logo
James Carville says Democrats need a radical plan to ‘save democracy,' including new states

James Carville says Democrats need a radical plan to ‘save democracy,' including new states

Independent5 hours ago
Democratic strategist and former Bill Clinton adviser James Carville has suggested that Democrats may have to add new states and seats to the Supreme Court to save democracy.
Carville, who made the comments during Wednesday's episode of his Politics War Room podcast, said Democrats 'are right when they say this democracy is really imperfect.'
The strategist said the changes had to be made if Democrats manage to win the House, the Senate, and the White House in 2028, which he called 'certainly not impossible.'
'They are just going to have to unilaterally add Puerto Rico and [the] District of Columbia [as] states … They're just going to have to do it,' the 80-year-old said. 'And they may have to expand the [Supreme Court] to 13 members.'
Congress would be able to enact legislation to expand the size of the nation's highest court. Still, the idea hasn't garnered significant support outside of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Four Democrats introduced a bill to expand the court in 2021. It was reintroduced in 2023.
The size of the Supreme Court has fluctuated since it was established in 1789, but it has remained at nine since 1869.
Congress could also approve statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., but the proposal has never been close to passing. In 1979, the D.C. Voting Rights Amendment, which would have given D.C. certain state-like rights, such as representation in Congress, without actually making it a state, passed Congress by the required two-thirds majority but was only ratified by 16 states. Thirty-eight were needed for the Amendment to pass.
Carville also argued that Democrats should push for legislation to regulate congressional redistricting amid an effort by Texas Republicans to gerrymander five districts in the state held by Democrats.
In July, Carville said in a New York Times op-ed that 'The Democratic Party is in shambles' and that it was 'steamrolling toward a civilized civil war.'
While Carville didn't address how likely his proposals were to succeed, he argued that the political environment the Democrats find themselves in requires that they take on proposals that would appear radical in different times.
'Any of those things in isolation, I would be skeptical about. ... I would say, 'Well, I don't know if that's the greatest idea in the world, you're opening Pandora's Box,'' he said. 'If you want to save democracy, I think you've got to do all of those things because we just are moving further and further away from being anything close to democracy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fourth court blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order nationwide
Fourth court blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order nationwide

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Fourth court blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order nationwide

August 7(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship was blocked nationwide by a fourth court on Thursday, after a judge issued an injunction in a class action covering children born anywhere in the United States who would be affected by it. U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman in Greenbelt, Maryland, sided with immigrant rights advocates who asked her to halt Trump's order, marking the latest decision to show the limits of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that curtailed the ability of judges to block his directive and other policies nationwide. Trump's executive order, which he issued on his first day back in office on January 20, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. It was swiftly challenged in court by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violates the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. Every court to address the merits of order have agreed, and three judges including Boardman earlier this year halted nationwide the enforcement of the policy, which is part of the Republican president's hardline immigration agenda. The 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 sided with the administration by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. But the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to issue decisions stopping Trump's citizenship order from taking effect nationally. The Supreme Court's ruling notably held out the possibility that a lower court judge could halt a federal policy across the country if it was challenged in a class action on behalf of a nationwide group. Immigrant rights advocates seized on that holding and launched two proposed class actions that same day, including the one before Boardman, who had earlier in the same case concluded in February that Trump's order was likely unconstitutional. Boardman, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, in her February decision said Trump's order interpreted the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment "in a manner that the Supreme Court has resoundingly rejected and no court in the country has ever endorsed." Boardman in a July 16 opinion said she would once again block the policy nationally by granting children class action status at the request of groups including CASA and Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project. But she did not immediately do so, saying because her original decision was still on appeal, she would need the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to return the case to her. It did so recently by dismissing the Trump administration's appeal. The case is Casa Inc. et al v. Trump, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 8:25-cv-00201. For the plaintiffs: Joseph Mead of Georgetown University Law Center's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and Conchita Cruz of Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project. For the United States: Brad Rosenberg of the U.S. Department of Justice Read more: US judge reaffirms nationwide injunction blocking Trump executive order on birthright citizenship US appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court ruling Supreme Court in birthright case limits judges' power to block presidential policies

Judge orders halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
Judge orders halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Judge orders halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'

A judge has ordered the halt of construction of a Florida detention facility Donald Trump had nicknamed 'Alligator Alcatraz' and where he claimed would be held some of the most 'menacing' and 'vicious' people on the planet. The facility, operated by the state and with its costs reimbursed by the federal government, opened two months ago with the intention of housing undocumented migrants rounded up as part of the president's immigration crackdown. It is located in the Florida Everglades, something Mr Trump said made it the ideal place to hold the detainees. Yet, its location near Big Cypress National Preserve was something seized on by environmental activists who filed a lawsuit arguing the site threatens the environmentally sensitive wetlands. They are home to many protected plants and animals. 'We're pleased that the judge saw the urgent need to put a pause on additional construction, and we look forward to advancing our ultimate goal of protecting the unique and imperilled Everglades ecosystem from further damage caused by this mass detention facility,' said Eve Samples, executive director at Friends of the Everglades. At the hearing in Miami on Thursday, US District Judge Kathleen Williams issued an order halting new construction for the next week but did not suspend operations at the facility. A spokesperson for Republican Governor Ron DeSantis denounced the ruling but said it 'will have no impact on immigration enforcement in Florida'. 'Alligator Alcatraz will remain operational, continuing to serve as a force multiplier to enhance deportation efforts,' said spokesperson Alex Lanfranconi. Mr Trump made a crackdown on immigration a centre part of his campaign for a second term in the Oval Office. Polls show his policies on deportations are largely popular, though not some of his most extreme steps, such as the rounding up of farm workers and day labourers. When Mr Trump visited the site at the beginning of July, he told reporters: 'It's known as Alligator Alcatraz, which is very appropriate because I looked outside and that's not a place I want to go hiking.' He added: 'But very soon, this facility will house some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet.' Mr Trump has also spoken several times of his wish to reopen the original Alcatraz prison, located in the waters off San Francisco and administration officials have toured the facility, which closed as a jail in 1963. In May, he wrote on Truth Social he was ordering all his staff to work towards reopening the prison to house 'America's most ruthless and violent offenders'. He added: 'For too long, America has been plagued by vicious, violent and repeat Criminal Offenders, the dregs of society, who will never contribute anything other than Misery and Suffering.'

FBI fires more top officials who investigated Trump
FBI fires more top officials who investigated Trump

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

FBI fires more top officials who investigated Trump

The FBI has fired more top officials who had investigated President Donald Trump or who responded to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Under the Trump-appointed Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, the agency has seen an array of ousters, which critics say were essentially done in retaliation against agents involved in politically sensitive cases. Five new ousters, among them former Acting Director Brian Driscoll, were reported Thursday by The New York Times, which cited people familiar with the matter. Driscoll had refused to turn over the names of FBI agents who worked on the investigation into the January 6 attack, when a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol building in a failed attempt to overturn Trump's 2020 election loss. 'Last night, I was informed that tomorrow will be my last day in the F.B.I.,' Driscoll said in a message to his colleagues about his departure, which the NYT shared. 'I understand that you may have a lot of questions regarding why, for which I currently have no answers. No cause has been articulated at this time.' Steven Jensen, head of the FBI's Washington field office, who played a major role in responding to the January 6 attack, was also forced out this week, according to the NYT's sources. Additionally, agents Walter Giardina and Christopher Meyer, who both worked on investigations involving Trump, were ousted, per the sources. Spencer Evans, a senior agent at the bureau, was also dismissed, the paper reported. Trump supporters have accused Evans of denying religious exemptions for the COVID-19 vaccine when he worked for the agency's human resources. When The Independent reached out to the FBI about the oustings, the agency declined to comment. The FBI Agents Association, an advocacy group for current and retired FBI agents, said in a statement Thursday it was 'deeply concerned' by the reported firings. 'Agents are not given the option to pick and choose their cases, and these Agents carried out their assignments with professionalism and integrity. Most importantly, they followed the law,' the advocacy group said. It added: 'If these Agents are fired without due process, it makes the American people less safe. Agents need to be focused on their work and not on potentially being illegally fired based on their assignments.' In late January, shortly after Trump took office, multiple top FBI officials promoted by former Director Christopher Wray were told to resign or retire, and if they didn't, they would be demoted or reassigned, journalist Ken Dilanian reported, citing multiple sources. Trump was the one who appointed Wray, but by the time he finished his first term, their relationship soured. He applauded his December 2024 resignation, writing on Truth Social at the time it was a great day for America as it will end the Weaponization of what has become known as the United States Department of Injustice.' In early February, FBI agents who worked on investigations into Trump and on cases surrounding the January 6 attack sued the Justice Department to block the administration from 'unlawful' and 'retaliatory' purges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store