Iconic Aussie magazines up for sale
Publisher Are Media, which publishes the Australian Women's Weekly, New Idea, Better Homes and Gardens, TV Week, Marie Claire and other well known magazines, is up for sale.
The Women's Weekly is Australia's most read magazine and the New Idea has been printed for more than 120 years.
The owner of Are Media has put the magazine titles up for sale.
Are Media estimates 90 per cent of Australian woman seeking 'entertainment, inspiration, information and escapism' read their magazines each month. The New Idea has been printed in Australia since 1902. Credit: Supplied
The publishing group was started by Sir Frank Packer (father of Kerry Packer) and Edward Theodore in 1932 and later merged with the Associated Press to become Australian Consolidated Press.
Bauer Media acquired the magazines in 2012 for an estimated $525m from ACP, then bought Pacific Magazines acquiring Marie Claire and Better Homes and Gardens from Seven West Media in 2020 for $40m.
Mercury Capital took ownership of the publisher for an estimated $40m to $50m in 2020, five years on, they have now listed the business for sale with KPMG Corporate Finance The publisher of The Australian Women's Weekly, Are Media is up for sale. Credit: Supplied
A Mercury Capital spokesman said they had decided to sell Are Media.
'Further to recent speculation, and on the back of a number of market inquiries and approaches, we can confirm that a decision has been made to commence a sale process for Are Media, Australia's leading omnichannel content company for women,' he said.
An email from Are Media chief executive officer Jane Huxley to staff said the decision came from a place of strength and optimism. Mercury Capital confirmed they were selling Are Media five years after they purchased the publishing business from Bauer Media. Supplied Credit: Supplied
'We've built incredibly strong foundations, and now it's time to take the next step,' she said in the email.
'Nothing changes day to day. Our teams, priorities, your roles, and goals stay the same.
'We'll keep delivering great content, driving results, and doing what we do best.
'We are committed to delivering 2025 and will be planning for 2026 the same way we always have.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
29 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Trade stand-off continues as US drug tariffs loom
Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme is not up for negotiation, says the federal government in the face of ramped-up US threats to triple the price of foreign medicines. In a continuation of his erratic approach to trade policy, President Donald Trump says taxes on drug imports could be announced as soon as the end of the month, with eventual tariff rates of up to 200 per cent. 'We're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff,' Trump said. Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, under which the government negotiates medicine prices with manufacturers before subsidising them for patients, is reportedly in the crosshairs of US pharmaceutical companies lobbying the White House. The Albanese government has flatly refused any negotiation on the PBS. 'Obviously, they are being lobbied, as other US presidents have been for many years by the US big pharma industry, which wants not just Australia's scheme but other schemes like it around the world ... they want that freed up,' federal health minister Mark Butler said on Wednesday. 'They want to see their profits increased. That's been the case for decades and decades.' The PBS is crucial to ensure equitable and affordable access to medicines, according to Royal Australian College of GPs president Michael Wright. 'We should be proud of the prime minister and treasurer's steadfast support for maintaining the PBS, regardless of external pressure.' But complaints about such pricing schemes are common across the industry and include Australian medicine manufacturers, says Melbourne University research fellow Joe Carrello. 'They argue the increasing costs it takes to investigate and run trials and bring a new drug to market aren't keeping up with what the return is, given what the government is willing to pay,' Dr Carrello said. Dr Carrello, who helps evaluate medicines proposed for the PBS after their approval by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, said there could be consequences to a relatively small market like Australia negotiating such lean prices. 'The fear is some US companies may decide against launching new drugs in Australia because comparatively, they're not going to get a good price,' he said. In the US, where a relatively free-market approach has been favoured, drug prices are almost three times higher than in 33 comparable income countries, according to RAND research. Australians have an average life expectancy of 83.2 years, compared to 77.4 years in the US, World Bank data shows. 'Without the PBS, we'd see people losing access to affordable medications and an increased spend per person on average but it wouldn't be evenly distributed,' Dr Carrello said.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Trade stand-off continues as US drug tariffs loom
Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme is not up for negotiation, says the federal government in the face of ramped-up US threats to triple the price of foreign medicines. In a continuation of his erratic approach to trade policy, President Donald Trump says taxes on drug imports could be announced as soon as the end of the month, with eventual tariff rates of up to 200 per cent. "We're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff," Mr Trump said. Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, under which the government negotiates medicine prices with manufacturers before subsidising them for patients, is reportedly in the crosshairs of US pharmaceutical companies lobbying the White House. The Albanese government has flatly refused any negotiation on the PBS. "Obviously, they are being lobbied, as other US Presidents have been for many years by the US big pharma industry, which wants not just Australia's scheme but other schemes like it around the world ... they want that freed up," federal health minister Mark Butler said on Wednesday. "They want to see their profits increased. That's been the case for decades and decades." The PBS is crucial to ensure equitable and affordable access to medicines, according to Royal Australian College of GPs president Michael Wright. "We should be proud of the prime minister and treasurer's steadfast support for maintaining the PBS, regardless of external pressure." But complaints about such pricing schemes are common across the industry and include Australian medicine manufacturers, says Melbourne University research fellow Joe Carrello. "They argue the increasing costs it takes to investigate and run trials and bring a new drug to market aren't keeping up with what the return is, given what the government is willing to pay," Dr Carrello told AAP. Dr Carrello, who helps evaluate medicines proposed for the PBS after their approval by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, said there could be consequences to a relatively small market like Australia negotiating such lean prices. "The fear is some US companies may decide against launching new drugs in Australia because comparatively, they're not going to get a good price," he said. In the US, where a relatively free-market approach has been favoured, drug prices are almost three times higher than in 33 comparable income countries, according to RAND research. Australians have an average life expectancy of 83.2 years, compared to 77.4 years in the US, World Bank data shows. "Without the PBS, we'd see people losing access to affordable medications and an increased spend per person on average but it wouldn't be evenly distributed," Dr Carrello said. In a submission to a Productivity Commission inquiry, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer criticised the PBS's assessment process, claiming it under-accounted for drug and vaccine benefits over multiple budget cycles and missed broader social benefits. "Over the last decade, while the total PBS spend has increased, the proportion of the PBS that funds innovative medicines has seen minimal growth," Pfizer wrote in its submission. "This means, as a proportion of GDP, the government's expenditure on innovative medicines is going backwards." Federal treasurer Jim Chalmers has joined the health minister in ruling out any changes to the PBS in US trade negotiations. "This Albanese Labor government is about strengthening the PBS in the interests of our people, not weakening it in the interests of American multinationals," he recently said. As for Australian drug producers, the federal government was still weighing the impacts of the proposed tariffs on Australian exports, which were worth $2.2 billion in 2024. "(President Trump) indicated there was a long lead time, a long period where he'd be considering this possible step," Dr Chalmers said. That lead time was cut by a matter of months this week, in a sign the United States' push may be turning to a shove.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Trade stand-off continues as US drug tariffs loom
Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme is not up for negotiation, says the federal government in the face of ramped-up US threats to triple the price of foreign medicines. In a continuation of his erratic approach to trade policy, President Donald Trump says taxes on drug imports could be announced as soon as the end of the month, with eventual tariff rates of up to 200 per cent. "We're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff," Mr Trump said. Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, under which the government negotiates medicine prices with manufacturers before subsidising them for patients, is reportedly in the crosshairs of US pharmaceutical companies lobbying the White House. The Albanese government has flatly refused any negotiation on the PBS. "Obviously, they are being lobbied, as other US Presidents have been for many years by the US big pharma industry, which wants not just Australia's scheme but other schemes like it around the world ... they want that freed up," federal health minister Mark Butler said on Wednesday. "They want to see their profits increased. That's been the case for decades and decades." The PBS is crucial to ensure equitable and affordable access to medicines, according to Royal Australian College of GPs president Michael Wright. "We should be proud of the prime minister and treasurer's steadfast support for maintaining the PBS, regardless of external pressure." But complaints about such pricing schemes are common across the industry and include Australian medicine manufacturers, says Melbourne University research fellow Joe Carrello. "They argue the increasing costs it takes to investigate and run trials and bring a new drug to market aren't keeping up with what the return is, given what the government is willing to pay," Dr Carrello told AAP. Dr Carrello, who helps evaluate medicines proposed for the PBS after their approval by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, said there could be consequences to a relatively small market like Australia negotiating such lean prices. "The fear is some US companies may decide against launching new drugs in Australia because comparatively, they're not going to get a good price," he said. In the US, where a relatively free-market approach has been favoured, drug prices are almost three times higher than in 33 comparable income countries, according to RAND research. Australians have an average life expectancy of 83.2 years, compared to 77.4 years in the US, World Bank data shows. "Without the PBS, we'd see people losing access to affordable medications and an increased spend per person on average but it wouldn't be evenly distributed," Dr Carrello said. In a submission to a Productivity Commission inquiry, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer criticised the PBS's assessment process, claiming it under-accounted for drug and vaccine benefits over multiple budget cycles and missed broader social benefits. "Over the last decade, while the total PBS spend has increased, the proportion of the PBS that funds innovative medicines has seen minimal growth," Pfizer wrote in its submission. "This means, as a proportion of GDP, the government's expenditure on innovative medicines is going backwards." Federal treasurer Jim Chalmers has joined the health minister in ruling out any changes to the PBS in US trade negotiations. "This Albanese Labor government is about strengthening the PBS in the interests of our people, not weakening it in the interests of American multinationals," he recently said. As for Australian drug producers, the federal government was still weighing the impacts of the proposed tariffs on Australian exports, which were worth $2.2 billion in 2024. "(President Trump) indicated there was a long lead time, a long period where he'd be considering this possible step," Dr Chalmers said. That lead time was cut by a matter of months this week, in a sign the United States' push may be turning to a shove.
