Uttarakhand sets record with over 8.13 lakh saplings planted on Harela festival
According to a government release, the plantation drive was aligned with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam' campaign, which Chief Minister Dhami expanded into a broader initiative with the slogan 'Celebrate the festival of Harela, repay the debt of Mother Earth.' Over 8,13,000 saplings were planted across all 13 districts of the state, making it the largest such plantation effort in Uttarakhand during a single festival, the release said.
Dehradun, Jul 16 (PTI) Uttarakhand created a new record on Wednesday by planting over 8.13 lakh saplings across the state on the occasion of the Harela festival, with Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami launching the campaign by planting a Rudraksh sapling.
The state had initially set a target of planting five lakh saplings for Harela this year. In comparison, around two lakh saplings were planted on Harela in 2016.
Speaking at a plantation programme at the Gorkha Military Inter College campus here, Dhami said Harela is not just a festival but an emotion rooted in Uttarakhand's culture, nature and environmental consciousness. It reminds citizens of their duty toward protecting nature, he added.
'This is not just a figure of saplings planted, but a living example of collective effort, reflecting our commitment to environmental protection,' he said.
He emphasised that planting trees is only the beginning. 'We must nurture the saplings like our own children to ensure they grow into lush green trees,' Dhami said.
He added that 50 per cent of the saplings planted in each forest division this year will be fruit-bearing trees.
Highlighting environmental challenges like climate change, uncontrolled development, and resource exploitation, Dhami said a collective effort is required to restore ecological balance.
He also informed that the Spring and River Rejuvenation Authority (SARA) has helped conserve over 6,500 water sources and collect 3.12 million cubic metres of rainwater in the state.
The state has also imposed a complete ban on single-use plastic and made dustbins mandatory in vehicles, he said.
The chief minister called upon people to plant saplings on special occasions in their lives and nurture them, turning environmental protection into a mass movement.
State Forest Minister Subodh Uniyal, who was also present at the event, said the survival rate of saplings planted during Harela over the past three years has been over 80 per cent. PTI DPT HIG HIG
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Who is surprised by a Monojit Mishra? A look at Bengal colleges, governing bodies, and political control
The alleged rape of a student at a law college in Kolkata last month brought into focus a well-known West Bengal secret: the control by politicians of colleges in the state, largely through their governing bodies (GBs). In his latest visit to the state, which goes to the polls next year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi Friday raised 'the state of the education sector' in Bengal, specifically the school jobs scam. 'What is happening in West Bengal is worrying. Be it primary education or higher education, the situation is the same everywhere. Thousands of teachers have lost their jobs because of grassroots corruption … Trinamool has put both the present and future of Bengal in crisis,' he said at a rally in Durgapur in Paschim Bardhaman district. The Indian Express looked at several colleges in and around Kolkata, some of which are affiliated to the University of Calcutta (CU), where Trinamool Congress (TMC) leaders wield influence in the governing bodies. Following the case of alleged rape at the law college, it emerged that the main accused, Monojit Mishra, is a member of the TMC's student wing Trinamool Chhatra Parishad and was appointed a 'casual' clerical staffer after he graduated. A TMC MLA heads the college's governing body. Some MLAs and ministers, in fact, are the governing body presidents of multiple colleges. To questions about how this affects academic and administrative freedom in these institutions, the TMC points out that the appointments are well within the rules. The West Bengal Universities and Colleges (Administration and Regulation) Act, 2017, which sets out the rules on governing bodies, says in Article 5(3) that their tenure will be 'determined by the State Government from time to time'. As a result, many of these GBs have remained unchanged for over half a decade, with the government routinely extending their tenure every six months. The structure of these 10-member bodies is also such that it allows the government to stack them with people whom it either directly nominates or those who are closely linked to the TMC. Only four elected members make it to the governing bodies — three teachers and one non-teaching staff representative — and often, they too have links to the ruling party. Since student union elections have not been held in colleges for the past several years, the post of student representative continues to remain vacant. Some TMC leaders and the college governing bodies they are presidents of are: . Ashok Kumar Deb, Budge Budge MLA: Bangabasi College, Acharya Girish Chandra Bose College, Budge Budge College, South Kolkata Law College, and Sarsuna College . Shashi Panja, Industry Minister: Maharaja Manindra Chandra College, Maharaja Srischandra College, Baghbazar Women's College, and Chittaranjan College . Chandrima Bhattacharya, Health Minister: Mrinalini Datta Mahavidyapith and Gopal Chandra Memorial College of Education . Sudip Banerjee, Kolkata North MP: Maulana Azad College and Seth Anandram Jaipuria College . Madan Mitra, Kamarhati MLA: Hiralal Mazumdar Memorial College for Women . Md Nadimul Haque, Rajya Sabha MP: Calcutta Girls' College The Indian Express reached out to all of them but received no response. 'Principals are now sandwiched between politics and college administration. There is no freedom to work,' said a college principal who refused to be identified. A recurring complaint among principals is the lack of change in the governing bodies. 'The GB in my college was last officially formed in 2018. Every six months, the government sends an extension order,' said Dr Satya Upadhyay, principal of Calcutta Girls' College. However, he added, that despite TMC MP Haque heading the college governing body, he didn't face any pressure. 'We sometimes have differences of opinion, but we end up finding a solution. You cannot take politics out of campuses,' Upadhyay said. Last month, after the principal of Kolkata's Rani Birla Girls' College, Srabanti Bhatacharya, initiated the election of teaching and non-teaching staff representatives to the GB — which has been unchanged for seven years — a government nominee dropped in a day before voting was to take place. The election was subsequently cancelled, with Bhattacharya hospitalised on complaint of acute chest discomfort. In a letter, the faculty and other staff members alleged that the government nominee had put pressure on the principal to halt the election. 'Those who don't listen to orders face consequences. Many principals have been suspended because of differences. For instance, it happened in Purulia Raghunathpur College because the principal didn't listen to the GB,' claimed former All Bengal Principals' Council president and retired AJC Bose College principal Purna Chandra Maity. Alleged political interference in colleges also extends beyond GB appointments, with instances of former leaders and general secretaries of TMCP getting appointed to non-teaching positions. In one instance, a powerful TMCP leader became the head clerk at Ashutosh College and a former general secretary was appointed the college accountant, said a source. This shows an 'urgent need for comprehensive reforms to restore academic autonomy and ensure transparent, democratic governance in colleges', said a college principal, who did not wish to be identified. Another feature of the political limbo on college campuses is the absence of regular student union elections. 'Non-functional student unions give the TMCP all the advantage,' said a CU official. 'College authorities also treat the TMCP unit as the students' union. Every college used to have a separate fund for these unions, and that now goes to the outfit.' Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha state president Indranil Khan alleged that 'over-politicisation of campuses' by the TMC had 'ruined the academic atmosphere'. 'Such people control colleges, admissions, and examinations. They would never nominate a fair academic to the governing body, as then they will not be able to rig elections,' he said. CPI(M) student wing SFI's All India Joint Secretary Dipsita Dhar accused the TMC of running a monopoly in colleges. 'The whole idea of having a governing body without a student in it is antithetical to internal democracy. Sadly, in Bengal, colleges have turned into a source of income for the Trinamool nexus,' she said. The institutional control of universities and educational institutions, however, is not exclusive to the TMC years. It was a source of consternation for the middle classes during the three-decade Left rule, too. In Economic and Political Weekly in June 2011, economist Pranab Bardhan, analysing the fall of the CPI(M), mentioned its all-pervasive control of institutions, including colleges and universities, and the damage it caused. 'The appointments and promotions in colleges and universities, directly orchestrated from the party office in Alimuddin Street and screened for party loyalty, decimated Bengal's long-enjoyed advantage in academic, intellectual and professional pursuits,' he wrote. TMCP state president Trinankur Bhattacharya defended the extended term of the general bodies, saying it was within the rules. 'I do not understand the problem if the GB president is a political person and is efficient. For example, Dr Shashi Panja is so efficient. Also, not all college GBs are in the party's control,' he said.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Modi's Iron Shield: The Vision Behind Bharat's Ballistic Missile Defence
Last Updated: Pakistan continues to view India as an existential threat and is expanding its nuclear arsenal accordingly, whilst simultaneously deepening its military relationship with China. When Pakistan's waves of missiles and drones crashed against India's multi-layered air defence systems during those crucial nights in May, they were met with India's air defence network, which comprehensively neutralised the targets. With its resounding success, India demonstrated to the world not merely our tactical prowess, but the transformation that has unfolded under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership. Pakistan's drones and missiles shattered against a vision that has redefined how India approaches national security in an increasingly volatile neighbourhood. The operation marked a watershed moment: the successful test of an indigenous ballistic missile defence ecosystem that has taken India decisively beyond outdated Cold War nuclear doctrines of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) toward a more secure and responsible future. For decades, strategic thinking regarding Nuclear armaments and use was dominated by the Cold War logic of MAD. As a nation committed to a No First Use nuclear policy, India must, by definition, be prepared to absorb a first strike before retaliating. However, the hostile environment that India confronts today is markedly more complex and dangerous than at any point since independence. Pakistan continues to view India as an existential threat and is expanding its nuclear arsenal accordingly, whilst simultaneously deepening its military relationship with China. The United States Defence Intelligence Agency's 2025 assessment reveals that Pakistan is modernising its nuclear capabilities with substantial Chinese assistance, particularly focusing on battlefield nuclear weapons designed to offset India's conventional military superiority. During the recent crisis, Pakistan's ambassador to Russia explicitly threatened the use of 'the full spectrum of power, both conventional and nuclear" in response to any Indian military action. Such nuclear blackmail represents precisely the kind of coercive diplomacy that ballistic missile defence systems are designed to neutralise. The very fact that Pakistan felt compelled to convene its National Command Authority—which oversees the country's nuclear arsenal—during the crisis demonstrates how atomic weapons remain central to Islamabad's strategic calculus. China's role as the primary enabler of Pakistan's weapons of mass destruction programmes adds another layer of complexity. Foreign materials and technology supporting Pakistan's WMD capabilities are acquired primarily from Chinese suppliers, often transshipped through intermediaries. This creates a dangerous convergence where Pakistan's tactical nuclear weapons, enabled by Chinese technology, pose an immediate threat to India's security infrastructure. The China Factor The relationship between China and India has evolved from mere border disputes to a comprehensive rivalry encompassing nuclear capabilities. China's nuclear modernisation programme, whilst ostensibly directed at the United States, poses a direct threat to India given the geographical intimacy of the subcontinent. The majority of Chinese nuclear-capable missiles cannot reach the American mainland but could easily strike Indian population centres. China's ballistic missile defence capabilities add urgency to India's programme. The People's Republic of China has developed advanced systems, including the HQ-19 and HQ-29, which significantly enhance the People's Liberation Army's capabilities to protect Chinese critical infrastructure. China's BMD capabilities serve as a strong defensive shield against nuclear-armed missile attacks, potentially neutralising India's deterrent capability. This creates a dangerous imbalance, giving China a significant damage-limitation capability and lowering the threshold for nuclear adventurism. In the 21st century, true deterrence requires not just the promise of punishment but the capacity for survival. The triangular nuclear dynamic between China, India, and Pakistan arguably poses a more serious threat of nuclear conflict than any other regional arrangement globally. South Asia remains the only place in the world where three nuclear-armed nations sit in such proximity and are bound by violently contested borders. Operation Sindoor: Where Atmanirbhar Bharat Won Operation Sindoor served as a comprehensive validation of India's defence indigenisation policies under the Atmanirbhar Bharat vision. The operation demonstrated how indigenous systems performed under actual combat conditions, providing real-world proof of concept for India's ballistic missile defence ecosystem. The multi-layered air defence system that protected India during the crisis consisted of several indigenous components. During the onslaught, a unified grid directed a tiered defence: the inner layer, comprising Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) and Man-Portable Air Defence Systems (MANPADS), neutralised low-flying drones. The next layer of short-range missiles like the Spyder and Pechora provided point defence for critical assets, while the medium-range, indigenously developed Akash and Indo-Israeli MRSAM systems formed the backbone of area defence. The outermost layer, consisting of the formidable S-400 'Sudarshan' system and combat air patrols by fighter jets, engaged threats at long range. The operation showcased the maturity of India's indigenous defence ecosystem. The Akashteer air defence system, developed by Bharat Electronics Limited and integrated with IACCS, provided seamless and unified air situation awareness accessible to the lowest units of the Army Air Defence. The successful deployment of loitering munitions and precision strike capabilities demonstrated India's advancement in offensive systems as well. Indigenous platforms executed strikes without loss of Indian assets, underscoring the effectiveness of surveillance, planning, and delivery systems developed under the Make in India initiative. DRDO's Ballistic Missile Defence Programme: India's Ballistic Missile Defence programme represents one of the most ambitious technological undertakings in the country's defence history. The programme, sanctioned in 2000 following the Kargil conflict, has evolved through systematic phases designed to address increasingly sophisticated threats. Phase I of the BMD programme is now complete and has been successfully deployed. This phase includes the Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) missile for exo-atmospheric interception and the Advanced Air Defence (AAD) missile for endo-atmospheric ranges. The system demonstrates the capability to intercept ballistic missiles with ranges up to 2,000 kilometres, providing robust protection against medium-range threats. The recent successful testing of Phase II represents a quantum leap in capabilities. On July 24, 2024, DRDO successfully flight-tested the Phase-II Ballistic Missile Defence System, demonstrating indigenous capability to defend against ballistic missiles of the 5,000-kilometre class. This achievement places India in an exclusive club of nations with advanced BMD capabilities. The two-stage solid-propelled ground-launched system incorporates state-of-the-art indigenous technologies developed by DRDO. The Revolution In Defence Production The transformation of India's defence sector under the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative has been nothing short of revolutionary. Defence production has surged 174% since 2014, reaching Rs 1.27 lakh crore in 2023-24. Defence exports provide compelling evidence of this transformation. From Rs 1,940 crore in 2014-15, exports soared to Rs 23,622 crore in 2024-25. The country now exports defence equipment to over 85 countries, including sophisticated markets like the United States and France. The establishment of Defence Industrial Corridors in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu has created concentrated centres of excellence for defence manufacturing. The implementation of Positive Indigenisation Lists has provided guaranteed markets for domestic manufacturers, encouraging investment in research and development. Over 14,000 items have been indigenised under the SRIJAN initiative, with an additional 3,000 items covered under the Positive Indigenisation Lists. The Defence Production and Export Promotion Policy aims to achieve Rs 1.75 lakh crore in defence manufacturing by 2025, demonstrating the government's commitment to scaling indigenous capabilities. In addition, the success of Atmanirbhar Bharat in developing critical defence technologies validates the potential for technological sovereignty in an increasingly multipolar world. This achievement encourages other developing nations, especially in the Global South, to invest in indigenous capabilities rather than accepting permanent dependence on foreign suppliers. Deterrence Through Defence top videos View all As Prime Minister Modi declared following Operation Sindoor, 'India will not be intimidated by nuclear threats". And the evolution and progress of India's defence system under his leadership show that India is ready to deliver on it. The psychological impact of effective missile defence is clear. Pakistan's reliance on nuclear blackmail as a tool of statecraft becomes significantly less effective when India possesses credible defensive capabilities. The knowledge that India can neutralise a significant portion of incoming threats alters the strategic calculus that Pakistan or even China must consider. As India moves toward complete defence autonomy by 2047, the ballistic missile defence programme stands as a testament to what can be achieved when visionary leadership, technological capability, and national will converge in service of a secure and prosperous future. The iron shield that protects Bharat today is the delivery of Modi's promise to the citizens and is the foundation for India's emergence as a responsible global power. About the Author Sohil Sinha Sohil Sinha is a Sub Editor at News18. He writes on foreign affairs, geopolitics along with domestic policy and infrastructure projects. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 20, 2025, 10:15 IST News india Modi's Iron Shield: The Vision Behind Bharat's Ballistic Missile Defence Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
India is going to take control of this island due to..., it is located in...
India is going to take control of this island due to..., it is located in...(Representational Image) The Lakshadweep administration is considering the acquisition of Bitra, one of the 10 inhabited islands in the archipelago, for defence purposes. The move invited a strong protest from Lakshadweep MP Hamdullah Sayeed, who extended complete support to the local residents of the island and promised them to explore political and legal avenues to resist it. At present, there are 105 families on the island. And several have opposed the move. A recent government notification outlined this proposal for the Department of Revenue to take over the entire land area of Bitra Island, reported news agency PTI. The intent is to transfer it to relevant defense and strategic agencies of the Centre. What is the reason behind acquiring Bitra Island? The notification, issued last week, clarified that the initiative is driven by the strategic location of the island, its national security relevance, and the inherent logistical and administrative challenges posed by the civilian habitation. According to the news agency PTI report, the territorial administration would take over the island as per the relevant provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resetlement Act, 2013 for which Social Impact Assessment study has to be undertaken for the affected area. District Collector Shivam Chandra, in the order, said all stakeholders, including grama sabhas, would be consulted as part of the Social Impact Assessment initiatives. The survey of the proposed area under the acquisition would be completed within two months from the date of the publication of the notification on July 11, it stated. Why are some locals opposing the government's decision? On the other hand, Lakshadweep MP Hamdullah Sayeed has stood up firm against the move to take over Bitra island by the UT administration. He stated that the real objective behind the move is to displace the indigenous population. In a statement issued by his office, the MP said Bitra is the smallest inhabited island in the UT and he would strongly protest against the administration's attempt to acquire it under the pretext of defense requirements. He also demanded that the decision be withdrawn immediately. Sayeed pointed out that the land required for defense purposes has already been acquired by the government in several islands. He stated that targeting Bitra, which has had a permanent population for decades, without considering any of these alternatives, is completely unacceptable. Why is Bitra Island strategically important for defence? Furthermore, he criticised the administration for initiating such actions without any consultation with the indigenous residents, especially at a time when there are no functioning of local panchayat in the islands. He stated that this kind of unilateral action undermines the democratic system and violates the constitutional rights guaranteed to citizens. In a statement, the MP assured that he would stand with the people of Bitra and would explore all political and legal avenues to resist the move. In addition, he also stated that he would raise the issue in the upcoming Parliament session, urging the central government to intervene immediately. Hamdullah Sayeed, MP for Lakshadweep, in a video message has given assurances to the people of Bitra not to panic or feel anxious about the notification. 'As your MP, we held a conference that included leaders from Bitra and Lakshadweep and discussed it in detail. We have decided to fight with the people of Bitra, politically and legally,' Hamdullah Sayeed stated, as reported by The Times of India.
