops on the tour were in Texas, where he shared the stage with former Congressman Beto O'Rourke in June. He made other stops in Louisiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Montana, where Sanders, 83, appeared with New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to rail against the economic and political power of billionaire Elon Musk and Republican President Donald Trump. 'Taking on oligarchy is enormously difficult,' Sanders said at the April 16 event in Montana. 'These guys own the economy.' Want to attend? People interesting in attending Sanders' event can RSVP online at More: 'I need you after I am president': Bernie Sanders to Asheville during 2020 election rally More: Asheville Citizen Times staff recognized for journalism excellence in Helene coverage Jacob Biba is the Helene recovery reporter at the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Email him at jbiba@ This article originally appeared on Asheville Citizen Times: Sen. Bernie Sanders in Asheville: August visit part of nationwide tour
USA Today
39 minutes ago
- USA Today
Judges question whether Trump tariffs are authorized by emergency powers
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs Trump imposed on U.S. trading partners. U.S. appeals court judges sharply questioned on July 31 whether President Donald Trump's tariffs were justified by the president's emergency powers, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., is considering the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of U.S. trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. In hearing arguments in two cases brought by five small U.S. businesses and 12 Democratic-led U.S. states, judges pressed government lawyer Brett Shumate to explain how the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, gave Trump the power to impose tariffs. More: Trump's final stumbling blocks for countries hoping to avoid tariff hikes: Live updates Trump is the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs. "IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them," one of the judges said. Shumate said that the law allows for "extraordinary" authority in an emergency, including the ability to stop imports completely. He said IEEPA authorizes tariffs because it allows a president to "regulate" imports in a crisis. The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners - mark the first test before a U.S. appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining U.S. manufacturing power. More: Trade whiplash: Appeals Court allows Trump to keep tariffs while appeal plays out He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing U.S. borders. The countries have denied that claim. "Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again," Trump wrote in a social media post on Thursday. "To all of my great lawyers who have fought so hard to save our Country, good luck in America's big case today." The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under IEEPA and that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. The case is being heard by a panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trade negotiations Tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue source for the federal government, with customs duties in June quadrupling to about $27 billion, a record, and through June have topped $100 billion for the current fiscal year. That income could be crucial to offset lost revenue from Trump's tax bill passed into law earlier this month. But economists say the duties threaten to raise prices for U.S. consumers and reduce corporate profits. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted U.S. companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. Dan Rayfield, the attorney general of Oregon, one of the states challenging the levies, said that the tariffs were a "regressive tax" that is making household items more expensive. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an August 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority.
